Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting Electrode Materials and Sequence for Electrochemical Removal of Chlorinated Ethenes in Groundwater

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chlorinated ethene contaminations are a widespread environmental hazard and a threat to drinking water supplies. Electrochemical methods for in situ degradation of the chlorinated ethenes in the plume are under development. In laboratory, complete electrochemical removal of chlorinated ethenes in undivided flow-through reactors is reported when using palladized iron (Fe) cathodes (C) and cast Fe anodes (A). The cost of the electrodes depends on the Fe purity. In this study, 99.95%, 99.8% and 98+% palladized Fe cathodes, and 99.8% Fe and cast Fe anodes were investigated. The surfaces of the palladized Fe electrodes were examined by scanning electron microscopy. Deposition of palladium by electroless plating onto the Fe surfaces was uneven and disconnected. The less pure the Fe material, the higher the degree of oxide coverage of the cathode’s surface during electroless plating. Electrochemical application via Fe electrodes installed in a flow-through reactor of field-extracted groundwater and sandy sediment was studied for three-electrode configurations of A–A–C and C–C–A. The anodes of 99.8% Fe and cast Fe demonstrated different corrosion patterns; uniform corrosion and graphitization, respectively. Corrosion products clogged the sandy matrix. The corrosion product compositions differed between the A–A–C and C–C–A electrode configurations. The groundwater pH of 7.35 ± 0.05 changed downgradient to the electrochemical zone to 9.5 and 6.2 for the A–A–C and C–C–A reactors, respectively. The response of the hydrogeochemical settings to the established redox zones showed that the C–C–A electrode configuration was less intrusive to the surrounding environment.

.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark (grant number 5016-00165B), COWIfonden (grant number C-131.01), the Capital Region of Denmark (grant number 14002102), COWI A/S, and the Technical University of Denmark. A special thanks to Dr. David Gent, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Centers Environmental Laboratory, for access to the acrylic column for customization to comply with the lab work requirements of this study. The sandy sediment was kindly donated by Nymølle Stenindustrier A/S, Denmark. The cast iron was kindly donated by Velamp A/S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Højlund Hyldegaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyldegaard, B.H., Ottosen, L.M. Selecting Electrode Materials and Sequence for Electrochemical Removal of Chlorinated Ethenes in Groundwater. Water Air Soil Pollut 231, 290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04641-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04641-8

Keywords

Navigation