Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Cobalt in GdFeO3 Catalyst Systems on Their Activity in the Dry Reforming of Methane to Synthesis Gas

  • Published:
Petroleum Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perovskite-type complex oxides GdFeO3 and GdCo0.5Fe0.5O3 synthesized by the sol–gel method and gadolinium ferrite modified with cobalt oxide (5 wt %) are studied as catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Single-phase catalysts with the perovskite orthorhombic crystal structure and an average particle size of 100–200 nm are synthesized. Catalytic activity testing shows that the surface modification of gadolinium ferrite with cobalt, as well as the introduction of Co directly into the crystal structure to form a GdCo0.5Fe0.5O3 solid solution, leads to the formation of new catalytically active sites and provides an increase in the activity of GdFeO3. The sample with cobalt oxide deposited on the surface is highly resistant to coking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. R. Foit, I. C. Vinke, L. G. J. de Haart, and R. A. Eichel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 5402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201607552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Acharya, P. Roy, and A. Dutta, Biofuels 5, 551 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2014.1002996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Herna’ndez, M. A. Farkhondehfal, F. Sastre, M. Makkee, G. Saracco, and N. Russo, Green Chem. 19, 2326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC00398F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Vasiliades, P. Djinović, L. F. Davlyatova, A. Pintar, and A. M. Efstathiou, Catal. Today 299, 201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. H. Gunardson and J. M. Abrardo, Hydrocarbon Process. 78 (4), 87 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Xie, L. Shi, J. Zhang, and D. Zhang, Chem. Commun. 50, 7250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC01441C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Zhao, H. Li, and H. Li, Nano Energy 45, 101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. A. Peña and J. L. G. Fierro, Chem. Rev. 101, 1981 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr980129f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Abdolrahmani, M. Parvari, and M. Habibpoor, Chin. J. Catal. 31 (4), 394 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60059-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. de Caprariis, P. de Filippisa, V. Palma, A. Petrullo, A. Ricca, C. Ruocco, and M. Scarsella, Appl. Catal., A 517, 47 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.02.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Wang, X. Dong, T. Zhao, H. Yu, and M. Li, Appl. Catal., B 245, 302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. S. Amin and T. C. Yaw, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 1789 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. X. Song, X. Dong, Sh. Yin, M. Wang, M. Li, and H. Wang, Appl. Catal., A 526, 132 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.07.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. W. Nam, H. Chae, S. H. Lee, H. Jung, and K.‑Y. Lee, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 119, 843 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(98)80537-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Zhu, H. Cheng, X. Zou, X. Lu, Q. Xu, and Zh. Zhou, Chin. J. Catal. 36, 915 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(14)60303-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. R. Moradi, F. Khosravian, and M. Rahmanzadeh, Chin. J. Catal. 33, 797 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60378-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Touahra, A. Rabahi, R. Chebout, A. Boudjemaa, D. Lerari, M. Sehailia, D. Halliche, and K. Bachari, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 2477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. V. Yafarova, I. V. Chislova, I. A. Zvereva, T. A. Kryuchkova, V. V. Kost, and T. F. Sheshko, J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 92, 264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05013-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. T. F. Sheshko, Yu. M. Serov, T. A. Kryuchkova, I. A. Khayrullina, I. V. Chislova, L. V. Yafarova, and I. A. Zvereva, Nanotechnol. Russ. 12 (3–4), 174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078017020112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. A. Daza, D. Maiti, R. A. Kent, V. R. Bhethanabotla, and J. N. Kuhn, Catal. Today 258, 691 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Valderrama, A. Kiennemann, and M. R. Goldwasser, J. Catal. 135, 142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Lago, G. Bini, M. A. Peña, and J. L. G. Fierro, J. Catal. 167 (1), 198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1997.1580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Ao, G. H. Pham, V. Sage, and V. Pareek, Fuel 206, 390 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. U. O. Osarieme, D. S. Herma, A. R. Ruwaida, and K. C. Chin, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 37, 435 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O. V. Krylov, Ross. Khim. Zh. 44 (1), 19 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. K. Nikoo and N. A. S. Amin, Fuel Process. Technol. 92 (3), 678 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Pakhare and J. Spivey, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (22), 7813 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60395d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Nagaokaa, K. Takanabe, and K. Aika, Appl. Catal., A 268 (1–2), 151 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O. U. Osazuwa and C. K. Cheng, J. Cleaner Prod. 148, 202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. T. F. Sheshko, Yu. M. Serov, T. A. Kryuchkova, I. A. Khairullina, I. V. Chislova, and I. A. Zvereva, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 90 (6), 1137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024416060236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. X. E. Verykios, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 28 (10), 1045 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00215-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The physicochemical studies were conducted using the equipment of the Thermogravimetric and Calorimetric Research Center, the Center for X-ray Diffraction Studies, and the Interdisciplinary Resource Center for Nanotechnology of the St. Petersburg State University Research Park.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 17-03-00647. The publication was supported by Program 5-100 of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 117198, Moscow, Russia

    T. A. Kryuchkova, V. V. Kost’ & T. F. Sheshko

  2. St. Petersburg State University, 198504, St. Petersburg, Russia

    I. V. Chislova, L. V. Yafarova & I. A. Zvereva

Authors
  1. T. A. Kryuchkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. V. Kost’
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. F. Sheshko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. V. Chislova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. V. Yafarova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. I. A. Zvereva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Kryuchkova.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

T.A. Kryuchkova, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-9756

V.V. Kost’, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-8992

T.F. Sheshko, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-4085

I.V. Chislova, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-5014

L.V. Yafarova, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-2209

I.A. Zvereva, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-3897

Additional information

Translated by M. Timoshinina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kryuchkova, T.A., Kost’, V.V., Sheshko, T.F. et al. Effect of Cobalt in GdFeO3 Catalyst Systems on Their Activity in the Dry Reforming of Methane to Synthesis Gas. Pet. Chem. 60, 609–615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544120050059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544120050059

Keywords:

Search

Navigation