Skip to main content
Log in

The Interpersonal Problem-Solving Measure for Elementary School Students: Development and Preliminary Evaluation in a Third Grade Student Sample

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpersonal problem-solving ability takes an increasingly important role in the socialization process during childhood. This paper describes the development and preliminary evaluation of the interpersonal problem-solving inventory for elementary school students (IPSI). The IPSI is a process measure structured into five subscales: Positive problem-solving behavior; Negative problem-solving behavior; Rational problem-solving behavior; Impulsive behavior; and Avoidance behavior. The scale was administered to a Vietnamese elementary student sample that consists of 437 third grade students (M = 8.67, SD = 0.47). The reliability of the tool was reported by calculating internal consistencies (Cronbach’s α = .88; McDonald’s ω = .85). The construct validity of IPSI was investigated by using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the emerging factor structure of IPSI on the first data set. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the second data set to define theory-driven five-factor structure of IPSI in comparison with any structure emerged from EFA. The CFA findings indicated that the data verified the theory-driven five-factor model of IPSI. The initial testing of the five-factor model showed a moderately good fitting model with four of the five global fit indices (χ2/df = 1.274 < 2, p < .001; CFI: .930; TLI: .926; GFI: .842; and RMSEA: .032 < .05). The results suggest that the scores of IPSI justified adequate internal consistencies and construct/concurrent validities. The IPSI can assess interpersonal problem-solving skills in elementary students. Caution is recommended pertaining to the preliminary evaluation in a Vietnamese third grade student sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Conner, C. K. (2000). Conner’s rating scales—Revised: Technical manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J. (1986). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. (1971). Problem-solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 104–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (1982). Social problem solving in adults. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive–behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1996). Manual for the social problem solving inventory-revised (SPSI-R). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dereli-İman, E. (2013). The social problem-solving questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish primary school students. Egitim Arastirmalari Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., McClaskey, C. L., & Feldman, E. (1985). Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Bussey, K. (2011). The development of the social bullying involvement scales. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2020). Statistical analysis in JASP 0.12: A guide for students. April 2020. http://static.jasp-stats.org/Manuals/Statistical_Analysis_in_JASP_-_A_Students_Guide_v0.12.pdf.

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Manual for the social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem solving inventory. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 29, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S., Hunsley, J., & Hemsworth, D. (2002). Factor structure of the relationship belief inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(6), 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasik, L. (2014). Development of social problem solving—A longitudinal study (2009–2011) in a Hungarian context. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 142–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathryn, S. W. (2011). Understanding how social and emotional skill deficits contribute to school failure. Preventing School Failure, 55(1), 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B. (Ed.). (1966). Problem solving: Research, method and theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M., & McGuire, J. (2011). Social problem solving and offending evidence, evaluation and evolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1994). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. K. (2019). Development of the teacher rating scale of interpersonal problem solving in adolescents. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00427-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. K., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2020). Development and psychometric properties of a social problem solving test for adolescents. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 38, 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00325-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. K., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2018). The problem-solving ability of 4th and 5th grade elementary school students: the situation and factors affecting. In Proceedings the sixth international conference on school psychology: The role of school psychology in promoting well-being of students and families (pp. 182–194).

  • Nguyen, C. K., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2020). The development of a social problem-solving test for elementary school students. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00360-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offrey, L., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Parent–child communication and adolescents’ problem-solving strategies in hypothetical bullying situations. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.884006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura, K. H., Nakamura, B. J., Mueller, C., Hayashi, K., & Higa-McMillan, C. K. (2016). An exploratory factor analysis of the knowledge of evidence-based services questionnaire. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9384-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2007). Social competence in children. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shujja, S., Malik, F., & Khan, N. (2015). Social competence scale for adolescents (SCSA): Development and validation within cultural perspective. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25(1), 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, G., Platt, J. J., & Shure, M. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1974). Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real-life problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepeli, K., & Yılmaz, E. (2013). Social problem solving skills of children in terms of maternal acceptance-rejection levels. US-China Education Review, 3(8), 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, H. (2007). The psychometric validation of the social problem-solving inventory—Revised with UK incarcerated sexual offenders. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9038-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2010). Deciding between competing models: Chi-square difference tests. Retrieved April 10, 2019, from https://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-b371-2797-0000-00000fda8f29/chisquare_diff_en.pdf.

  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai, A., Kasik, L., & Braunitzer, G. (2014). Coping strategies at the ages 8, 10 and 12. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.916397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collected for this study and preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by the Vietnamese national project “Assessing primary school students forward the competence-approach in responding the requirements of general education programe innovation”. Project number: KHGD/16-20. ĐT.016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Khanh Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 937 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, C.K., Tran, H.T. & Nguyen, M.L.T. The Interpersonal Problem-Solving Measure for Elementary School Students: Development and Preliminary Evaluation in a Third Grade Student Sample. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 39, 14–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00361-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00361-4

Keywords

Navigation