Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian Inverse Transient Analysis for Pipeline Condition Assessment: Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategic pipeline asset management requires accurate and up-to-date information on pipeline condition. As a tool for pipeline condition assessment, inverse transient analysis (ITA - a pipeline model calibration approach) is typically formulated as a deterministic problem, and optimization methods are used for searching a single best solution. The uncertainty associated with the single best solution is rarely assessed. In this paper, the pipeline model calibration problem is formulated as a Bayesian inverse problem, and a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based method is used to construct the estimated posterior probability density function (PDF) of the calibration parameters. The MCMC based method is able to achieve parameter estimation and uncertainty assessment in a single run, which is confirmed by numerical experiments. The proposed technique is also validated using measured hydraulic transient response data from an experimental laboratory pipeline system. Two thinner-walled pipe sections (simulating extended deterioration) are successfully identified with an assessment of the parameter uncertainty. The results also suggest that proper sensor placement can reduce parameter uncertainty and significantly enhance system identifiability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bush CA, Uber JG (1998) Sampling design methods for water distribution model calibration. J Water Resour Plan Manag 124(6):334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, M.H. (2014) Applied hydraulic transients

  • Colombo AF, Lee P, Karney BW (2009) A selective literature review of transient-based leak detection methods. J Hydro Environ Res 2(4):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covas D, Ramos H (2010) Case studies of leak detection and location in water pipe systems by inverse transient analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(2):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan H-F (2018) Accuracy and sensitivity evaluation of TFR method for leak detection in multiple-pipeline water supply systems. Water Resour Manag 32(6):2147–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Lambert M, Zecchin A, Simpson A, Arbon N, Kim Y (2016a) Field study on non-invasive and non-destructive condition assessment for asbestos cement pipelines by time-domain fluid transient analysis. Struct Health Monit 15(1):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Lambert MF, Zecchin AC, Simpson AR (2016b) Experimental verification of pipeline frequency response extraction and leak detection using the inverse repeat signal. J Hydraul Res 54(2):210–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Stephens ML, Arbon NS, Zecchin AC, Lambert MF, Simpson AR (2015) On-site non-invasive condition assessment for cement mortar–lined metallic pipelines by time-domain fluid transient analysis. Struct Health Monit 14(5):426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Kulat K (2018) A selective literature review on leak management techniques for water distribution system. Water Resour Manag 32(10):3247–3269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi A, Ramos HM (2012) Detection of leakage freshwater and friction factor calibration in drinking networks using central force optimization. Water Resour Manag 26(8):2347–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton CJ, Kapelan Z, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia L, Savić DA (2012) Dealing with uncertainty in water distribution system models: a framework for real-time modeling and data assimilation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(2):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang D, Lansey K (2009) Real-time demand estimation and confidence limit analysis for water distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 135(10):825–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang D, Pasha M, Lansey K (2009) Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems. Urban Water J 6(3):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapelan ZS, Savic DA, Walters GA (2007) Calibration of water distribution hydraulic models using a Bayesian-type procedure. J Hydraul Eng 133(8):927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S (2014) Inverse transient analysis for a branched pipeline system with leakage and blockage using impedance method. Procedia Engineering 89:1350–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansey K, El-Shorbagy W, Ahmed I, Araujo J, Haan C (2001) Calibration assessment and data collection for water distribution networks. J Hydraul Eng 127(4):270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PJ, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Vítkovský JP, Liggett J (2006) Experimental verification of the frequency response method for pipeline leak detection. J Hydraul Res 44(5):693–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liggett JA, Chen L-C (1994) Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng 120(8):934–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meniconi S, Brunone B, Ferrante M, Massari C (2011) Small amplitude sharp pressure waves to diagnose pipe systems. Water Resour Manag 25(1):79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens ML, Lambert MF, Simpson AR (2013) Determining the internal wall condition of a water pipeline in the field using an inverse transient. J Hydraul Eng 139(3):310–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJ (2006) A Markov chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm differential evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces. Stat Comput 16(3):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vítkovský JP, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Liggett JA (2007) Experimental observation and analysis of inverse transients for pipeline leak detection. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133(6):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitkovsky, J.P., Lambert, M.F., Simpson, A.R. and Wang, X.-J. (2001) An experimental verification of the inverse transient technique for leak detection, p. 373, institution of engineers, Australia

  • Vrugt JA (2016) Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation. Environ Model Softw 75:273–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Ter Braak C, Diks C, Robinson BA, Hyman JM, Higdon D (2009) Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 10(3):273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie EB, Streeter VL, Suo L (1993) Fluid transients in systems. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Zhang H, Hou D (2017) Bayesian approach for joint estimation of demand and roughness in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143(8):04017034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. and Karney, B. (2017) Modeling and monitoring of pipelines and networks, pp. 13-37, springer

  • Zeng W, Gong J, Cazzolato BS, Zecchin AC, Lambert MF, Simpson AR (2019) Condition assessment of pipelines using a bi-directional layer-peeling method and a dual-sensor configuration. J Sound Vib 457:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Gong J, Lambert MF, Simpson AR, Zecchin AC (2019) Sensor placement strategy for pipeline condition assessment using inverse transient analysis. Water Resour Manag 33(8):2761–2774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zecchin AC, Lambert MF, Gong J, Simpson AR (2018) Multi-stage parameter-constraining inverse transient analysis for pipeline condition assessment. J Hydroinf 20(2):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper has been supported by the Australian Research Council through Discovery Project (DP170103715).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Lambert, M.F., Gong, J. et al. Bayesian Inverse Transient Analysis for Pipeline Condition Assessment: Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification. Water Resour Manage 34, 2807–2820 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02582-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02582-9

Keywords

Navigation