Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Saccharification of Sugarcane Bagasse Using Cellulase Preparation from a Thermophilic Strain of Brevibacillus sp.

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the production of cellulase from a thermophilic bacterium Brevibacillus sp. MT5 and prospects of utilizing the enzyme preparation for the saccharification of sugarcane bagasse (SB). The data revealed that cellulase produced at 70 °C expressed an IFPU (international filter paper unit) of 1.776 when assayed at 60 °C and showed good activity towards SB. Consequently, the conditions affecting saccharification of SB were studied by employing a Plackett–Burman design and reducing sugars were determined by dinitrosalicylic acid method and glucose oxidase kit. The analysis of the design highlighted that the factors affecting the hydrolysis process varies in terms of their significance with respect to the duration of the reaction, however, agitation remained a consistent significant factor throughout the process. Gravimetric analysis displayed a reduction of 49.7 and 22.6% in cellulose content after saccharification of SB from an industry and SB from a fruit juice vendor, respectively. The effect of enzyme action on SB was further visualized by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy that showed increased porosity and a diminished peak for cellulose, indicating degradation of the substrate by the enzyme preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Main manuscript and supplementary file contain all the relevant data. The raw dataset can be furnished upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Tariq R, Ansari I, Qadir F et al (2018) Optimization of endoglucanase production from thermophilic strain of Bacillus licheniformis RT-17 and its application for saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. Pak J Bot 50:807–816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Acharya S, Chaudhary A (2012) Bioprospecting thermophiles for cellulase production: a review Brazilian. J Microbiol 43(3):844–856

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatayama K, Shoun H, Ueda Y, Nakamura A (2014) Brevibacillus fulvus sp. nov., isolated from a compost pile. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:506–512. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.051052-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koutny M, Lemaire J, Delort AM (2006) Biodegradation of polyethylene films with prooxidant additives. Chemosphere 64(8):1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Narisawa N, Haruta S, Arai H et al (2008) Coexistence of antibiotic-producing and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria in biofilms is mediated by resistant bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(12):3887–3894. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02497-07

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naseeb S, Sohail M, Ahmad A, Khan SA (2015) Production of xylanases and cellulases by Aspergillus fumigatus MS16 using crude lignocellulosic substrates. Pakistan J Bot 47:779–784

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ejaz U, Muhammad S, Ali FI et al (2019) Methyltrioctylammonium chloride mediated removal of lignin from sugarcane bagasse for themostable cellulase production. Int J Biol Macromol 140:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arshad M, Ahmed S (2016) Cogeneration through bagasse: A renewable strategy to meet the future energy needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:732–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berezovsky IN, Shakhnovich EI (2005) Physics and evolution of thermophilic adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(36):12742–12747. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503890102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Panda AK, Bisht SS, DeMondal S et al (2014) Brevibacillus as a biological tool: A short review. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 105:623–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-0099-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Da Silva ASA, Inoue H, Endo T et al (2010) Milling pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and straw for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101(19):7402–7409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabelo SC, da Costa AC, Vaz Rossel CE (2015) Industrial waste recovery. In: Sugarcane: agricultural production, bioenergy and ethanol, pp. 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802239-9.00017-7

  13. Ejaz U, Ahmed A, Sohail M (2018) Statistical optimization of immobilization of yeast cells on corncob for pectinase production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 14:450–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yahya S, Jahangir S, Shaukat SS et al (2016) Production optimization by using plackett-burman design and partial characterization of amylase from Aspergillus tubingensis SY 1. Pakistan J Bot 48:2557–2561

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qadir F, Shariq M, Ahmed A, Sohail M (2018) Evaluation of a yeast co-culture for cellulase and xylanase production under solid state fermentation of sugarcane bagasse using multivariate approach. Ind Crops Prod 123:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezende CA, De Lima M, Maziero P et al (2011) Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar RS, Shankar T, Anandapandian KTK, Isaiarasu L (2012) Effect of Bacillus pumilus EWBCM1 whole cell immobilization in various matrices on cellulase enzyme production and saccharification of sugarcane bagasse. Am J Agric Environ Sci 12(1):128–132

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chandel AK, Antunes FAF, Anjos V et al (2014) Multi-scale structural and chemical analysis of sugarcane bagasse in the process of sequential acid-base pretreatment and ethanol production by Scheffersomyces shehatae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Corrales RCNR, Mendes FMT, Perrone CC et al (2012) Structural evaluation of sugar cane bagasse steam pretreated in the presence of CO 2 and SO 2. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Higher Education Commission Pakistan for the grant NRPU 6579 to the MS. Authors also thank to Dr. Firdous from the Department of Chemistry, University of Karachi for rendering TLC and FTIR services available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Sohail.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 9902 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M.T., Ejaz, U. & Sohail, M. Evaluation of Factors Affecting Saccharification of Sugarcane Bagasse Using Cellulase Preparation from a Thermophilic Strain of Brevibacillus sp.. Curr Microbiol 77, 2422–2429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02059-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02059-3

Navigation