Abstract
The amount of methane leaked from deep sea cold seeps is enormous and potentially affects the global warming, ocean acidification and global carbon cycle. It is of great significance to study the methane bubble movement and dissolution process in the water column and its output to the atmosphere. Methane bubbles produce strong acoustic impedance in water bodies, and bubble strings released from deep sea cold seeps are called “gas flares” which expressed as flame-like strong backscatter in the water column. We characterized the morphology and movement of methane bubbles released into the water using multibeam water column data at two cold seeps. The result shows that methane at site I reached 920 m water depth without passing through the top of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ, 850 m), while methane bubbles at site II passed through the top of the GHSZ (597 m) and entered the non-GHSZ (above 550 m). By applying two methods on the multibeam data, the bubble rising velocity in the water column at sites I and II were estimated to be 9.6 cm/s and 24 cm/s, respectively. Bubble velocity is positively associated with water depth which is inferred to be resulted from decrease of bubble size during methane ascending in the water. Combined with numerical simulation, we concluded that formation of gas hydrate shells plays an important role in helping methane bubbles entering the upper water bodies, while other factors, including water depth, bubble velocity, initial kinetic energy and bubble size, also influence the bubble residence time in the water and the possibility of methane entering the atmosphere. We estimate that methane gas flux at these two sites is 0.4×106−87.6×106 mol/a which is extremely small compared to the total amount of methane in the ocean body, however, methane leakage might exert significant impact on the ocean acidification considering the widespread distributed cold seeps. In addition, although methane entering the atmosphere is not observed, further research is still needed to understand its potential impact on increasing methane concentration in the surface seawater and gas-water interface methane exchange rate, which consequently increase the greenhouse effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bangs N L, Hornbach M J, Berndt C. 2011. The mechanics of intermittent methane venting at South Hydrate Ridge inferred from 4D seismic surveying. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 310(1): 105–112
Barnes P M, Lamarche G, Bialas J, et al. 2010. Tectonic and geological framework for gas hydrates and cold seeps on the Hikurangi subduction margin. New Zealand: Marine Geology, 272(1): 26–48
Berndt C, Feseker T, Treude T, et al. 2014. Temporal constraints on hydrate-controlled methane seepage off Svalbard. Science, 343(6168): 284–287, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246298
Boles J R, Clark J F, Leifer I, et al. 2001. Temporal variation in natural methane seep rate due to tides. Coal Oil Point area, California. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 106(C11): 27077–27086, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000774
Bourry C, Chazallon B, Charlou J L, et al. 2009. Free gas and gas hydrates from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey: Chemical and structural characterization. Chemical Geology, 264(1–4): 197–206
Chen Y, Ding J, Zhang H, et al. 2019. Multibeam water column data research in the Taixinan Basin: Implications for the potential occurrence of natural gas hydrate. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(5): 129–133, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1444-0
Ding L, Zhao M, Yu M, et al. 2017. Biomarker assessments of sources and environmental implications of organic matter in sediments from potential cold seep areas of the northeastern South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(10): 8–19, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1068-1
Egorov A V, Nigmatulin R I, Rimskii-Korsakov, et al. 2010. Breakup of deep-water methane bubbles. Oceanology, 50(4): 469–478, doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701004003X
Egorov A V, Nigmatulin R I, Rozhkov A N, et al. 2012. About transformation of the deep-water methane bubbles into hydrate powder and hydrate foam. Oceanology, 52(2): 194–205, doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701202004X
Feng D, Chen D. 2015. Authigenic carbonates from an active cold seep of the northern South China Sea: new insights into fluid sources and past seepage activity. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 122: 74–83, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.003
Fischer D, Sahling H, Nöthen K, et al. 2012. Interaction between hydrocarbon seepage, chemosynthetic communities, and bottom water redox at cold seeps of the Makran accretionary prism: insights from habitat-specific pore water sampling and modeling. Biogeosciences, 9(6): 2013–2031, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2013-2012
Greinert J. 2008. Monitoring temporal variability of bubble release at seeps: The hydroacoustic swath system GasQuant. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 113: C07048
Greinert J, Artemov Y, Egorov V, et al. 2006a. 1300-m-high rising bubbles from mud volcanoes at 2080 m in the Black Sea: Hydroacoustic characteristics and temporal variability. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 244(1): 1–15
Greinert J, McGinnis D F. 2009. Single bubble dissolution model -The graphical user interface SiBu-GUI. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(8): 1012–1013
Greinert J, Mcginnis D F, Naudts L, et al. 2010. Atmospheric methane flux from bubbling seeps: Spatially extrapolated quantification from a Black Sea shelf area. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 115: C01002
Himmler T, Birgel D, Bayon G, et al. 2015. Formation of seep carbonates along the Makran convergent margin, northern Arabian Sea and a molecular and isotopic approach to constrain the carbon isotopic composition of parent methane. Chemical Geology, 415: 102–117, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.016
Judd A A G, Hovland M. 2007, Seabed Fluid Flow: the Impact of Geology, Biology and the Marine Environment. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Judd A G. 2004. Natural seabed gas seeps as sources of atmospheric methane. Environmental Geology, 46(8): 988–996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1083-3
Judd A G, Hovland M, Dimitrov L I, et al. 2010. The geological methane budget at continental margins and its influence on climate change. Geofluids, 2(2): 109–126
Klaucke I, Weinrebe W, Petersen C J, et al. 2010. Temporal variability of gas seeps offshore New Zealand: Multi-frequency geoacoustic imaging of the Wairarapa area, Hikurangi margin. Marine Geology, 272(1): 49–58
Leifer I, Luyendyk B, Boles J, et al. 2006. Natural marine seepage blowout: Contribution to atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20: GB3008
Lelieveld J, Crutzen P J, Dentener F J. 1998. Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane: Tellus B. Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 50(2): 128–150
Li C, Gou L, You J, et al. 2016. Further studies on the numerical simulation of bubble plumes in the cold seepage active region. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 35(1): 118–124, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0803-3
Liu L, Fu S, Zhang M, et al. 2017. Coupled carbon and sulfur isotope behaviors and other geochemical perspectives into marine methane seepage. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(6): 12–22, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-0998-y
Loher M, Marcon Y, Pape T, et al. 2018. Seafloor sealing, doming, and collapse associated with gas seeps and authigenic carbonate structures at Venere mud volcano, Central Mediterranean: Deep Sea Research Part I. Oceanographic Research Papers, 137: 76–96, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2018.04.006
McGinnis D F, Greinert J, Artemov Y, et al. 2006. Fate of rising methane bubbles in stratified waters: How much methane reaches the atmosphere?. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111: C09007
Mcneil K. 2009. Considerable methane fluxes to the atmosphere from hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Nature Geoscience, 2(8): 561–565
Muyakshin S I, Sauter E. 2010. The hydroacoustic method for the quantification of the gas flux from a submersed bubble plume. Oceanology, 50(6): 995–1001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S00014370100
Myhre C L, Ferré B, Platt S M, et al. 2016. Extensive release of methane from Arctic seabed west of Svalbard 5 during summer 2014 does not influence the atmosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(9): 4624–4631, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068999
Nikolovska A, Sahling H, Bohrmann G. 2008. Hydroacoustic methodology for detection, localization, and quantification of gas bubbles rising from the seafloor at gas seeps from the eastern Black Sea. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9: Q10010
Olsen J E, Dunnebier D, Davies E, et al. 2017. Mass transfer between bubbles and seawater. Chemical Engineering Science, 161: 308–315, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.047
Römer M, Sahling H, Pape T, et al. 2012. Quantification of gas bubble emissions from submarine hydrocarbon seeps at the Makran continental margin (offshore Pakistan). Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117: C10015
Rehder G, Brewer P W, Peltzer E T, et al. 2002a. Enhanced lifetime of methane bubble streams within the deep ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(15): 21–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014864
Rehder G, Collier R W, Heeschen K, et al. 2002b. Enhanced marine CH4 emissions to the atmosphere off Oregon caused by coastal upwelling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16: 3
Rehder G, Leifer I, Brewer P G, et al. 2009. Controls on methane bubble dissolution inside and outside the hydrate stability field from open ocean field experiments and numerical modeling. Marine Chemistry, 114(1): 19–30
Riedel M. 2007. 4D seismic time-lapse monitoring of an active cold vent, northern Cascadia margin. Marine Geophysical Researches, 28(4): 355–371, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-007-9037-2
Sauter E J, Muyakshin S I, Charlou J L, et al. 2006. Methane discharge from a deep-sea submarine mud volcano into the upper water column by gas hydrate-coated methane bubbles. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 243(3): 354–365
Sloan E D, Koh C. 2007. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. New York: CRC Press.
Solomon E A, Kastner M, MacDonald I R, et al. 2009. Considerable methane fluxes to the atmosphere from hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Nature Geosci, 2(8): 561–565, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo574
St Louis V L, Jwm D E R, Rosenberg D M, et al. 2000. Reservoir surfaces as sources of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere: A global estimate. Bioscience, 50(9): 766–775, doi: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0766:RSASOG]2.0.CO;2
Sultan N, Bohrmann G, Ruffine L, et al. 2014. Pockmark formation and evolution in deep water Nigeria: Rapid hydrate growth versus slow hydrate dissolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(4): 2679–2694, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010546
Sun S, Liu C, Ye Y, et al. 2014. Pore capillary pressure and saturation of methane hydrate bearing sediments. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(10): 30–36, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0538-y
Sun T, Wu D, Yang F, et al. 2019. Sedimentary geochemical proxies for methane seepage at Site C14 in the Qiongdongnan Basin in the northern South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(7): 84–95, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1460-6
Torres M E, Wallmann K, Tréhu A M, et al. 2004. Gas hydrate growth, methane transport, and chloride enrichment at the southern summit of Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia margin off Oregon. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 226(1–2): 225–241, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.029
Tréhu A M, Stakes D S, Bartlett C D, et al. 2003. Seismic and seafloor evidence for free gas, gas hydrates, and fluid seeps on the transform margin offshore Cape Mendocino. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978-2012), 108: doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001679
Tréhu A M, Torres M E, Moore G F, et al. 1999. Temporal and spatial evolution of a gas hydrate bearing accretionary ridge on the Oregon continental margin. Geology, 27(10): 939, doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0939:TASEOA>2.3.CO;2
Tryon M D, Brown K M, Torres M E, et al. 1999. Measurements of transience and downward fluid flow near episodic methane gas vents, Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia. Geology, 27(12): 1075–1078, doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<1075:MOTADF>2.3.CO;2
Wang J, Wu S, Xiu K, et al. 2018. Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 168: 48–56, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.01.020
Wei J, Fang Y, Lu H, et al. 2018. Distribution and characteristics of natural gas hydrates in the Shenhu Sea Area, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 98: 622–628, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.07.028
Wei J, Li J, Wu T, et al. 2020. Geologically controlled intermittent gas eruption and its impact on bottom water temperature and chemosynthetic communities—A case study in the “HaiMa” cold seeps, South China Sea. Geological Journal,: doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3780
Wei J, Liang J, Lu J, et al. 2019. Characteristics and dynamics of gas hydrate systems in the northwestern South China Sea — Results of the fifth gas hydrate drilling expedition. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 110: 287–298, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.07.028
Wei J, Pape T, Sultan N, et al. 2015. Gas hydrate distributions in sediments of pockmarks from the Nigerian margin — Results and interpretation from shallow drilling. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59: 359–370, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.013
Wu T, Wei J, Liu S, et al. 2019. Characteristics and formation mechanism of seafloor domes on the north-eastern continental slope of the South China Sea. Geological Journal, 55: 1–10
Ye J, Qin X, Qiu H, et al. 2018. Preliminary results of environmental monitoring of the natural gas hydrate production test in the South China Sea. China Geology, 1(2): 202–209, doi: https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2018029
Ye J, Wei J, Liang J, et al. 2019. Complex gas hydrate system in a gas chimney, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 104: 29–39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.023
Yin X, Zhou H, Yang Q, et al. 2008. The evidence for the existence of methane seepages in the northern South China Sea: abnormal high methane concentrations in bottom waters. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 27(6): 62–70
Zhang M, Lu H, Guan H, et al. 2018. Methane seepage intensities traced by sulfur isotopes of pyrite and gypsum in sediment from the Shenhu area, South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 37(7): 20–27, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-018-1241-1
Acknowledgements
We thank Nabil Sultan for providing the data sets at site II. We thank the captain and crew of R/V Pourquoi pas? for their support during the GUINECO-MeBo cruise in 2011. We thank all the crew and scientists for their excellent work on the China-Pakistan Joint Marine Scientific Expedition in 2018. We also are thankful for the constructive comments from three anonymous reviewers which helped to improve the manuscript significantly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Key Research and Development Plan under contract Nos 2018YFC0310000 and 2016YFC0304905-03; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41602149; China Geological Survey Project under contract Nos DD20190582, DD20191009 and DD20160214.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, J., Wu, T., Deng, X. et al. Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 39, 133–144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0