Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nonlinear Decision Rule Approach for Real-Time Traffic Signal Control for Congestion and Emission Mitigation

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a real-time signal control framework based on a nonlinear decision rule (NDR), which defines a nonlinear mapping between network states and signal control parameters to actual signal controls based on prevailing traffic conditions, and such a mapping is optimized via off-line simulation. The NDR is instantiated with two neural networks: feedforward neural network (FFNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN), which have different ways of processing traffic information in the near past, and are compared in terms of their performances. The NDR is implemented within a microscopic traffic simulation (S-Paramics) for a real-world network in West Glasgow, where the off-line training of the NDR amounts to a simulation-based optimization aiming to reduce delay, CO2 and black carbon emissions. The emission calculations are based on the high-fidelity vehicle dynamics generated by the simulation, and the AIRE instantaneous emission model. Extensive tests are performed to assess the NDR framework, not only in terms of its effectiveness in reducing the aforementioned objectives, but also in relation to local vs. global benefits, trade-off between delay and emissions, impact of sensor locations, and different levels of network saturation. The results suggest that the NDR is an effective, flexible and robust way of alleviating congestion and reducing traffic emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Report to Congress on Black Carbon. Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. EPA-450/R-12-001.

  2. Transport ScotlandÕs Instantaneous Emissions Software AIRE. 2011. http://www.sias.com/2013/AIRE.html.

  3. Transport Scotland. AIRE (Analysis of Instantaneous Road Emissions) User Guidance In, Scotland, 2011.

References

  • Arel L, Liu C, Urbanik T, Kohls AG (2010) Reinforcement learning-based multi-agent system for network traffic signal control. IET Intell Transp Syst 4 (2):128–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaji PG, German X, Srinivasan D (2010) Urban traffic signal control using reinforcement learning agents. IET Intell Transp Syst 4(3):177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks A, Vincent J, Anyakoha C (2007) A review of particle swarm optimization. Part I: background and development. Nat Comput 6(4):467–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev 53(3):464–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Wong CK, Heydecker BG (2009) Adaptive traffic signal control using approximate dynamic programming. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 17 (5):456–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro GB, Hirakawa AR, Martini JS (2017) Adaptive traffic signal control based on bio-neural network. Procedia Comput Sci 109:1182–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L, Hui W (2016) Traffic emission control based on emission pricing and signal timing. In: 2016 12th World congress on intelligent control and automation (WCICA). IEEE, pp 467–472

  • Chang TH, Sun GY (2004) Modeling and optimization of an oversaturated signalized network. Transp Res B 38(8):687–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Bai R, Ma J, Wang D (2012) Research on intersection signal timing model considering emissions effects. In; CICTP 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 1024–1034

  • Christofa E, Skabardonis A (2011) Traffic signal optimization with application of transit signal priority to an isolated intersection. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 2259:192–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Christofa E, Ampountolas K, Skabardonis A (2016) Arterial traffic signal optimization: a person-based approach. Transp Res C 66:27–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Head K, Khoshmagham S, Zamanipour M (2015) A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment. Transp Res C 55:460–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesz TL (2010) Dynamic optimization and differential games. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner NH (1983) OPAC: a demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal control. Transp Res Record 906:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gkatzoflias D, Kouridis C, Ntziachristos L, Samaras Z (2006) COPERT 4 manual. European Environment Agency (EEA)

  • Han K (2017) Framework for real-time traffic management with case studies. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 2658:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Han K, Gayah VV (2015) Continuum signalized junction model for dynamic traffic networks: offset, spillback, and multiple signal phases. Transp Res B 77:213–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Han K, Gayah VV, Piccoli B, Friesz TL, Yao T (2014) On the continuum approximation of the on-and-off signal control on dynamic traffic networks. Transp Res B 61:73–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Han K, Sun Y, Liu H, Friesz TL, Yao T (2015) A bi-level model of dynamic traffic signal control with continuum approximation. Transp Res C 55:409–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Han K, Liu H, Gayah VV, Friesz TL, Yao T (2016) A robust optimization approach for dynamic traffic signal control with emission considerations. Transp Res C 70:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser TA, Scherer WT (2001) Data mining tools for real-time traffic signal decision support. 2001 IEEE International Conference on & Maintenance, Systems Man, and Cybernetics 3:1471–1477

    Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Head K, Ding J (2014) Multi-modal traffic signal control with priority, signal actuation and coordination. Transp Res C 46:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry JJ, Farges JL, Tuffal J (1983) The PRODYN real time traffic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the fourth IFAC-IFIP-IFORS conference on control in transportation systems, pp 307–311

  • Hunt PB, Robertson DI, Bretherton RD (1982) The SCOOT on-line traffic signal optimization technique. Traffic Eng Control 25:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidnejad A, Papamichail I, Papageorgiou M, De Schutter B (2017) Sustainable model-predictive control in urban traffic networks: efficient solution based on general smoothening methods. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 26(3):813–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen NAH, Gerlofs-Nijland ME, Lanki T, Salonen RO, Cassee F, Hoek G, Fischer P, Brunekreef B, Krzyzanowski M (2013) Health effects of black carbon. In Europe WROf (ed)

  • Ji Y, Hu B, Han J, Tang D (2014) An improved algebraic method for transit signal priority scheme and its impact on traffic emission. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 11 pages

  • Lefebvre W, Fierens F, Trimpeneers E, Janssen S, Van de Vel K, Deutsch F, Viaene P, Vankerkom J, Dumont G, Vanpoucke C, Mensink C, Peelaerts W, Vliegen J (2011) Modeling the effects of a speed limit reduction on traffic-related elemental carbon (EC) concentrations and population exposure to EC. Atmos Environ 45(1):197–207

  • Li L, Lv Y, Wang F (2016) Traffic signal timing via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sinica 3(3):247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, De Schutter B, Xi Y, Hellendoorn H (2013) Integrated urban traffic control for the reduction of travel delays and emissions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14(4):1609–1619

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Han K, Gayah VV, Friesz TL, Yao T (2015) Data-driven linear decision rule approach for distributionally robust optimization of on-line signal control. Transp Res C 59:260–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie P (1982) The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic system-principles, methodology, algorithms. International Conference on Road Traffic Signalling

  • Lucas D, Mirchandani P, Head K (2000) Remote simulation to evaluate real-time traffic control strategies. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 1727:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia M, Hu K, Han K, North R (2015) Simulation output for traffic scenarios for the city of Glasgow. Technical report, CARBOTRAF, D3.4

  • Mascia M, Hu K, Han K, North R, Van Poppel M, Theunis J, Beckx C, Litzenberger M (2016) Impact of traffic management on black carbon emissions: a microsimulation study. Netw Spatial Econ 17(1):269–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Osorio C, Nanduri K (2015) Urban transportation emissions mitigation: coupling high-resolution vehicular emissions and traffic models for traffic signal optimization. Transp Res B Methodol 81:520–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramics S, Paramics S (2011) Reference manual. In: SIAS limited. Edinburg

  • Papatzikou E, Stathopoulos A (2015) An optimization method for sustainable traffic control in urban areas. Transp Res C 55:179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Samah E, Baher A, Hossam A (2013) Multiagent reinforcement learning for integrated network of adaptive traffic signal controllers (MARLIN-ATSC): methodology and large-scale application on downtown Toronto. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 14 (3):1140–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Savsani V, Rao RV, Vakharia DP (2010) Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms. Mech Mach Theory 45(3):531–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha DY, Hsu CY (2008) A new particle swarm optimization for the open shop scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 35(10):3243–3261

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Barlow G, Xie X-F, Rubinstein Z (2013) SURTRAC: scalable urban traffic control. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Jan. 2013

  • Sobrino N, Monzon A, Hernandez S (2016) Reduced carbon and energy footprint in highway operations: the Highway Energy Assessment (HERA) methodology. Netw Spatial Econ 16:395–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan D, Choy MC, Cheu RL (2006) Neural networks for real-time traffic signal control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 7(3):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanovic A, Stevanovic J, So J, Ostojic M (2015) Multi-criteria optimization of traffic signals: mobility, safety, and environment. Transp Res C 55:46–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Benekohal RF, Waller ST (2006) Bi-level programming formulation and heuristic solution approach for dynamic traffic signal optimization. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 21(5):321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram S, Kumar SS, Divya Shree MS (2015) Hierarchical clustering technique for traffic signal decision support. Int J Innov Sci 2(6):72–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkari S (2004) The benefits of retiming traffic signals. Institute Transp Eng ITE J 74(4):26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukkusuri SV, Ramadurai G, Patil G (2010) A robust transportation signal control problem accounting for traffic dynamics. Comput Oper Res 37(5):869–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiering MA (2000) Multi-agent reinforcement learning for traffic light control. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning, pp 1151–1158

  • Yin PY (2006) Particle swarm optimization for point pattern matching. J Vis Commun Image Represent 17(1):143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y (2008) Robust optimal traffic signal timing. Transp Res B 42(10):911–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Yin Y, Lou Y (2010) Robust signal timing for arterials under day-to-day demand variations. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 2192:156–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Batterman S, Dion F (2011) Vehicle emissions in congestion: comparison of work zone, rush hour and free-flow conditions. Atmos Environ 45 (11):1929–1939

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Yin Y, Chen S (2013) Robust signal timing optimization with environmental concerns. Transp Res C 29:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Cai M (2014) Intersection signal control multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Edition) 1(2):153–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the EU 7th Framework Program project CARBOTRAF (28786), National Social Science Foundation of China (15BGL143), and the Zhejiang University/University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Han.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: : the PSO Algorithm

Appendix: : the PSO Algorithm

Given the objective function to be minimized, denoted f(⋅), and the feasible domain S, the following pseudo code summarizes the PSO procedure.

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Hu, S., Han, K. et al. Nonlinear Decision Rule Approach for Real-Time Traffic Signal Control for Congestion and Emission Mitigation. Netw Spat Econ 20, 675–702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-020-09497-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-020-09497-3

Keywords

Navigation