Abstract
Root system architecture (RSA) has positive effects on wheat growth and its yield performance. As root features are difficult to manipulate through conventional breeding strategies, marker-trait association (MTA) could be helpful for the improvement of RSA. In the present study, 112 durum wheat genotypes were investigated for several root system features as well as some agronomic traits. The population was genotyped using a 15K SNP and a total of 3321 markers were used in the association analysis. A total of 581 significant marker-trait associations were identified in all of the 14 chromosomes. The percentages of phenotypic variation (R2) of measured traits varied between 8.76 and 24.81%. Out of 581 associated markers, 125 loci were linked with multiple traits. The most significant associations on measured traits were detected for genome B compared to genome A (61% vs 39%). Also, major associated loci existed on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 2B, 3B, and 5B, which could be considered in the future breeding programs to manipulate relevant traits using marker-assisted selection procedures. Among associated SNP markers, most markers were related to the number of days to spike heading (181), anthesis (53), booting (69), physiological maturity (41), water use efficiency (109), and transpiration efficiency (24). Furthermore, the large number of QTLs (167 in total) for RSA and agronomic traits were detected. The highest numbers of QTLs were related to WUE (23), DAS (23), DB (21), and DA (20) than other traits. Among the detected QTLs, 16 QTLs for RSA overlapped with different agronomic traits, as well as 6 QTLs co-located with other RSA traits in at last one trait. These results are helpful for better understanding the genetic basis of root system features and agronomic traits. Furthermore, these results could be valuable for facilitating pyramiding of the ideal alleles using the MAS approach for favorable plant-type and high water use efficiency in the future durum wheat breeding programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadi J, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Fabriki-Ourang S, Mehrabi AA, Siddique KHM (2018a) Screening wild progenitors of wheat for salinity stress at early stages of plant growth: insight into potential sources of variability for salinity adaptation in wheat. Crop Pasture Sci 69:649–658
Ahmadi J, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Fabriki-Ourang S, Mehrabi AA, Siddique KHM (2018b) Screening wheat germplasm for seedling root architectural traits under contrasting water regimes: potential sources of variability for drought adaptation. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:1351–1365
Ahmadi J, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Ourang SF, Mehrabi AA, Siddique KHM (2018c) Wild relatives of wheat: Aegilops–Triticum accessions disclose differential antioxidative and physiological responses to water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 40:90
Alahmad S, El Hassouni K, Bassi FM, Dinglasan E, Youssef C, Quarry G, Aksoy A, Mazzucotelli E, Juhasz A, Able JA, Christopher J, Voss-Fels KP, Hickey LT (2019) A major root architecture QTL responding to water limitation in durum wheat. Front Plant Sci 10:436
Bai C, Liang Y, Hawkesford MJ (2013) Identification of QTLs associated with seedling root traits and their correlation with plant height in wheat. J Exp Bot 64:1745–1753
Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Shahid MQ, Çiftçi V, E. Sáenz de Miera L, Aasim M, Nadeem MA, Aktaş H, Özkan H, Hatipoğlu R (2017) A whole genome DArTseq and SNP analysis for genetic diversity assessment in durum wheat from central Fertile Crescent. PLoS One 12:e0167821
Bashiri H, Cheghamirza K, Arji I, Mahmodi N (2017) Assessing genetic diversity of Pyrus spp. in the central Zagros mountains based on morphological characters. Genet Resour crop Evol 64:391
Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop Res 112:119–123
Bodner G, Leitner D, Nakhforoosh A, Sobotik M, Moder K, Kaul HP (2013) A statistical approach to root system classification. Front Plant Sci 4:2–15
Boukid F, Dall’Asta M, Bresciani L, Mena P, Del Rio D (2019) Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of landraces, old and modern Tunisian durum wheat. Eur Food Res Technol 245:73–82
Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635
Bramley H, Turner NC, Siddique KHM (2013) Water use efficiency. In: Kole C (ed) Genomics and breeding for climate resilient crops. Springer Science & Business Media, pp 225–269
Cane MA, Maccaferri M, Nazemi G, Salvi S, Frncisa R, Colalongo C, Tuberosa R (2014) Association mapping for root architectural traits in durum wheat seedlings as related to agronomic performance. Mol Breeding 34:1629–1645
Christopher J, Christopher M, Jennings R, Jones S, Fletcher S, Borrell A, Manschadi AM, Jordan D, Mace E, Hammer G (2013) QTL for root angle and number in a population developed from bread wheats (Triticum aestivum) with contrasting adaptation to water-limited environments. Theor Appl Genet 126:1563–1574
Debibakas S, Rocher S, Garsmeur O, Toubi L, Roques D, D’Hont A, Hoarau JY, Daugrois JH (2014) Prospecting sugarcane resistance to sugarcane yellow leaf virus by genome-wide association. Theor Appl Genet 127:1719–1732
Deschamps S, Campbell M (2010) Utilization of next-generation sequencing platforms in plant genomics and genetic variant discovery. Mol Breed 25:553–570
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361
Edae EA, Byrne PF, Manmathan H, Haley SD, Moragues M, Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2013) Association mapping and nucleotide sequence variation in five drought tolerance candidate genes in spring wheat. Plant Genome 6:1–13
Ehdaie B, Mohammadi SA, Nouraein M (2016) QTLs for root traits at mid-tillering and for root and shoot traits at maturity in a RIL population of spring bread wheat grown under well-watered conditions. Euphytica 211:17–38
El Hassouni K, Alahmad B, Belkadi B, Filali-Maltouf L, Hickey LT, Bassi FM (2018) Root system architecture and its association with yield under different water regimes in durum wheat. Crop Sci 58:1–16
Fitter A (2002) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Beeckman T, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half, CRC Press, pp 15–32
Flint-Garcia SA, Thornsberry JM, Buckler ES (2003) Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:357–374
Gao Y, Duan A, Qiu X, Liu Z, Sun J, Zhang J, Wang H (2010) Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agric Water Manag 98:199–212
Giunta F, Pruneddu G, Motzo R (2019) Grain yield and grain protein of old and modern durum wheat cultivars grown under different cropping systems. Field Crop Res 230:107–120
Gould SH (1955) The methods of Archimedes. Am Math Mon 62:473–476
Graziani M, Maccaferri M, Royo C, Salvatorelli F, Tuberosa R (2014) QTL dissection of yield components and morphophysiological traits in a durum wheat elite population tested in contrasting thermo-pluviometric conditions. Crop & Pasture Sci 65:80–95
Gurung S, Mamidi S, Bonman JM, Xiong M, Brown-Guedira G, Adhikari TB (2014) Genome-wide association study reveals novel quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to multiple leaf spot diseases of spring wheat. PLoS One 9:e108179
Hajabbasi MA (2001) Tillage effects on soil compactness and wheat root morphology. J Agric Sci Technol 3:67–77
House MA, Griswold CK, Lukens LN (2014) Evidence for selection on gene expression in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa). Mol Biol Evol 31:1514–1525
Hu X, Ren J, Ren X, Huang S, Sabiel SAI, Luo M, Nevo E, Fu C, Peng J, Sun D (2015) Association of agronomic traits with SNP markers in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. durum (Desf.)). PLoS One 10:e0130854
Huang S, Sun L, Hu X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Nevo E, Peng J, Sun D (2018) Associations of canopy leaf traits with SNP markers in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. durum (Desf.)). PLoS One 13:e0206226
Hwang EY, Song Q, Jia G, Specht JE, Hyten DL, Costa J, Cregan PB (2014) A genome-wide association study of seed protein and oil content in soybean. BMC Genome 15:1
IBPGR (1985) Revised descriptor list for wheat (Triticum spp.). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy
Ju C, Zhang W, Liu Y, Gao Y, Wang X, Yan J, Yang X, Li J (2018) Genetic analysis of seedling root traits reveals the association of root trait with other agronomic traits in maize. BMC Plant Biol 18:171
Khalili M, Pour Aboughadareh A, Naghavi MR (2013) Screening of drought tolerant cultivars in barley using morpho-physiological traits and integrated selection index under water deficit stress condition. Advanced Crop Science 3:462–471
Le Gouis J, Bordes J, Ravel C, Heumez E, Faure S, Praud S, Galic N, Remoue C, Balfourier F, Allard V, Rousset M (2012) Genome-wide association analysis to identify chromosomal regions determining components of earliness in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 124:597–611
Lewien M, Carter A, Pumphrey M, Talbert L, Akhunov E (2016) Nested association mapping of water use efficiency in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using carbon isotope discrimination analysis and remote sensing traits. International Annual Meetings, 6-9 November, Phoenix, Arizona
Ma J, Luo W, Zhang H, Zhou XH, Qin NN, Wei YM, Liu YX, Jiang QT, Chen GY, Zheng YL, Lan XJ (2017) Identification of quantitative trait loci for seedling root traits from Tibetan semi-wild wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. tibetanum). Genome 60:1068–1075
Maccaferri M, El-Feki W, Nazemi G, Salvi S, Angela Cane M, Colalongo MC, Stefanelli S, Tuberosa R (2016) Prioritizing quantitative trait loci for root system architecture in tetraploid wheat. J Exp Bot 67:1161–1178
Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Corneti S, Ortega JLA, Salem MB, Bort J, DeAmbrogio E, del Moral LFG, Demontis A, el-Ahmed A, Maalouf F, Machlab H, Martos V, Moragues M, Motawaj J, Nachit M, Nserallah N, Ouabbou H, Royo C, Slama A, Tuberosa R (2008) Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and adaptation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) across a wide range of water availability. Genetics 178:489–511
Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Demontis A, El-Ahmed A, del Moral LG, Maalouf F, Nachit M, Nserallah N, Ouabbou H, Rhouma S, Royo C, Villegas D, Tuberosa R (2011) Association mapping in durum wheat grown across a broad range of water regimes. J Exp Bot 62:409–438
Mackay I, Powell W (2007) Methods for linkage disequilibrium mapping in crops. Trends Plant Sci 12:57–63
Mahanta D, Rai RK, Mishra SD, Raja A, Purakayastha TJ, Varghese E (2014) Influence of phosphorus and biofertilizers on soybean and wheat root growth and properties. Field Crop Res 166:1–9
Maulana F, Ayalew H, Anderson JD, Kumssa TT, Huang W, Ma XF (2018) Genome-wide association mapping of seedling heat tolerance in winter wheat. Front Plant Sci 9:1272
Mwadzingeni L, Shimelis H, Rees DJG, Tsilo TJ (2017) Genome-wide association analysis of agronomic traits in wheat under drought stressed and non-stressed conditions. PLoS One 12:e0171692
Newman EI (1966) A method for estimating the total length of roots in a sample. J Appl Ecol 3:139–145
Paula P, Pausas JG (2011) Root traits explain different foraging strategies between resprouting life histories. Oecologia 165:321–331
Peng J, Sun D, Nevo E (2011) Wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, occupies a pivotal position in wheat domestication process. Aust J Crop Sci 5:1127–1143
Phung NTP, Mai CD, Hoang GT, Truong HTM, Lavarenne J, Gonin M (2016) Genome-wide association mapping for root traits in a panel of rice accessions from Vietnam. BMC Plant Biol 16:64
Pierret A, Moran CJ, Mclachlan CB, Kirby JM (2000) Measurement of root length density in intact samples using x-radiography and image analysis. Image Anal Stereol 19:145–149
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Ahmadi J, Mehrabi AA, Etminan A, Moghaddam M, Siddique KHM (2017) Physiological responses to drought stress in wild relatives of wheat: implications for wheat improvement. Acta Physiol Plant 39:106
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Ren Y, Qian Y, Xu Y, Zou C, Liu D, Zhao X, Zhang A, Tong Y (2017) Characterization of QTLs for root traits of wheat grown under different nitrogen and phosphorus supply levels. Front Plant Sci 8:2096
Robredo A, Perez-Lopez U, de la Maza HS, Gonzalez-Moro B, Lacuesta M, Mena-Petite A, Munzo-Rueda A (2007) Elevated CO2 alleviates the impact of drought on barley improving water status by lowering stomatal conductance and delaying its effects on photosynthesis. Environ Exp Bot 59:252–263
Ruiz M, Giraldo P, Gonzalez JM (2018) Phenotypic variation in root architecture traits and their relationship with eco-geographical and agronomic features in a core collection of tetraploid wheat landraces (Triticum turgidum L.). Euphytica 214:54
Ryser P (2006) The mysterious root length. Plant Soil 286:1–6
Sabiel SAI, Huang S, Hu X, Ren X, Fu C, Peng J, Sun D (2017) SNP-based association analysis for seedling traits in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. durum (Desf.)). Breed Sci 67:83–94
Schenk MK, Barber SA (1979) Root characteristics of corn genotypes as related to P uptake. Agron J 71:921–927
Siosemardeh A, Osmani Z, Bahraminejad B, Vahabi K, Roohi E (2012) Identification of AFLP markers associated with stress tolerance index in Sardari wheat ecotypes. J Agr Sci Tech 14:629–643
Sukumaran S, Reynolds MP, Sansaloni C (2018) Genome-wide association analyses identify QTL hotspots for yield and component traits in durum wheat grown under yield potential, drought, and heat stress environments. Front Plant Sci 9:81
Sun X, Du Z, Ren J, Amombo E, Hu T, Fu J (2015) Association of SSR markers with functional traits from heat stress in diverse tall fescue accessions. BMC Plant Biol 15:116–149
Trebbi D, Maccaferri M, de Heer P, Sorensen A, Giuliani S, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Massi A, va der Vossen EA, Tuberosa R (2011) High-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Theor Appl Genet 123:555–569
Varshney RK, Spurthi N, Nayak S, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27:522–530
Wahl S, Ryser P (2000) Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. New Phytol 148:459–471
Waines JG, Ehdaie B (2007) Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat. Ann Bot 100:991–998
Wang S, Wong D, Forrest K, Allen A, Chao S, Huang BE, Maccaferri M, Salvi S, Milner SG, Cattivelli L, Mastrangelo AM, Whan A, Stephen S, Barker G, Wieseke R, Plieske J, International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, Lillemo M, Mather D, Appels R, Dolferus R, Brown-Guedira G, Korol A, Akhunova AR, Feuillet C, Salse J, Morgante M, Pozniak C, Luo MC, Dvorak J, Morell M, Dubcovsky J, Ganal M, Tuberosa R, Lawley C, Mikoulitch I, Cavanagh C, Edwards KJ, Hayden M, Akhunov E (2014) Characterization of polyploidy wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol J 12:787–796
Wehner G, Balko C, Ordon F (2016) QTL for water use related traits in juvenile barley. Agronomy 6:62
XLSTAT (2017) Data analysis and statistical solution for Microsoft excel. Addinsoft; Paris
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CG (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421
Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome 1:5–20
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank the Department of Gene Bank, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Germany for making the genotypic data. Also, the authors are grateful to Dr. Marion Roder, from the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant, for her fruitful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: AAM and AP; methodology: AAM, AP, and AH; investigation: AAM and SM. Software: AM and AP; writing—original draft: AAM and AP; writing—review and editing: AAM, AP, SM and AH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Table S1
Pearson’s correlation matrix for 26 root and agronomic traits in 112 durum wheat genotypes (DOCX 22 kb)
Table S2
Variable loading scores of 26 root and agronomic traits and the proportion of variation of each principal component (DOCX 15 kb)
Table S3
Significant trait-SNP marker association pairs for measured root and agronomic traits in 112 durum wheat genotypes (XLSX 47 kb)
Table S4
The SNP marker loci associated with multiple traits in durum wheat genotypes (XLSX 18 kb)
Fig. S1
Frequency distribution of the measured traits. (A) number of seminal roots, (B) length of maximum seminal root, (C) average of seminal root length, (D) sum of seminal root length, (E) root fresh weight, (F) root dry weight, (G) root length, (H) root surface area, (I) root fineness, (J) root diameter, (K) root surface density, (L) specific root length (PNG 1191 kb)
Fig. S2
Frequency distribution of the measured traits. (A) root length density, (B) root tissue density, (C) root volume, (D) days to appearance of spike, (E) days to anthesis, (F) days to booting, (G) days to physiological maturity, (H) grain filling period, (I) number of grains per spike, (J) root diameter, (K) 100-grains weight, (L) grain yield (PNG 1279 kb)
Fig. S3
Frequency distribution of the measured traits. (A) water use efficiency and (B) transpiration efficiency (PNG 208 kb)
Fig. S4
Genome LD decay of whole genome (PNG 358 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehrabi, A.A., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mansouri, S. et al. Genome-wide association analysis of root system architecture features and agronomic traits in durum wheat. Mol Breeding 40, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-020-01136-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-020-01136-6