Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of legacy on hydric forest structure in a subtropical urban watershed

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydric forest communities within the Tampa Bay Watershed were inventoried to assess the effect of urbanization on these systems. Based on aerial photography and site visits, 85 hydric plots were assigned a legacy class—remnant (forest, pre-1948), emergent (forest, post 1948), and managed (actively managed grass on plot). On each plot, diameter at breast height (dbh) and canopy width and species were recorded for trees ≥2.5 cm dbh. A hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis identified community types within a legacy class and one-way AOV (α = .05) was used to compare structural features within and among legacy classes. Remnant plots (43 plots) were composed of six, natural community types as recognized by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and no novel communities. Emergent plots (23 plots) were composed of four natural community types and one novel community. Managed plots (19 plots) contained only novel communities. Remnants had the highest species richness (41 species) and only one non-native species. Managed had the lowest species richness (33 species) but highest richness of non-native species (17). Remnant and emergent plots had similar densities for trees ≤32 cm dbh, (803 and 820 stems/ha, respectively), whereas managed plots had only 119 stems/ha. For trees >32 cm dbh, remnant plots had a significantly higher density (196 stems/ha) than emergent (99 stems/ha) and managed (40 stems/ha). These results suggest that legacy did not play a key role in differentiating between emergent and remnant plots but did play a key role in identifying managed plots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin AH (2011) Plant communities of urban wetlands: patterns and controlling processes. In: Niemelä J (ed) Urban ecology and: patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 77–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951) An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 72:476–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2008) Exotic invasive species in urban wetlands: environmental correlates and immplications for wetland management. J Appl Ecol 45:1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG, Schneider JP (1991) Chamaecyparis thyoides wetlands and suburbanization: effects on hydrology, water quality and plant community composition. J Appl Ecol 28:467–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner S (2004) Urbanization impacts on the structure and function of forested wetlands. Urban Ecosyst 7(2):89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FDEP (2011) Learn about your watershed: Tampa Bay Watershed Florida Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.protectingourwater.org/watersheds/map/tampa_bay/. Accessed June 1 2012

  • FLEPPC (2011) List of invasive plant species. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.fleppc.org/list/11list.htm. Accessed June 5 2012

  • FNAI (2010) Guide to the natural communities of Florida: 2010 edition. Florida natural areas inventory, Tallahassee, FL

  • Friedman MH (2011) Characterizating natural vegetative communities near freshwater hydrological features in an urbanizing watershed of west Central Florida. University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman MH, Andreu MG, Zipperer WC, Northrop RJ, Abd-Elrahman A (2015) Species composition of forested natural communities near freshwater hydrological features in an urbanizing watershed of west Central Florida. Florida Sci 78(3):111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Bains JB, Band LE, Belt KT, Brush GS, Grove JM, Pouyat RV, Yesilonis IC, Zipperer WC (2003) Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Front Ecol Environ 1:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau MK (2011) Dunnett-Tukey-Kramer pairwise multiple comparison test adjusted for unequal variances and unequal sample sizes. R package Version 3.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DTK. Accessed June 5 2012

  • Levenson JB (1981) Woodlots as biogeographic islands in southeastern Wisconsin. In: Burgess RL, Sharpe DM (eds) Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 13–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1993) Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol Conserv 66:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. mjm Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

  • Messina MG, Conner WH (1998) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Muratet A, Porcher E, Devictor V, Arnal G, Moret J, Wright S, Machon N (2008) Evaluation of floristic diversity in urban as a basis for habitat management. Appl Vege Manag 11:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney JW, Bruner MC, Levenson JB (1981) The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands. In: Burgess RL, Sharpe DM (eds) Forest Island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 67–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2010) Boundary descriptions and names of regions, subregions, accounting units, and cataloging units. United States Geological Survey. http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/huc_name.html. Accessed June 1 2012

  • Welch BL (1947) The generalization of 'Student's' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF (2008) Atlas of Florida's vascular plants. Institute for Systematic Botany, University of Florida. http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu. Accessed May 28 2012

  • Xian G, Crane M, Su J (2007) An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. J Environ Manag 85:965–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC (2002) Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 6:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC, Foresman TW, Sisinni SM, Pouyat RV (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosyst 1:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne C. Zipperer.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 7 Importance values (IV), from largest to smallest, for species in remnant, emergent, and managed hydric plots in Tampa Bay Watershed sub-basins adjacent to the city of Tampa, FL

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lagrosa, J.J., Andreu, M.G., Friedman, M.H. et al. Effect of legacy on hydric forest structure in a subtropical urban watershed. Urban Ecosyst 24, 49–58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01009-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01009-y

Keywords

Navigation