Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access May 23, 2020

Enzymatic degradation study of PLA-based composite scaffolds

  • Ricardo Donate EMAIL logo , Mario Monzón , María Elena Alemán-Domínguez and Zaida Ortega

Abstract

Disadvantages in the use of polylactic acid (PLA) as a base material for Tissue Engineering applications include the low osteoconductivity of this biomaterial, its acidic degradation and the deficient cellular adhesion on its surface. In order to counteract these drawbacks, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and β-tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2, β-TCP) were proposed in this work as additives of PLA-based support structures. Composite scaffolds (PLA:CaCO3: β-TCP 95:2.5:2.5) manufactured by fused deposition modeling (FDM) were tested under enzymatic degradation using proteinase K enzymes to assess the modification of their properties in comparison with neat PLA scaffolds. The samples were characterized before and after the degradation test by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, compression testing and thermogravimetric and calorimetric analysis. According to the results, the combination of the PLA matrix with the proposed additives increases the degradation rate of the 3D printed scaffolds, which is an advantage for the application of the composite scaffold in the field of Tissue Engineering. The higher degradation rate of the composite scaffolds could be explained by the release of the additive particles and the statistically higher microporosity of these samples compared to the neat PLA ones.

References

[1] Narayanan, G., V. N. Vernekar, E. L. Kuyinu, and C. T. Laurencin. Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Vol. 107, 2016, pp. 247–276.10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.015Search in Google Scholar

[2] Abert, J., A. Amella, S. Weigelt, and H. Fischer. Degradation and swelling issues of poly-(d,l-lactide)/ β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium carbonate composites for bone replacement. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Vol. 54, 2016, pp. 82–92.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.016Search in Google Scholar

[3] Saha, S. K., and H. Tsuji. Effects of molecular weight and small amounts of d-lactide units on hydrolytic degradation of poly(llactic acid)s. Polymer Degradation & Stability, Vol. 91, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1665–1673.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.12.009Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mainil-Varlet, P., R. Curtis, and S. Gogolewski. Effect of in vivo and in vitro degradation on molecular and mechanical properties of various low-molecular-weight polylactides. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1997, pp. 360–380.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970905)36:3<360::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Laurence, J., P. M. Baptista, A. Atala, and M. Van Beusekom. Translating Regenerative Medicine to the Clinic. Elsevier Inc., 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-15405-0.10.1016/C2013-0-15405-0Search in Google Scholar

[6] Schiller, C., and M. Epple. Carbonated calcium phosphates are suitable pH-stabilising fillers for biodegradable polyesters. Bio-materials, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2003, pp. 2037–2043.10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00634-8Search in Google Scholar

[7] Zhang, Y. S., K. Yue, J. Aleman, K. M. Moghaddam, S. M. Bakht, J. Yang, W. Jia, V. Dell’Erba, P. Assawes, S. R. Shin, M. R. Dokmeci, R. Oklu, and A. Khademhosseini. 3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2017, pp. 148–163.10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] de Tayrac, R., S. Chentouf, H. Garreau, C. Braud, I. Guiraud, P. Boudeville, and M. Vert. In vitro degradation and in vivo biocompatibility of poly(lactic acid) mesh for soft tissue reinforcement in vaginal surgery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 85, No. 2, 2008, pp. 529–536.10.1002/jbm.b.30976Search in Google Scholar

[9] Yuan, X., A. F. T. Mak, and K. Yao. Comparative observation of accelerated degradation of poly(L-lactic acid) fibres in phosphate buffered saline and a dilute alkaline solution. Polymer Degradation & Stability, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2002, pp. 45–53.10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00203-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zeng, J., X. Chen, Q. Liang, X. Xu, and X. Jing. Enzymatic degradation of poly(L-lactide) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) electro-spun fibers. Macromolecular Bioscience, Vol. 4, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1118–1125.10.1002/mabi.200400092Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tsuji, H., and H. Muramatsu. Blends of aliphatic polyesters: V. Non-enzymatic and enzymatic hydrolysis of blends from hydrophobic poly(L-lactide) and hydrophilic poly(vinyl alcohol). Polymer Degradation & Stability, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2001, pp. 403–413.10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00192-0Search in Google Scholar

[12] Liu, L., S. Li, H. Garreau, and M. Vert. Selective enzymatic degradations of poly(L-lactide) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) blend films. Biomacromolecules, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2000, pp. 350–359.10.1021/bm000046kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Sheng, S. J., X. Hu, F. Wang, Q. Y. Ma, and M. F. Gu. Mechanical and thermal property characterization of poly-l-lactide (PLLA) scaffold developed using pressure-controllable green foaming technology. Materials Science and Engineering C, Vol. 49, 2015, pp. 612–622.10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Domingos, M., F. Intranuovo, A. Gloria, R. Gristina, L. Ambrosio, P. J. Bártolo, and P. Favia. Improved osteoblast cell aflnity on plasma-modified 3-D extruded PCL scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2013, pp. 5997–6005.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Yang, G. H., M. Kim, and G. Kim. Additive-manufactured polycaprolactone scaffold consisting of innovatively designed microsized spiral struts for hard tissue regeneration. Biofabrication, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2016, id. 015005.10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Esposito Corcione, C., F. Gervaso, F. Scalera, F. Montagna, A. Sannino, and A. Maffezzoli. The feasibility of printing polylactic acid–nanohydroxyapatite composites using a low-cost fused deposition modeling 3D printer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 134, No. 13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44656.10.1002/app.44656Search in Google Scholar

[17] Garlotta, D. A literature review of poly(lactic acid). Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 63–84.10.1023/A:1020200822435Search in Google Scholar

[18] Alemán-Domínguez, M. E., E. Giusto, Z. Ortega, M. Tamaddon, A. N. Benítez, and C. Liu. Three-dimensional printed polycaprolactone-microcrystalline cellulose scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 107, No. 3, 2019, pp. 521–528.10.1002/jbm.b.34142Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Reeve, M. S., S. P. McCarthy, M. J. Downey, and R. A. Gross. Polylactide Stereochemistry: Effect on Enzymic Degradability. Macromolecules, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1994, pp. 825–831.10.1021/ma00081a030Search in Google Scholar

[20] Leong, K. F., C. K. Chua, N. Sudarmadji, and W. Y. Yeong. Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 140–152.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-09-03
Accepted: 2019-12-11
Published Online: 2020-05-23

© 2020 Ricardo Donate et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2020-0005/html
Scroll to top button