Next Article in Journal
In vivo Fitness of Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in Murine Infection Is Associated with International Lineage II-rep-2 and International Lineage III Clones Showing High Case Fatality Rates in Human Infections
Previous Article in Journal
The Pta-AckA Pathway Regulates LrgAB-Mediated Pyruvate Uptake in Streptococcus mutans
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Porcine Faecal Commensal Escherichia coli Carrying Class 1 Integrons from Sows and Their Offspring

1
The ithree institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW 2007, Australia
2
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle NSW 2568, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(6), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060843
Submission received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 3 June 2020 / Accepted: 3 June 2020 / Published: 4 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology and Immunology)

Abstract

:
Intensive pig production systems often rely on the use of antimicrobials and heavy metal feed additives to maintain animal health and welfare. To gain insight into the carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the faecal flora of commercially reared healthy swine, we characterised the genome sequences of 117 porcine commensal E. coli that carried the class 1 integrase gene (intI1+). Isolates were sourced from 42 healthy sows and 126 of their offspring from a commercial breeding operation in Australia in 2017. intI1+ E. coli was detected in 28/42 (67%) sows and 90/126 (71%) piglets. Phylogroup A, particularly clonal complex 10, and phylogroup B1 featured prominently in the study collection. ST10, ST20, ST48 and ST361 were the dominant sequence types. Notably, 113/117 isolates (96%) carried three or more ARGs. Genes encoding resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and heavy metals were dominant. ARGs encoding resistance to last-line agents, such as carbapenems and third generation cephalosporins, were not detected. IS26, an insertion sequence noted for its ability to capture and mobilise ARGs, was present in 108/117 (92%) intI1+ isolates, and it played a role in determining class 1 integron structure. Our data shows that healthy Australian pig faeces are an important reservoir of multidrug resistant E. coli that carry genes encoding resistance to multiple first-generation antibiotics and virulence-associated genes.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli (E. coli) comprises an important component of the commensal gastrointestinal flora of warm-blooded vertebrate species. Its evolution is characterised by a remarkable capacity to acquire mobile genetic elements (MGE) such as plasmids, genomic islands and phages by lateral gene transfer (LGT), which is the major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and pathogen evolution [1]. Antibiotic usage features prominently in efforts to curtail the impact of the pathogenic E. coli disease in livestock production systems and prevent animal loss. In addition to antibiotics, diets designed to enhance growth performance and pig health often contain zinc and copper [2,3], which influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota and are the major non-antibiotic growth promoters used in swine production [4,5]. Due to the rising global demand for animal protein, antimicrobial usage is forecast to increase substantially over the next 15 years [6]. In regards to pig production, more than 1.4 billion pigs are slaughtered globally on an annual basis for food consumption [7], a production process that generates billions of tonnes of faecal waste, where E. coli is present at 104–108 per gram of faeces [8]. The application of manure as land fertiliser introduces faecal bacteria, antimicrobial and heavy metal residues into the environment beyond the farm [9,10,11]. The impact of composting on the carriage of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria is complex, and recent evidence suggests that the practice is not effective in reducing antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) pollution in animal manure [11]. Although the precise ecological and molecular effects of livestock manure as a land fertiliser are poorly understood and undoubtedly complex [11,12,13], this practice may represent the driving force for AMR spread in the environment, wildlife and humans [9,14].
Class 1 integrons are considered a reliable predictor of AMR as they play a crucial role in the capture and expression of gene cassettes encoding resistance to a wide variety of antimicrobials that are embedded in complex resistance regions associated with insertion sequences (IS) [15,16]. It has been estimated that the faecal production of humans and livestock is responsible for the release of 1023 copies of clinical class 1 integrons into the environment daily [17], and large-scale molecular screening studies have reported the contamination of estuary sediments and animal manure with class 1 integrons [13,17,18,19]. Therefore, understanding the extent of class 1 integron presence in intensive farming systems becomes crucial to containing the impact of AMR spread in animal, human and environmental settings. IS elements play a pivotal role in the capture and mobilisation of ARGs. IS26, in particular, pervades the genomes of a wide variety of Enterobacteriaceae [20,21,22,23] and is prevalent in commensal porcine E. coli residing on diverse plasmid backbones [21,24,25]. IS26 is responsible for the mobilisation of a wide array of ARGs conferring resistance to first generation antimicrobials [25,26] and last-line agents such as third generation cephalosporins and colistin [27,28,29], and it is capable of shaping the structure of MGEs [30]. Therefore, we can expect MDR Enterobacteriaceae to continue evolving by capturing different combinations of ARGs with the potential to create new MDR pathogenic clones [31,32].
Sows are actively involved in the acquisition of multiple drug resistance by newborn piglets. Previous studies investigated the use of antimicrobials in sows and the presence of AMR in the faecal E. coli of their offspring, showing an association between MDR E. coli found in the two animal groups that persisted to slaughter [33,34]. These studies underpin the significant role of sows as potential sources of MDR E. coli for the intestinal microbiota of newborn piglets [34,35]. Farming practices also play a role in the acquisition and spread of AMR. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli sourced from pigs and individuals working on farms shared pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles, multi-locus sequence types (STs), ARGs and plasmid incompatibility types, suggesting transmission between pigs and humans [36]. Understanding transmission pathways between sows, newborn piglets and farmers is critical to avoiding the spread of MDR E. coli within farms and, more broadly, the environment.
Previously, we used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to characterise 103 class 1 integron-positive (intI1+) E. coli, isolated in 2007 from swine faeces from two commercial production facilities in New South Wales, Australia, with a history of antimicrobial use. Our study showed that E. coli belonging to commensal phylogroups A and B1 carried ARGs and diverse virulence-associated genes (VAGs) [25]. Here, we used WGS to further investigate the genomic features of 117 commensal intI1+ E. coli sourced from a commercial breeding operation in 2017. We estimated the carriage rates of class 1 integrase gene intI1 and determined the class 1 integron structures carried by E. coli from the faeces of 42 healthy sows and 126 of their post-weaned piglets. We also characterised the carriage of ARGs and VAGs, STs, serotypes and phylogenetic associations. This study provides further baseline knowledge about the genomic features of MDR commensal E. coli sourced from healthy Australian pigs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Animal Trial

Rectal faecal samples from 126 one-day post-weaned pigs sourced from a commercial pig breeding operation in Australia were collected in January 2017 at the Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute (EMAI), Menangle, NSW. Rectal faecal samples from 42 healthy sows, which gave birth to the 126 piglets, were also collected from the breeding operation and were dispatched to the EMAI microbiology laboratory for processing. Faecal samples were labelled and immediately inoculated in EC-broth for the culture of E. coli. Faeces were stored at −80 °C. At the time of sampling, the sows were not receiving antimicrobial treatment, whereas the piglets had never received antimicrobials before sampling.

2.2. Faecal Sample Collection, E. coli Isolation and Identification

Three grams of faecal material from each animal were homogenised in 15 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution using a Stomacher (Bio-Rad) for 1 min. To isolate E. coli colonies, 500 µL of homogenised faecal material was incubated at 37 °C overnight in EC enrichment broth (BD) and 50 µL was used to inoculate petri dishes containing MacConkey agar (BD). Three presumptive E. coli colonies were picked for each faecal sample. To confirm the identity of the typical dark pink lactose-fermenting colonies, crude boiled cell lysates were prepared, and an aliquot was used as template for a multiplex PCR containing primers spanning the E. coli-specific uspA gene [37] and the class 1 integrase intI1 [38,39]. The cycling conditions for the multiplex PCR were as follows: 94 °C for 2 min (initial denaturation) followed by 30 cycles 94 °C for 20 s (denaturation), 60 °C for 20 s (annealing) and 72 °C for 30 s (polymerisation). The final extension cycle was performed at 72 °C for 5 min. The presence of uspA was sufficient to confirm the bacterial colony identity as E. coli, and intI1 was considered as a reliable proxy for the presence of ARGs [40]. For sows’ faecal samples that were intI1- after the first PCR screening, a further 10 dark pink lactose-fermenting colonies from the overnight enrichment broth were screened with the multiplex PCR.

2.3. Isolate Identifiers

E. coli isolates were identified with the TZ prefix. E. coli derived from sows were identified by TZ followed by the animal number and S (i.e., TZ2_S). E. coli from piglets were identified by the TZ number, which refers to the sow that gave birth to it, and the piglet number followed by P (i.e., TZ2_1P). To investigate the diversity of E. coli in a single faecal enrichment broth, we sequenced the genomes of all three E. coli colonies for two sows and six piglets. These isolates are indicated by the same code for the first bacterial colony, plus the suffix a or b for the second and third colonies (i.e., TZ17_4Pa).

2.4. DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s standard protocol for bacterial cells. The steps used for DNA quantification and library preparation for WGS were performed as described previously [25]. After multiplex PCR screening, 117 intI1+ E. coli genomes (32 from sows and 85 from piglets) were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 v4 instrument. The Illumina raw reads were assessed for quality and assembled using the A5 pipeline (version A5-miseq 20150522) [41]. For eight animals (two sows and six piglets) we selected three intI1+ E. coli colonies to be sequenced to determine if only a single intI1+ E. coli clone was dominating per faecal sample. At least two colonies were successfully sequenced for 7 out of 8 pigs.

2.5. Assembly Statistics

Assembly statistics for 117 sequenced intI1+ E. coli are provided in Table S1. The number of scaffolds per genome ranged from 100 to 864, with an average of 247. The median sequencing coverage was between 28× and 94×, with an average of 58×.

2.6. Gene Identification, Serotyping, Phylogrouping, Phylogenetic Analysis and Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes were catalogued using local BLAST v2.2.30+ and the previously reported gene databases [25] (Tables S2–S4). These were also used to identify plasmid incompatibility groups, insertion sequences and serotypes, addressing the same criteria of >90% nucleotide sequence identity [25]. Identification of truncated gene sequences, class 1 integron characterisation and confirmation of the presence of two integrons in the collection was performed as previously described [25].
E. coli phylogroups and MLST determination were performed in silico using the Clermont et al. scheme [42] and the PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/) following the scheme proposed by Achtman (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/).
The short read alignment of our strains to K12-MG1655 (ST10) as a reference genome was performed as previously described using the custom snakemake workflow snplord, available at https://github.com/CJREID/snplord. The full alignment was recombination filtered and a tree inferred by Gubbins using RaxML as a tree-builder. This tree and recombination-filtered alignment are available via Figshare (See data availability for links). Tree analysis and visualisation with metadata was performed with iTOL (https://itol.embl.de).

2.7. Ethical Statement

The swine trial was conducted at the Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute under the Animal Ethics Committee number M16/04.

2.8. Data Availability

The following data arising from this study have been made publicly available:

3. Results

3.1. Class 1 Integrase Gene Presence

We isolated three E. coli colonies per sample from a cohort of 42 healthy sows and 126 post-weaned piglets and screened them for the presence of the intI1 gene. intI1 was detected in 28/42 sows (67%) and 90/126 piglets (71%). For the 14 sows in which intI1 was not detected in the initial screen, we tested a further 10 E. coli colonies. Using this approach, almost all sows (41/42; 98%) were found to carry intI1+ E. coli in their faeces.

3.2. Phylogroups, Sequence Types and Serotypes

The commensal E. coli from sows and their offspring had their phylogroup, MLST and serotype determined in silico. Phylogroup A was predominant (70/117; 60%), followed by phylogroups B1 (36/117; 31%), D (9/117; 7.6%) and B2 (2/117; 1.7%). Phylogroup A was also dominant in sows and piglets when considered separately. Interestingly, 9/12 (75%) E. coli isolates belonging to pathogenic phylogroups B2 and D were found in piglets. Phylogroup B1 E. coli was more prevalent in piglets than in sows.
Forty-six different STs were identified in the study collection, 19 of which were represented by a single isolate. ST10 was most common (10/117; 8.5%), followed by ST20 (8/117; 6.8%) and ST48 (7/117; 6%). ST29 and ST398 were also frequently encountered but only in piglets, while ST48 was identified in both groups but predominantly in piglets. Whilst 13 STs were identified in both sows and piglets, there was only one instance where a piglet shared an ST with its mother.
The in silico serotyping analysis identified 52 different serotypes among 103 isolates. Nine isolates were O non-typable (ONT) and associated with 7 different H alleles; one isolate typed as ONT:HNT. E. coli isolates with the same ST often displayed the same serotype, though ST10 in particular displayed a variety of serotypes. Serotypes O15:H2 (8/85; 9.4%) and O15:H11 (5/85; 5.9%) were predominant in piglets but absent in sows, while O8:H30 was prevalent in sows (4/32; 12.5%) and frequently encountered in piglets.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

In order to visualise genetic relatedness among our collection, we inferred a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from an alignment of our 117 sequences to the complete genome of K12-MG1655 (Figure 1). We also included a previously examined porcine commensal E. coli collection of 68 genomes from 2007 for comparison. These strains are labelled with the prefix “F2”.
The phylogeny was dominated by phylogroup A strains, separated from all other phylogroups on one major clade. The phylogroup A clade contained seven of the nine most common STs, five of which were shared between the 2017 and 2007 collections. Sequence types belonging to the ST10 complex were mostly clustered together, except for ST34, which split two clusters of ST10 and a cluster of three ST48s that were distinct from the other ST48s in the collection.
The second major clade comprised strains from all four phylogroups but mostly featured phylogroup D, including two ST117 strains, one from each collection. The third major clade was made up of B1 and a singular A strain. This clade contained ST20 and ST29, common STs observed in the 2017 collection only. There were numerous instances of strains from the two collections clustering together in sub-clades within all three of the major clades, particularly phylogroup A.

3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes (ARGs)

In total, 21 different ARGs were identified within the collection, and each isolate carried between two and 17 ARGs. 113/117 intI1+ strains (96.6%) carried ARGs conferring resistance to one antimicrobial in three or more categories and were therefore classified as MDR [43].
The predominant ARGs identified in the collection were blaTEM-1 (108/117; 92%), followed by strA, strB (69/117; 59%) and tetA (65/117; 55.5%) (Figure 2). Frequently observed resistance gene cassettes associated with class 1 integrons included dfrA5 (56/117; 48%), dfrA12 (102/117; 87%), aadA1 (63/117; 54%), aadA2 (53/117; 45%) and cmlA (49/117; 42%) encoding trimethoprim, aminoglycoside and chloramphenicol resistance, respectively (Figure 3). aph(3`)-Ia, conferring resistance to neomycin and kanamycin, was present in 28/117 isolates (24%). Three sulphonamide-resistance genes were identified in the collection. sul2 was predominant (60/117; 51%), followed by sul3 (49/117; 42%) and sul1 (24/117; 20.5%). sul2 also predominated in piglets (50/85; 59%), followed by sul3 (30/85; 35.2%) and sul1 (20/85; 23.5%). Contrarily, in sows, sul3 was most prevalent (19/32; 59.3%), followed by sul2 (10/32; 31.2%) and sul1 (4/32; 12.5%). The sul1 and sul3 genes were found to be closely associated with class 1 integrons; however, integrons lacking sul1 due to IS26 were also a feature of the collection (Figure 3). Considering the animal groups singularly, blaTEM-1 was prevalent in both, followed by dfrA12, aadA1 and aadA2 in sows and strA, strB, sul2 and tetA in piglets. Except for the single ARGs identified only in piglets, such as qnrS, blaP1 and mphA, all the ARGs that were identified in the study collection were present in both piglets and sows.
Genes encoding resistance to third generation cephalosporins, carbapenems and polymyxins were not detected. Resistance genes conferring resistance to mercury and tellurite were detected in 102/117 (87%) and 24/117 (20.5%) isolates, respectively. Chromosomally-encoded copper resistance genes (cusA, cueO, copA) were detected in 100% of the isolates, whilst plasmid-encoded genes such as pcoA were detected in 3/32 (9.4%) isolates from sows and 12/85 (14.1%) isolates from piglets (Figure 2, cueO, copA not shown).

3.5. Class 1 Integron Structures

We identified 17 different class 1 integron structures in this study. Six integrons (Figure 3a–c,k) carried sul1. The difference between structures (a) and (a1) was an additional gene cassette (estX), whereas structure (b1) represented a variant of (b) for the presence of two different truncation events, presumably mediated by IS26 (Figure 3b,b1). Integron structure (d), with a truncated 3′-CS region, was identified in 40 isolates (40/117; 34%) and associated with 16 different STs (Figure 3d). Two novel IS26-mediated truncations of the 3′-CS region, one comprising 172 nucleotides and the other 122 nucleotides, respectively, were also identified (Figure 3(d2,d3)). A commonly identified sul3-associated integron comprised dfrA12-orfF-aadA2-cmlA-aadA1-qacH-tnp440-sul3 (Figure 3e), and variants of this structure were also characterised. Integron (e) was the second most frequently reported structure in the collection. The length of the macrolide efflux gene mefB was one of the features that differentiated sul3-associated integrons with similar gene cassette arrays Figure 3(e–j). Structure (f) carried a full copy of mefB along with (j), which was missing the qacH gene cassette. Structures (e) and (i) carried a signature mefB 260 bp deletion (ΔmefB260), whereas (g) and (h) lacked mefB. In all the aforementioned structures, mefB was flanked by IS26, the presumptive cause of these truncation and deletion events.
Seven isolates carried two integron structures: (a1, d) 4/7; (d, e) 1/7; (b, d) 1/7; (f, k) 1/7. Class 1 integron structures (d) and (e) were the most prevalent in both groups, followed by (j) in sows and (i) in piglets. Nine integron types, (b), (c), (d), (d1), (d2), (e), (f), (i) and (j), were shared by sows and piglets. Integron structures (k) and (l) were each identified only once, both times in piglets. At least one representative for each integron structure was found in piglets, whereas in sows, structures (a), (a1), (h), (k) and (l) were not reported.
The mapping integron carriage data to the phylogeny (Figure 1, Tables S2 and S6) highlighted the carriage of certain integrons within multiple unrelated strains. Integrons (b), (d), (d1), (d2), (e), (f) and (i) were each present in more than one ST. Integrons (d), (d1) and (e) were also present in multiple STs within the 2007 collection.

3.6. Virulence Associated Genes (VAGs)

The most frequently identified VAGs in the collection were fimH (31/117; 26.4%), a type 1 fimbrial adhesin involved in bladder colonisation [44,45]; iss (36/117; 31%), the increased serum survival protein widely distributed in avian and human E. coli [46]; and traT (30/117; 26%), an outer membrane serum survival-associated protein. Less common VAGs in the collection were eaeA and espA, which are involved in the formation of the attaching and effacing lesions induced by enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) [47,48], ColV genes (cvaA, cvaB) and siderophore encoding genes (iucD, iutA, irp2, fyuA and iroN). Two isolates from phylogroup B2 carried the pap operon encoding for P fimbriae, which is one of the most recognised extra-intestinal virulence factors [49].
Within phylogroup A, 16/20 different VAGs were identified, with 18/20 in phylogroup B1, 13/20 in phylogroup B2 and 17/20 in phylogroup D. The highest number of VAGs per isolate was 12 for a single B2 isolate. Nonetheless, four phylogroup B1 and one phylogroup A isolates carried 11 VAGs each. Overall, only 15 phylogroup A isolates did not carry VAGs.
Heat-stable cytotoxin astA and fimH were the most common VAGs in sows, whereas iss and mchF (microcin H47), previously associated with extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) [50], were prominent in piglets. The membrane protein traT was the third most represented VAG in both groups.

3.7. Plasmid Incompatibility Groups

The collection was screened for eight plasmid replication-associated genes and all were represented in the collection (Figure 2). IncF was the most frequently identified (60/117; 51.2%), followed by IncR (27/117; 23%) and IncHI2 (12/117; 10.2%). All identified replicons except IncN were present in both sows and piglets.

4. Discussion

E. coli genomic sequences from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy Australian pigs are underrepresented in public repositories. We recently described the genomes of 103 intI1+ E. coli, isolated from the faeces of mostly healthy swine that were sourced from two commercial production facilities with a history of antimicrobial usage [25]. Our previous study showed that commensal E. coli belonged predominantly to phylogroup A and B1 and sequence types ST10, ST361 and ST542. The present study provides further genomic data characterising 117 intI1+ faecal commensal E. coli from healthy Australian sows and their offspring, sourced from a commercial breeding operation in 2017. The post-weaned pigs had not previously been exposed to antimicrobial treatment.
E. coli ST10 and ST20, belonging to phylogroup A and B1, respectively, were predominant in this study collection, a result that is consistent with earlier Australian studies [25,51]. ST10, part of clonal complex 10 (CC10), has been previously reported as an important extra-intestinal pathogen in humans and pigs [52,53] and a potential dominant clonal group of commensal E. coli globally [54]. The latter study also reported E. coli CC10 as well established in the gut of Australian pigs, belonging to multiple phylogenetic lineages [54]. A phylogenomic comparison of our 117 strains with a historical collection of intI1+ commensal porcine E. coli from 2007 (Figure 1) revealed that, in addition to the conservation of STs, sub-lineages within these STs persisted in Australian swine. This suggests that intI1+ CC10 E. coli remain under selection in Australian swine production systems, though the underlying mechanisms require further elucidation. Direct or indirect selection of antimicrobial resistance, and the genetic basis of commensal fitness, are avenues worth exploring. In addition, the gut microbiome of post-weaned piglets must quickly adapt to the transition from sow’s milk to a solid grain diet; during this period of approximately 10 days, animals are particularly prone to diarrhoeic disease [55,56]. Given the lack of diarrhoeal disease in the cohort and the presence of dominant clonal groups of commensal E. coli such as CC10, it is likely that these lineages are adept at surviving the transition phase and may have some protective effect from the risk of diarrhoeal disease. Therefore, further WGS of commensal E. coli CC10 is desirable in order to understand its intestinal persistence and any effect on the occurrence of post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets. E. coli ST20 was the second most represented ST in the collection, although it was only identified in the piglets’ group and not present in our historical collection. ST20 may represent an emerging ST carrying ARGs and VAGs in commensal porcine E. coli in Australia; however, further genomic studies are required to determine the extent of ST20 carriage in Australian porcine E. coli populations.
A wide variety of STs and serotypes were reported in the study collection, particularly in piglets. Previous studies evaluated the genomic diversity of intestinal E. coli in nursery pigs in the absence of antimicrobial treatment, suggesting that piglets showed significant genetic variety among E. coli [8]. To get an insight into E. coli diversity, we isolated and sequenced three intI1+ E. coli from a single porcine faecal sample for two sows and six piglets. Due to sequence failure episodes and the low number of colonies that were sequenced, we were not able to comment on the establishment of a single E. coli lineage or otherwise. Studies from Danish farms described the genetic relationship among E. coli sourced from pigs which had not previously been treated with antimicrobials [57,58]. These studies determined that sampling 10 E. coli colonies was sufficient to gauge E. coli diversity in the faeces of swine [57]. Moreover, much remains to be learned about the role of diet and animal age in the composition and concomitant carriage of AMR genes in the gut microbiota [33,34,59]. Collectively, our data suggest that intI1+ commensal E. coli display remarkable genetic diversity. Further WGS studies are needed to determine the full genetic diversity of E. coli in the porcine gastrointestinal tract.
Farming practices, feed additives and the antimicrobial treatment regime given to sows may have a significant influence on how their offspring acquire ARGs [33,35]. In the present study, post-weaned piglets were not exposed to antimicrobial treatments prior to sampling; however, the sows were likely to have been previously exposed to antimicrobials. This may have been a contributing factor to the shared carriage of identical ARGs and the presence of intI1 in both groups [33,60]. Surprisingly, we only identified one example of a sow and its progeny carrying the same ST (ST48). These two ST48 strains displayed identical ARG profiles. The general trend of shared ARGs but not STs may be due to the presence of too few strains isolated from sows for comparison but may also reflect that genes are simply more mobile or transmissible than organisms. Further work examining the context of ARGs in pigs and sows and more comprehensive sampling is required to address this.
Although the assembly of complex MDR genomic regions using short read sequencing technology is challenging, we identified 17 class 1 integron structures in which the sul2 and sul3 genes were prevalent. In E. coli from piglets, integron structure (d) was frequently identified in strains that also carried blaTEM, strA, strB and sul2, which are typical components of the transposon Tn6029 [26]. This result suggests that the Tn6029 transposon was present in the study collection, as highlighted in our previous study [25], particularly in piglets. The presence of aph(3′)-Ia, conferring resistance to neomycin and kanamycin in 28 isolates, a gene that is typically flanked by IS26, suggests that Tn6026 may also be a feature of MDR commensal E. coli in Australian swine production systems. Further studies using long read sequencing are needed in order to confirm these assertions. Integron structure (d), in which only 24 bp of the 3′-CS remains intact, is a frequently described genetic signature in Australia [61]. It was previously reported in atypical bovine enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) throughout NSW, from the faeces and urine of humans with haemorrhagic colitis and UTIs, respectively, and in E. coli ST58 causing urosepsis in humans [24,61,62]. Our analysis demonstrates that this signature remains common within and between clonal lineages in Australian swine, supporting both vertical and horizontal gene transfer as the mechanisms by which it persists. In the present study, we identified two new class 1 integron structures carrying unique deletions in their 3′-CS, presumably created by the action of IS26 (integrons d2; d3). This result suggests that Tn6029 and Tn6026 may truncate the 3′-CS of class 1 integrons in different locations, creating novel genetic signatures. Further studies are required to confirm this.
sul3-associated class 1 integrons were prevalent here and in our earlier study [25]. Since its first description in pigs [63], sul3 has been reported in Australia in commensal E. coli and Salmonella enterica from swine [25,51,64] and commensal and uropathogenic E. coli from humans [65,66], but it has been reported less frequently in avian pathogenic E. coli [67]. Based on these observations, livestock may play an important role in the spread of MGEs that carry sul3 and other sulphonamide resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. sul3-associated class 1 integrons may be tracked identifying different IS26-mediated mefB deletions. In our previous study, we described evidence that IS26 was shaping atypical class 1 integron structures and causing characteristic deletions in mefB [25]. In our current study, we identified all four previously described sul3-associated integrons. Integron (e) in particular was most prevalent and was found in both predominant and sporadically occurring STs. We also identified six new variants, several of which had complete copies of the mefB gene which had not been previously reported in Australia. The presence of a full copy of mefB, as well as different deletion or truncation events, may indicate that class 1 integrons are mobilised with different mechanisms involving different MGEs such as transposons or ISs. Furthermore, variants of mefB may represent useful genetic epidemiological markers.
The co-carriage of ARGs and heavy metal resistance genes in the collection is concerning, yet unsurprising given the known association between class 1 integrons, ARGs and mercury resistance transposons [68]. In food animals, ARGs and heavy metal resistance genes in widely disseminated plasmid types, such as the HI2 family, have been previously reported [69,70]. This is best explained by widespread in-feed copper and zinc supplementation in swine operations, which drives the persistence of AMR in the absence of direct antimicrobial selection pressure. A body of evidence justifies the phasing out of both antimicrobials and heavy metals in food animal production in favour of alternatives [71].
The high rate of VAGs identified in the present study was unexpected, particularly because E. coli belonging to phylogroups A and B1 are usually considered as low virulence, commensal strains [72]. VAGs identified in E. coli from sows and piglets were previously reported in multiple pathotypes of E. coli [47,48,49,73,74], and the carriage of multiple VAGs in commensal E. coli strains is consistent with our earlier study [25]. Reliance on antibiotics and metals to prevent outbreaks of infectious disease is likely to not only maintain high carriage levels of class 1 integrons in plasmids that also carry heavy metal resistance genes and IS26 [25,74,75], but it may yield a more severe disease presentation by driving the evolution of MDR hybrid E. coli with virulence attributes derived from different pathovar designations. Indeed, Australia has already experienced one such episode in early 2000s when an MDR enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) O157:H19-ST4245 (ST23 complex) that was phylogenetically more closely related to serogroup O78 avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) and distant from enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC,) O157:H7, caused widespread mortalities in several swine production operations [76]. Similarly, plasmids described in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium 1,4 [5] 12:i:- from Australian pigs in 2013 were shown to carry EHEC VAGs that had been described in E. coli sourced from cattle circa 1998, highlighting how these elements can be mobilised and how VAGs and AMR genes can be shared [75]. Previous studies identified both VAGs and ARGs in multiple conjugative plasmid types in Enterobacteriaceae [22,75,77]. Hybrid plasmids are known to be generated by the mechanism of action of IS26, leading to the creation of plasmids carrying combinations of VAGs and ARGs [22,78], conferring a high selective advantage to the host strain. E. coli sourced from sows and piglets carried multiple VAGs. Notably, most of the hypervirulent strains, belonging to phylogroups B2 and D, were sourced from piglets. The significant presence of VAGs in this animal group represents a high risk of the onset of post-weaning diarrhea [79], considering the temporary disequilibrium in the gut microflora because of diet transition from liquid to solid. Altogether, these observations suggest that E. coli in commercial swine production systems should be monitored, as “harmless” commensals may rapidly transition into drug resistant pathogens via the acquisition of hybrid virulence/resistance plasmids which are present in the porcine faecal microbiome.
Collectively, our data shows that despite the evidence for sound antimicrobial stewardship in Australia [51,80], class 1 integron structures are present and are evolving in Australian swine breeding operations. This is in part due to the infiltration of IS26, which is altering class 1 integron structures by creating complex regions of resistance and enhancing the opportunities for the formation of hybrid MDR resistance and virulence plasmids [75,81]. Australian antimicrobial stewardship practices, in conjunction with strict quarantine requirements, prohibiting the import of living animals or fresh pork for sale [82], appear to be effective in limiting the capture and carriage of ARGs to last-line antimicrobials, such as third generation cephalosporins and colistin, in porcine E. coli. This may have had an influence on the apparently stable presence of class 1 integron structures in commensal porcine E. coli compared to our earlier findings [25]. Nonetheless, effective strategies for improving on-farm biosecurity routines and farmers’ education need to be implemented in order to prevent the spread of AMR and disease outbreaks.
Our WGS study suggests that Australian commensal porcine E. coli mainly belong to commensal phylogroups A and B1 and are an important reservoir of ARGs encoding resistance to first generation antimicrobials. Notably, the E. coli characterised here carry atypical class 1 integron structures, particularly those associated with sul3, and have been altered in large part due to the mechanism of action of IS26. Commensal E. coli also carry numerous and diverse VAGs, including those reported in different E. coli pathotypes, suggesting that their zoonotic potential needs to be monitored. Further genomic studies are needed to understand the role played by the surrounding environment and the sows’ intestinal microflora on the acquisition of MDR E. coli in post-weaned piglets not previously exposed to antimicrobial treatments. Furthermore, our data suggest that the microbiological impact of the application of swine manure on agricultural land needs to be monitored more closely, and they underscore the importance of adopting a one health perspective in the study of pathogen evolution and MDR [40,68].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/6/843/s1, Tables S1–S4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.P.D., T.A.C., A.E.D.; data curation, T.Z., C.J.R.; formal analysis, T.Z.; funding acquisition, S.P.D., A.E.D., T.Z.; investigation, T.Z.; methodology, T.A.C., M.L.; project administration, S.P.D., T.A.C., T.Z.; resources, T.Z., T.A.C., D.G., M.L., A.E.D.; software, C.J.R.; supervision, S.P.D. and T.A.C.; visualisation, T.Z.; writing- original draft, T.Z.; writing – review and editing, S.P.D., T.A.C., A.E.D., T.Z., C.J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council, linkage grant LP150100912. This project was also partly funded by the Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology (Ausgem), a collaborative partnership between the NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of Technology Sydney. T.Z. and D.G. are recipients of UTS International Research and UTS President’s Scholarships.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Graeme Eamens, Linda Falconer and Shayne Fell for their technical assistance during the animal trial at EMAI pig facility. Paul Worden and Max Cummins for their assistance in the preparation and analysis of the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Stokes, H.W.; Gillings, M.R. Gene flow, mobile genetic elements and the recruitment of antibiotic resistance genes into Gram-negative pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 790–819. [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong, T.A.; Cook, D.R.; Ward, M.M.; Williams, C.M.; Spears, J.W. Effect of dietary copper source (cupric citrate and cupric sulfate) and concentration on growth performance and fecal copper excretion in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacela, J.Y.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Nelssen, J.L.; Renter, D.G.; Dritz, S.S. Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets – high dietary levels of copper and zinc for young pigs, and phytase. J. Swine Health Prod. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thacker, P.A. Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use in swine production: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Case, C.L.; Carlson, M.S. Effect of feeding organic and inorganic sources of additional zinc on growth performance and zinc balance in nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 1917–1924. [Google Scholar]
  6. Van Boeckel, T.P.; Brower, C.; Gilbert, M.; Grenfell, B.T.; Levin, S.A.; Robinson, T.P.; Teillant, A.; Laxminarayan, R. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5649–5654. [Google Scholar]
  7. National Research Council. National Research Council Nutrient requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrero-Fresno, A.; Larsen, I.; Olsen, J.E. Genetic relatedness of commensal Escherichia coli from nursery pigs in intensive pig production in Denmark and molecular characterization of genetically different strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 342–353. [Google Scholar]
  9. Binh, C.T.T.; Heuer, H.; Kaupenjohann, M.; Smalla, K. Piggery manure used for soil fertilization is a reservoir for transferable antibiotic resistance plasmids. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 66, 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Binh, C.T.T.; Heuer, H.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Kotzerke, A.; Fulle, M.; Wilke, B.-M.; Schloter, M.; Smalla, K. Short-term effects of amoxicillin on bacterial communities in manured soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 62, 290–302. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peng, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Lin, X. Long-term application of fresh and composted manure increase tetracycline resistance in the arable soil of eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 506–507, 279–286. [Google Scholar]
  12. Topp, E.; Larsson, D.G.J.; Miller, D.N.; Van den Eede, C.; Virta, M.P.J. Antimicrobial resistance and the environment: Assessment of advances, gaps and recommendations for agriculture, aquaculture and pharmaceutical manufacturing. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fix185. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gillings, M.R. Class 1 integrons as invasive species. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 38, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jechalke, S.; Kopmann, C.; Rosendahl, I.; Groeneweg, J.; Weichelt, V.; Krögerrecklenfort, E.; Brandes, N.; Nordwig, M.; Ding, G.-C.; Siemens, J.; et al. Increased abundance and transferability of resistance genes after field application of manure from sulfadiazine-treated pigs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1704–1711. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillings, M.R. Integrons: Past, present, and future. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 257–277. [Google Scholar]
  16. Partridge, S.R. Analysis of antibiotic resistance regions in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 820–855. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillings, M.R. DNA as a pollutant: The clinical class 1 integron. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2018, 4, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu, Y.-G.; Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Yu, S.; Chen, Y.-S.; Zhang, T.; Gillings, M.R.; Su, J.-Q. Continental-scale pollution of estuaries with antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 16270. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu, Y.-G.; Johnson, T.A.; Su, J.-Q.; Qiao, M.; Guo, G.-X.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Hashsham, S.A.; Tiedje, J.M. Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3435–3440. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, C.-M.; Yu, W.-L.; Huang, M.; Liu, J.-J.; Chen, I.-C.; Chen, H.-F.; Wu, L.-T. Characterization of IS26-composite transposons and multidrug resistance in conjugative plasmids from Enterobacter cloacae. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 59, 516–525. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dolejska, M.; Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Medvecky, M.; Davidova-Gerzova, L.; Valcek, A. Characterization of the Complete Nucleotide Sequences of IMP-4-Encoding Plasmids, Belonging to Diverse Inc Families, Recovered from Enterobacteriaceae Isolates of Wildlife Origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02434-17. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mangat, C.S.; Bekal, S.; Irwin, R.J.; Mulvey, M.R. A Novel Hybrid Plasmid Carrying Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes in Salmonella enterica Serovar Dublin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02601-16. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tseng, S.-P.; Wang, S.-F.; Ma, L.; Wang, T.-Y.; Yang, T.-Y.; Siu, L.K.; Chuang, Y.-C.; Lee, P.-S.; Wang, J.-T.; Wu, T.-L.; et al. The plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance determinants and synergy of fosfomycin and meropenem in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 50, 653–661. [Google Scholar]
  24. Venturini, C.; Hassan, K.A.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Paulsen, I.T.; Walker, M.J.; Djordjevic, S.P. Sequences of two related multiple antibiotic resistance virulence plasmids sharing a unique IS26-related molecular signature isolated from different Escherichia coli pathotypes from different hosts. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78862. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reid, C.J.; Wyrsch, E.R.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Zingali, T.; Liu, M.; Darling, A.E.; Chapman, T.A.; Djordjevic, S.P. Porcine commensal Escherichia coli: A reservoir for class 1 integrons associated with IS26. Microb. Genom. 2017, 3. [Google Scholar]
  26. Reid, C.J.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Djordjevic, S.P. Tn6026 and Tn6029 are found in complex resistance regions mobilised by diverse plasmids and chromosomal islands in multiple antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Plasmid 2015, 80, 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  27. Partridge, S.R.; Zong, Z.; Iredell, J.R. Recombination in IS26 and Tn2 in the evolution of multiresistance regions carrying blaCTX-M-15 on conjugative IncF plasmids from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4971–4978. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, B.-T.; Song, F.-J.; Zou, M.; Hao, Z.-H.; Shan, H. Emergence of Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-1 in Cronobacter sakazakii Producing NDM-9 and in Escherichia coli from the Same Animal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, Z.; Fu, Y.; Du, X.-D.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Y. Potential transferability of mcr-3 via IS26-mediated homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 55. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cain, A.K.; Liu, X.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Hall, R.M. Transposons related to Tn1696 in IncHI2 plasmids in multiply antibiotic resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from Australian animals. Microb. Drug Resist. 2010, 16, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  31. Baquero, F.; Martínez, J.-L.; Cantón, R. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  32. Martinez, J.L. Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2893–2902. [Google Scholar]
  33. Birkegård, A.C.; Halasa, T.; Folkesson, A.; Clasen, J.; Græsbøll, K.; Toft, N. Persistence of antimicrobial resistance genes from sows to finisher pigs. Prev. Vet. Med. 2018, 149, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  34. Callens, B.; Faes, C.; Maes, D.; Catry, B.; Boyen, F.; Francoys, D.; de Jong, E.; Haesebrouck, F.; Dewulf, J. Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mathew, A.G.; Garner, K.N.; Ebner, P.D.; Saxton, A.M.; Clift, R.E.; Liamthong, S. Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2005, 2, 212–220. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hammerum, A.M.; Larsen, J.; Andersen, V.D.; Lester, C.H.; Skovgaard Skytte, T.S.; Hansen, F.; Olsen, S.S.; Mordhorst, H.; Skov, R.L.; Aarestrup, F.M.; et al. Characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli obtained from Danish pigs, pig farmers and their families from farms with high or no consumption of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 2650–2657. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, J.; Griffiths, M.W. PCR differentiation of Escherichia coli from other Gram-negative bacteria using primers derived from the nucleotide sequences flanking the gene encoding the universal stress protein. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 27, 369–371. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sallen, B.; Rajoharison, A.; Desvarenne, S.; Mabilat, C. Molecular epidemiology of integron-associated antibiotic resistance genes in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Microb. Drug Resist. 1995, 1, 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  39. Maguire, A.J.; Brown, D.F.; Gray, J.J.; Desselberger, U. Rapid screening technique for class 1 integrons in Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria and its use in molecular epidemiology. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gillings, M.R.; Gaze, W.H.; Pruden, A.; Smalla, K.; Tiedje, J.M.; Zhu, Y.-G. Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar]
  41. Coil, D.; Jospin, G.; Darling, A.E. A5-miseq: An updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 587–589. [Google Scholar]
  42. Clermont, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Bingen, E. Rapid and simple determination of theEscherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4555–4558. [Google Scholar]
  43. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mobley, H.L.; Chippendale, G.R.; Tenney, J.H.; Hull, R.A.; Warren, J.W. Expression of type 1 fimbriae may be required for persistence of Escherichia coli in the catheterized urinary tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1987, 25, 2253–2257. [Google Scholar]
  45. Langermann, S.; Palaszynski, S.; Barnhart, M.; Auguste, G.; Pinkner, J.S.; Burlein, J.; Barren, P.; Koenig, S.; Leath, S.; Jones, C.H.; et al. Prevention of mucosal Escherichia coli infection by FimH-adhesin-based systemic vaccination. Science 1997, 276, 607–611. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nolan, L.K.; Horne, S.M.; Giddings, C.W.; Foley, S.L.; Johnson, T.J.; Lynne, A.M.; Skyberg, J. Resistance to serum complement, iss, and virulence of avian Escherichia coli. Vet. Res. Commun. 2003, 27, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jerse, A.E.; Yu, J.; Tall, B.D.; Kaper, J.B. A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 7839–7843. [Google Scholar]
  48. Neves, B.C.; Knutton, S.; Trabulsi, L.R.; Sperandio, V.; Kaper, J.B.; Dougan, G.; Frankel, G. Molecular and ultrastructural characterisation of EspA from different enteropathogenicEscherichia coli serotypes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 169, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnson, J.R.; Russo, T.A. Molecular epidemiology of extraintestinal pathogenic (uropathogenic) Escherichia coli. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 295, 383–404. [Google Scholar]
  50. Micenková, L.; Štaudová, B.; Bosák, J.; Mikalová, L.; Littnerová, S.; Vrba, M.; Ševčíková, A.; Woznicová, V.; Šmajs, D. Bacteriocin-encoding genes and ExPEC virulence determinants are associated in human fecal Escherichia coli strains. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 109. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kidsley, A.K.; Abraham, S.; Bell, J.M.; O’Dea, M.; Laird, T.J.; Jordan, D.; Mitchell, P.; McDevitt, C.A.; Trott, D.J. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Isolates From Healthy Pigs in Australia: Results of a Pilot National Survey. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1207. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gerhold, G.; Schulze, M.H.; Gross, U.; Bohne, W. Multilocus sequence typing and CTX-M characterization of ESBL-producing E. coli: A prospective single-centre study in Lower Saxony, Germany. Epidemiol. Infect. 2016, 144, 3300–3304. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ding, Y.; Tang, X.; Lu, P.; Wu, B.; Xu, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, R.; Bei, W.; Chen, H.; Tan, C. Clonal analysis and virulent traits of pathogenic extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates from swine in China. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 140. [Google Scholar]
  54. Reid, C.J.; DeMaere, M.Z.; Djordjevic, S.P. Australian porcine clonal complex 10 (CC10) Escherichia coli belong to multiple sublineages of a highly diverse global CC10 phylogeny. Microb. Genom. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar]
  55. Spencer, B.T.; Howell, P.G. Some husbandry factors influencing weaning stresses in piglets. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1989, 60, 62–64. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Fang, C.; Zhao, L.; Chen, F. The Maturing Development of Gut Microbiota in Commercial Piglets during the Weaning Transition. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1688. [Google Scholar]
  57. Herrero-Fresno, A.; Ahmed, S.; Hansen, M.H.; Denwood, M.; Zachariasen, C.; Olsen, J.E. Genotype variation and genetic relationship among Escherichia coli from nursery pigs located in different pens in the same farm. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 5. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ahmed, S.; Olsen, J.E.; Herrero-Fresno, A. The genetic diversity of commensal Escherichia coli strains isolated from non-antimicrobial treated pigs varies according to age group. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178623. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jensen, A.N.; Hansen, L.L.; Baggesen, D.L.; Mølbak, L. Effects of feeding finisher pigs with chicory or lupine feed for one week or two weeks before slaughter with respect to levels of Bifidobacteria and Campylobacter. Animal 2013, 7, 66–74. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sekirov, I.; Russell, S.L.; Antunes, L.C.M.; Finlay, B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 859–904. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dawes, F.E.; Kuzevski, A.; Bettelheim, K.A.; Hornitzky, M.A.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Walker, M.J. Distribution of class 1 integrons with IS26-mediated deletions in their 3′-conserved segments in Escherichia coli of human and animal origin. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12754. [Google Scholar]
  62. McKinnon, J.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Djordjevic, S.P. Genomic analysis of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli ST58 causing urosepsis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 430–435. [Google Scholar]
  63. Perreten, V.; Boerlin, P. A new sulfonamide resistance gene (sul3) in Escherichia coli is widespread in the pig population of Switzerland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1169–1172. [Google Scholar]
  64. Billman-Jacobe, H.; Liu, Y.; Haites, R.; Weaver, T.; Robinson, L.; Marenda, M.; Dyall-Smith, M. pSTM6-275, a Conjugative IncHI2 Plasmid of Salmonella enterica That Confers Antibiotic and Heavy-Metal Resistance under Changing Physiological Conditions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar]
  65. Moran, R.A.; Holt, K.E.; Hall, R.M. pCERC3 from a commensal ST95 Escherichia coli: A ColV virulence-multiresistance plasmid carrying a sul3-associated class 1 integron. Plasmid 2016, 84–85, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  66. Gündoğdu, A.; Long, Y.B.; Vollmerhausen, T.L.; Katouli, M. Antimicrobial resistance and distribution of sul genes and integron-associated intI genes among uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Queensland, Australia. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 1633–1642. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cummins, M.L.; Reid, C.J.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Bushell, R.N.; Esbert, N.; Tivendale, K.A.; Noormohammadi, A.H.; Islam, S.; Marenda, M.S.; Browning, G.F.; et al. Whole genome sequence analysis of Australian avian pathogenic Escherichia coli that carry the class 1 integrase gene. Microb. Genom. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar]
  68. Djordjevic, S.P.; Stokes, H.W.; Roy Chowdhury, P. Mobile elements, zoonotic pathogens and commensal bacteria: Conduits for the delivery of resistance genes into humans, production animals and soil microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 86. [Google Scholar]
  69. Fang, L.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Li, S.; Liao, X.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y. Co-spread of metal and antibiotic resistance within ST3-IncHI2 plasmids from E. coli isolates of food-producing animals. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25312. [Google Scholar]
  70. Reid, C.J.; McKinnon, J.; Djordjevic, S.P. Clonal ST131-H22 Escherichia coli strains from a healthy pig and a human urinary tract infection carry highly similar resistance and virulence plasmids. Microb. Genom. 2019, 5, e000295. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lillehoj, H.; Liu, Y.; Calsamiglia, S.; Fernandez-Miyakawa, M.E.; Chi, F.; Cravens, R.L.; Oh, S.; Gay, C.G. Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 76. [Google Scholar]
  72. Johnson, J.R.; Stell, A.L. Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 261–272. [Google Scholar]
  73. Baranzoni, G.M.; Fratamico, P.M.; Gangiredla, J.; Patel, I.; Bagi, L.K.; Delannoy, S.; Fach, P.; Boccia, F.; Anastasio, A.; Pepe, T. Characterization of Shiga Toxin Subtypes and Virulence Genes in Porcine Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 574. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jarocki, V.M.; Reid, C.J.; Chapman, T.A.; Djordjevic, S.P. Escherichia coli ST302: Genomic Analysis of Virulence Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance Mediated by Mobile Genetic Elements. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 3098. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wyrsch, E.R.; Reid, C.J.; DeMaere, M.Z.; Liu, M.Y.; Chapman, T.A.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Djordjevic, S.P. Complete Sequences of Multiple-Drug Resistant IncHI2 ST3 Plasmids in Escherichia coli of Porcine Origin in Australia. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 18. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wyrsch, E.; Roy Chowdhury, P.; Abraham, S.; Santos, J.; Darling, A.E.; Charles, I.G.; Chapman, T.A.; Djordjevic, S.P. Comparative genomic analysis of a multiple antimicrobial resistant enterotoxigenic E. coli O157 lineage from Australian pigs. BMC Genomics 2015, 16, 1382. [Google Scholar]
  77. Brilhante, M.; Perreten, V.; Donà, V. Multidrug resistance and multivirulence plasmids in enterotoxigenic and hybrid Shiga toxin-producing/enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheic pigs in Switzerland. Vet. J. 2019, 244, 60–68. [Google Scholar]
  78. García, V.; García, P.; Rodríguez, I.; Rodicio, R.; Rodicio, M.R. The role of IS26 in evolution of a derivative of the virulence plasmid of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis which confers multiple drug resistance. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 45, 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith, M.G.; Jordan, D.; Chapman, T.A.; Chin, J.J.C.; Barton, M.D.; Do, T.N.; Fahy, V.A.; Fairbrother, J.M.; Trott, D.J. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles in multi-drug resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 145, 299–307. [Google Scholar]
  80. Abraham, S.; Jordan, D.; Wong, H.S.; Johnson, J.R.; Toleman, M.A.; Wakeham, D.L.; Gordon, D.M.; Turnidge, J.D.; Mollinger, J.L.; Gibson, J.S.; et al. First detection of extended-spectrum cephalosporin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in Australian food-producing animals. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2015, 3, 273–277. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wong, M.H.-Y.; Chan, E.W.-C.; Chen, S. IS26-mediated formation of a virulence and resistance plasmid in Salmonella Enteritidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2750–2754. [Google Scholar]
  82. Australian Pork Limited Submission to Foreign Policy White Paper—Australian Pork Limited. Available online: https://australianpork.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/170228_-APL-Submission-to-Foreign-Policy-White-Paper.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2019).
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny shown as cladogram. The cladogram shows the 117 porcine commensal E. coli genomes from the present study as well as 68 from the second farm described in our previous study (labelled “F2”). Label highlight colour indicates phylogroups. Sequence types are represented by a coloured strip. Class 1 integron structures in Figure 3 are annotated with letters (a- l). “o” (black square) indicates that another integron not shown in Figure 3 was identified. “u” (white square) indicates that the integron structure was not determined.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogeny shown as cladogram. The cladogram shows the 117 porcine commensal E. coli genomes from the present study as well as 68 from the second farm described in our previous study (labelled “F2”). Label highlight colour indicates phylogroups. Sequence types are represented by a coloured strip. Class 1 integron structures in Figure 3 are annotated with letters (a- l). “o” (black square) indicates that another integron not shown in Figure 3 was identified. “u” (white square) indicates that the integron structure was not determined.
Microorganisms 08 00843 g001
Figure 2. Heat map showing proportion of sequence types (STs) carrying plasmid replicons (aqua), antimicrobial resistance genes (purple) and virulence-associated genes (red). For the full dataset see Supplementary Tables S2–S4.
Figure 2. Heat map showing proportion of sequence types (STs) carrying plasmid replicons (aqua), antimicrobial resistance genes (purple) and virulence-associated genes (red). For the full dataset see Supplementary Tables S2–S4.
Microorganisms 08 00843 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of class 1 integron structures (labeled a-l) present in the sequenced genomes. Arrows represent open reading frames (ORFs). Purple and yellow arrows represent antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and insertion sequences, respectively. Arrows with dashed lines indicate hypothetical proteins. Diagonal dashed double lines represent scaffold breaks in the sequence.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of class 1 integron structures (labeled a-l) present in the sequenced genomes. Arrows represent open reading frames (ORFs). Purple and yellow arrows represent antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and insertion sequences, respectively. Arrows with dashed lines indicate hypothetical proteins. Diagonal dashed double lines represent scaffold breaks in the sequence.
Microorganisms 08 00843 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zingali, T.; Reid, C.J.; Chapman, T.A.; Gaio, D.; Liu, M.; Darling, A.E.; Djordjevic, S.P. Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Porcine Faecal Commensal Escherichia coli Carrying Class 1 Integrons from Sows and Their Offspring. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060843

AMA Style

Zingali T, Reid CJ, Chapman TA, Gaio D, Liu M, Darling AE, Djordjevic SP. Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Porcine Faecal Commensal Escherichia coli Carrying Class 1 Integrons from Sows and Their Offspring. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(6):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060843

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zingali, Tiziana, Cameron J. Reid, Toni A. Chapman, Daniela Gaio, Michael Liu, Aaron E. Darling, and Steven P. Djordjevic. 2020. "Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Porcine Faecal Commensal Escherichia coli Carrying Class 1 Integrons from Sows and Their Offspring" Microorganisms 8, no. 6: 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060843

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop