Abstract
Medical practice has changed since the classical paternalistic model to nowadays. Currently, the patient assumes a more important role in the decision making on health issues. Autonomy is a challenge both for the patient and for the doctor. It implies better knowledge, able to be applied in the acquisition of attitudes and skills toward a better health. Patients get information from many other ways complementary to the doctor–patient direct communication. Internet is one of the favorite sources of information but fails too often. We describe the Metis project, a web-based intervention for health education aiming to improve literacy for Portuguese speaking people. The Metis project develops in five complementary axes: evidence-based information, accessibility, generalization, leadership and ethical commitment. Basically, this project provides scientific rigorous health information in a clear language, understandable by the general population, unaccustomed to medical jargon. We use the internet and social networks to reach our target, improving the quality of the available information, and several other strategies to lead people to appropriate the contents and to be more conscious and truly free when they have to decide between the different options in daily life. In conclusion, electronic communication is the current favorite source of health information. However, we can easily identify numerous problems that must be addressed so it can be a real ally for the healthcare providers. The Metis project addresses some of them in a real contribution toward a better health literacy.
References
Miller, B.L.: Authonomy. In: Post, S.G. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd edn, pp. 246–251. Macmillan Reference USA, New York (2004)
Emanuel, E.J., Emanuel, L.L.: Four models of the physician-patient relationship. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 267(16), 2221–2226 (1992)
Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., Haynes, R.B.: Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh (2000)
Holmberg, C., Berg, C., Dahlgren, J., Lissner, L., Chaplin, J.E.: Health literacy in a complex digital media landscape: pediatric obesity patients’ experiences with online weight, food, and health information. Health Inform. J. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218759699
Rasche, P., Wille, M., Brohl, C., Theis, S., Schafer, K., Knobe, M., et al.: Prevalence of health app use among older adults in Germany: National Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 6(1), e26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8619
Hanif, F., Read, J.C., Goodacre, J.A., Chaudhry, A., Gibbs, P.: The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information. Inform. Health Soc. Care 34(4), 231–243 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3109/17538150903359030
Chen, Y.Y., Li, C.M., Liang, J.C., Tsai, C.C.: Health information obtained from the internet and changes in medical decision making: questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 20(2), e47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9370
Santos, P., Sá, L., Couto, L., Hespanhol, A.: Sources of information in health education: a cross-sectional study in Portuguese university students. AMJ 11(6), 352–360 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21767/AMJ.2018.3435
Shieh, C., Mays, R., McDaniel, A., Yu, J.: Health literacy and its association with the use of information sources and with barriers to information seeking in clinic-based pregnant women. Health Care Women Int. 30(11), 971–988 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330903052152
Neter, E., Brainin, E.: eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res. 14(1), e19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1619
Xavier-Elsas, P., Bastos, S.E., Gaspar-Elsas, M.I.: How reliable is online diffusion of medical information targeting patients and families? World J. Exp. Med. 5(4), 244–250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v5.i4.244
Lorence, D.P., Greenberg, L.: The zeitgeist of online health search: implications for a consumer-centric health system. J. Gen. Internal Med. 21(2), 134–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0295.x
Benigeri, M., Pluye, P.: Shortcomings of health information on the internet. Health Promot Int. 18(4), 381–386 (2003)
Ratzan, S., Parker, R.: Introduction. In: Selden, C.R., Zorn, M., Ratzan, S., Parker, R.M. (eds) Health Literacy. Current Bibliographies in medicine 2000-1. Bethesda, Md. (8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda 20894): U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, Reference Section, pp. v–vii (2000)
Santos, P.: Challenge of health literacy in cardiovascular disease prevention. J. Heart Res. 1(1), 18 (2018)
Oliveira, A.C., Santos, P.: Hypertension: drug adherence and social factors. J Hypertens Manag. 4(2), 034 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3690/1510034
Santos, P., Sá, L., Couto, L., Hespanhol, A.: Health literacy as a key for effective preventive medicine. Cogent Soc. Sci. 3(1), 1407522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1407522
Santos, P., Martins, C., Sa, L., Portinha, C., Pessanha, P., Ferreira-Silva, A., et al.: Health education: five years’ experience of teaching preventive medicine at the Faculty of Medicine of Oporto University. Educ. Primary Care 25(2), 103–107 (2014)
The Health Communication Unit. Introduction to Health Promotion Program Planning. 3.0 ed. Toronto: Centre for Health Promotion Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building (2001)
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K.: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Wiley, London (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, P., Oliveira, A.C., Beirão, D. et al. The Metis project—education for health: a project report. Univ Access Inf Soc 20, 417–420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00722-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00722-x