Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Morphometric analysis of a badland affected portion of the Mandakini River sub-watershed, central India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphometric analysis has evolved as an important tool for basin management and to study the process performing in the basin. The trio of remote sensing, GIS, and morphometric analysis gives the best possible results in investigating, supervising, and understanding the basin. The present study comprises a detailed study of morphometric parameters in a badland affected sub-watershed of the Mandakini River. The sub-watershed is located in the northern foot slope of Vindhyan mountain range. The area consists of many structural and denudational hills, pediment, and pediplain complexes. Geologically soft sedimentary rocks are in the majority in this terrain and the area comprises a diverse range of gullies, in terms of shape and size. The intensity of the study is both macro and micro watershed level (up to the third and fourth sub-watershed level). The analysis is mostly based on derived parameters such as bifurcation ratio (Rb), drainage density (Dt), stream frequency (Fs), drainage texture (Dt), length of overland flow (Lg), and constant of channel maintenance (C), shape parameters such as circularity Ratio (Rc), elongation ratio (Re), form factor (Rf), and in relief parameter ruggedness number (Rn) and dissection index (Di). The analysis shows that low infiltration rate, i.e., a higher value of infiltration number (70.0), triggers high runoff and hence increases drainage density (4.5), drainage frequency (15.16), and drainage texture (25.23) and ultimately from an erosional setup in the sub-watershed and it is gradually deforming the land into a rugged terrain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdallah SM, Massoud EE (2018) Land degradation risk assessment in Al-Sawda terraces, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 11:599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3956-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad E (1968) Distribution and causes of gully erosion in India. 21st International Geographical Union Congress (N. Delhi) Selected Papers 1: l-3.

  • Ahmad E (1973) Soil erosion in India. Asia Publishing House, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Alqahtani F, Qaddah AA (2019) GIS digital mapping of flood hazard in Jeddah–Makkah region from morphometric analysis. Arab J Geosci 12:199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4338-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbarasu K (2001) Facies variation and depositional environment of Mesoproterozoic Vindhyan sediments of Chitrakut Area, Central India. J Geol Soc India 58:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Auden JB (1933) Vindhyan sedimentation in the Son Valley Mirzapur district. Memoir Geol Soc India 62(2):141–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Avouac JP, Burov E (1996) Erosion as a driving mechanism of intracontinental mountain growth. J Geophys Res 101:17,747–17,769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bali R, Agarwal K, Nawaz Ali SN, Rastogi S, Krishna K (2012) Drainage morphometry of Himalayan glacio-fluvial basin, India: hydrologic and neotectonic implications. Environ Earth Sci 66:1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson S, Belivanova V, Rasmussen B and Whitehouse M (2009) The controversial “Cambrian” fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older. Proceedings of National Acadamy of Sciences, USA, 106(19): 7729–7734

  • Bhattacharyya A (1996) Recent advances in Vindhyan geology. Memoir Geol Soc India 36:331

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan RB, Yair A (1982) Badland geomorphology and piping. Geo Books, Norwich, p 408

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty C (2006) Proterozoic intracratonic basin: the Vindhyan example. J Earth Syst Sci 115:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ (1969) The drainage basin as the fundamental geomorphic unit. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Introduction to fluvial processes. Methuen Co. Ltd, London, pp 30–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JI (1966) Morphometry from maps. Essays in Geomorphology, G. H. Dury, Ed., Elsevier, New York, NY, USA: 235–274.

  • Deshmukh DS, Chaube UC, Tignath S, Pingale SM (2011) Geomorphological analysis and distribution of badland around the confluence of Narmada and Sher River, India. Eur J Water Qual (36): 15-26.

  • Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhan Yahya, Ali Anbar, Omar Enaba, Nisrin Al-Shaikh (2015) “Quantitative analysis of geomorphometric parameters of Wadi Kerak, Jordan, using remote sensing and GIS”, J Wat Res and Protection, 7, 456-475.

  • Favis-Mortlock DT, Guerra AJT (1999) The implications of general circulation model estimates of rainfall for future erosion: a case study from Brazil. Catena 37:329–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh R, Srivastava P, Shukla UK, Singh I, Champati Ray PK, Sehgal RK (2018) Tectonic forcing of evolution and Holocene erosion rate of ravines in the Marginal Ganga Plain, India. J. Asian Earth Sci 162:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie AS (2006) Global warming and fluvial geomorphology 79: 384- 394.

  • Gregory KJ (1973) Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. Arnold, London: 456

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley R and Schumm S (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin. US Geol Surv Water-Supply Paper 1531-B, Washington DC: 198.

  • Horton R (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR013i001p00350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshua JR, Benjamin HM, Alexander LH, Adam MB, David AS, Georgina LB, Corina CD (2015) Beyond the angle of repose: a review and synthesis of landslide processes in response to rapid uplift, Eel River, Northern California. Geomorphology 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.013

  • Koons PO (1989) The topographic evolution of collisional mountain belts: a numerical look at the southern Alps, New Zealand. Am J Sci 289:1041–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gopalan K, Rajagopalan G (2001) Age of the Lower Vindhyan sediments, Central India. Curr Sci 81(7):806–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal RC, William and Moldenhaver (1987) Effect of soil erosion on crop productivity, Crit Rev Plant Sci 5 (4): 303-367.

  • Lal R (2001) Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degrad Dev 12:519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert D (1998) Field Guide Geol. Checkmark Books

  • Lavbe J, Avouac JP (2001) Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 106(26):561–26,591

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha M, Tignath S, Singh BN (2009) Drainage characterization of Pariyat watershed Jabalpur, India. Hydrol J 32(3-4):157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller V (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Project NR 389-402, Technical Report 3, Columbia University, Depart Geol, ONR, New York.

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, part of Western Ghats, Tirunelueli District, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS Approach. Environ Earth Sci 64:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0860-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P, England P (1990) Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and global climate change: chicken or egg? Nature 346:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadal-Romero E, Regüés D (2010) Geomorphological dynamics of sub-humid mountain badland areas: weathering, hydrological and suspended sediment transport processes. A case of study in the Araguás catchment (Central Pyrenees), and implications for altered hydro-climatic regimes. Prog Phys Geogr 34(3):123–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309356624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penck W (1953) Morphological analysis of land forms. Geomorphology, AUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray JS (2006) J Earth Syst Sci 115: 149–160.

  • Reddy MS (1999) Theme paper on water: vision 2050. Indian Water Res Soc, Roorkee, pp 51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Regüés D, Pardini G, Gallart F (1995) Regolith behaviour and physical weathering of clayey mudrock as dependent on seasonal weather conditions in a badland area at Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees. Catena 25(1–4):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(95)00010-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter ME (2003) An introduction to physical geography. Physical Environ http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/textbook/title_page.html

  • Pruski FF, Nearing MA (2002) Runoff and soil loss responses to changes in precipitation: a computer simulation study. J Soil Water Conserv 57(1):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Safaya HL (1975) Microfacies and depositional history of Strandline carbonates of Semri Series. Lower Vindhyan System. Banda Dist., U.P. J Geol Soc India 16(3):294–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HS (1980) Ravine erosion in India. Concept, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh IB, Ansari AA, Chandel RS, Mishra A (1996) Neotectonic control on the drainage system in Gangetic Plain, Uttar Pradesh. Jr. Geol Soc India 47:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Dubey A (1994) Planning of watersheds in India, Allahabad. India: Chugh Publications 28(A):69

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (1950) Standards for grading textures of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.248.9.655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1130/00167606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, Am Geophy Union 38:913–920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of appld hydrol. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, pp 4–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1968) Quantitative geomorphology. The Encyclopedia of geomorphology: 898–912.

  • Tignath S, Kapoor M, Jha M, Sharma SK, (2014) Morphometric analysis of part of the Hiran River, District Jabalpur, M.P., India using Remote sensing and GIS, International J of Environ Sci 5: 181-196 .

  • Torri D, Calzolari C, Rodolfi G (2000) Badlands in changing environments: an introduction. Catena 40(2):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00119-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Nearing MA, Nicks A, Skidmore E, Valentine C, King K, Savabi R (1996) Using soil erosion models for global change studies. J Soil Water Conserv 51(5):381–385

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly grateful to the Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), for providing necessary facilities in this study.

Funding

The authors received financial assistance from the University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India

    Nikhilesh Singh, Medha Jha & Bhola Nath Singh

  2. Department of Geology, Government Science College, Jabalpur, MP, 482001, India

    Sanjay Tignath

Authors
  1. Nikhilesh Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Medha Jha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay Tignath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bhola Nath Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhilesh Singh.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Stefan Grab

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, N., Jha, M., Tignath, S. et al. Morphometric analysis of a badland affected portion of the Mandakini River sub-watershed, central India. Arab J Geosci 13, 423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05405-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05405-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation