Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DEM–FEM simulation of tire–sand interaction based on improved contact model

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the interaction between rubber tire and granular terrain, the dynamic behavior of granular terrain is significantly affected not only by the shape of soil grains, but also by the deformation contact of tread rubber. Therefore, the effect of these two factors should be considered in tire–sand interactions. In this study, an improved contact model including the effect of sand grain shape and tread rubber deformation is developed for dealing with the interaction between rubber tire and sand terrain. In sand–sand contact model, the interaction between sand grains takes the form of surface contact instead of conventional point contact, where the contact calculation contains four interactions, i.e., normal force, tangential force, rolling resistance and twisting resistance. And in tread–sand contact model, the contact between tread rubber and sand grains is surface contact, which includes the rolling resistance and twisting resistance on the grains caused by rubber deformation during contact. As a result, the complete and realistic evaluation of contact forces is accomplished. Next, a comparison of sandpile simulation of coarse particles and experiment is carried out to verify the effectiveness of the sand–sand contact model. Finally, the novel contact model is applied to tire–sand interaction simulations and compared with the single-wheel experiments. The results indicate that the proposed contact model can be a powerful tool to simulate the interactions between rubber tire and sand terrain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Sayegh Z, El-Gindy M, Johansson I et al (2018) Improved tire–soil interaction model using FEA-SPH simulation. J Terrramech 78:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cueto OG, Coronel CEI, Morfa CAR et al (2013) Three dimensional finite element model of soil compaction caused by agricultural tire traffic. Comput Electron Agric 99:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xia K (2011) Finite element modeling of tire/terrain interaction: application to predicting soil compaction and tire mobility. J Terrramech 48(2):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez JA, Al-Qadi IL (2016) Semicoupled modeling of interaction between deformable tires and pavements. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 143(4):04016015

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Schindler C (2013) Analysis of soil compaction and tire mobility with finite element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-body Dyn 227(3):275–291

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rubinstein D, Shmulevich I, Frenckel N (2018) Use of explicit finite-element formulation to predict the rolling radius and slip of an agricultural tire during travel over loose soil. J Terrramech 80:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yamashita H, Jayakumar P, Alsaleh M et al (2018) Physics-based deformable tire–soil interaction model for off-road mobility simulation and experimental validation. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 13(2):021002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozaki S, Kondo W (2016) Finite element analysis of tire traveling performance using anisotropic frictional interaction model. J Terrramech 64:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Behnke R, Wollny I, Hartung F et al (2019) Thermo-mechanical finite element prediction of the structural long-term response of asphalt pavements subjected to periodic traffic load: tire–pavement interaction and rutting. Comput Struct 218:9–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith W, Peng H (2013) Modeling of wheel–soil interaction over rough terrain using the discrete element method. J Terrramech 50(5–6):277–287

    Google Scholar 

  11. Du Y, Gao J, Jiang L et al (2017) Numerical analysis of lug effects on tractive performance of off-road wheel by DEM. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(6):1977–1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Du Y, Gao J, Jiang L et al (2018) Development and numerical validation of an improved prediction model for wheel–soil interaction under multiple operating conditions. J Terrramech 79:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang M, Dai Y, Cui L et al (2018) Experimental and DEM analyses on wheel–soil interaction. J Terrramech 76:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nakashima H, Takatsu Y, Shinone H et al (2009) FE-DEM analysis of the effect of tread pattern on the tractive performance of tires operating on sand. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 2(1):55–65

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nishiyama K, Nakashima H, Yoshida T et al (2016) 2D FE–DEM analysis of tractive performance of an elastic wheel for planetary rovers. J Terrramech 64:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nishiyama K, Nakashima H, Shimizu H et al (2017) 2D FE–DEM analysis of contact stress and tractive performance of a tire driven on dry sand. J Terrramech 74:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nishiyama K, Nakashima H, Yoshida T et al (2018) FE–DEM with interchangeable modeling for off-road tire traction analysis. J Terrramech 78:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michael M, Vogel F, Peters B (2015) DEM–FEM coupling simulations of the interactions between a tire tread and granular terrain. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:227–248

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Horner DA, Peters JF, Carrillo A (2001) Large scale discrete element modeling of vehicle–soil interaction. J Eng Mech 127(10):1027–1032

    Google Scholar 

  20. Recuero A, Serban R, Peterson B et al (2017) A high-fidelity approach for vehicle mobility simulation: nonlinear finite element tires operating on granular material. J Terrramech 72:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yamashita H, Chen G, Ruan Y et al (2019) Hierarchical multiscale modeling of tire–soil interaction for off-road mobility simulation. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 14(6):061007

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao C, Zang M (2014) Analysis of rigid tire traction performance on a sandy soil by 3D finite element–discrete element method. J Terrramech 55(7):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao CL, Zang MY (2017) Application of the FEM/DEM and alternately moving road method to the simulation of tire–sand interactions. J Terrramech 72:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao C, Zang M, Chen S et al (2018) Improving the 3D finite–discrete element method and its application in the simulation of wheel–sand interactions. Int J Comput Methods 15(07):1850059

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng Z, Zang M, Chen S et al (2018) A GPU-based DEM–FEM computational framework for tire–sand interaction simulations. Comput Struct 209:74–92

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng H, Xu W, Zang M et al (2019) Experimental and numerical investigations of tractive performance of off-road tires on gravel terrain. Int J Comput Methods. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876219500555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nassauer B, Liedke T, Kuna M (2013) Polyhedral particles for the discrete element method. Granul Matter 15(1):85–93

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eliáš J (2014) Simulation of railway ballast using crushable polyhedral particles. Powder Technol 264:458–465

    Google Scholar 

  29. Govender N, Wilke DN, Wu CY et al (2018) Large-scale GPU based DEM modeling of mixing using irregularly shaped particles. Adv Powder Technol 29(10):2476–2490

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khazeni A, Mansourpour Z (2018) Influence of non-spherical shape approximation on DEM simulation accuracy by multi-sphere method. Powder Technol 332:265–278

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu T, Yu J, Yu Y et al (2018) A modelling and verification approach for soybean seed particles using the discrete element method. Adv Powder Technol 29(12):3274–3290

    Google Scholar 

  32. He Y, Evans TJ, Shen YS et al (2018) Discrete modelling of the compaction of non-spherical particles using a multi-sphere approach. Miner Eng 117:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  33. Iwashita K, Oda M (2000) Micro-deformation mechanism of shear banding process based on modified distinct element method. Powder Technol 109(1–3):192–205

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang MJ, Yu HS, Harris D (2005) A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 32(5):340–357

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang M, Shen Z, Wang J (2015) A novel three-dimensional contact model for granulates incorporating rolling and twisting resistances. Comput Geotech 65:147–163

    Google Scholar 

  36. Horabik J, Molenda M (2016) Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: a review. Biosyst Eng 147:206–225

    Google Scholar 

  37. Markauskas D, Kačianauskas R (2011) Investigation of rice grain flow by multi-sphere particle model with rolling resistance. Granul Matter 13(2):143–148

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ai J, Chen JF, Rotter JM et al (2011) Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 206(3):269–282

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wakui F, Terumichi Y (2011) Numerical simulation of tire–ground system considering soft ground characteristics. J Syst Des Dyn 5(8):1650–1661

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matsushima T (2005) Effect of irregular grain shape on quasi-static shear behavior of granular assembly. Powders Grains 2:1319–1323

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Google Scholar 

  42. Balevičius R, Džiugys A, Kačianauskas R (2004) Discrete element method and its application to the analysis of penetration into granular media. J Civ Eng Manag 10(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Perez JCL, Kwok CY, Senetakis K (2016) Effect of rubber size on the behaviour of sand–rubber mixtures: a numerical investigation. Comput Geotech 80:199–214

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tekeste MZ, Balvanz LR, Hatfield JL et al (2019) Discrete element modeling of cultivator sweep-to-soil interaction: worn and hardened edges effects on soil–tool forces and soil flow. J Terrramech 82:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  45. Luding S (2008) Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension. Granul Matter 10(4):235

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Gardiner BS, Tordesillas A (2006) Effects of particle size distribution in a three-dimensional micropolar continuum model of granular media. Powder Technol 161(2):110–121

    Google Scholar 

  47. Huang J, da Silva MV, Krabbenhoft K (2013) Three-dimensional granular contact dynamics with rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 49:289–298

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lei Z, Zang M (2010) An approach to combining 3D discrete and finite element methods based on penalty function method. Comput Mech 46(4):609–619

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Zang MY, Lei Z, Wang SF (2007) Investigation of impact fracture behavior of automobile laminated glass by 3D discrete element method. Comput Mech 41(1):73–83

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Y, Xu Y, Thornton C (2005) A comparison of discrete element simulations and experiments for ‘sandpiles’ composed of spherical particles. Powder Technol 160(3):219–228

    Google Scholar 

  51. Derakhshani SM, Schott DL, Lodewijks G (2015) Micro-macro properties of quartz sand: experimental investigation and DEM simulation. Powder Technol 269:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dai L, Sorkin V, Vastola G et al (2019) Dynamics calibration of particle sandpile packing characteristics via discrete element method. Powder Technol 347:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ani OA, Uzoejinwa BB, Ezeama AO et al (2018) Overview of soil–machine interaction studies in soil bins. Soil Tillage Res 175:13–27

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hallquist JO (2007) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, vol 970. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California, pp 299–800

    Google Scholar 

  55. Syed Z, Tekeste M, White D (2017) A coupled sliding and rolling friction model for DEM calibration. J Terrramech 72:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhuang J (2002) Computational vehicle terramechanics. Press of Mechanical Industry, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hambleton JP, Drescher A (2009) Modeling wheel-induced rutting in soils: indentation. J Terrramech 46(2):35–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0117300), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (No. 201804020065), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11672344).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, 381 Wushan RD, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510641, People’s Republic of China

    Peng Yang, Mengyan Zang & Haiyang Zeng

Authors
  1. Peng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengyan Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haiyang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengyan Zang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, P., Zang, M. & Zeng, H. DEM–FEM simulation of tire–sand interaction based on improved contact model. Comp. Part. Mech. 7, 629–643 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00293-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00293-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation