Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteresis, Unconscious and Economics

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
p-Adic Numbers, Ultrametric Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the main aspects of a previous formal model of the relationships unconscious-conscious based on the representation of mental entities by m-adic numbers through hysteresis phenomenology, a pattern which has been then used to work out a possible psychoanalytic model of human consciousness as well as to argue on a simple derivations of p-adic Weber-Fechner laws of psychophysics, we now carry on along this formal analysis putting forward some remarks about the possible applications and consequences of this model of human psyche in regard to central themes of economics and sociology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Argenziano and I. Gilboa, “Psychophysical foundations of the Cobb-Douglas utility function,” Econom. Lett. 157, 21–23 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. K. J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 1963).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Cargnello, Alterita e alienita (Feltrinelli Editore, Milano, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Carr, “An interpretation of the Weber-Fechner law,” Psycholog. Rev. 34 (4), 313–19 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Castronovo (a cura di), Nuovi equilibri in un mercato globale - Le sfide dell’Asia e le tempeste del turbocapitalismo finanziario (Editori Laterza/RCS Media Group, Roma-Bari/Milano, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. C. Chiang, Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, USA, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Cuche, La notion de culture dans les sciences sociales (Editions La Decouverte, Paris, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. D’Onofrio, Levi-Strauss face р la catastrophe (Editions Mimesis, Paris, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Dragovich and D. Joksimovic, “On possible uses of p-adic analysis in econometrics,”, Megatrend Rev. 4 (2), 5–16 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Dragovich, A. Yu. Khrennikov, S. V. Kozyrev, I. V. Volovich and E. I. Zelenov, “p-Adic mathematical physics: the first 30 years,” p-Adic mathematical physics: the first 30 years 9 (2), 87–121 (2017).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Ferrauto, Esercizi di statistica (G. Giappichelli Editore, Torino, IT, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Fromm, The Sane Society (Rinehart & Company, Inc., New York, USA, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Fromm, To Have or To Be? (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., New York, 1976).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Iurato and A. Yu. Khrennikov, “Hysteresis model of unconscious-conscious interconnection: exploring dynamics on m-adic trees,” p-Adic Numbers Ultramet. Anal. Appl. 7 (4), 312–321 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Iurato, A.Yu. Khrennikov and F Murtagh, “Formal foundations for the origins of human consciousness,” p-Adic Numbers Ultramet. Anal. Appl. 8 (4), 249–279 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Iurato, “A possiblep-adic Weber-Fechner law,” p-Adic Numbers Ultramet. Anal. Appl. 10 (4), 299–304 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. K. K. Solms and M. Solms, Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. Introduction to a Depth Neuropsychology (Routledge, London, UK, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Yu. Khrennikov, Non-Archimedean Analysis: Quantum Paradoxes, Dynamical Systems and Biological Models (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, ND, 1997).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Yu. Khrennikov, Classical and Quantum Mental Models and Freud’s Theory of Unconscious Mind (Vaxjö University Press, Vaxjo, Sweden, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. H. Krantz, “Integration of just-noticeable differences,” J. Math. Psychol. 8 (4), 591–99 (1971).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Laplanche and J-B. Pontalis, The Language of Psycho-Analysis (W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Laplanche, Problematiques VII: Le fourvoiement biologisant de la sexualite chez Freud. Biologisme et biologie (PUF-Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Leukel, Introduction to Physiological Psychology, 3rd edition (C.V. Mosby Publishing Company, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Levi-Strauss, Tristes Tropiques (Librairie Plon, Paris, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Luccio, La psicologia: un profilo storico, con la collaborazione di S. Gori Savellini (Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari, IT, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu. I. Manin, “Continuo/discreto”, in Enciclopedia Einaudi, Vol. 3, pp. 935–986 (Giulio Einaudi editore, Torino, IT, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. Matera and A. Biscaldi, Manuale di scienze umane. Sociologia (De Agostini Scuola/Marietti Editore, Novara, IT, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. McCall, “Viconomics: an evolutionary science of mind and society,” Viconomics: an evolutionary science of mind and society Part II, Ch. 7, pp. 91–130 (MacMillan Press, London, UK, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Nolen-Hoeksema, B. L. Fredrickson, G. R. Loftus and C. Lutz, Atkinson & Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology, 16th edition (Cengage Learning EMEA Publishing, Ltd., Boston, MA, USA, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. H. Ospina-Holguin, “The Cobb-Douglas function for a continuum model,” Cuadernos de Economía 36 (70), 1–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Pewzner and J-F. Braunstein, Storia della psicologia (Giulio Einaudi editore, Torino, IT, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Poma, Corso di economia politica (Edizioni Principato, Messina, IT, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. M. Purcell, Electricity and Magnetism. Berkeley Physics Course, Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA, 1965).

  35. G. C. Quarton, T. Melnechuk and F. O. Schmitt, Eds., The Neurosciences. A Study Program (Rockefeller University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. J. Reis Mourao, “The Weber-Fechner law and public expenditures impact to the Win-Margins at parliamentary elections,” Prague Econom. Papers 3, 291–308 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Rifkin, Entropy. Into the Greenhouse World, 2nd revised and updated edition with the collaboration of Ted Howard, Foundation of Economic Trend (Penguin Putnam, Inc., New York, NY, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. A. Samuelson and W. D. Nordhaus, Economics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, USA, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. Shigemoto, “Weber-Fechner’s law and Cobb-Douglas function,” Tezukayama Econom. Papers 6, 69–73 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  40. K. Shigemoto, “Weber-Fechner’s law and Demand function,” Tezukayama Econom. Papers 6, 41–46 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Shigemoto, “Weber-Fechner’s law, Demand function and related topics,” Tezukayama J. Busin. Econom. 15, 51–56 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. S. Stevens, “On the theory of scales of measurement,” Science 103 (2684), 677–680 (1946).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Teitelbaum, Psicologia jisiologica (Aldo Martello Editore, Milano, IT, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  44. F. Teulon, Introduction à l’économie (PUF-Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach (WW Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Weber, “Marginal utility theory and the fundamental law of psychophysics,” Social Sci. Quart. 56 (1), 21–36 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Zafirovski, “Max Weber’s analysis of marginal utility theory and psychology revisited: latent propositions in economic sociology and the sociology of economics,” History Polit. Econom. 33 (3), 437–458 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Iurato.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the author in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iurato, G. Hysteresis, Unconscious and Economics. P-Adic Num Ultrametr Anal Appl 11, 270–279 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070046619040022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070046619040022

Key words

Navigation