Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter April 27, 2020

Postoperative analgesia effects of sulfentanyl plus dexmedetomidine in patients received VATS

  • Haoyu Jiang , Ying Zheng , Chang Liu and Ying Bao EMAIL logo
From the journal Pteridines

Abstract

Background To evaluate sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride on postoperative analgesia in patients who received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and its effects on serum norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and prostaglandin (PGE2).

Material and Methods Ninety-nine non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received VATS were included in the study. All the patients received intravenous inhalation compound anesthesia. Of the 99 cases, 49 subjects (control group) received sulfentanyl for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PICA) and other 50 cases (experiment group) received sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for PICA after operation of VATS. The analgesic effects of the two groups were evaluated according to Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and the Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS). The serum pain mediator of NE, DA, 5-HT, and PGE2 were examined and compared between the two groups in the first 24 h post-surgery.

Results The VAS scores for the experiment group were significant lower than that of control group on the time points of 8, 16, and 24 h post-surgery (pall<0.05), and the BCS scores of the experiment group in the time points of 8, 16, and 24 h were significantly higher than that of controls (p<0.05). However, the VAS and BCS scores were not statistical differently in the time point of 1, 2, and 4 h post-surgery (pall>0.05). The mean sulfentanyl dosage was 63.01 ± 5.14 μg and 67.12 ± 6.91 μg for the experiment and control groups respectively with significant statistical difference (p<0.05). The mean analgesic pump pressing times were 4.30 ± 1.31 and 5.31 ± 1.46 for experiment and control groups respectively with significant statistical difference (p<0.05). The serum NE, DA, 5-HT, and PGE2 levels were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to that of control group in the time point of 12 h post-surgery (pall<0.05). The side effects of nausea, vomiting, delirium, rash, and hypotension atrial fibrillation were not statistically different between the two groups (pall>0.05).

Conclusion Patient controlled intravenous analgesia of sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride was effective in reducing the VAS score and serum pain mediators in NSCLC patients who received VAST.

References

1. Cao M, Chen W. Epidemiology of lung cancer in China. Thorac Cancer. 2019 Jan;10(1):3–7.10.1111/1759-7714.12916Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7–30.10.3322/caac.21387Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Chen D, Mao R, Kadeer X, Sun W, Zhu E, Peng Q, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery is an optimal alternative to conventional thoracotomy for reoperations for ipsilateral pulmonary lesions. Thorac Cancer. 2018 Nov;9(11):1421–8.10.1111/1759-7714.12854Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Huang H, Ma H, Chen S. Enhanced recovery after surgery using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A preliminary study. Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):83–7.10.1111/1759-7714.12541Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Koryllos A, Stoelben E. Video assisted thoracic surgery vs. thoracotomy regarding postoperative chronic pain. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):3498–500.10.21037/jtd.2017.08.160Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Mercieri M, D’Andrilli A, Arcioni R. Improving postoperative pain management after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resection contributes to enhanced recovery, but guidelines are still lacking. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(S9 Suppl 9):S983–7.10.21037/jtd.2018.03.152Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Veit S. [Pain Management in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)]. Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Sep;139 Suppl 1:S34–8.10.1055/s-0034-1383030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Abrolat M. LHJ E, Kalmus G, Koch T, Nardi-Hiebl S [Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA): an Overview About Methods, Handling and New Modalities]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2018;53:270–80.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ripamonti C, Bruera E. Current status of patient-controlled analgesia in cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park). 1997 Mar;11(3):373–80.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chrubasik J, Chrubasik S, Martin E. Patient-controlled spinal opiate analgesia in terminal cancer. Has its time really arrived? Drugs. 1992 Jun;43(6):799–804.10.2165/00003495-199243060-00001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Ren C, Zhang X, Liu Z, Li C, Zhang Z, Qi F. Effect of Intraoperative and Postoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on the Quality of Postoperative Analgesia in Highly Nicotine-Dependent Patients After Thoracic Surgery: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(32):e1329.10.1097/MD.0000000000001329Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Brogan SE, Winter NB. Patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia for the management of breakthrough cancer pain: a retrospective review and commentary. Pain Med. 2011 Dec;12(12):1758–68.10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01262.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Mercadante S. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and management of pain in post-surgical elderly with cancer. Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;19(3):173–7.10.1016/j.suronc.2009.11.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Yang HC, Lee JY, Ahn S, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, et al. Pain control of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection: is pre-emptive local bupivacaine injection able to replace the intravenous patient controlled analgesia? J Thorac Dis. 2015 Nov;7(11):1960–9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Oshima H, Nakamura M, Watanabe O, Yamamura T, Funasaka K, Ohno E, et al. Dexmedetomidine provides less body motion and respiratory depression during sedation in double-balloon enteroscopy than midazolam. SAGE Open Med. 2017 Sep;5:2050312117729920.10.1177/2050312117729920Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shin HJ, Do SH, Lee JS, Kim TK, Na HS. Comparison of Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Apr.10.1213/ANE.0000000000003315Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Jiang L, Ding S, Yan H, Li Y, Zhang L, Chen X, et al. A retrospective comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease requiring postoperative sedation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Jun;36(5):993–9.10.1007/s00246-015-1110-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):428–36.10.1097/00000542-200302000-00024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Akça B, Arslan A, Yılbaş AA, Canbay Ö, Çelebi N. Comparison of the effects of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using dexmedetomidine and propofol during septoplasty operations: a randomized clinical trial. Springerplus. 2016 May;5(1):572.10.1186/s40064-016-2245-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Alhashemi JA, Kaki AM. Dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine PCA provides superior analgesia for shockwave lithotripsy. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;51(4):342–7.10.1007/BF03018237Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Sarkar A, Bafila NS, Singh RB, Rasheed MA, Choubey S, Arora V. Comparison of Epidural Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Relief in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):572–80.10.4103/aer.AER_70_18Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Rahimzadeh P, Faiz SH, Imani F, Derakhshan P, Amniati S. Comparative addition of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic procedure in lower limbs. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jun;18(1):62.10.1186/s12871-018-0531-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kim NY, Kwon TD, Bai SJ, Noh SH, Hong JH, Lee H, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine in combination with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on pain attenuation after open gastrectomy in comparison with conventional thoracic epidural and fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Int J Med Sci. 2017 Aug;14(10):951–60.10.7150/ijms.20347Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Yang J, Yuan HF, Liu WY, Zhang XX, Feng JP, Ni N, et al. Norepinephrine regulates arginine vasopressin secretion in hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus relating with pain modulation. Neuropeptides. 2009 Aug;43(4):259–65.10.1016/j.npep.2009.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Potvin S, Grignon S, Marchand S. Human evidence of a supra-spinal modulating role of dopamine on pain perception. Synapse. 2009 May;63(5):390–402.10.1002/syn.20616Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-04-30
Accepted: 2020-03-10
Published Online: 2020-04-27

© 2020 Haoyu Jiang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 18.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pteridines-2020-0007/html
Scroll to top button