Skip to main content
Log in

The Follower Competitive Location Problem with Comparison-Shopping

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In competitive settings, firms locate their stores to take advantage of consumers’ behavior to maximize their market share. A common behavior is comparison-shopping: in this behavioral pattern, consumers visit multiple stores that sell non-identical products, which are mutual substitutes, before making their purchase decision. This behavior has never been included in location-prescribing models for competitive firms. Given existing branches of one firm, we address the location problem of a follower firm that locates its own branches. We present insights on the instance used by ReVelle in his maximum capture formulation, provide computational experience with one thousand 100-node instances, and consider a realistic case using a 353-node network of Santiago, Chile. The results are compared in terms of the demand captured by each firm and the locational patterns that result from different consumer behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aras N, Küçükaydın H (2017) Bilevel models on the competitive facility location problem. In: Mallozzi L et al (eds) Spatial interaction models. Springer Optimization and Its Applications 118

  • Arentze TA, Oppewal H, Timmermans HJP (2005) A multipurpose shopping trip model to assess retail agglomeration effects. J Mark Res 42:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund PG, Kwon C (2014) Solving a location problem of a Stackelberg firm competing with Cournot-Nash firms. Netw Spat Econ 14:117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breidert C (2006) Estimation of willingness-to-pay: theory, measurement, application. Deutscher Universitäts Verlag, Wiesbaden. 135 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1989) Retail location theory: the legacy of Harold Hotelling. J Retail 65(4):450–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin E (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Church R, ReVelle C (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32(1):101–118

  • D’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling’s ‘stability in competition’. Econometrica 47:1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaert BGC, Arentze TA, Bierlaire M, Borgers AWJ, Timmermans HJP (1998) Investigating consumers’ tendency to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations. J Mark Res 35:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1982) Competitive location strategies for two facilities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T (2014) A review of competitive facility location in the plane. Logist Res 7:114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-014-0114-z. last retrieved 7/21/2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T, Drezner Z (1996) Competitive facilities: market share and location with random utility. J Reg Sci 36:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner T, Drezner Z, Eiselt HA (1996) Consistent and inconsistent rules in competitive facility choice. J Oper Res Soc 47:1494–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1975) The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Rev Econ Stud 42(1):27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1979) Comparison-shopping and the clustering of homogeneous firms. J Reg Sci 19(4):421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1982) An economic theory of central places. Econ J 92(365):56–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt HA (2011) Equilibria in competitive location models. In: Eiselt HA, Marianov V (eds) Foundations of location analysis. Chapter 7. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 139–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt HA, Marianov V (eds) (2015) Applications of location analysis. Vol 232 in the international series in operations research & management science. Springer-Verlag, Cham. 437p

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt HA, Marianov V, Drezner T (2015) Competitive location models. In: Laporte G, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F (eds) Location science. Chapter 14. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández J, Pelegrín B, Plastria F, Tóth B (2007) Solving a Huff-like competitive location and design model for profit maximization in the plane. Eur J Oper Res 179:1274–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Buchanan B (1988) Multiple outlets in a duopoly: a first entry paradox. Geogr Anal 20:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, McLafferty S (1984) A model of consumer propensity for multipurpose shopping. Geogr Anal 16(3):244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo WC, Lai FC (2014) Spatial competition with quadratic transport costs and one online firm. Ann Reg Sci 52(1):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi SL (1983) On locating new facilities in a competitive environment. Eur J Oper Res 12:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson MJ (1978) Toward more realistic allocation in location-allocation models: an interaction approach. Environ Plan A 10:1273–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson MJ (1990) A flow-capturing location-allocation model. Geogr Anal 22:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1963) A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Econ 39:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagpal S (2008) Fusion for profit: how marketing and finance can work together to create value. Oxford University Press 664 pages

  • Jedidi K, Jagpal S (2009) Willingness-to-pay: measurement and managerial implications. In: Rao V (ed) Handbook of pricing research in marketing. Chapter 2. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham. 616 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress D, Pesch E (2012) Sequential competitive location on networks. Eur J Oper Res 217:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress D, Pesch E (2016) Competitive location and pricing on networks with random utilities. Netw Spat Econ 16:837–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laporte G, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F (eds) (2015) Location science. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner AP, Singer HW (1937) Some notes on duopoly and spatial competition. J Polit Econ 45(2):145–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Eiselt HA (2016) On agglomeration in competitive location models. Ann Oper Res 246:31–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Ríos M, Icaza MJ (2008) Facility location for market capture when users rank facilities by travel and waiting times. Eur J Oper Res 191(1):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Eiselt HA, Lüer-Villagra A (2018) Effects of multipurpose shopping trips on retail store location in a duopoly. Eur J Oper Res 269(2):782–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLafferty S, Ghosh A (1987) Optimal location and allocation with multipurpose shopping. In: Ghosh A, Rushton G (eds) Spatial analysis and location-allocation models. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Megiddo N, Zemel E, Louis Hakimi S (1983) The maximum coverage location problem. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods 4(2):253–261

  • Miralinaghi M, Keskin BB, Lou Y, Roshandeh M (2017) Capacitated refueling station location problem with traffic deviations over multiple time periods. Netw Spat Econ 17:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF (1987) Consumer travel behavior: extensions of a multipurpose shopping model. Geogr Anal 19(4):364–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy G, Salhi S (2007) Location-routing: issues, models and methods. Eur J Oper Res 177:649–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly M (1981) A model of the demand for retail facilities, incorporating multistop, multipurpose trips. Geogr Anal 13(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly M (1983) Impacts of multistop, multipurpose trips on retail distributions. Urban Geogr 4(2):173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe A, Suzuki A (1987) Stability of spatial competition for a large number of firms on a bounded two-dimensional space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 19:1067–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Transportation - Economic & Financial Analysis Unit (2014) The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2013. Available in http://library.state.or.us/repository/2009/200902121450374/2013.pdf, last retrieved on 7/21/2019

  • Pelegrín B, Fernández P, García MD (2018) Computation of multi-facility location Nash equilibria on a network under quantity competition. Netw Spat Econ 18:999–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott EC, Visscher M (1977) Sequential location among firms with foresight. Bell J Econ 8(2):378–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C (1986) The maximum capture or “sphere of influence” location problem: Hotelling revisited on a network. J Reg Sci 26(2):343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Peñate DR, Campos-Rodríguez CM, Moreno-Pérez JA (2019) A kernel search Matheuristic to solve the discrete leader-follower location problem. Networks and Spatial Economics Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-09472-7

  • Small K (2012) Valuation of travel time. Econ Transp 1(1):2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl K (1982) Differentiated products, consumer search, and locational oligopoly. J Ind Econ 31:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill JC (1982) Spatial duopolisic competition with multipurpose and multistop shopping. Ann Reg Sci 26:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2016) Transportation cost and benefit analysis: techniques, estimates and implications [second edition]. Available in http://www.vtpi.org/tca/, last retrieved on 7/21/2019

  • von Stackelberg H (1943) Grundlagen der theoretischen Volkswirtschaftslehre (translated as The theory of the market economy). W. Hodge & Co., Ltd., London. 1952

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolinsky A (1983) Retail trade concentration due to consumers’ imperfect information. Bell J Econ 14(1):275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support by Grant FONDECYT 1160025 and by the Complex Engineering Systems Institute through grant CONICYT PIA FB0816.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Marianov.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marianov, V., Eiselt, H.A. & Lüer-Villagra, A. The Follower Competitive Location Problem with Comparison-Shopping. Netw Spat Econ 20, 367–393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-09481-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-09481-6

Keywords

Navigation