Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula using multiplanar reformation in MDCT: correlation with ERCP findings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MPR-MDCT) to identify and classify the juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum (JPDD), with ERCP findings as the gold standard.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP examinations (n: 455) performed between January 2010 to December 2018 and selected 105 patients with JPDD as the inclusion criteria. Of those, 28 patients were excluded because of advanced pancreatic carcinoma, incomplete MDCT examinations and biliary catheter insertion. Finally, MDCT examinations of 77 patients with JPDD were assessed for the presence and type of JPDD.

Results

MPR-MDCT was able to identify 71 (92.2%) JPDD in 77 cases with 88.9% accuracy, 83.3% sensitivity, and 91.6% specificity in classifying the type of JPDD. MPR-MDCT performed best in determining type 1 JPDD, with accuracy of 95.4% compared with type 2 (83.3%) and type 3 (87.8%). There was no significant difference between age, gender, incidence of biliary stones and pancreatitis between each type of JPDD. No correlation of sizes with types of JPDD was found.

Conclusions

MPR-MDCT can accurately identify and classify JPDD. This information will be useful in determining the difficulty of ERCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiesner W, Beglinger Ch, Oertli D, et al. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum: MDCT findings in 1010 patients and proposal for a new classification. JBR-BTR. 2009;92:191–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Straja D, Marincas M, Alecu M, et al. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum early and late clinical and therapeutical implications. Chirurgia. 2009;104:687–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Nieuwkoop C, Boere I, Rosekrans PA, et al. Recurrent bacterial cholangitis due to a juxtapapillary diverticulum. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:189–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoneyama F, Miyata K, Ohta H, et al. Excision of a juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum causing biliary obstruction: report of three cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ko KS, Kim SH, Kim HC, et al. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum risk development and recurrence of biliary stone. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:772–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraj M, Mohan BP, Dhindsa BS, et al. Periampullary diverticulum and ERCP outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1364–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ketwaroo G, Qureshi W. ERCP success rate and periampullary diverticula: the pocket makes no difference. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1072–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Z, Bo W, Jiang P, et al. Different types of periampullary duodenal diverticulum are associated with occurrence and recurrence of bile duct stones: a case–control study from a Chinese center. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;6:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tamm EP, Balachandran A, Bhosale P, et al. Update on 3D and multiplanar MDCT in the assessment on biliary and pancreatic pathology. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morita S, Ueno E, Masukawa A, et al. Defining juxtapapillary diverticulum with 3D segmented trueFISP MRCP: comparison with conventional MRCP sequences with an oral negative contrast agent. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JY, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Assessment of hilar and extrahepatic bile duct cancer using multidetector CT: value of adding multiplanar reformations to standard axial images. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:3130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandenbroucke F, Op de Beeck B, De Mey J. Duodenal diverticulitis: CT and MR findings. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:95–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boix J, Lorenzo Zuniga V, Ananos F, et al. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticulum at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticulum. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2006;16:208–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nandalur KR, Hussain HK, Weadock WJ, et al. Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology. 2008;249:883–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:419–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto S, Mori H, Miyake H, et al. Uneven fatty replacement of the pancreas: evaluation with CT. Radiology. 1995;194:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozogul B, Ozturk G, Kisaoglu A, et al. The clinical importance of different localizations of the papilla associated with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum. Can J Surg. 2014;57:337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express special thanks to Mr. Takashi Takiguchi, a medical student in our university, and Cathel Kerr BSc, Ph.D. from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Silman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest and declare no relationship with any companies, whose products or services may be or will be related to the subject matter of the article.

Ethical considerations

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (revised in 2008). This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review boards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silman, C., Matsumoto, S., Yamada, Y. et al. Evaluation of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula using multiplanar reformation in MDCT: correlation with ERCP findings. Jpn J Radiol 38, 968–972 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00995-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00995-5

Keywords

Navigation