Abstract
A comprehensive experimental study of the hydrodynamic behaviors for the specific system of air/paraffin oil/silica particles in a slurry bubble column of 0.15 m diameter and 2.9 m length has been carried out. The effect of regime transition, solid concentrations, static liquid height, sparger type and related bubble size on gas holdup over a range of superficial gas velocities has been investigated. From the experimental work, it is revealed that the gas holdup increases by increasing the superficial gas velocity and transition regime occurred at 0.043 to 0.08 m/s. The slope of this curve is steeper for homogeneous regime and less for heterogeneous regime. In addition, the presence of silica particle (0–40 vol %) inhibits bubble breakage, increases rise velocity and consequently decreases residence time and gas holdup. Approximately a 40% decrease in the overall gas holdup was observed by adding 40% solid particles to the air/paraffin oil system. Moreover, increasing static liquid height from 6 to 12 leads to about a 61% decrease in gas holdup in the absence of solid particles. Also, the use of a perforated plate instead of a porous one causes a 9% increase and a 21% decrease in bubble size and gas holdup, respectively. Finally, it is found that the Krishna and Sie correlation can predict gas holdup in the air/paraffin oil/silica particles system with an acceptable minimum relative error of about 8%.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Kostanyan, A.E., Multistage bubble suspended-bed column reactor for hydrocarbon oxidation processes, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2013, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 660–662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579513050047
Pour, A.N., Housaindokht, M.R., Irani, M. and Shahri, S.M.K., Size-dependent studies of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on iron based catalyst: New kinetic model, Fuel, 2014, vol. 116, pp. 787–793.
Pour, A.N. and Housaindokht, M.R., Study of activity, products selectivity and physico-chemical properties of bifunctional Fe/HZSM-5 Fischer–Tropsch catalyst: Effect of catalyst shaping, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2013, vol. 14, pp. 29–33.
Schumpe, A., Saxena, A., and Fang, L., Gas/liquid mass transfer in a slurry bubble column, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1987, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1787–1796.
Shaikh, A. and Al-Dahhan, M.H., A review on flow regime transition in bubble columns, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 2007, vol. 5, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1368
Rozen, A.M. and Kostanyan, A.E., Scaling-up effect in chemical engineering, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2002, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019877029219
Götz, M., Lefebvre, J., Mörs, F., Reimert, R., Graf, F., and Kolb, T., Hydrodynamics of organic and ionic liquids in a slurry bubble column reactor operated at elevated temperatures, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, vol. 286, pp. 348–360.
Panchenko, S.V., Panchenko, D.S., and Glebova, N.B., Hydrodynamics of the bubble bed of a heterogeneous reduction reactor, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2005, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022160
Behkish, A., Men, Z., Inga, J.R., and Morsi, B.I., Mass transfer characteristics in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor with organic liquid mixtures, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2002, vol. 57, no. 16, pp. 3307–3324.
Li, Z., Guan, X., Wang, L., Cheng, Y., and Li, X., Experimental and numerical investigations of scale-up effects on the hydrodynamics of slurry bubble columns, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2016, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.05.009
Lau, R., Mo, R., and Sim, W.S.B., Bubble characteristics in shallow bubble column reactors, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2010, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 197–203.
Krishna, R., De Swart, J.W., Ellenberger, J., Martina, G.B., and Maretto, C., Gas holdup in slurry bubble columns: Effect of column diameter and slurry concentrations, AIChE J., 1997, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 311–316.
Vandu, C., Koop, K., and Krishna, R., Volumetric mass transfer coefficient in a slurry bubble column operating in the heterogeneous flow regime, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2004, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 5417–5423.
Vandu, C. and Krishna, R., Volumetric mass transfer coefficients in slurry bubble columns operating in the churn-turbulent flow regime, Chem. Eng. Process., 2004, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 987–995.
Woo, K.-J., Kang, S.-H., Kim, S.-M., Bae, J.-W., and Jun, K.-W., Performance of a slurry bubble column reactor for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: Determination of optimum condition, Fuel Process. Technol., 2010, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 434–439.
Behkish, A., Lemoine, R., Sehabiague, L., Oukaci, R., and Morsi, B.I., Prediction of the gas holdup in industrial-scale bubble columns and slurry bubble column reactors using back-propagation neural networks, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 2005, vol. 3, no. 1.
Sehabiague, L. and Morsi, B.I., Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor for gas mixtures in actual Fischer–Tropsch cuts, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 2013, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 83–102.18. Abdulrahman, M., Experimental studies of the transition velocity in a slurry bubble column at high gas temperature of a helium–water–alumina system, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 2016, vol. 74, pp. 404–410.
Gheni, S.A., Abdulaziz, Y.I., and Al-Dahhan, M.H., Effect of L/D ratio on phase holdup and bubble dynamics in slurry bubble column using optical fiber probe measurements, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 2016, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 653–664.
Jana, S.K., Biswas, A.B., and Das, S.K., Gas holdup in tapered bubble column using pseudoplastic non-Newtonian liquids, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2014, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 574–581.
Mersmann, A., Design and scale-up of bubble and spray columns, Ger. Chem. Eng., 1978, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
Basha, O.M., Sehabiague, L., Abdel-Wahab, A., and Morsi, B.I., Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in slurry bubble column reactors: Experimental investigations and modeling–A review, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 2015, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 201–288.
Rabha, S., Schubert, M., and Hampel, U., Intrinsic flow behavior in a slurry bubble column: A study on the effect of particle size, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2013, vol. 93, pp. 401–411.
Krishna, R. and Sie, S., Design and scale-up of the Fischer–Tropsch bubble column slurry reactor, Fuel Process. Technol., 2000, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 73–105.
Abdulrahman, M., Experimental studies of gas holdup in a slurry bubble column at high gas temperature of a helium− water− alumina system, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2016, vol. 109, pp. 486–494.
Kaštánek, A., Zelenka, J., and Hájek, K., The viscosity of an unsaturated polyester, J. App. Polym. Sci., 1984, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 447–453.
Kumar, S.B., Moslemian, D., and Duduković, M.P., Gas-holdup measurements in bubble columns using computed tomography, AIChE J., 1997, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1414–1425.
Ruzicka, M., Drahoš, J., Fialova, M., and Thomas, N., Effect of bubble column dimensions on flow regime transition, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2001, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 6117–6124.
Wilkinson, P.M., Spek, A.P., and van Dierendonck, L.L., Design parameters estimation for scale-up of high-pressure bubble columns, AIChE J., 1992, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 544–554.
Yamashita, F., Effect of clear liquid height and gas inlet height on gas holdup in a bubble column, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 1998, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 285–288.
Jordan, U. and Schumpe, A., The gas density effect on mass transfer in bubble columns with organic liquids, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2001, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 6267–6272.
Bouaifi, M., Hebrard, G., Bastoul, D., and Roustan, M., A comparative study of gas hold-up, bubble size, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in stirred gas–liquid reactors and bubble columns, Chem. Eng. Process., 2001, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 97–111.
Bouaifi, M. and Roustan, M., Bubble size and mass transfer coefficients in dual-impeller agitated reactors, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1998, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 390–397.
Luo, X., Lee, D., Lau, R., Yang, G., and Fan, L.S., Maximum stable bubble size and gas holdup in high-pressure slurry bubble columns, AIChE J., 1999, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 665–680.
Sauer, T. and Hempel, D.C., Fluid dynamics and mass transfer in a bubble column with suspended particles, Chem. Eng. Technol., 1987, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 180–189.
Fan, L.-S., Yang, G., Lee, D., Tsuchiya, K., and Luo, X., Some aspects of high-pressure phenomena of bubbles in liquids and liquid–solid suspensions, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1999, vol. 54, no. 21, pp. 4681–4709.
Koide, K., Takazawa, A., Komura, M., and Matsunaga, H., Gas holdup and volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in solid-suspended bubble columns, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 1984, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 459–466.
Reilly, I., Scott, D., De Bruijn, T., Jain, A., and Piskorz, J., A correlation for gas holdup in turbulent coalescing bubble columns, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1986, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 705–717.
Prakash, A., Margaritis, A., Li, H., and Bergougnou, M.A., Hydrodynamics and local heat transfer measurements in a bubble column with suspension of yeast, Biochem. Eng. J., 2001, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 155–163.
Li, H. and Prakash, A., Influence of slurry concentrations on bubble population and their rise velocities in a three-phase slurry bubble column, Powder Technol., 2000, vol. 113, nos. 1–2, pp. 158–167.
Hyndman, C.L., Larachi, F., and Guy, C., Understanding gas-phase hydrodynamics in bubble columns: A convective model based on kinetic theory, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1997, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 63–77.
Mena, P.C., Ruzicka, M.C., Rocha, F.A., Teixeira, J.A., and Drahoš, J., Effect of solids on homogeneous–heterogeneous flow regime transition in bubble columns, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2005, vol. 60, no. 22, pp. 6013–6026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.020
Pino, L.Z., Solari, R.B., Siuier, S., Estevez, L.A., Yepez, M.M., and Saez, A.E., Effect of operating conditions on gas holdup in slurry bubble columns with a foaming liquid, Chem. Eng. Commun., 1992, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 367–382.
Funding
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support granted by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
NOTATIONSymbols and Abbrevia-tions | Greeks | ||
C s | solid concentration in slurry phase | σ | surface tension, N m–1 |
Cso | solid concentration at the bottom of the reactor | εg | gas holdup |
D | diameter of reactor, m | \(\rho \) | density, kg m–3 |
d | bubble diameter, m | \(\mu \) | viscosity, kg m–1s–1 |
d 32 | Sauter diameter, m | \(\upsilon \) | kinematic viscosity, m2s–1 |
d b | large bubble diameter, m | \(\zeta \) | dimensionless radial position |
g | gravity acceleration, m s–1 | Subscripts | |
H C | height of reactor, m | b | bubble |
L | length of reactor, m | C | column |
Mo | Morton number, dimensionless | cal | calculated |
U G | superficial gas velocity, m s–1 | df | dense phase |
U–Udf | superficial gas velocity through the large bubbles, m s–1 | expt | experimental |
U trans | transition superficial gas velocity, m s–1 | eff | effective |
\({{\upsilon }_{{{\text{eff}}{\text{,rad}}}}}\) | radial momentum transfer coefficient, m2 s–1 | G, L | gas and liquid phases |
SBCR | slurry bubble column reactor | large | referring to large bubbles |
RE | relative error | P | particle |
ARE | absolute relative error | small | referring to small bubbles |
Nlit/min | normal liter per minute | sl | slurry |
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A. Garmroodi Asil, Pour, A.N. & Mirzaei, S. Intrinsic Hydrodynamic Investigation of Three-Phase Bubble Column: Comparative Experimental Study on Gas Holdup. Theor Found Chem Eng 54, 331–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579520020050
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579520020050