Abstract
The interfacial interaction between the fiber and matrix is the most important factor which influences the performance of the carbon fiber-epoxy composites. In this study, the graphitic surface of the carbon fibers was modified with graphene oxide nanomaterials by using a spray coating technique which is an easy, cheap, and quick method. The carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy matrix composites were prepared by hand layup technique using neat carbon fibers and 0.5, 1 and 2% by weight graphene oxide (GO) modified carbon fibers. As a result of SEM analysis, it was observed that GO particles were homogeneously coated on the surface of the carbon fibers. Furthermore, Young's modulus increased from 35.14 to 43.40 GPa, tensile strength increased from 436 to 672 MPa, and the elongation at break was maintained around 2% even in only 2% GO addition.
Funding source: Bursa Technical University Scientific Research Project
Award Identifier / Grant number: 182N34
Research funding: This work was supported by Bursa Technical University Scientific Research Project (BAP) (grant number 182N34).
References
1. Zhang J. PhD Thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris. Paris, France, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
2. Liu L., Jia C. Y., He J., Zhoa F., Fan D., Xing L., Wang M., Wang F., Jiang Z., Huang Y. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 121, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.002.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.002Search in Google Scholar
3. Yao S. S., Jin F. L., Rhee K. Y., Hui D., Park S. J. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 142, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007Search in Google Scholar
4. Jiang D., Liu L., Wu G., Zhang Q., Long J., Wu Z., Xie F., Huang Y. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 2425–2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23828.https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23828Search in Google Scholar
5. Tiwari S., Bijwe J. Proc. Tech. 2014, 14, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.064.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.064Search in Google Scholar
6. Jin F. L., Lee S. Y, Park S. J. Carbon Lett. 2013, 14, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2013.14.2.076.https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2013.14.2.076Search in Google Scholar
7. Yuan J. M., Fan Z. F., Yang Q. C., Li W., Wu Z. J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 164, 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.043.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.043Search in Google Scholar
8. Qiu J., Li J., Yuan Z., Zeng H., Chen X. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9727-8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9727-8Search in Google Scholar
9. Liu L., Yan F., Li M., Zhang M., Xiao L., Lei S., Yuhui A. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 107, 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.009.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.009Search in Google Scholar
10. Alsaadi M., Bulut M., Erklig A., Jabbar A. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 152, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.015.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.015Search in Google Scholar
11. Yao X., Gao X., Jiang J., Xu C., Deng C., Wang J. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 132, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.012.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.012Search in Google Scholar
12. Munoz-Velez M. F., Valadez-Gonzalez A., Herrera-Franco P. J. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 704–718. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.68.https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.68Search in Google Scholar
13. Wu G., Chen L., Liu L., Huang Y. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 3509–3518. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24370.https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24370Search in Google Scholar
14. Zhang Q., Jiang D., Liu L., Yudong H., Jun L., Guangshun W., Zijian W., Ahmad U., Jiang G., Xi Z., Zhanhu G. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 9807–9811. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.10625.https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.10625Search in Google Scholar
15. Tang L. G., Kardos J. L. Polym. Compos. 1997. 18, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10265.https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10265Search in Google Scholar
16. Hung P. Y., Lau K. T., Fox B., Hameed N., Lee J. H., Hui D. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 133, 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.010.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.010Search in Google Scholar
17. Yuan X., Zhu B., Cai X., Qiao K., Zhao S., Zhang M., Lu J. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 111, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.010.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.010Search in Google Scholar
18. Wang C., Li J., Sun S., Li X., Feng Z., Jiang B., Huang Y. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 135, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.009.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.009Search in Google Scholar
19. Ashori A., Rahmani H., Bahrami R. Polym. Test 2015, 48, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.09.010.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.09.010Search in Google Scholar
20. Gu H., Tadakamalla S., Zhang X., Huang Y., Jiang Y., Colorada H.A., Luo Z., Wei S., Guo Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TC00379A.https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TC00379ASearch in Google Scholar
21. Pathak A. K., Borah M., Gupta A., Yolcozeki T., Dhakate S. R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 135, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.007.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar
22. Wan Y. J., Tang L. C., Yan D., Zhao L., Li Y. B., Wu L. B., Jiang J. X., Lai G. Q. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 82, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.009.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.009Search in Google Scholar
23. Rohini R., Katti P., Bose S. Polymer 2015, 70, A17–A34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.016.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.016Search in Google Scholar
24. Bowman S., Hu X., Jiang Q., Qiu Y., Liu W., Wei Y. Coatings 2018, 8, 149.https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8040149.https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8040149Search in Google Scholar
25. Wang C. C., Ge H. Y., Liu H. S., Liang J. J. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 2719–2726. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23466.https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23466Search in Google Scholar
26. Yuan X., Zhu B., Cai X., Qiao K., Zhao S., Yu J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 458, 996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.161.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.161Search in Google Scholar
27. Marcano D. C., Kosynkin D. V., Berlin J. M., Sinitskii A., Sun Z., Slesarev A., Alemany L. B., Lu W., Tour J. M. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806–4814. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1006368.https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1006368Search in Google Scholar
28. Dai Z., Shi F., Zhang B., Li M., Zhang Z. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 6980–6985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.047.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.047Search in Google Scholar
29. Dilsiz N., Wightman J. P. Carbon 1999, 37, 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00300-5.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00300-5Search in Google Scholar
30. Dilsiz N., Wightman J. P. Colloids Surf., A 2000, 164, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00400-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00400-8Search in Google Scholar
31. Lee H., Ohsawa I., Takahashi J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 328, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.012.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.012Search in Google Scholar
32. Zhong M., Liu Y. T., Xie X. M. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 4001–4008. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00075K.https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00075KSearch in Google Scholar
33. Choi E. Y., Han T. H., Hong J. H., Kim J. E., Lee S. H., Kim H. W., Kim S. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1039/B919074K.https://doi.org/10.1039/B919074KSearch in Google Scholar
34. Tas M., Altin Y., Bedeloglu A. J. Text. Inst. 2019. 110, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1460039.https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1460039Search in Google Scholar
35. Tuinstra F. K., Koenig J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108Search in Google Scholar
36. Kudin K. N., Ozbas B., Schniepp H. C., Prud'homme R. K., Aksay I. A., Car R. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl071822y.https://doi.org/10.1021/nl071822ySearch in Google Scholar
37. Javadi A., Zheng Q., Payen F., Javadi A., Altin Y., Cai Z., Sabo R., Gong S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfac. 2013, 5, 5969–5975. https://doi.org/10.1021/am400171y.https://doi.org/10.1021/am400171ySearch in Google Scholar
38. Stankovich S., Dikin D. A., Richard D. P., Kohlhaas K. A., Kleinhammes A., Jia Y., Wu Y., Nguyen S. T., Ruoff R. S. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034Search in Google Scholar
39. Perumbilavil, S., Sankar, P., Priya Rose, T., Philip, R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 051104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928124.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928124Search in Google Scholar
40. Fu J., Zhang M., Jin L., Liu L., Li N., Shang L., Li M., Xiao L., Ao Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 6980–6985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.047.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.047Search in Google Scholar
41. Sengupta I., Chakraborty S., Talukdar M., Pal S., Chakraborty S. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 4113–4122. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.338.https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.338Search in Google Scholar
42. Ganguly A., Sharma S., Papakonstantinou P., Hamilton J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17009–17019. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp203741y.https://doi.org/10.1021/jp203741ySearch in Google Scholar
43. Terzioglu P.Dr., Altin Y., Kalemtas A.Dr., Celik Bedeloglu A. J Polym Eng 40. 2020, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0240.https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0240Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
