Skip to main content
Log in

Uniform reliable broadcast in anonymous distributed systems with fair lossy channels

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uniform reliable broadcast (URB) is an important abstraction in distributed systems, offering delivery guarantee when spreading messages between processes. Informally, URB guarantees that if a process (correct or not) delivers a message m, then all correct processes deliver m. This abstraction has been extensively investigated in distributed systems where all processes have unique identifiers. Furthermore, the majority of papers in the literature usually assume that the communication channels of the system are reliable, which is not always the case in real systems. In this paper, the URB abstraction is investigated in anonymous asynchronous message passing distributed systems with process crash failures and fair lossy channels. For that, we assume the availability of a random number generator that generates unique global values with very high probability. Firstly, a simple URB algorithm is given assuming a majority of correct processes. Then, we prove the impossibility of solving URB without a majority of correct processes if no failure detector is used. Subsequently, a new failure detector class \(A{\varTheta }\) is proposed, which can be used to implement URB with any number of correct processes. However, the two previous URB algorithms are non-quiescent because every correct process, to offset the loss of messages caused by fair lossy channels, has to broadcast all URB\(\_\)delivered messages forever. Hence, a perfect anonymous failure detector \(AP^*\) is proposed, together with \(A{\varTheta }\), to make the URB algorithm quiescent. Finally, we discuss an alternative failure detector \(A{\varTheta }P^*\), which combines the properties of \(A{\varTheta }\) and \(AP^*\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cachin C, Guerraoui R, Rodrigues L (2011) Reliable and secure distributed programming, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider F, Gries D, Schlichting R (1984) Fault-tolerant broadcast. Sci Comput Program 4(1):1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hadzilacos V (1984) Issues of fault tolerance in concurrent computation. Ph.D thesis, Harvard University

  4. Hadzilacos V, Toueg S (1993) Fault-tolerant broadcasts and related problems. In: Mullender S (ed) Distributed systems. ACM Press & Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hadzilacos V, Toueg S (1994) A modular approach to fault-tolerant broadcasts and related problems. Technical Report 94-1425, 83 pages, Cornell University, Ithaca (USA)

  6. Schiper A (2002) Failure detection vs group membership in fault-tolerant distributed systems: hidden trade-offs. In: Proceedings of the second joint international workshop on process algebra and probabilistic methods, performance modeling and verification. Springer, London, pp 1–15

  7. Basu A, Charron-Bost B, Toueg S (1996) Simulating reliable links with unreliable links in the presence of process crashes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on distributed algorithms. Springer, London, pp 105–122

  8. Afek Y, Attiya H, Fekete A, Fisher M, Lynch N, Mansour Y, Wang D, Zuck L (1994) Reliable communication over unreliable channels. J ACM 41(6):1267–1297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Movahedi M, Saia J, Zamani M (2014) Secure anonymous broadcast. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.5326

  10. Angluin D (1980) Local and global properties in networks of processors (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC ’80). ACM New York, pp 82–93

  11. Yamashita M, Kameda T (1996) Computing on anonymous networks, part I: characterizing the solvable cases. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 7(1):69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita M, Kameda T (1996) Computing on anonymous networks, part II: decision and membership problems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 7(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buhrman H, Panconesi A, Silvestri R, Vityani P (2006) On the importance of having an identity or is consensus really universal? Distrib Comput 18(3):167–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Delporte-Gallet C, Fauconnier H, Tielmann A (2009) Fault-tolerant consensus in unknown and anonymous networks. In: Proceeding of 29th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS’09), pp 368–375

  15. Guerraoui R, Ruppert E (2007) Anonymous and fault-tolerant shared-memory computing. Distrib Comput 20(3):165–177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Delporte-Gallet C, Fauconnier H, Tran-The H (2012) Homonyms with forgeable identifiers. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on structural information and communication complexity (SIROCCO’12). Springer, Berlin, pp 171–182

  17. Arévalo S, Jiménez E, Tang J (2015) Fault-tolerant broadcast in anonymous systems. J Supercomput 71(11):4172–4191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arévalo S, Fernández Anta A, Imbs D, Jiménez E, Raynal M (2015) Failure detectors in homonymous distributed systems (with an application to consensus). J Parallel Distributed Comput 83:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouzid Z, Travers C (2012) Brief announcement: anonymity, failures, detectors and consensus. In: Proceedings of the 26th international symposium on distributed computing (DISC’12). Salvador, Brazil, pp 427–428

  20. Bouzid Z, Travers C (2016) Anonymity-preserving failure detectors. In: Proceedings of the 30th international symposium on distributed computing (DISC’16). Paris, France, pp 173–186

  21. Angluin D, Aspnes J, Eisenstat D, Ruppert E (2006) On the power of anonymous one-way communication. In: Principles of distributed systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 3974. Springer, Berlin, pp 396–411

  22. Bakhshi R, Fokkink W, Pang J, van de Pol J (2008) leader election in anonymous rings: Franklin Goes probabilistic. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on theoretical computer science (IFIP’08). Milano, Italy, pp 57–72

  23. Fraigniaud P, Pelc A, Peleg D, Perennes S (2001) Assigning labels in an unknown anonymous network with a leader. Distrib Comput 14(3):162–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kshemkalyani A, Singhal M (2013) Efficient distributed snapshots in an anonymous asynchronous message-passing system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(5):621–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilera M, Toueg S, Deianov B (1999) Revisiting the weakest failure detector for uniform reliable broadcast. In: Proceeding of the 13th international symposium on distributed computing (DISC’99). Bratislava, Slovak Republic, pp 19–33

  26. Chandra T, Toueg S (1996) Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems. J ACM 43(2):225–267

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. de Montjoye Y, Radaelli L, Singh V, Pentland A (2015) Unique in the shopping mall: on the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science 347(6221):536–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang J, Larrea M, Arévalo S, Jiménez E (2017) Reliable broadcast in anonymous distributed systems with fair lossy channels. Int J High Perform Comput Netw 10(4/5):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kshemkalyani A, Singhal M (2013) Efficient distributed snapshots in an anonymous asynchronous message-passing system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(5):621–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mathis F (1991) A generalized birthday problem. SIAM Rev 33(2):265–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonnet F, Raynal M (2010) Anonymous asynchronous systems: the case of failure detectors. In: Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on distributed computing (DISC’10). Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 206–220

  32. Aguilera M, Chen W, Toueg S (2000) On quiescent reliable communication. SIAM J Comput 29(6):2040–2073

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Raynal M (2010) Communication and agreement abstractions for fault-tolerant asynchronous distributed systems. Synth Lect Distrib Comput Theory 1(1):1–273

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Jiménez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research is partially supported by the Community of Madrid, under Grant EDGEDATA (P2018/TCS-4499), the Spanish Research Council, under Grants TIN2013-41123-P, TIN2013-46883-P, TIN2016-80350 and TIN2016-79897-P, the Basque Government, under Grants IT395-10 and IT980-16, and a scholarship of the Chinese Scholarship Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, J., Larrea, M., Arévalo, S. et al. Uniform reliable broadcast in anonymous distributed systems with fair lossy channels. Computing 102, 1967–1999 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00825-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation