Abstract
In the past few decades, the demand for electricity has increased substantially. A number of factors affect this rapid rise in electricity demand. With this increased demand the role of transmission network becomes crucial for suitable operation, especially under restructured environment. The different limitations such as stability limit, voltage limit and thermal limits enforce restrictions on power wheeling capability of transmission lines. The major issues associated with power industry especially in the pool-based market are the recovery of transmission costs apportioned between the diverse. Restructuring of the electricity supply industry has taken place around the world. This restructuring consists of various new aspects such as transmission embedded cost allocation, reactive power cost allocation, transmission loss allocation, the impact of power flow regulating devices etc. Many methodologies and algorithms were proposed for addressing these issues. In this paper, FACTS incorporated power flow model is used for the determination of flow of real and reactive power by using the power flow tracing principle, which involves matrix properties for the real and reactive power allocation and cost allocation for different participants. FACTS devices which have the capability of regulating the power flow and voltage support at the buses. Hence UPFC incorporated in the transmission system have been considered in this paper. Comparative results with and without FACT controller are present for the sample 5 bus system and methodology also tested on IEEE 14 bus system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acha E, Fuerte-Esquivel CR, Ambize-Perez H, Angeles-Camacho C (2004) FACTS: modelling and simulation in power networks. Wiley, Hoboken
Song YH, Liu JY, Mehta PA (1999) Power injection modeling and optimal multiplier power flow algorithm for steady-state studies of unified power flow controllers. Electr Power Syst Res 52:51–59
Talebi N, Ehsan M, Bathaee SMT (2004) An efficient power injection modeling and sequential power flow algorithm for FACTS devices. In: IEEE SoutheastCon, 2004. Proceedings., Greensboro, NC, USA, pp 97–104
Fuerte Esquiivel CR, Acha E (1996) Newton–Raphson algorithm for the reliable solution of large power networks with embedded FACTS. IEEE Proc-Gan Tvansnr Distrib 143(5):447–454
Fuerte-Esquivel CR, Acha E, Ambriz-Prez H (2000) A comprehensive Newton–Raphson UPFC model for the quadratic power flow solution for practical power networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15:102–109
Kumar A, Kumar J (2013) ATC determination with FACTS devices using PTDFs approach for multi-transactions in competitive electricity markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 44(1):308–317
Gupta G, Dubey M, Khan B (2015) A PSO based approach for usage and cost allocation under contingent restructured market. In: 2015 IEEE International conference on signal processing, informatics, communication and energy systems (SPICES), Kozhikode, pp 1–5
Bialek J, Tam DB (1996) Tracing the generators’ output. Opportunities and advances in international power generation, 18–20 March 1996
Kirschen D, Allan R, Strbac G (1997) Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(1):52–60
Gubina F, Grgic D, Banic I (2000) A method for determining the generators’ share in a consumer load. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(4):1376–1381
Wu FF, Ni Y, Wei P (2000) Power transfer allocation for open access using graph theory-fundamentals and applications in systems without loopflow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(3):923–929
Xie Kaigui, Zhou Jiaqi, Li Wenyuan (2009) Analytical model and algorithm for tracing active power flow based on extended incidence matrix. Electr Power Syst Res 79:399–405
Conejo AJ, Contreras J, Lima DA, Padilha-Feltrin A (2007) Z-bus transmission network cost allocation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):342–349
Dai Y, Liu XD, Ni YX, Wen FS, Han ZX, Shen CM, Wu FF (2003) A cost allocation method for reactive power service based on power flow tracing. Electr Power Syst Res 64(1):59–65
De Mala, Goswami Swapan K (2012) Reactive power cost allocation by power tracing based method. Energy Convers Manag 64:43–51
Dubey M, Gupta G, Arya A (2019) Influence of power flow controller on energy transaction charges in restructured power system. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Energy Power Eng 13(9):592–597
Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L (2000) Understanding FACTS. IEEE Press, New York
Acknowledgements
This Publication is an outcome of the R&D work undertaken in the project under the Young Faculty Research Fellowship, Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme of Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, being implemented by Digital India Corporation (formerly Media Lab Asia). We would also like to show our gratitude to Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal for providing us the required facilities during the course of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arya, A., Gupta, G. & Dubey, M. Enhancement of electricity wheeling charges by incorporating FACTS controller in restructured power system. CSIT 8, 205–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-020-00296-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40012-020-00296-2