Skip to main content
Log in

Computer Simulation Model of a Hybrid Zone: Assortative Mating in the Role of Selection against Hybrids

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assumption of low hybrid fitness serves as the cornerstone in the logical justification of the discreteness of species in terms of the biological concept. The majority of natural hybrid zones are narrow and stable in time; thus, this proves, as mathematical models have shown, the existence of selection against hybrids. It is assumed that, since the coadaptive gene complexes of the parent forms are destroyed in hybrids, they must be less viable and/or fertile. However, this statement remains no more than a hypothesis. The low reproductive success of hybrids may have other causes, e.g., they may have difficulties in pair formation because of the rarity and strangeness of their appearance. A computer simulation model has been constructed to verify this assumption. The main purpose of this work is to give answers to the following questions. (1) Is it possible to form a narrow and stable hybrid zone with assortative mating but without lower viability and fertility of the hybrids? Assortative mating in the model is due to sexual imprinting: descendants remember the image of one of their parents and seek an appropriate partner. (2) Is it possible to complete the speciation process under these conditions and what is necessary for this? Here, we interpret speciation as the process of the establishment of sympatry between the initially allopatric forms with the maintenance of their appearance and a low level of hybridization. The model study gave positive answers for both questions. Without biotopic segregation and with assortative mating, the hybrid zone is narrow and stable in time. Hybrids remain unmated more often than parent forms (5–8 and 1–3% respectively), which results in selection pressure in favor of a narrow hybrid zone. In addition to assortative mating, biotopic segregation is necessary to establish sympatry, and hybrids have to be less successful than parent forms in the occupation of an individual territory. In opposite case, when the biotopes of the both parent forms are optimal for hybrids, the contact zone became wider at first and then, after the smoothing of biotopic segregation, they started to slowly shrink to a narrow hybrid zone. As a result, the two forms became indistinguishable by selectively neutral loci (DNA markers analog) over the entire space of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Alekseev, E.R., Chesnokova, O.V., and Kucher, T.V., Free Pascal i Lazarus: Uchebnik po programmirovaniyu (Free Pascal and Lazarus: Manual for Programmers), Moscow: DMK-Press, 2010.

  2. Arnold, M.L., Natural Hybridization and Evolution, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barton, N.H. and Hewitt, G.M., Analysis of hybrid zones, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1985, vol. 16, pp. 113–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Butlin, R., Speciation by reinforcement, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1987, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chernetsov, N., Sokolov, L.V., Kosarev, V., Leoke, D., Markovets, M., et al., Sex-related natal dispersal of pied flycatchers: How far away from home? Condor, 2006, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 711–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyne, J.A. and Orr, H.A., Speciation, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dobrzhanskii, F.G., Genetika i proiskhozhdenie vidov (Genetics and Species Origin), Moscow: Inst. Komp. Issled., 2010.

  8. Grabovskii, V.I., Cellular automates as simple models of complex systems, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1995a, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grabovskii, V.I., Secondary contact areas: selection effects against hybrids, mating assortativeness, and competition, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1995b, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grabovskii, V.I., Secondary contact areas: selection effects against hybrids, mating assortativeness, and competition, 2002. http://nature.air.ru/models/contact.htm.

  11. Hewitt, G.M., Hybrid zones—natural laboratories for evolutionary studies, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1988, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 158–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kryukov, A.P. and Blinov, V.N., Interaction of the hooded crow (Corvus cornix L.) and carrion crow (C. corone L.) in the sympatry and hybridization zone: is there a selection against hybrids? Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1989, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lavrenchenko, L.A., Hybrid speciation in mammals: illusion or reality? Biol. Bull. Rev., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayr, E., Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1963.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Orr, H.A., The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities, Genetics, 1995, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 1805–1813.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Panov, E.N., Gibridizatsiya i etologicheskaya izolyatsiya u ptits (Hybridization and Ethological Isolation in Birds), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.

  17. Poelstra, J.W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C.M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., et al., The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows, Science, 2014, vol. 344, no. 6190, pp. 1410–1414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Price, T.D., Speciation in Birds, Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Randler, C., Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice, Anim. Behav., 2002, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Randler, C., Mating patterns in avian hybrid zones—a meta-analysis and review, Ardea, 2008, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubtsov, A.S., Reproductive isolation and definition of a species in birds, Zool. Zh., 2015, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 816–831.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ten Cate, C., Sexual imprinting, mate preferences and plumage evolution, Acta XX Congr. Int. Ornithologici, Wellington, 1991, pp. 1081–1088.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author expresses deep gratitude to V.I. Grabovskii for in-depth analysis of the work and valuable comments during preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 17-04-00903 and 18-04-00770).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Rubtsov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubtsov, A.S. Computer Simulation Model of a Hybrid Zone: Assortative Mating in the Role of Selection against Hybrids. Biol Bull Rev 10, 186–192 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420030068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420030068

Navigation