Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory and Gut Microbiota Modulatory Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain LDTM 7511 in a Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Murine Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of a Novel Yersinia enterocolitica Strain from Bats in Association with a Bat Die-Off That Occurred in Georgia (Caucasus)
Previous Article in Journal
In vivo Fitness of Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in Murine Infection Is Associated with International Lineage II-rep-2 and International Lineage III Clones Showing High Case Fatality Rates in Human Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seroprevalence in Bats and Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in Bat Ectoparasites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Epidemiological Characteristics of the Korean Bat Paramyxovirus between 2016 and 2019

1
Department of Microbiology, College of Natural Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
2
Infectious Disease Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea
3
Bio-Analytical Science Division, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Korea
4
The Korean Institute of Biospeleology, Daejeon 34225, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(6), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060844
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 2 June 2020 / Accepted: 2 June 2020 / Published: 4 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bats in Infectiology Research—Novel Tools and New Findings)

Abstract

:
Bats are considered reservoirs of severe emerging human pathogens. Notably, bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses from the family Paramyxoviridae, order Mononegavirales. In this study, paramyxoviruses were investigated by reverse transcription semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-semi-nested PCR) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), based on the RT-semi-nested PCR using the consensus paramyxovirus primers targeting the RNA dependent-RNA-polymerase (RdRp) region. In addition, RT-PCR was performed using newly designed primers targeting regions of the fusion protein (F) and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN). The dominant bat species in the collection site of paramyxoviruses were Miniopterus schreibersii, Myotis macrodactylus, Myotis petax, and Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Paramyxoviruses were detected in four samples in 2016 and six in 2019. Meanwhile, in samples collected in 2017 and 2018, no paramyxoviruses were detected. Phylogenetic analysis based on the partial nucleotide sequences of RdRp, F, and HN proteins suggested that the viruses belonged to the proposed genus Shaanvirus. In conclusion, this study revealed that bat paramyxoviruses in Korea belonged to a single genus and circulated sporadically in several provinces, including Chungbuk, Gangwon, Jeju, and Jeonnam.

1. Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and the Ebola virus are all thought to be bat-borne viruses. In addition, the recent acute respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 is also suspected as a bat-borne virus [1]. These bat-borne viruses are primarily transmitted to humans via intermediate host animals. For SARS-CoV, this intermediate host is believed to be palm civets, while camels play that role for MERS-CoV [2,3]. The zoonotic host of the Nipah virus belonging to the paramyxovirus is the Pteropus bat and the pig is likely an amplifying host [4]. However, Nipah virus transmission from bat to human via date palm sap contaminated with urine from infected bats was identified [5,6]. Further, epidemiologic investigation of Nipah virus-associated outbreaks implicated human-to-human transmission [7]. Hence, Nipah virus was included in the WHO R&D Blueprint list to prevent public health emergencies. In addition, serological evidence of possible human infection by the Tioman virus belonging to the paramyxovirus enhances the role of bats in the epidemiologic role of pathogens [8].
The paramyxovirus family consists of several viruses having very broad host ranges [9]. Paramyxoviruses have been isolated from different vertebrates, including fish and mammals [10]. Among various vertebrates, bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses from the subfamily Orthoparamyxovirinae, family Paramyxoviridae, and order Mononegavirales [11,12]. The Hendra and Nipah viruses are emerging bat-borne infectious agents that are highly pathogenic paramyxoviruses, which have caused outbreaks of respiratory and neurological diseases in humans and domesticated mammals [13,14].
Novel paramyxoviruses are increasingly being reported around the world, with the identification of three new genera (Jeilongvirus, Narmovirus, Salemvirus) being created from the subfamily Orthoparamyxovirinae by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) [11]. Recent bat-associated paramyxoviruses were classified as a separate phylogenetic clade proposed as shaanvirus [15]. In 2018, the isolation and genetic characterization of a bat paramyxovirus in Korea was reported. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the virus belonged to the proposed shaanvirus clade [16]. However, there have been very few studies conducted on bat paramyxoviruses in Korea, except for the 2018 study.
Therefore, we investigated paramyxoviruses in Korean bat species using 473 fecal samples collected from 2016 to 2019 at 85 sites in natural bat habitats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

To avoid animal disturbance, the study was focused on the analysis of guano collected beneath bat roosting sites/colonies in Korea. This sampling design did not require ethical approval for the study. From 2016 to 2019, 473 fecal samples were collected at 85 sites in natural bat habitats (Table S1). We sampled fecal pellets directly on the cave floor with sterile swabs; fresh fecal samples were preferred. The fecal samples were immediately placed into Universal Transport Medium (Noble Biosciences™, Hwaseong, Korea). The samples were transported to the laboratory and ultimately stored at –80 °C until the analysis.

2.2. Reverse Transcription Semi-Nested PCR (RT-Semi-Nested PCR) and Reverse Transcription PCR (RT-PCR) Screening

RNA was extracted from the bat raw samples using Trizol LS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using an M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with a mixture of random hexamer. RT-semi-nested PCR was performed using a consensus paramyxovirus primer targeting the RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase (RdRp) region [15]. In addition, RT-PCR was performed with newly designed primers targeting regions of the fusion protein (F) and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) (Table 1). In this study, we used bat paramyxovirus B16-40 (accession no. MG230624.1) belonging to the proposed genus shaanvirus as a positive control and nuclease free water as a negative control.
For the first amplification in the semi-nested assay, the optimized PCR mixture contained 10 μL Accupower® PCR MasteMix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea), 7 μL nuclease free water, 1 μL each of 10 pmol forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL cDNA. The mixture was first heated to 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s, 50 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For the second amplification, we used 10 μL Accupower® PCR MasterMix, 7 μL nuclease free water, 1 μL each of 10 pmol forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL aliquot from the first reaction and the conditions were the same.
RT-PCR was performed to detect F and HN regions of paramyxoviruses. Each reaction mixture contained 10 μL Accupower® PCR MasterMix, 7 μL nuclease free water, 1 μL each of 10 pmol forward and reverse primers, and 1 μL cDNA. For the detection of the F region, the mixture was first heated to 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s, 49 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For the detection of HN region, the mixture was first heated to 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s, 50 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were revealed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and the gels were purified using ExpinTM Combo GP mini kit (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). The PCR products were submitted to the Cosmogenetech company in Daejeon, Korea, for sequencing. The nucleotide data obtained from Sanger sequencing of the PCR fragments were further analyzed with related sequences in BLASTn using BioEdit software version 7.2.5 [18].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The nucleotide sequences were aligned by the ClustalW module using BioEdit. Each sequence was trimmed to where both forward and reverse reads were a 100% match with the consensus sequence. The phylogenetic analyses were conducted with the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and the Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA version X [19].

2.4. Bat Species Identification

According to a recent report, there are 23 species of bats in Korea. Most Korean bats are thought to be insectivores, as no fruit bats have been found in Korea to date [20] due to the fecal samples collected from the cave which is the harbor for multiple bat species. DNA extraction was performed only for PCR positive individuals. DNA was extracted from the bat raw samples using QIAmp® DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, NRW, Germany). PCR was performed using a specific primer targeting the cytochrome b gene. Forward (5′-TCATCMTGATGAAAYTTYGG-3′) and reverse (5′-ACTGGYTGDCCBCCRATTCA-3′) primers targeting a 946 bp region of the cyt b gene were used. The optimized PCR mixture contained 10 μL Accupower® PCR MasteMix, 6 μL nuclease free water, 1 μL each of 10 pmol forward and reverse primers, and 2 μL DNA. The mixture was first heated to 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 47 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min [21]. The amplicons from positive PCRs were sequenced using target-specific forward and reverse primers synthesized by Cosmogenetech Co. Ltd. (Daejeon, Korea). The nucleotide data obtained from Sanger sequencing of the PCR fragments were further analyzed with related sequences in BLASTn using BioEdit.

3. Results

3.1. PCR-Based Detection of Bat Paramyxoviruses in Bat Feces

In total, 473 samples were tested for the presence of paramyxovirus by nested RT-PCR detection of an RdRp gene fragment. Paramyxoviruses were detected in 2.1% (10/473) of samples obtained from the bat natural habitats in 85 sites.
In 2016, 121 bat fecal samples were collected and four positive samples were identified based on RT-semi-nested PCR using consensus primers targeting the RdRp region. B16-6 and B16-40 were obtained at the BT cave in Hapcheon in March 2016 and G cave in Danyang in April 2016, respectively. The detection rate in March was 7.7% (1/13) and in April 20% (1/5). B16-148 was obtained at the OJ cave in Yeongwol in July 2016. B16-154 was obtained at the S cave in Pyeongchang in July 2016 (Table S1 and Figure 1). The detection rate in July was 6.7% (2/30) (Table 2 and Table S2).
A total of 214 bat fecal samples were collected between 2017 and 2018 but no samples were positive for paramyxoviruses (Table 2).
In 2019, 138 bat fecal samples were collected and six positive samples were identified based on RT-semi-nested PCR using consensus primers targeting the RdRp region. B19-3 was obtained at the SAOL cave in Seogwipo in February 2019. B19-33 was obtained at the GCS cave in Pyeongchang in April 2019. B19-112 was obtained at the LK cave in Goesan in July 2019. B19-145 was obtained at the JA cave in Pyeongchang in August 2019. B19-151 and B19-152 were obtained at the S cave in Pyeongchang in August 2019 (Table S1 and Figure 1). Positive samples were detected in February, April, July, and August with each detection rate of 12.5% (1/8), 6.7% (1/15), 3.1% (1/32) and 12% (3/25) (Table 2 and Table S2).
In addition, RT-PCR was performed only for RT-semi-nested PCR positive individuals, based on the RT-PCR using the newly designed paramyxovirus primers targeting the F and HN region. Two samples, B19-33 and B19-152, and one sample, B19-151, were positive, respectively.
The GenBank accession numbers for the nucleotide sequence in this study are MT212726, MT230548, MT264743-MT264753, and MT277365.

3.2. PCR-Based Identification of Bat Species in Bat Feces

A total of 10 paramyxoviruses were detected in bat fecal samples collected from 2016 to 2019. To identify the bat species, PCR was performed using a consensus primer targeting the cyt b gene. Cyt b sequences of approximately 946 bp were obtained from B16-148, B19-112, B19-145, B19-151, and B19-152. The major bat species were identified as Miniopterus schreibersii, Myotis macrodactylus, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, and Myotis petax. In this study, five bat paramyxovirus samples (B16-148, B19-112, B19-145, B19-151, and B19-152) were identified as bat species by PCR through special primer pairs but the others could not be identified because there were no remaining bat raw samples (Table S2).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis Based on the Genomic Nucleotide Sequence of the Paramyxovirus

Partial RdRp sequences were obtained from B16-6, B16-40, B16-148, B16-154, B19-3, B19-33, B19-112, B19-145, B19-151, and B19-152. The lengths of the sequences were 535, 467, 463, 465, 469, 487, 470, 457, 464 and 466 bp, respectively. The sequences of the partial RdRp region of the bat paramyxoviruses were analyzed with other paramyxovirus sequences from the GenBank database. The Korean bat paramyxoviruses belong to the proposed genus Shaanvirus and showed 68.99–100% nucleotide identity with the paramyxovirus isolated in Korea (Bat-ParaV/B16-40) and 69.75–77.69% nucleotide identity with the paramyxoviruses isolated in China (Bat-ParaV/Anhui2011 and Bat-ParaV/QH2013) (Figure 2). In the BT cave, one of nine fecal samples (B16-6) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 71.02% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/Anhui2011 (GenBank accession no. KC154054.1). In the G cave, one of 18 fecal samples (B16-40) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 100% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40 (GenBank accession no. MG230624.1). In the OJ cave, one of 12 fecal samples (B16-148) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 74.46% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40. In the S cave, three of 18 fecal samples (B16-154, B19-151, and B19-152) were found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 76.51% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/QH2013 (GenBank accession no. KJ641657.1) and 74.24%–74.89% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40. In the SAOL cave, one of 25 fecal samples (B19-3) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 98.72% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40. In the GCS cave, one of 26 fecal samples (B19-33) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 74.41% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40. In the LK cave, one of six fecal samples (B19-112) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 74.36% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/Anhui2011. In the JA cave, one of 35 fecal samples (B19-145) was found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 74.07% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/QH2013.
Partial F sequences were obtained from B19-33 and B19-152. The lengths of the sequences were 224 and 220 bp, respectively. The sequences of the partial F region of the bat paramyxoviruses were analyzed with other paramyxovirus sequences from the GenBank database. The Korean bat paramyxoviruses belonged to the proposed genus Shaanvirus and showed 93.75–100% nucleotide identity with the paramyxovirus isolated in Korea (Bat-ParaV/B16-40) and 93.75% nucleotide identity with the paramyxovirus isolated in China (Bat-ParaV/Anhui2011) (Figure 3). B19-33 and B19-152 were found to be a bat paramyxovirus showing 100% and 99.56% nucleotide identity with Bat-ParaV/B16-40, respectively.
A partial HN sequence was obtained from B19-151. The length of the sequence was 245 bp. The sequence of the partial HN region of the bat paramyxovirus was analyzed with other paramyxovirus sequences from the GenBank database. The Korean bat paramyxovirus belonged to the proposed genus Shaanvirus and showed 100% nucleotide identity with the paramyxovirus isolated in Korea (Bat-ParaV/B16-40) and 92.86% nucleotide identity with the paramyxovirus isolated in China (Bat-ParaV/Anhui2011) (Figure 4).
Based on the partial RdRp, F, and HN nucleotide sequences, the Korean bat paramyxoviruses belonged to the proposed genus shaanvirus. These data indicated a single, closely related group of paramyxoviruses circulating in Korea.

4. Discussion

Bats are considered natural reservoirs for various zoonotic viruses [9]. Notably, bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses [9,10,12]. In this study, we screened for bat paramyxoviruses in Korea and discovered 10 paramyxoviruses between 2016 and 2019. The National Institute of Biological Resources have reported 23 species of bat present in Korea [20]. We identified four bat species (Miniopterus schreibersii, Myotis macrodactylus, Myotis petax, and Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) based on PCR. We identified a bat species with a consensus primer that targets cyt b gene. Cyt b sequences of approximately 946 bp were obtained from B16-148, B19-112, B19-145, B19-151, and B19-152 [21].
Bat paramyxoviruses have been consistently detected in Korea. Four paramyxoviruses were detected from bat fecal samples in 2016. Paramyxoviruses were not detected in bat fecal samples in 2017 and 2018. Six paramyxoviruses were detected in bat fecal samples in 2019 (Table 2). Overall, 107 bat fecal samples were collected from natural bat habitats in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Some samples were collected at the same site where the paramyxovirus was detected but there were no positive samples in 2017 and 2018. It is expected that there is an active cycle of Korean bat paramyxoviruses.
The phylogenetic analysis based on partial RdRp nucleotide sequences indicated that Korean bat paramyxoviruses belonged to the unclassified proposed genera Shaanvirus (Figure 2). The maximum likelihood tree showed that Korean bat paramyxoviruses were closely related to the bat paramyxovirus ParaV/Anhui2011, BtMI-ParaV/QH2013, and Bat-paraV/B16-40. The newly identified bat paramyxoviruses in China, ParaV/Anhui2011 and BtMI-ParaV/QH2013, were recently proposed to be part of the Genus shaanvirus [15]. In addition, isolation of Bat-paraV/B16-40 occurred in the Korean bat Miniopterus schreibersii in a previous study in 2018 [16]. Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis based on partial F and HN nucleotide sequences showed that Korean bat paramyxoviruses are closely related to the single clade (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
B16-154, B19-151, and B19-152 are bat paramyxoviruses detected in the same cave. It was interesting that there were differences in the partial RdRp nucleotide sequence of bat paramyxoviruses detected in 2016 and 2019. Although the bat species of B16-154 sample is unclear, these results suggest the possibility of genetic diversity in the same place.
Although our results have limitations that the partial nucleotide sequence used and some information of the associated bat species were not clearly available, this study described the existence of bat paramyxovirus in Korea. Furthermore, our results revealed that paramyxoviruses circulated in bat species in Korea. Based on our discovery of paramyxoviruses in bats, it is implied that there are many more paramyxoviruses circulating in bat species and various geographic areas.
Contact between humans and wildlife was identified as the origin of the recent epidemics [22,23]. In Korea, there is usually limited contact with bats because they roost in caves or deep inside forests. However, some caves where bats roost are located near human habitats. People frequently visit caves to avoid hot weather and store fermented foods. Close human-bat interactions may lead to human exposure to zoonotic pathogens [24]. In addition, the size of bat habitats is decreasing due to indiscriminate forest destruction. The resulting bat movement increases the chances of contact with humans as well as livestock. Zoonotic pathogens in bats have the potential to be transmitted to humans and livestock. We do not know whether the paramyxoviruses detected in this study are zoonotic pathogens. To determine this, follow-up studies involving virus isolation, characterization, and genomic analysis to identify their prevalence, epidemiology and zoonotic potential are required.
In conclusion, we have detected the presence of bat paramyxoviruses and revealed that paramyxoviruses circulated in bat species in Korea. Although the partial sequence was confirmed in this study, we confirmed the diversity of the detected nucleotide sequence of bat paramyxoviruses. In addition, the phylogenetic analysis based on the partial nucleotide sequences of RdRp, F, and HN proteins suggested that the viruses belonged to the proposed genus Shaanvirus.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/6/844/s1, Table S1: Bat samples information, Table S2: Information of the positive sample.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.J., J.Y.N., V.T.L. and H.K.K.; data analysis, S.S.J.; investigation, S.S.J., J.Y.N. and V.T.L.; methodology, S.S.J. and J.Y.N.; resources, Y.G.C.; writing–original draft, S.S.J.; writing–review and editing, S.-W.Y., D.G.J., and H.K.K.; supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration, H.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the research grant of the Chungbuk National University in 2019 and supported by the BioNano Health-Guard Research Center funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea as Global Frontier Project (Grant No. H-GUARD 2013M3A6B2078954) and supported by the Beginning Independent Researcher Program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (NRF-2019R1G1A1100250).

Acknowledgments

We thank Min Chan Kim (Chungbuk National University) and Dhandapani Gowtham (Chungbuk National University) for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, Y.R.; Cao, Q.D.; Hong, Z.S.; Tan, Y.Y.; Chen, S.D.; Jin, H.J.; Tan, K.S.; Wang, D.Y.; Yan, Y. The Origin, Transmission and Clinical Therapies on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak - An Update on the Status. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Hu, B.; Ge, X.; Wang, L.F.; Shi, Z. Bat origin of human coronaviruses. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wong, S.; Lau, S.; Woo, P.; Yuen, K.Y. Bats as a continuing source of emerging infections in humans. Rev. Med. Virol. 2007, 17, 67–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rahman, M.; Chakraborty, A. Nipah virus outbreaks in Bangladesh: A deadly infectious disease. WHO South East Asia J. Public Health 2012, 1, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Islam, M.S.; Sazzad, H.M.; Satter, S.M.; Sultana, S.; Hossain, M.J.; Hasan, M.; Rahman, M.; Campbell, S.; Cannon, D.L.; Stroher, U.; et al. Nipah Virus Transmission from Bats to Humans Associated with Drinking Traditional Liquor Made from Date Palm Sap, Bangladesh, 2011–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Luby, S.P.; Rahman, M.; Hossain, M.J.; Blum, L.S.; Husain, M.M.; Gurley, E.; Khan, R.; Ahmed, B.N.; Rahman, S.; Nahar, N.; et al. Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus, Bangladesh. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1888–18894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Homaira, N.; Rahman, M.; Hossain, M.J.; Epstein, J.H.; Sultana, R.; Khan, M.S.; Podder, G.; Nahar, K.; Ahmed, B.; Gurley, E.S.; et al. Nipah virus outbreak with person-to-person transmission in a district of Bangladesh, 2007. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 1630–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yaiw, K.C.; Crameri, G.; Wang, L.; Chong, H.T.; Chua, K.B.; Tan, C.T.; Goh, K.J.; Shamala, D.; Wong, K.T. Serological Evidence of Possible Human Infection with Tioman Virus, a Newly Described Paramyxovirus of Bat Origin. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mahy, B.W.J.; van Regenmortel, M.H.V. Desk Encyclopeida of Animal and Bacterial Virology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; p. 175. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lamb, R.A.; Kolakofsky, D. Paramyxoviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication; Lippincott-Raven Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006; pp. 1449–1496. [Google Scholar]
  11. Amarasinghe, G.K.; Ayllon, M.A.; Bao, Y.; Basler, C.F.; Bavari, S.; Blasdell, K.R.; Briese, T.; Brown, P.A.; Bukreyev, A.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; et al. Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: Update 2019. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 1967–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Drexler, J.F.; Corman, V.M.; Muller, M.A.; Maganga, G.D.; Vallo, P.; Binger, T.; Gloza-Rausch, F.; Cottontail, V.M.; Rasche, A.; Yordanov, S.; et al. Bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Halpin, K.; Hyatt, A.D.; Fogarty, R.; Middleton, D.; Bingham, J.; Epstein, J.H.; Rahman, S.A.; Hughes, T.; Smith, C.; Field, H.E.; et al. Pteropid Bats are Confirmed as the Reservoir Hosts of Henipaviruses: A Comprehensive Experimental Study of Virus Transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Eaton, B.T.; Broder, C.C.; Middleton, D.; Wang, L.F. Hendra and Nipah viruses: Different and dangerous. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, Z.; Yang, L.; Ren, X.; He, G.; Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Qian, Z.; Dong, J.; Sun, L.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Deciphering the bat virome catalog to better understand the ecological diversity of bat viruses and the bat origin of emerging infectious diseases. ISME J. 2016, 10, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Noh, J.Y.; Jeong, D.G.; Yoon, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, Y.G.; Kang, S.Y.; Kim, H.K. Isolation and characterization of novel bat paramyxovirus B16–40 potentially belonging to the proposed genus Shaanvirus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tong, S.; Chern, S.W.; Li, Y.; Pallansch, M.A.; Anderson, L.J. Sensitive and broadly reactive reverse transcription-PCR assays to detect novel paramyxoviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 2652–22658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT Nucl. Nucleic Acids Symp. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, S.; Jung, C.W.; Choi, Y.G.; Kim, S.S. Sounds of the Bats in Korea. In National Institute of Biological; Resources Press: Incheon, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schlegel, M.; Ali, H.S.; Stieger, N.; Groschup, M.H.; Wolf, R.; Ulrich, R.G. Molecular Identification of Small Mammal Species Using Novel Cytochrome B Gene-Derived Degenerated Primers. Biochem. Genet. 2012, 50, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jones, K.E.; Patel, N.G.; Levy, M.A.; Storeygard, A.; Balk, D.; Gittleman, J.L.; Daszak, P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morse, S.S.; Mazet, J.A.; Woolhouse, M.; Parrish, C.R.; Carroll, D.; Karesh, W.B.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C.; Lipkin, W.I.; Daszak, P. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. Lancet 2012, 380, 1956–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, H.K.; Yoon, S.W.; Kim, D.J.; Koo, B.S.; Noh, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, Y.G.; Na, W.; Chang, K.T.; Song, D.; et al. Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Like, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Like Bat Coronaviruses and Group H Rotavirus in Faeces of Korean Bats. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2016, 63, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A map of sampling sites for positive samples. Samples were collected from around the country. Positive samples were detected in several provinces, including Gangwon, Chunbuk, Jeonnam and Jeju. In the Pyeongchang and Yeongwol Regions of Gangwon Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in five and one samples, respectively. In the Danyang and Goesan Regions of Chungbuk Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample, respectively. In the Hapcheon Region of Jeonnam Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample. In the Seogwipo Region of Jeju Island, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample.
Figure 1. A map of sampling sites for positive samples. Samples were collected from around the country. Positive samples were detected in several provinces, including Gangwon, Chunbuk, Jeonnam and Jeju. In the Pyeongchang and Yeongwol Regions of Gangwon Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in five and one samples, respectively. In the Danyang and Goesan Regions of Chungbuk Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample, respectively. In the Hapcheon Region of Jeonnam Province, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample. In the Seogwipo Region of Jeju Island, bat paramyxovirus was detected in one sample.
Microorganisms 08 00844 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase (RdRp) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses detected in 2016 are indicated by blue boxes. Korean bat paramyxoviruses detected in 2019 are indicated by red boxes.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase (RdRp) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses detected in 2016 are indicated by blue boxes. Korean bat paramyxoviruses detected in 2019 are indicated by red boxes.
Microorganisms 08 00844 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial Fusion protein (F) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses are indicated by red boxes.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial Fusion protein (F) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses are indicated by red boxes.
Microorganisms 08 00844 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial Hemagglutinin Neuraminidase (HN) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses are indicated by red boxes.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial Hemagglutinin Neuraminidase (HN) nucleotide sequences of bat paramyxoviruses detected in Korean bats and other reference viruses belonging to Paramyxoviridae. The phylogenetic tree was generated via the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrap sampling and Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA X. Korean bat paramyxoviruses are indicated by red boxes.
Microorganisms 08 00844 g004
Table 1. Information regarding the primers for RT-semi-nested PCR and RT-PCR.
Table 1. Information regarding the primers for RT-semi-nested PCR and RT-PCR.
TargetPrimerSequence
(5′-3′)
PCR MethodAmplicon Size (bp)Reference
RdRpPAR-F1GAAGGITATTGTCAIAARNTNTGGACRT-semi-nested PCR580[17]
PAR-F2GTTGCTTCAATGGTTCARGGNGAYAA
PAR-RGCTGAAGTTACIGGITCICCDATRTTNC
FF-F2ACATCAGCCCAGATTACTGCRT-PCR320This study
F-R2AGCTTGAATTGACAAGGTCT
HNHN-F2CCTAATAAACTCAGCATCAAGRT-PCR350This study
HN-R2GCTATCTGGTTGTGAGTGTA
Table 2. Number of positive samples in each month from 2016 to 2019.
Table 2. Number of positive samples in each month from 2016 to 2019.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
Year
2016--1/131/50/120/312/300/80/60/80/70/14/121
2017--0/10/210/260/180/30/130/50/100/40/60/107
2018-0/20/20/130/360/200/20/90/100/4-0/90/107
2019-1/80/191/150/200/191/323/25----6/138

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, S.S.; Noh, J.Y.; Lo, V.T.; Choi, Y.G.; Yoon, S.-W.; Jeong, D.G.; Kim, H.K. The Epidemiological Characteristics of the Korean Bat Paramyxovirus between 2016 and 2019. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060844

AMA Style

Jang SS, Noh JY, Lo VT, Choi YG, Yoon S-W, Jeong DG, Kim HK. The Epidemiological Characteristics of the Korean Bat Paramyxovirus between 2016 and 2019. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(6):844. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Seong Sik, Ji Yeong Noh, Van Thi Lo, Yong Gun Choi, Sun-Woo Yoon, Dae Gwin Jeong, and Hye Kwon Kim. 2020. "The Epidemiological Characteristics of the Korean Bat Paramyxovirus between 2016 and 2019" Microorganisms 8, no. 6: 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop