Skip to main content
Log in

Al–Fe–Humus Podzols in Russia: Geography of Some Properties

  • SOIL GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY
  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The properties of representative soil profiles of podzols included in the database of the Unified State Register of Soil Resources of Russia are considered. As a result of processing and analysis of the data array (53 measured profiles), the ranges of values of a number of parameters have been corrected. It has been revealed that, in most cases, the ranges of properties of podzols are wider as compared to the estimated profiles given in published works (the thickness of the Al–Fe–humus horizon and the humus content in the E horizon). However, the range of values of the humus content in the illuvial horizon is narrower. We revealed specific features of podzols in particular regions received as a result of consolidation of soil provinces of the Map of Soil–Ecological Zoning. Regularities can be seen in the geographical distribution of the thickness of profiles of these soils and the content and profile distribution of humus. The humus content is maximal in the eluvial soil horizons in Siberian regions and in the illuvial soil horizons in the European Russia and Primor’e.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aleksandrovskii, A.L. and Aleksandrovskaya, E.I., Evolyutsiya pochv i geograficheskaya sreda (Soils Evolution and Geographical Environment), Moscow, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alyabina, I.O. and Nedanchuk, I.M., Assessment of the relationships between the distribution of soil horizons and the climatic parameters, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2014, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 968–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dokuchaev, V.V., On podzol, Tr. Vol’n. Ekonom. O-va, 1880, vol. 1, no. 2.

  4. Edinyi gosudarstvennyi reestr pochvennykh resursov. Versiya 1.0 (Uniform State List of the Soil Resources. Ver. 1.0), Ivanov, A.L. and Shoba, S.A., Eds., Moscow, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhangurov, E.V. and Golubeva, I.I., Morphological and genetic characteristics and petrological features of automorphous soils rocks of Middle Timan, Vestn. Inst. Geol. Komi Nauchn. Tsentra, Ural. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, no. 2.

  6. Zaidel’man, F.R., Podzolo- i gleeobrazovanie (Podzol and Gley Formation), Moscow, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanova, E.N., Klassifikatsiya pochv SSSR (Classification of the USSR Soils), Moscow, 1976.

  8. Karavaeva, N.A., Targul’yan, V.O., Cherkinskii, A.E., et al., Elementarnye pochvoobrazovatel’nye protsessy: opyt kontseptual’nogo analiza, kharakteristika, sistematika (Elementary Soil Formation Processes: an Experience of Conceptual Analysis, Characteristics, Systematic), Moscow, 1992.

  9. Karta pochvenno-ekologicheskogo raionirovaniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Masshtab 1:2 500 000 (Map of Soil–Ecological Zoning of the Russian Federation. 1:2 500 000), Dobrovol’skii, G.V. and Urusevskaya, I.S., Eds., Moscow, 2013.

  10. Klassifikatsiya i diagnostika pochv Rossii (Classification and Diagnostics of the Russian Soils), Smolensk, 2004.

  11. Klassifikatsiya i diagnostika pochv SSSR (Classification and Diagnostics of the USSR Soils), Moscow, 1977.

  12. Kolesnikova, V.M., Alyabina, I.O., Vorob’eva, L.A., et al., Soil attribute database of Russia, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2010, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 839–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirovaya korrelyativnaya baza pochvennykh resursov: osnova dlya mezhdunarodnoi klassifikatsii i korrelyatsii pochv (World Correlation Database for Soil Resources as a Basis of International Soils Classification and Correlation), Targul’yan, V.O. and Gerasimova, M.I., Eds., Moscow, 2007.

  14. Pereverzev, V.N., Zonal features of humus formation in Al–Fe-humus podzols of the Kola Peninsula, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2011, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1178–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponomareva, V.V., Teoriya podzoloobrazovatel’nogo protsessa. Biokhimicheskie aspekty (The Theory of Podzol Forming Process. Biochemical Aspects), Moscow, 1964.

  16. Pochvennaya karta RSFSR. Masshtab 1:2 500 000 (Soil Map of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. 1:2 500 000), Fridland, V.M., Ed., Moscow, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pochvovedenie. Chast’2: Tipy pochv, ikh geografiya i ispol’zovanie (Soil Science, Part 2: Soils Types: Geography and Use),Kovda, V.A. and Rozanov, B.G., Eds., Moscow, 1988.

  18. Pochvy i pochvennyi pokrov Pechoro-Ilychskogo zapovednika (Severnyi Ural) (Soils and Soil Cover of Pechoro-Ilychskii National Reserve (Northern Urals)), Degtev, S.V. and Laptev, E.M., Eds., Syktyvkar, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rode, A.A., Izbrannye trudy. Tom 2. Podzoloobrazovatel’nyi protsess (Selected Research Works, Vol. 2: Podzol Forming Process),, Moscow, 2008.

  20. Rozanov, B.G., Morfologiya pochv (Soils Morphology), Moscow, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Targul’yan, V.O., Pochvoobrazovanie i vyvetrivanie v kholodnykh gumidnykh oblastyakh (Soil Formation and Weathering in Cold Humid Areas), Moscow, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Urusevskaya, I.S., Alyabina, I.O., and Shoba, S.A., Soil-geographical zoning as a direction of science and as the basis for rational land use, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2015, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 897–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shlyakhov, S.A., Northern Sakhalin Podzols: variety and properties, Vestn. Krasn. Gos. Agrarn. Univ., 2011, no. 12.

  24. Shoba, S.A., Alyabina, I.O., Kolesnikova, V.M., et al., Pochvennye resursy Rossii. Geograficheskaya pochvennaya baza dannykh (Russian Soil Resources. Geographic Soil Data Base), Moscow, 2010.

  25. Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend, World Research Report, Rome: FAO-UNESCO, 1988, no. 60.

  26. Freyerová, K. and Šefrna, L., Soil organic carbon density and storage in podzols— a case study from Ralsko Region (Czech Republic), AUC Geogr., 2014, vol. 49, no. 2.

  27. Kabala, C., Waroszewski, J., Bogacz, A., and Labaz, B., O specificebielicgorskich on the specifics of podzols in mountain areas, Roczniki Gleboznawcze. Soil Sci. Annu., 2012, vol. 63, no. 2.

  28. Podzols, Buurman, P., Ed., New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sanborn, P., Lamontagne, L., and Hendershot, W., Podzolic soils of Canada: genesis, distribution, and classification, Can. J. Soil Sci., 2011, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 843–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soil Survey Staff, Soil Taxonomy, Washington, 1999, 2nd ed.

  31. IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Report No. 106, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to I. O. Alyabina or A. G. Shmatova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alyabina, I.O., Shmatova, A.G. Al–Fe–Humus Podzols in Russia: Geography of Some Properties. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 75, 8–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687420010020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687420010020

Keywords:

Navigation