Abstract
The interaction between zinc oxide cluster (ZnO)3 in both pure and hydrated forms with mercury ion (HgOH+) has been investigated by using density functional theory (DFT) approach at the GGA-PBE/DZVP level of theory and climbing image – nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method. The Fukui indices were used to predict the reactivity of the atoms. The adsorption energies were calculated. The results show that HgOH+ ion is strongly chemically adsorbed on the clusters. The adsorption process does not involve a transition state. When zinc oxide clusters were deposited on the mesoporous silica material (SBA-15), the adsorption ability of the assembly (ZnO)3/SBA-15 for HgOH+ is increased comparing to the pristine materials. Furthermore, calculation results show that the (ZnO)3/SBA-15 can adsorb HgOH+ even in the presence of a chloride ion.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
P. B. Tchounwou, C. G. Yedjou, A. K. Patlolla, and D. J. Sutton, Exp. Suppl. 101, 133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6
M. A. Barakat, Arab. J. Chem. 4, 361 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019
M. H. Al-Malack and A. A. Basaleh, Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 24519 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1144536
M. Karnib, A. Kabbani, H. Holail, and Z. Olama, Energy Proc. 50, 113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.014
E. Erdem, N. Karapinar, and R. Donat, J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 280, 309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.028
M. Hong, L. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Zh. Chen, L. Dong, Q. Zan, and R. Li, Chem. Eng. J. 359, 363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.087
T. Viraraghavan and A. Kapoor, Appl. Clay Sci. 9, 31 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(94)90013-2
Seo-Yun Lee and Hee-Jeong Choi, J. Environ. Manage. 209, 382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.080
S. Senthilkumaar, S. Bharathi, D. Nithyanandhi, and V. Subburam, Bioresour. Technol. 75, 163 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00021-3
P. Sahu, A. K. Singha Deb, S. K. M. Ali, K. T. Shenoy, and S. Mohan, Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 3, 917 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8ME00039E
S. Debnath and U. C. Ghosh Desalination 273, 330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.043
R. K. Gupta and A. Nayak, Chem. Eng. J. 180, 81 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.006
A. Hadi Abdullah, R. Mat, S. Somderam, A. Sh. Abd Aziz, and A. Mohamed, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 65, 334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.05.003
D. Gouvêa, S. V. Ushakov, and A. Navrotsky, Langmuir 30, 9091 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/la500743u
R. Kumar, O. Al-Dossary, G. Kumar, and A. Umar, Nanomicro Lett. 7, 97 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-014-0023-3
S. Xiong, L. Kong, Z. Zhong, and Y. Wang, AIChE J. 62, 3982 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15293
Q. Tian, W. Wu, Sh. Yang, J. Liu, W. Yao, F. Ren, and Ch. Jiang, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12, 221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2005-0
T. Sheela, Y. Arthoba Nayaka, R. Viswanatha, S. Basavanna, and T. G. Venkatesha Madhavi, Powder Technol. 217, 163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.023
Sh. Mahdavi, A. Afkhami, and H. Merrikhpour, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 17, 1645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0898-9
X. Wang, W. Cai, Yongxing Lin, G. Wanga, and Ch. Liang, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 8582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM01024C
L. Wang, Ch. Han, M. Nadagouda, and D. D. Dionysiou, J. Hazard. Mater. 313, 283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.070
Y. Kikuchi, Q. Qian, M. Machida, and H. Tatsumoto, Carbon 44, 195 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.040
M. Breedon, M. J. S. Spencer, and I. Yarovsky, Surf. Sci. 603, 3389 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2009.09.032
A. Al-Sunaidi and S. Goumri-Said, Chem. Phys. Lett. 507, 111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.03.041
K. Hermann, P. S. Bagus, and C. J. Nelin, Phys. Rev. B 35, 9467 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.35.9467
H. Chen, J. Ding, N. Yuan, X. Wang, Ch. Chen, and D. Weng, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. 20, 30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60003-3
J. Beheshtian, A. A. Peyghan, and Z. Bagheri, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 8171 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.016
B. Wang, Sh. Nagase, J. Zhao, and G. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 4956 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp066548v
M. Chen, T. P. Straatsma, Z. Fang, and D. A. Dixon, J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 20400 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06730
https://www.cp2k.org/.
S. Goedecker, M. Teter, and J. Hutter, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703 (1996).
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 9901 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1329672
P. L. Brown and Ch. Ekberg, Hydrolysis of Metal Ions (Wiley, New York, 2016).
B. Cordero, V. Gómez, A. E. Platero-Prats, M. Revés, J. Echeverría, E. Cremades, F. Barragán, and S. Alvarez, Dalton Trans. 21, 2832 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1039/b801115j
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded by the Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training, grant no. B2018-SPH-47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, Cam, L.M., Lan, N.H. et al. A Theoretical Study on the Interaction between Zinc Oxide Cluster (ZnO)3 and Mercury Ion (HgOH+). Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1199–1207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420060126
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420060126