Skip to main content
Log in

Setting Peak Ground Accelerations for Performance-Based Design of Earthquake-Resistant Constructions

  • Published:
Seismic Instruments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship of the design peak ground accelerations, earthquake frequency, and seismological conditions of a construction site for a performance-based design has been analyzed. The limitations of using the linear dependence of the repeatability logarithm on the earthquake intensity are given. Recommendations on how the new seismic scale can be used to solve engineering problems in designing structures in seismic areas are given. It is shown that the instrumental part of the new scale is quite acceptable for development of performance-based design. At the same time, in areas with a possible shaking intensity of more than IX, peak ground accelerations lose their importance for assessing seismic resistance, and there is a need to ration the input energy characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni” (18A00716). Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti. Decreto 17 gennaio 2018, Supplemento ordinario alla “Gazzetta Ufficiale” no. 42 del 20 febbraio 2018, Serie generale, no. 8.

  2. Aptikaev, F.F., Instrumental’naya shkala seismicheskoi intensivnosti (Instrumental Scale of Seismic Intensity), Moscow, Nauka i obrazovanie, 2012.

  3. Areshchenko, T.S., Prokopovich, S.V., Sabirova, O.B., and Frolova, E.D., Setting the level of seismic effect for assessing earthquake resistance of buildings when performance-based design, Prir. Tekhnog. Riski. Bezop. Sooruzh., 2018, no. 4, pp. 25–27.

  4. Birbraer, A.N., Raschet konstruktsii na seismostoikost’ (Earthquake-Resistance Analysis of Constructions), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1998.

  5. Bogdanova, A.M., Nesterova, O.P., Nikonova, N.V., Tkachenko, A.S., Uzdin, A.M., Rakhmanova, M., Azaev, T.M., and Zainulabidova, Kh.R., Numerical characteristics of seismic effects, Nauka Mir, 2017, no. 3, pp. 49–55.

  6. Divja, B. and Arcumar, C., Evaluation of response reduction factor of irregular reinforced concrete frame structures, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dolgaya, A.A., Modeling of seismic effect by a short-term process, Seismostoik. Stroit., 1994, nos. 5–6, pp. 56–63.

  8. Dowric, D.J., Earthquake Resistant Design for Engineers and Architects, New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fardis, M.N., Code developments in earthquake engineering, 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., 2002, Pap. Ref. 845.

  10. Ghobarah, A., Performance-based seismic design in earthquake engineering: State of development, Eng. Struct., 2001, no. 23, pp. 878–884.

  11. Gol’denblat, I.I., Nikolaenko, N.A., Polyakov, S.V., and Ul’yanov, S.V., Modeli seismostoikosti sooruzhenii (Earthquake-Resistant Models of Structures), Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1979.

  12. GOST R (National Standard of Russian Federation) 57546-2017: Earthquakes. Seismic Intensity Scale, 2017.

  13. GOST (State Standard) 6249-52: Scale for Determining Earthquake Intensity in the Range from VI to IX, 1952. European Macroseismic Scale EMS-98, Grünthal, G., Ed., ESC, Luxemburg, 1998.

  14. Ingale, C. and Nalamwar, M.R., Performance based seismic design of RCC building, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 2017, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khatavkar, A.S., Ghadi, A.P., and Barbude, P.F., Comparative study of response reduction factor for reinforced concrete and steel frame, International Conference on Quality Up-gradation in Engineering, Science and Technology (ICQUEST2015), Maharashtra, India, 2015, pp. 12–14.

  16. Kilimnik, L.Sh., Metody tselenapravlennogo proektirovaniya v seismostoikom stroitel’stve (Methods of Targeted Design in Earthquake Engineering), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.

  17. Moehle, J., Performance-based seismic design of tall buildings in the U.S., 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.

  18. Moehle, J. and Deierlein, G.G., A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004, Pap. No. 679.

  19. Moskvitin, V.V., Tsiklicheskie nagruzheniya elementov konstruktsii (Cyclic Loadings of Structural Components), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

  20. Nesterova, O.P., Uzdin, A.M., Sibul’, G.A., Dolgaya, A.A., and Guan’ Yukhai, Universal energy-based characteristic of an earthquake, Prir. Tekhnog. Riski. Bezop. Sooruzh., 2018, no. 4, pp. 23–26.

  21. Newmark, N.M. and Rosenblueth, E., Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park, R. and Paulay, T., Reinforced Concrete Structures, New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Riddell, R., Hidalgo, P., and Cruz, E., Response modification factor for earthquake resistant design of short period buildings, Earthquake Spectra, 1989, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salem, Y.S., Lomiento, G., and Khan, J., Assessment of Response modification factor of reinforced concrete table top-frame structures to seismic loads, in International Congress and Exhibition “Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology”, GeoMEast 2017: Facing the Challenges in Structural Engineering, Egypt, 2017, pp. 55–71.

  25. Seismicheskaya sotryasaemost’ territorii SSSR (Seismic Shaking of the USSR Territory), Riznichenko, Yu.V., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sidorin, A.Ya., Comments on the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) in terms of its applicability in Russia, Seism. Instrum., 2010, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smirnova, L.N., Benin, A.V., Semenov, S.G., Uzdin, A.M., and Guan’ Yukhai, Estimation of reduction coefficient for designing bridge supports, Seismostoik. Stroit. Bezop. Sooruzh., 2016, no. 6, pp. 15–19.

  28. Sosnin, A.V., On specifying the coefficient of acceptable damages K1 and its consistency with the concept of seismic forces reduction in statement of the spectral method, Vestn. Grazhdanskikh Inzh., 2017, no. 1, pp. 92–114.

  29. SP (Design Code) 14.13330.2014. Building in Regions Prone to Earthquakes. Updated Version of SNiP II-7-81*, 2014.

  30. Sy, J.A., Anwar, N., HtutAung, T., and Rayamajhi, D., Performance based seismic design state of practice, 2012 Manila, Philippines, Int.J. High-Rise Build., 2012, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ulomov, V.I. and Bogdanov, M.I., A new set of maps of general seismic zoning for the territory of Russian Federation (GSZ-2012), Inzh. Izyskaniya, 2013, no. 8, pp. 30–39.

  32. Uzdin, A.M., What lies behind the linear-spectral theory of seismic resistance, Seismostoik. Stroit. Bezop. Sooruzh., 2009, no. 2, pp. 18–23.

  33. Uzdin, A.M., Elizarov, S.V., and Belash, T.A., Seismostoikie konstruktsii transportnykh zdanii i sooruzhenii. Uchebnoe posobie (Earthquake-Resistant Constructions of Transport-Related Buildings and Facilities: A Textbook), Moscow: Uchebno-Metod. Tsentr Obraz. Zheleznodorozhn. Transp., 2012.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Prof. F.F. Aptikaev for consultations and help during the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sh. Sh. Nazarova.

Ethics declarations

The authors claim no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by N. Astafiev

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazarova, S.S., Uzdin, A.M. Setting Peak Ground Accelerations for Performance-Based Design of Earthquake-Resistant Constructions. Seism. Instr. 56, 225–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923920020085

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923920020085

Keywords:

Navigation