Abstract
In the present study, an immunosorbent surface-based theophylline determination method was developed and validated. The procedure was tested on milk samples. Theophylline was removed from milk by an immunosorbent surface. The efficiency of theophylline removal was found to be between 95–97%. The proposed method is cost effective and does not require any special equipment. Detection and quantification limits of the proposed method were determined based on the standard deviation of 10 ng/mL theophylline and they were equal 3 and 11 ng/mL, respectively. Results were also validated for precision, accuracy and linearity.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Gallelli, L., Falcone, D., Cannataro, R., Perri, M., Serra, R., Pelaia, G., Maselli, R., Savino, R., Spaziano, G., and D’Agostino, B., Drug Des., Dev. Ther., 2017, vol. 11, p. 265.
Barnes, P.J., Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 2003, vol. 167, p. 813.
Frymover, A., Su, F., Grimm, P.C., Sutherland, S.M., and Axelrod, D.M., J. Clin. Pharmacol., 2016, vol. 56, p. 1084.
Barnes, P.J. and Theophylline, Am. J. Respir. Crit. CareMed., 2013, vol. 188, p. 901.
Itturriaga, H., Coello, J., Maspoch, S., and Porcel, M., Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2002, vol. 374, p. 33.
Ozlem, A., Abdorrezzek, B., and Gonul, K., Int. J. Chem., 2003, vol. 13, p. 45.
Singh, D.K. and Sahu, A., Anal. Biochem., 2006, vol. 349, p. 176.
Al-Jenoobi, F.I., Ahad, A., Mahrous, G.M., Raish, M., Alam, M.A., and Al-Mohizea, A.M., J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2015, vol. 53, p. 1765.
Zacharis, C.K., Kika, F.S., Tzanavaras, P.D., and Fytianos, K., J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2013, vol. 927, p. 218.
Tzanavaras, P.D., Zacharis, C.K., and Themelis, D.G., Talanta, 2010, vol. 81, p. 1494.
Pagliariussi, R., Frietas, S., Luis, A.P., and Bastos, J.K.I., J. Sep. Sci., 2002, vol. 25, p. 371.
Qing-Chun, C. and Wang, J., J. Chromatogr. A, 2001, vol. 937, p. 57.
Chen, M.L., Zheng, M.M., and Feng, Y.Q., J. Chromatogr. A, 2010, vol. 1217, p. 3547.
Chernyseva, N.N., Abdullin, I.F., and Bundikov, G.K., J. Anal. Chem., 2001, vol. 56, p. 663.
Jain, K.K., Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 2003, vol. 3, p. 153.
Asefa, T., Duncan, C.T., and Krishna, K.S., Analyst, 2009, vol. 134, p. 1980.
O’Leary, R.M., Feuerhelm, D., Peers, D., Xu, Y., and Blank, G., BioPharm, 2001, vol. 14, p. 10.
Garcinuño, R.M., Fernández, P., Pérez-Conde, C., Guitiérrez, A.M., and Cámara, C., Talanta, 2000, vol. 52, p. 825.
Bruce, G.R. and Gill, P.S., J. Chem. Educ., 1999, vol. 76, p. 805.
AOAC Guidelines for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical Methods for Dietary Supplements and Botanicals, Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2002.
Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G., Lancet, 1995, vol. 346, p. 1085.
Jatlow, P., Clin. Chem., 1975, vol. 21, p. 1518.
Mckenna, D.J., Koritz, G.D., Neff-Davis, C.A., Langston, V.C., and Berger, L.L., J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1989, vol. 195, p. 603.
Giavarina, D., Biochem. Med. Zagreb, 2015, vol. 25, p. 141.
Srdjenovic, B., Djordjevic-Milic, V., Grujic, N., Injac, R., and Lepojevic, Z., J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2008, vol. 46, p. 144.
Oelling, C., Schunck, J., and Schwack, W.J., J. Chromatogr. A, 2018, vol. 1533, p. 208.
Sophi, S.L., Martono, S., and Rohman, A., Indones. J. Pharm., 2016, vol. 27, p. 190.
Tiwari, G. and Tiwari, R., Pharm. Methods, 2010, vol. 1, p. 25.
Gonzales, A.G. and Herrador, M.A., TrAC,Trends Anal. Chem., 2007, vol. 26, p. 227.
Funding
We thank to Marmara University Scientific Research Projects Commission for supporting this study (Project number: SAG-B-130511-0122).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
It is confirmed that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tugba Tunali Akbay, Ipekci, H. & Yarat, A. Validated Immunosorbent Surface-Based Determination of Theophylline in Milk. J Anal Chem 75, 640–644 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934820050020
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934820050020