Skip to main content
Log in

A methodology for designing cutting drum of surface miner to achieve production of desired chip size

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The size of coal chips, produced during coal cutting operations, is of prime importance from the viewpoint of feed size desired by power plants. Proper chip size in cutting can eliminate primary crushing and in-turn save energy. Achieving a designated size of chip is intimately linked with the drum design inter alia the wrap angle, line spacing of picks and pick size. Operating parameters namely cutting speed and drum speed also influence the output. Considering the increased need to produce a sized product for cost-effective mining, a design methodology was developed to achieve a required chip size for surface miners with a middle drum configuration. Various pick, drum and operational parameters were taken into account for the development of drum design, namely drum width, drum diameter, pick size, clearance angle, rake angle, cutting angle, lacing pattern, angle of wrap, depth of cut, indented depth of cut and pick spacing. Limiting factors for drum design such as the number of picks, pick temperature, strength of pick, depth of cut and dust generation were discussed. A new drum configuration for achieving 100 mm chip size was validated which showed close agreement with the output produced using 2200SM model surface miner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prakash A, Murthy V M S R and Singh K B 2015 Chip size characterization for selecting optimum production parameters of surface miner operating in a coal mine. Curr. Sci. 108(3): 422-426

  2. Adebayo B 2008 Evaluation of cuttability of selected rocks in South-Western Nigeria. Aus. J. Tech. 12(2): 126–129

  3. Evans I 1984 Basic mechanics of the point attack pick. Coll. Guardian. 189–193

  4. Goktan R M and Gunes N 2005 A semi-empirical approach to cutting force prediction for point-attack picks. J. S. Afr. I. Min. Metall. 105: 257–263

  5. Roxborough F F and Liu Z C 1995 Theoretical considerations on pick shape in rock and coal cutting. In: Golosinski T S, (editor), Proceedings of the 6th Underground Operator’s Conference, Kalgoorlie, WA, Australia, pp. 189–193

  6. Peng S S 2019 Longwall Mining, 3rd edition, Publisher CRC Press/Balkema, The Netherlands: 546

  7. www.wirtgen.com. Accessed 24 September 2012

  8. Plis M N, Winguist C F and Roepke W W 1988 Preliminary evaluation of the relationship of bit wear to cutting distance, force and dust using selected commercial and experimental coal-and-rock-cutting tools. USBM RI 9193

  9. Hurt K G and Evans I 1980 A laboratory study of the rock cutting using point attack tools. In: Summers D, editor, Proceedings of the 21st US rock mechanics symposium, Missouri-Rolla, AIME, pp. 112–121

  10. Hurt K G and MacAndrew K M 1985 Cutting efficiency and life of rock cutting picks. Min. Sci. Tech. 2: 139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Casteel K 1995 Manufacturing report. World Min. Equip. June: 42–43

  12. Pozin E Z, Melamed V Z and Ton V V 1989 Coal cutting by winning machines. Russian Translations Series 74, A. A. Balkema Publishers.

  13. Murthy V M S R 1988 Abrasivity of Indian coals and evaluation of power rating of longwall shearers. M. Tech. dissertation, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad

  14. Brooker C M 1979 Theoretical and practical aspects of cutting and loading by shearer drums, Part I. Coll. Guard. Coal Int. January and April: 41–50

  15. Johson S T and Fowell R J 1986 Compressive strength is not enough. In: Hartman H L, editor, Proceedings of the 27th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, pp. 840–845

  16. www.wirtgen.ed. Accessed 10 July 2013

  17. Loui J P and Rao U M K 2005 Heat transfer simulation in drag–pick cutting of rocks. Tunn. Underg. Sp. Tech. May 20 (3): 263–270

  18. Prakash A 2013 A study into the influence of intact rock and rock mass properties on the performance of surface miners in Indian geo-mining conditions. PhD Thesis, Mining Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented here forms a part of the Ph.D. work of the first author at Indian School of Mines (ISM), Dhanbad and thus the authors acknowledge the support of Department of Mining Engineering, ISM for making use of different facilities. Thanks are due to mine management and machine manufactures for providing required support in carrying out the field investigations. The authors also thank the Director, Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research, Dhanbad, for permitting to publish the paper. The views expressed in this paper are those of authors and not necessarily of the organizations they represent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Prakash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakash, A., Murthy, V.M.S.R., Singh, K.B. et al. A methodology for designing cutting drum of surface miner to achieve production of desired chip size. Sādhanā 45, 143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01387-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01387-1

Keywords

Navigation