Skip to main content
Log in

From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works

  • HISTORY OF BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Developmental Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [General Morphology of Organisms] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both within the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the General Morphology (hereafter GM), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arnold Dodel. Ernst Haeckel als Erzieher. Nachdruck mit Anmerkungen, Porges, K., Hoßfeld, U., and Hoppe, Th., Eds., Gera: Museum für Naturkunde, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carl Gegenbaur and Evolutionary Morphology, Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., and Breidbach, O., Eds., Theory Biosci., 2003, vol. 122, nos. 2/3.

  3. Grell, K.G., Die Gastraea-Theorie, Medizinhistorisches J., 1979, vol. 14, pp. 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst Haeckel, Gemeinverständliche Werke, Schmidt, H., Ed., Leipzig: Alfred Krӧner, 1924, vols. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst Haeckel (1843–1919): The German Darwin and His Impact on Modern Biology, Hoßfeld, U., Levit, G.S. and Kutschera, U., Eds., Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 1–202.

  6. From Evolutionary Morphology to the Modern Synthesis and “Evo-Devo”: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Olsson, L., Hoßfeld, U., and Breidbach, O., Eds., Theory Biosci., 2006, vol. 124, nos. 3/4, pp. 259–418.

  7. Haeckel, E., Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, vol. 1: Allgemeine Anatomie der Organismen, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1866a.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haeckel, E., Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, vol. 2: Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1866b.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haeckel, E., Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haeckel, E., Monographie der Kalkschwämme, vol. 1: Genereller Theil. Biologie der Kalkschwämme, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haeckel, E., Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Grundzüge der menschlichen Keimes- und Stammesgeschichte, Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1874a.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Haeckel, E., Die Gastraea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification des Thierreichs und die Homologie der Keimblätter, J. Zeitschr. für Naturwiss., 1874b, vol. 8, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haeckel, E., Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere, J. Zeitschr. für Naturwiss., 1875, vol. 9, pp. 402–508.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haeckel, E., Morphologie der Infusorien, J. Zeitschr. für Naturwiss., 1883, vol. 7, p. 560.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haeckel, E., Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte.8 Auflage, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haeckel, E., Prinzipien der Generellen Morphologie der Organismen, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1906.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hopwood, N., Haeckel’s Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoßfeld, U., Levit, G.S, ‘Tree of life’ took root 150 years ago, Nature, 2016, vol. 540, no. 7631, p. 38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoßfeld, U. and Olsson, L., The history of comparative anatomy in Jena—an overview, Theor. Biosci., 2003a, vol. 122, nos. 2/3, pp. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoßfeld, U. and Olsson, L., The road from Haeckel. The Jena tradition in evolutionary morphology and the origin of “Evo-Devo,” Biol. Philos., 2003b, vol. 18, pp. 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoßfeld, U. and Olsson, L., Entwicklung und Evolution—ein zeitloses Thema, Prax. Naturwiss.,Biol. Sch., 2008, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoßfeld, U., Watts, E., and Levit, G.S., The first phylogenetic tree of plants was defined 150 years ago, Trends Plant Sci., 2017, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 99–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoßfeld, U., Levit, G.S., and Olsson, L., Haeckel reloaded: 150 Jahre “Biogenetisches Grundgesetz,” Biologie in unserer Zeit, 2016, vol. 46, pp. 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoßfeld, U., Porges, K., Levit, G.S., and Olsson, L., Ernst Haeckel’s embryology in biology textbooks in the German Democratic Republic, 1951–1988, Theor. Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoßfeld U., Olsson L., and Levit G.S., Evolutionäre Entwicklungsbiologie (Evo-Devo), in Evolutionsbiologie—Moderne Themen für den Unterricht, Dreesmann, D., Graf, D., and Witte, K., Eds., Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011, pp. 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoßfeld, U., Olsson, L., and Levit, G.S., The 150th anniversary of Ernst Haeckel’s “Biogenetic Law,” RSHU Proc., 2017, vol. 47, pp. 167–176.

  27. Hoßfeld, U., Ernst Haeckel. Biographienreihe absolute, Freiburg: Orange Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joshi, A., Ernst Heinrich Phillipp August Haeckel, Resonance, 2018a, vol. 23, pp. 1165–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Joshi, A., Vignettes of Haeckel’s contributions to biology, Resonance, 2018b, vol. 23, pp. 1177–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Junker, Th. and Hoßfeld, U., Die Entdeckung der Evolution. Eine revolutionäre Theorie und ihre Geschichte, Darmstadt: WBG, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kleeberg, B., God–nature progressing: natural theology in German monism, Sci. Context, 2007, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 537–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kolchinsky, E. I., Russian editions of E. Haeckel’s works and the evolution of their perception, Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, pp. 49–71.

  33. Kolchinsky, E. I. and Levit, G.S., The reception of Haeckel in pre-revolutionary Russia and his impact on evolutionary theory, Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, pp. 73–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levit, G.S. and Hoßfeld, U., Major research traditions in twentieth-century evolutionary biology: the relations of Germany’s Darwinism with them, in The Darwinian Tradition in Context, Delisle R., Ed., Cham: Springer Nature, 2017, pp. 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Levit, G.S., Hoßfeld, U., and Olsson, L., The integration of Darwinism and evolutionary morphology: Alexej Nikolajevich Sewertzoff (1866–1936) and the developmental basis of evolutionary change, J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.), 2004, vol. 302, no. 4, pp. 343–354.

  36. Levit, G.S., Hoßfeld, U., and Olsson, L., The Darwinian revolution in Germany: from evolutionary morphology to the modern synthesis, Endeavour, 2014, vol. 38, nos. 3–4, pp. 268–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Levit, G.S., Hoßfeld, U., and Olsson, L., Alexei Sewertzoff and Adolf Naef: revising Haeckel’s biogenetic law, Hist. Philos. Life Sci., 2015, vol. 36, pp. 357–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nordenskiöld, E., The History of Biology. A Survey, New York: Tudor, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Olsson, L. and Hoßfeld, U., Die Entwicklung: Die Zeit des Lebens. Ausgewählte Themen zur Geschichte der Entwicklungsbiologie, in Lebenswissen. Eine Einführung in die Geschichte der Biologie, Höxtermann, E. and Hilger, H.H., Eds., Rangsdorf. Natur & Text, 2007, pp. 218–243.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Olsson, L., Levit, G.S., and Hoßfeld, U., Evolutionary developmental biology: its concepts and history with a focus on Russian and German contributions, Naturwissenschaften, 2010, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 951–969.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olsson, L., Levit, G. S. and Hoßfeld, U., The ‘‘Biogenetic Law’’ in zoology: from Ernst Haeckel’s formulation to current approaches, Theory Biosci., 2017, vol. 136, pp. 19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rensch, B., Biophilosophy, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reynolds, A., Ernst Haeckel and the philosophy of sponges, Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, pp. 133–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Reynolds, A. and Hülsmann, N., Ernst Haeckel’s discovery of Magosphaera planula: a vestige of metazoan origins?, Hist. Phil. Sci., 2008, vol. 30, pp. 339–386.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Richards, R. J., The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Richards, R. J., Ernst Haeckel, a dream transformed, in Dreamers, Visionaries, and Revolutionaries in the Life Sciences, Harman O. and Dietrich M., Eds., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rieppel, O., Phylogenetic Systematics. Haeckel to Hennig, New York: CRC Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Rieppel, O., The concept of the organic individual in Haeckel’s writings, Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, pp. 147–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rinard, R. The problem of the organic individual: Ernst Haeckel and the development of the biogenetic law, J. Hist. Biol, 1981, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 249–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stewart, I. G., Hoßfeld, U., and Levit, G.S., Evolutionary ethics and Haeckelian monism: the case of Heinrich Schmidt’s harmonie (1931), Theory Biosci., 2019, vol. 138, pp. 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ulrich, K., Levit, G.S. and Hoßfeld, U., Ernst Haeckel (1843–1919): the German Darwin and his impact on modern biology, Theory Biosci., 2019, vol.138, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ulrich, W., Ernst Haeckel: “Generelle Morphologie,” 1866, Zoologische Beiträge N.F., 1967, vol. 13, pp. 165–212.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ulrich, W., Ernst Haeckel: Generelle Morphologie, 1866 (Fortsetzung und Schluß), Zooligische Beiträge N.F., 1968, vol. 14, pp. 213–311.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Uschmann, G., 100 Jahre Generelle Morphologie, Biologische Rundschau, 1966, pp. 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Watts, E., Hoßfeld, U., and Levit, G.S., Ecology and evolution—Haeckel’s Darwinian paradigm, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2019 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.003

Download references

Funding

Ian Stewart’s involvement in this article was as visiting scholar at the Biology Education Research Group (Bienenhaus), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, made possible through a Mobility Grant through the Erasmus + Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgy S. Levit.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porges, K., Stewart, I.G., Hoßfeld, U. et al. From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works. Russ J Dev Biol 50, 290–302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360419060079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360419060079

Keywords:

Navigation