Skip to main content
Log in

Bioindicational Potential of Biophysical and Hydrobiological Indicators of Phytoplankton in Experiments with Laboratory Algocenoses

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioindication, a method for the assessment of the quality of the natural environment with allowance for the state of the biota, is widely used to assess the impact of various factors on an ecosystem. Two problems remain relevant: on the one hand, the adequate selection of biological indicators of the ecosystem state with the greatest bioindicative potential, and, on the other, the establishment of the numerical boundaries of the norm for the indicators. A laboratory algocenosis has been created to study the bioindicational potential of hydrobiological and biophysical indicators. It consists of representatives of various classes of microalgae and cyanobacteria: Anabaena variabilis, Pleurochloris magna, Ankistrodesmus falcatus, and Stichococcus bacillaris. Salts of copper and zinc and diuron were used as effective toxicants. The method of local ecological norms was used for the analysis of the experimental data. The method is based on a computer analysis of the interrelated distribution of biological and physicochemical characteristics, i.e., on the search for boundaries of the factor and indicator norms for which suitable values of the indicator correspond to acceptable values of the factor and unacceptable values of the factor correspond to unsuitable indicator values. The paper analyzes data on 27 bioindicators: various fluorescence indicators, spectral characteristics; number and average volumes of cells of each type; parameters of the rank distribution of the number of species in the sample; evenness indices; nonparametric indices of species diversity; and the phytoplankton saprobity index. The boundaries of each indicator norm have been calculated; the most significant factors, as well as the boundaries of those factors' norm, have been revealed and determined. The bioindicators were compared by the average strength of connection with factors, the number of found significant factors, and their geometric mean value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Allen, M.M., Simple conditions for growth of unicellular blue-green algae on plates, J. Phycol., 1968, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1‒4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fursova, P.V., Voronova, E.N., Levich, A.P., et al., Selection of species for the laboratory-reared algal community by their hydrobiological and biophysical features, Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2017, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 184–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goncharov, I.A., Levich, A.P., and Risnik, D.V., RF Patent 2012616523, 2012.

  4. Konyukhov, I.V., Selina, M.S., Morozova, T.V., and Pogosyan, S.I., Experience of continuous fluorimetric monitoring of phytoplankton at a mooring station, Oceanology (Engl. Transl.), 2012, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 130–140.

  5. Levich, A.P., Struktura ekologicheskikh soobshchestv (The Structure of Ecological Communities), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1980.

  6. Levich, A.P., Zaburdaeva, E.A., Maksimov, V.N., Bulgakov, N.G., and Mamikhin, S.V., The search for target values of quality indices for bioindicators of the ecological state and environmental factors: Case study of water bodies of the Don River, Water Resour., 2009, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 706–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levich, A.P., Bulgakov, N.G., Maksimov, V.N., and Risnik, D.V., In situ technology for local ecological standardization, in Voprosy ekologicheskogo normirovaniya i razrabotka sistemy otsenki sostoyaniya vodoemov (Ecological Standardization and the Evaluation System of the State of Reservoirs), Moscow: KMK, 2011, pp. 32–57.

  8. Levich, A.P., Bulgakov, N.G., Maksimov, V.N., and Fursova, P.V., In situ evaluation of habitat quality: general statements, Ispol’z. Okhrana Prirod. Resur. Ross., 2012, no. 6, pp. 35−37.

  9. Levich, A.P., Bulgakov, N.G., Risnik, D.V., et al., Searching for connections between biological and physico-chemical characteristics of Rybinsk Reservoir ecosystem. Part 3: Calculation of the boundaries of water quality classes, Komp. Issled. Model., 2013, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 451−471.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacArthur, R.H., Fluctuations of animal populations, and measure of community stability, Ecology, 1955, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 353–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matorin, D.N. and Alekseev, A.A., Fluorestsentsiya khlorofilla dlya biodiagnostiki rastenii (Fluorescence of Chlorophyll for Biodiagnostics of the Plants), Moscow: Al’teks, 2013.

  12. Matorin, D.N., Osipov, V.A., Yakovleva, O.V., and Pogosyan, S.I., Opredelenie sostoyaniya rastenii i vodoroslei po fluorestsentsii khlorofilla (Determination of the State of the Plants and Algae by Chlorophyll Fluorescence), Moscow: Maks-Press, 2010.

  13. Merzlyak, M.N. and Naqvi, K.R., On recording the true absorption and scattering spectrum of a turbid sample: application to cell suspensions of the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 2000, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 123–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Motomura, I., Statistical treatment of association, Jpn. J. Zool., 1932, vol. 44, pp. 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pigulevskaya, T.K., Analysis of mechanism of toxic effect of zinc on photosynthetic reactions of the plants, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 1984.

  16. Pogosyan, S.I., Gal’chuk, S.V., Kazimirko, Yu.V., Konyukhov, I.V., and Rubin, A.B., Use of MEGA-25 fluorometer for analysis of abundance of phytoplankton and its photosynthetic apparatus, Voda: Khim. Ekol., 2009, no. 6, pp. 34‒40.

  17. Risnik, D.V., Levich, A.P., Fursova, P.V., and Goncharov, I.A., The algorithm of the method for calculating quality classes’ boundaries for quantitative systems’ characteristics and for determination of interactions between characteristics. Part 1: Calculation for two quality classes, Komp. Issled. Model., 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rukovodstvo po gidrobiologicheskomu monitoringu presnovodnykh ekosistem (Manual for Hydrobiological Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems), Abakumov, V.A., Ed., St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., et al., Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods, 2012, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 676‒682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shitikov, V.K., Rozenberg, G.S., and Zinchenko, T.D., Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: metody sistemnoi identifikatsii (Quantitative Hydroecology: System Identification), Tolyatti: Inst. Ekol. Volzhsk. Basseina, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2003.

  21. Simpson, E.H., Measurement of diversity, Nature, 1949, vol. 163, no. 4148, p. 668.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The EU Water Framework Directive, 2000. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en. html.

  23. The US Clean Water Act, 1972. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Water_Act.

  24. Young, E.B. and Beardall, J., Transient perturbations in chlorophyll a fluorescence elicited by nitrogen re-supply to nitrogen-stressed microalgae: distinct responses to NO3–versus, J. Phycol., 2003, vol. 39, pp. 332–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation (agreement no. 14.616.21.0080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Fursova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by T. Kuznetsova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fursova, P.V., Bobyrev, P.A., Risnik, D.V. et al. Bioindicational Potential of Biophysical and Hydrobiological Indicators of Phytoplankton in Experiments with Laboratory Algocenoses. Biol Bull Rev 10, 193–201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420030032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420030032

Navigation