Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian estimation of spatially varying soil parameters with spatiotemporal monitoring data

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characterization of in situ ground conditions is essential for geotechnical practice. The probabilistic estimation of soil parameters can be achieved via updating with monitoring data within the Bayesian framework. The estimation of spatially varying soil parameters is seldom undertaken with time-variant monitoring data. In this study, an efficient Bayesian method is presented for the estimation of spatially varied saturated hydraulic conductivity ks of unsaturated soil slope with spatiotemporal monitoring data. The computationally cheap surrogate model of the adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion method is adopted to approximate the transient numerical model. Markov chain Monte Carlo method is used for the probabilistic estimation of basic random variables. Based on the hypothetical cases, the effects of monitoring frequency and stage are studied. The errors and the uncertainties of the estimated ks fields are increased with the decreasing monitoring frequency. Bayesian estimation of spatial variability is more accurate when using the later stage of monitoring data. The estimated method is further verified with a real case study by the comparison of borehole data, dynamic probe test (DPT) data, and field monitoring data. The distribution of the soil types acquired from boreholes is reflected in the estimated ks. The estimated field of ks has a certain agreement with the borehole log and DPT measurements and can reproduce the spatial variability of the site to an acceptable degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

(modified from Evans and Lam [17])

Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alcolea A, Carrera J, Medina A (2006) Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem. Adv Water Resour 29(11):1678–1689

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beran PS, Pettit CL, Millman DR (2006) Uncertainty quantification of limit-cycle oscillations. J Comput Phys 217(1):217–247

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilgin Ö, Arens K, Dettloff A (2019) Assessment of variability in soil properties from various field and laboratory tests. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 13(4):247–254

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blatman G, Sudret B (2010) An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech 25(2):183–197

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blatman G, Sudret B (2011) Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression. J Comput Phys 230(6):2345–2367

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozorgzadeh N, Bathurst RJ (2019) A Bayesian approach to reliability of MSE walls. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1666999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7(4):434–455

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao Z, Wang Y (2012) Bayesian approach for probabilistic site characterization using cone penetration tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):267–276

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ching J, Phoon KK (2013) Effect of element sizes in random field finite element simulations of soil shear strength. Comput Struct 126:120–134

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ching J, Phoon KK (2019) Constructing site-specific multivariate probability distribution model using Bayesian machine learning. J Eng Mech 145(1):04018126

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ching J, Wang JS (2016) Application of the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to probabilistic site characterization. Eng Geol 203:151–167

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho KH, Choi MK, Nam SW, Lee IM (2006) Geotechnical parameter estimation in tunnelling using relative convergence measurement. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30(2):137–155

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cho SE (2014) Probabilistic stability analysis of rainfall-induced landslides considering spatial variability of permeability. Eng Geol 171:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis JM, Wilson JL, Phillips FM, Gotkowitz MB (1997) Relationship between fluvial bounding surfaces and the permeability correlation structure. Water Resour Res 33(8):1843–1854

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desai A, Witteveen JA, Sarkar S (2013) Uncertainty quantification of a non-linear aeroelastic system using polynomial chaos expansion with constant phase interpolation. J Vib Acoust 135(5):051034

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ering P, Babu GS (2016) Probabilistic back analysis of rainfall induced landslide—a case study of Malin landslide, India. Eng Geol 208:154–164

    Google Scholar 

  17. Evans NC, Lam JS (2003) Tung Chung East natural terrain study area ground movement and groundwater monitoring equipment and preliminary results. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering Department

  18. Feng S, Vardanega PJ (2019) A database of saturated hydraulic conductivity of fine-grained soils: probability density functions. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 13(4):255–261

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7(4):457–472

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (2003) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gong W, Tien YM, Juang CH, Martin JR, Luo Z (2017) Optimization of site investigation program for improved statistical characterization of geotechnical property based on random field theory. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76(3):1021–1035

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gómez-Hernánez JJ, Sahuquillo A, Capilla J (1997) Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data—I. Theory. J Hydrol 203(1–4):162–174

    Google Scholar 

  24. Griffiths DV, Huang J, Fenton GA (2011) Probabilistic infinite slope analysis. Comput Geotech 38(4):577–584

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hess KM, Wolf SH, Celia MA (1992) Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersivities. Water Resour Res 28(8):2011–2027

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang J, Griffiths DV (2015) Determining an appropriate finite element size for modelling the strength of undrained random soils. Comput Geotech 69:506–513

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huang J, Zheng D, Li DQ, Kelly R, Sloan SW (2018) Probabilistic characterization of two-dimensional soil profile by integrating cone penetration test (CPT) with multi-channel analysis of surface wave (MASW) data. Can Geotech J 55(8):1168–1181

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang SH, Li DQ, Zhang LM, Zhou CB (2014) Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method. Eng Geol 168:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang SH, Papaioannou I, Straub D (2018) Bayesian updating of slope reliability in spatially variable soils with in situ measurements. Eng Geol 239:310–320

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klaas DK, Imteaz MA (2017) Investigating the impact of the properties of pilot points on calibration of groundwater models: case study of a karst catchment in Rote Island, Indonesia. Hydrogeol J 25(6):1703–1719

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li S, Zhao H, Ru Z, Sun Q (2016) Probabilistic back analysis based on Bayesian and multi-output support vector machine for a high cut rock slope. Eng Geol 203:178–190

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu K, Vardon PJ, Hicks MA (2018) Sequential reduction of slope stability uncertainty based on temporal hydraulic measurements via the ensemble Kalman filter. Comput Geotech 95:147–161

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mai CV, Sudret B (2017) Surrogate models for oscillatory systems using sparse polynomial chaos expansions and stochastic time warping. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif 5(1):540–571

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Mollon G, Dias D, Soubra AH (2010) Probabilistic analysis of pressurized tunnels against face stability using collocation-based stochastic response surface method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(4):385–397

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ng CWW, Wong HN, Tse YM, Pappin JW, Sun HW, Millis SW, Leung AK (2011) A field study of stress-dependent soil–water characteristic curves and permeability of a saprolitic slope in Hong Kong. Geotechnique 61(6):511–521

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pan Q, Dias D (2017) Probabilistic evaluation of tunnel face stability in spatially random soils using sparse polynomial chaos expansion with global sensitivity analysis. Acta Geotech 12(6):1415–1429

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pan Q, Dias D (2017) Sliced inverse regression-based sparse polynomial chaos expansions for reliability analysis in high dimensions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:484–493

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pan Q, Qu X, Liu L, Dias D (2020) A sequential sparse polynomial chaos expansion using Bayesian regression for geotechnical reliability estimations. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 44(6):874–889

    Google Scholar 

  40. Peng M, Li XY, Li DQ, Jiang SH, Zhang LM (2014) Slope safety evaluation by integrating multi-source monitoring information. Struct Saf 49:65–74

    Google Scholar 

  41. Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):612–624

    Google Scholar 

  42. Qi XH, Zhou WH (2017) An efficient probabilistic back-analysis method for braced excavations using wall deflection data at multiple points. Comput Geotech 85:186–198

    Google Scholar 

  43. Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1(5):318–333

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Santoso AM, Phoon KK, Quek ST (2011) Effects of soil spatial variability on rainfall-induced landslides. Comput Struct 89(11–12):893–900

    Google Scholar 

  45. Srivastava A, Babu GS, Haldar S (2010) Influence of spatial variability of permeability property on steady state seepage flow and slope stability analysis. Eng Geol 110(3–4):93–101

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tabarroki M, Ching J (2019) Discretization error in the random finite element method for spatially variable undrained shear strength. Comput Geotech 105:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  47. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vardon PJ, Liu K, Hicks MA (2016) Reduction of slope stability uncertainty based on hydraulic measurement via inverse analysis. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 10(3):223–240

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vrugt JA (2016) Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation. Environ Model Softw 75:273–316

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vrugt JA, Ter Braak CJ, Clark MP, Hyman JM, Robinson BA (2008) Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Water Resour Res 44(12):W00B09

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wan X, Karniadakis GE (2006) Long-term behavior of polynomial chaos in stochastic flow simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(41–43):5582–5596

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang L, Hwang JH, Luo Z, Juang CH, Xiao J (2013) Probabilistic back analysis of slope failure—a case study in Taiwan. Comput Geotech 51:12–23

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang Y, Zhao T (2016) Interpretation of soil property profile from limited measurement data: a compressive sampling perspective. Can Geotech J 53(9):1547–1559

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Y, Cao Z, Li D (2016) Bayesian perspective on geotechnical variability and site characterization. Eng Geol 203:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang Y, Jin H, Ouyang LJ (2013) Real-time prediction of seepage field during tunnel excavation. In: Shao J, Liu X (eds) Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol 274. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wei X, Zhang L, Yang HQ, Zhang L, Yao YP (2020) Machine learning for pore-water pressure time-series prediction: application of recurrent neural networks. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Witteveen JA, Iaccarino G (2013) Simplex stochastic collocation with ENO-type stencil selection for robust uncertainty quantification. J Comput Phys 239:1–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(43):4927–4948

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Xu J, Zhang L, Li J, Cao Z, Yang H, Chen X (2020) Probabilistic estimation of variogram parameters of geotechnical properties with a trend based on Bayesian inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1757720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang HQ, Chen X, Zhang L, Zhang J, Wei X, Tang C (2020) Conditions of hydraulic heterogeneity under which Bayesian estimation is more reliable. Water 12(1):160

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yang HQ, Zhang L, Li DQ (2018) Efficient method for probabilistic estimation of spatially varied hydraulic properties in a soil slope based on field responses: a Bayesian approach. Comput Geotech 102:262–272

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yang HQ, Zhang L, Xue J, Zhang J, Li X (2019) Unsaturated soil slope characterization with Karhunen-Loève and polynomial chaos via Bayesian approach. Eng Comput 35(1):337–350

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yuan J, Papaioannou I, Straub D (2019) Probabilistic failure analysis of infinite slopes under random rainfall processes and spatially variable soil. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 13(1):20–33

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang J, Tang WH, Zhang LM (2009) Efficient probabilistic back-analysis of slope stability model parameters. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(1):99–109

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang LL, Li JH, Li X, Zhang J, Zhu H (2016) Rainfall-induced soil slope failure: stability analysis and probabilistic assessment. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang LL, Wu F, Zheng YF, Chen LH, Zhang J, Li X (2018) Probabilistic calibration of a coupled hydro-mechanical slope stability model with integration of multiple observations. Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 12(3):169–182

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang LL, Zhang J, Zhang LM, Tang WH (2010) Back analysis of slope failure with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Geotech 37(7–8):905–912

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang LL, Zheng YF, Zhang J (2017) Assessment of error assumption in probabilistic model calibration of rainfall infiltration in soil slope. In: Geo-Risk 2017, Denver Colorado, United States, pp 82–100

  69. Zhang LL, Zheng YF, Zhang LM, Li X, Wang JH (2014) Probabilistic model calibration for soil slope under rainfall: effects of measurement duration and frequency in field monitoring. Géotechnique 64(5):365

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang LL, Zuo ZB, Ye GL, Jeng DS, Wang JH (2013) Probabilistic parameter estimation and predictive uncertainty based on field measurements for unsaturated soil slope. Comput Geotech 48:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zheng D, Huang J, Li DQ, Kelly R, Sloan SW (2018) Embankment prediction using testing data and monitored behaviour: a Bayesian updating approach. Comput Geotech 93:150–162

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zimmermann B, Elsenbeer H (2008) Spatial and temporal variability of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in gradients of disturbance. J Hydrol 361(1–2):78–95

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work in this paper was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51679135 and No. 51422905) and the Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (Project No. 19XD1421900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lulu Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, HQ., Zhang, L., Pan, Q. et al. Bayesian estimation of spatially varying soil parameters with spatiotemporal monitoring data. Acta Geotech. 16, 263–278 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00991-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00991-z

Keywords

Navigation