Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of the Lithosphere in the Zone of the Continent–Ocean Transition in the Southern Part of the Russian Far East: Evidence from the Density Modeling

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantitative processing of gravimetric data is performed and the 3D density model is calculated for the southern part of the Russian margin of Eurasian continent. Based on the density model, new patterns of disjunctive tectonics at different depth levels are revealed and the position of the region at the global tectonic level is shown. It is established that the transition zone is an integrated lithospheric structure of the northeastern orientation, in which there are mantle blocks with the boundaries corresponding to the borders of depressions and major tectonic objects. The data obtained may be applied for refinement of the deep structure and paleogeodynamics of the studied area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Geology and Petroleum Potential of the Okhotsk–Shantar Sedimentary Basin, Ed. by V.G. Varnavsky, A.E. Zha-rov, G.L. Kirillova, (DVO RAN, Vladivostok, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. M. Grannik, “Correlation of structural units of Sakhalin and Hokkaido,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 401 (2), 177–181 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dapeng Zhao, Franko Pirajno, and Lycy Liu, “Mantle structure and dynamics under East Russia and adjacent regions,” Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2010, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. K. Zlobin, Structure of the Sea of Okhotsk Crust and Petroleum Potential of its Northeastern (near-Kamchatka) Part (Sesimic Data) (SakhGU, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 2002) [in Russian].

  5. E. G. Ivolga, N. P. Romanovskii, V. G. Gurovich, and Yu. F. Manilov, “On the deep structure of the north Sikhote-Alin and north Sakhalin fold structures junction area,” Tikhookean. Geol. 7 (5), 358–368 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. G. Ivolga and Yu. F. Manilov, “Fault tectonics of the continent–ocean junction zone of Russian Asia,” in Problems of Geology and Complex Development of Natural Resources of East Asia: 3rd All-Russia Conference, Blagoveshchensk,2014 (IGiP DVO RAN, Blagoveshchensk, 2014), Vol. 1, pp. 21–25 [in Russian].

  7. L. P. Karsakov, Chzhao Chun’tsin, Yu. F. Malyshev, et al., Tectonics, Deep Structure, and Metallogeny of the Central Asia–Pacific Belt Junction Zone: Explanatory Note to the Tectonic Scheme 1 : 1 500 000 (Khabarovsk, Vladivostok, 2005) [in Russian].

  8. L. I. Krasnyi, Global System of Geoblocks (Nedra, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. G. Kulinich, M. G. Valitov, and Z. N. Proshkina, “A comparative analysis of the seismic and density models for the Earth’s crust of the Central Kurils,” Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 9 (6), 439–450 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. P. Laverov, S. S. Lappo, L. I. Lobkovskii, B. V. Baranov, R. G. Kulinich, B. Ya. Karp, “The Central Kuril “gap”: structure and seismic potential," Dokl. Earth Sci. 408 (6), 878–790 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. F. Malyshev, Yu. F. Manilov, and V. A. Gur’yanov, “Deep structure of the eastern North Asian craton: interpreyation of data of geopotential fields,” Litosfera, No. 2, 144–151 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. F. Manilov, “Features of deep structure of the southeastern part of the Argun–Mamyn massif (Geophysical data),” Tikhookean. Geol. 29 (6), 39–48 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. A. Martynov, V. V. Golozubov, and A. I. Khanchuk, “Mantle diapirism at convergent boundaries (sea of Japan),” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 57 (5), 745–755 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Nikitin and A. V. Petrov, Theoretical Principle of Processing of Geiohysical Information. A Textbook, 2nd Ed., (OOO “Tsentr informatsionnykh tekhnologii v prirodopol’zovanii”, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  15. V. M. Nikiforov, R. G. Kulinich, M. G. Valitov, I. V. Dmitriev, S. S. Starzhinskii, and G. N. Shkabarnya, “Peculiarities of the fluid regime in the lithosphere of the junction zone between South Primorye and the Sea of Japan from the comprehensive geophysical data,” Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 32 (1), 46–55 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Explanatory Note to tectonic Map of the Sea of Okhotsk Region. 1 : 2 500 000, Ed. by N.A. Bogdanov and V.E. Khain (In-t litosf. Okr. Vnutr. Morei, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

  17. Parfenov, L.M., Continental Margins and Island Arcs of Northeastern Asian Mesozoides (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. M. Petrishchevskii and T. K. Zlobin, “Density heterogeneity of tectonosphere of the Sea of Okhotsk region,” Research Notes of the Sakhalin State University. A Collection of Paper, Ed. by T. K. Zlobin (Izd-vo SakhGU, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 2004), pp. 10–20 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. N. Senachin and A. A. Baranov, “Gravity anomalies of crust and upper mantle of Central and South Asia,” Geodynam. & Tectonophys. 7 (4), 2016.

  20. “Earth’s delamination and multi-stage convection as basis for the global geodynamic model,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 308 (6), 1437–1440 (1989).

  21. V. E. Khain and A. N. Balukhovskii, Historical Geotectonics. Mesozoic, Cenozoic (Aviar, Moscow, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. I. Khanchuk, et al., Geodynamics, Magmatism, and Metallogeny of East Russia (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 2006), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. I. Khanchuk and Yu. A. Martynov, “Tectonics and magmatism of oceanic and continental transform plate boundaries,” Geological Processes in Subduction, Collision, and Transform Plate Boundary Zones. Proceedings of All-Russian Conference with International Participance (Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 2011), pp. 45–49 [in Russian].

  24. V. V. Kharakhinov, Petroleum Geology of the Sakhalin Region (Nauch. mir, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

  25. A. A. Baranov, “A new crustal model for central and southern Asia,” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 46 (1), 34–46 (2010). https://link.springer.com/journal/11486

  26. C. Bassin, G. Laske, and G. Masters, “The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America,” EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 81, F897 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shigenori Maruyama, Yukio Isozaki, Gaku Kimura, and Masaru Terabayashi, “Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic synthesis from 750 Ma to the present,” Orogeny of the Japanese Islands. Selected Papers, The Island Arc, 5–6, 1997.

Download references

Funding

This study was performed within the State Task of the Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. G. Ivolga or Yu. F. Manilov.

Additional information

Recommended for publishing by R.G. Kulinich

Translated by A. Bobrov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivolga, E.G., Manilov, Y.F. Structure of the Lithosphere in the Zone of the Continent–Ocean Transition in the Southern Part of the Russian Far East: Evidence from the Density Modeling. Russ. J. of Pac. Geol. 13, 493–509 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714019060034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714019060034

Keywords:

Navigation