Skip to main content
Log in

V.S. Ivlev’s Monograph Revisited. The Role of Habitat Heterogeneity in Biological Interactions

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fundamental regularities of trophology, such as the dependence of the fish diet on the food concentration, foraging selectivity, and competition for food, which are the key concepts in V.S. Ivlev’s book Experimental Ecology of the Fish Feeding are quite familiar to a broad community of ecologists. However, the range of problems addressed in this milestone study is not limited to the issues of fish trophology. The effect of habitat heterogeneity on biological interactions in ecosystems, which is one of the major objects of research in contemporary ecology, is discussed in the book in two aspects: the connection between the foraging intensity and selectivity to the heterogeneity of prey distribution (the degree of aggregation per Ivlev) and the role of physical obstacles in the regulation of intra- and interspecific competition for food. The dependence of the feeding rate on aggregation was even more substantial than the dependence on prey concentration. Ivlev demonstrated this in laboratory experiments and, which is even more important and difficult, studies of natural water bodies. In this paper, a brief analysis of the ideas and results included in the book and related to the ecological significance of habitat heterogeneity is followed by an overview of a number of modern studies that adhere to Ivlev’s working style and develop his approaches and ideas. It is apparent from these studies that habitat heterogeneity, which is determined by different factors and manifested on different scales, affects both the behavior and the population dynamics of the interacting organisms. As a result, both the mechanisms underlying biological interactions and the structure and functioning of organism communities are modified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barry, J.P. and Dayton, P.K., Physical heterogeneity and the organization of marine communities, in Ecological Heterogeneity, Kolasa, J. and Pickett, S.T.A., Eds., New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 270–320.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Begon, M., Harper, J.L., and Townsend, C.R., Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benhamou, S. and Bovet, P., How animals use their environment: a new look at kinesis, Anim. Behav., 1989, vol. 38, pp. 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnov, E.L., Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem, Theor. Popul. Biol., 1976, vol. 9, pp. 129–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gause, G.F., The Struggle for Existence, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1934.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant, J.W.A., Territoriality, in Behavioral Ecology of Teleost Fishes, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997, pp. 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanski, I., Metapopulation Ecology, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hassell, M.P., The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host-Parasitoid Interactions, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M., Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability, J. Anim. Ecol., 1974, vol. 43, pp. 567–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hildrew, A.G. and Townsend, C.R., Aggregation, interference and foraging by larvae of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae), Anim. Behav., 1980, vol. 28, pp. 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holling, C.S., Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Can. Entomol., 1959, vol. 91, pp. 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huffaker, C.B., Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations, Hilgardia, 1958, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 343–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter, J.R., Swimming and feeding behavior of larval anchovy Engraulis mordax,Fish. Bull., 1972, vol. 70, pp. 821–838.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter, J.R. and Thomas, G.L., Effect of prey distribution and density on the searching and feeding behavior of larval anchovy Engraulis mordax, in The Early Life History of Fish, Blaxter, J.H.S., Ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp. 559–574.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchinson, G.E., The paradox of the plankton, Am. Nat., 1961, vol. 95, pp. 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivlev, V.S., Hunting period and the path traveled by the predator related with the population density of the victim, Zool. Zh., 1944, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ivlev, V.S., Food utilization by fishes-plantonophages, Tr. Sevastop. Biol. Stn., 1961a, vol. 14, pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivlev, V.S., Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1961b.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krause, J. and Ruxton, G.D., Living in Groups, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lasker, R., Field criteria for the survival of anchovy larvae: the relation between inshore chlorophyll maximum layers and successful first feeding, Fish. Bull., 1975, vol. 73, pp. 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levin, S.A., Patchiness in marine and terrestrial systems: from individuals to populations, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B, 1994, vol. 343, pp. 99–103.

  22. Levins, R., Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control, Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 1969, vol. 15, pp. 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lotka, A., Elements of Physical Biology, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1925.

  24. Manteifel’, B.P., Ekologiya povedeniya zhivotnykh (Ecology of Animal’s Behavior), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

  25. Mikheev, V.N., Change of availability of invertebrates due to change of their behavior for fish juveniles, Trudy IV Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii po povedeniyu vodnykh bespozvonochnykh (Proc. IV All-Union Conf. on Behavior of Aquatic Invertebrates), Borok: Inst. Biol. Vnutr. Vod, 1986, pp. 18–22.

  26. Mikheev, V.N., Foraging behavior of fishes and habitat complexity: searching, prey selection and conflict of motivations, J. Ichthyol., 2000, vol. 40, suppl. 2, pp. 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mikheev, V.N., Neodnorodnost’ sredy i troficheskie otnosheniya u ryb (Heterogenity of Environment and Trophic Relations of Fishes), Moscow: Nauka, 2006.

  28. Mikheev, V.N. and Pakul’skaya, D.S., Motion activity in food searching behavior of larvae of Hemigrammus caudovittatus,Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1988, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1007–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mikheev, V.N. and Pavlov, D.S., Ethological and bioenergetic approaches to fish trophology, Zool. Zh., 2005, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1202–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mikheev, V.N., Pavlov, D.S., and Pakulska, D., Swimming response of goldfish, Carassius auratus, and the tetra, Hemigrammus caudovittatus, larvae to individual food items and patches, Environ. Biol. Fish., 1992, vol. 35, pp. 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikheev, V.N., Bobyrev, A.E., Kriksunov, E.A., and Mikheev, A.V., Food search strategies of juvenile fishes: analysis of a mathematical model, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1997, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mikheev, V.N., Afonina, M.O., and Pavlov, D.S., Habitat heterogeneity and fish behavior: units of heterogeneity as a resource and as a source of information, J. Ichthyol., 2010, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murdoch, W.W., Swarbrick, S.L., Luck, R.F., Walde, S., and Yu, D.S., Refuge dynamics and metapopulation dynamics: an experimental test, Am. Nat., 1996, vol. 147, pp. 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Radakov, D.V., Stainost’ ryb kak ekologicheskoe yavlenie (Fish Flocking as Ecological Phenomena), Moscow: Nauka, 1972.

  35. Solomon, M.E., The natural control of animal populations, J. Anim. Ecol., 1949, vol. 18, pp. 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vinberg, G.G., Life and scientific activities of Viktor Segeevich Ivlev (1907–1964), in Eksperimental’naya ekologiya pitaniya ryb (Experimental Ecology of Fish Feeding), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1977, pp. 243–265.

  37. Vlymen, W.J., A mathematical model of the relationship between larval anchovy (Engraulis mordax) growth, prey microdistribution, and larval behavior, Environ. Biol. Fish., 1977, vol. 2, pp. 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Volterra, V., Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 1928, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was performed with financial support from the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 14-14-01171P (analysis of publications and manuscript writing), and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 17-04-00247a (analysis and arrangement of the materials).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Mikheev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by S. Semenova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikheev, V.N. V.S. Ivlev’s Monograph Revisited. The Role of Habitat Heterogeneity in Biological Interactions. Biol Bull Rev 10, 11–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420010053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420010053

Navigation