Abstract
Redox-active polymers among the energy storage materials (ESMs) are very attractive due to their exceptional advantages such as high stability and processability as well as their simple manufacturing. Their applications are found to useful in electric vehicle, ultraright computers, intelligent electric gadgets, mobile sensor systems, and portable intelligent clothing. They are found to be more efficient and advantageous in terms of superior processing capacity, quick loading unloading, stronger security, lengthy life cycle, versatility, adjustment to various scales, excellent fabrication process capabilities, light weight, flexible, most significantly cost efficiency, and non-toxicity in order to satisfy the requirement for the usage of these potential applications. The redox-active polymers are produced through organic synthesis, which allows the design and free modification of chemical constructions, which allow for the structure of organic compounds. The redox-active polymers can be finely tuned for the desired ESMs applications with their chemical structures and electrochemical properties. The redox-active polymers synthesis also offers the benefits of high-scale, relatively low reaction, and a low demand for energy. In this review we discussed the relationship between structural properties of different polymers for solar energy and their energy storage applications.
References
1. Choi J. W., Aurbach D. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16013. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201000136.Search in Google Scholar
2. Casado N., Hernández G., Sardon H., Mecerreyes D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 52, 107−135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
3. Häupler B., Wild A., Schubert U. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1402034. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201402034.Search in Google Scholar
4. Liu T., Wei X., Nie Z., Sprenkle V., Wang W. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 6, 1501449. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501449.Search in Google Scholar
5. Liu J., Zhang J. G., Yang Z., Lemmon J. P., Imhoff C., Graff G. L., Li L., Hu J., Wang C., Xiao J., et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 929–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200690.Search in Google Scholar
6. Ulaganathan M., Aravindan V., Yan Q., Madhavi S., Skyllas-Kazacos M., Lim T. M. Adv. Mater. 2016, 3, 1500309. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201500309.Search in Google Scholar
7. Kim K. J., Park M. S., Kim Y. J., Kim J. H., Dou S. X., Skyllas-Kazacos M., J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 16913–16933. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA02613J.Search in Google Scholar
8. Grey C. P., Tarascon J. M. Sustainability and in situ monitoring in battery development, Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 45–56, doi: 10.1038/nmat4777.10.1038/nmat4777Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Lewis N. S. Science 2016, 351, aad1920–aad1920. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1920.Search in Google Scholar
10. Zhang X., Mi C. C., Yin C. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.117.Search in Google Scholar
11. Larcher D., Tarascon J. M. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2085.Search in Google Scholar
12. Yu M. Z., Ren X. D., Ma L., Wu Y. Y. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5111. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6111.Search in Google Scholar
13. Kundu D., Black R., Adams B., Nazar L. F. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00267.Search in Google Scholar
14. Casado N., Herńandez G., Sardon H., Mecerreyes D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 52, 107–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
15. Boudouris B. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2013, 2, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.07.002.Search in Google Scholar
16. Root S. E., Savagatrup S., Printz A. D., Rodriquez D., Lipomi D. J. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6467–6499. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00003.Chauhan N. P. S. Biocid. Polym., De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639131.Search in Google Scholar
17. McNaught A. D. Wilkinson A. IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Science Publication: Oxford, UK, 1997. ISBN 0865426848.Search in Google Scholar
18. Castellanos S., Gaidelis V., Jankauskas V., Grazulevicius J. V., Brillas E., López-Calahorra, F., Juliá L., Velasco D. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5130–5132. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc00529k.Search in Google Scholar
19. Tomlinson E. P., Hay M. E., Boudouris B. W. Macromol. 2014, 47, 6145–6158. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma5014572.Search in Google Scholar
20. Rostro L., Baradwaj A. G., Boudouris, B. W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9896–9901. https://doi.org/10.1021/am403223s.Search in Google Scholar
21. Song Z., Zhan H., Zhou Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4, 448–450. https://doi.org/10.1039/B814515F.Search in Google Scholar
22. Lee W., Suzuki S., Miyayama M. Nanomaterials 2014, 4, 599–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano4030599.Search in Google Scholar
23. Fahey D. R., Hensley H. D., Ash C. E., Senn D. R. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 387−393. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma961015d.Search in Google Scholar
24. Álvaro C., Jorge M., Nuno R., Francisco B. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 39, 889–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3260.Search in Google Scholar
25. Chanyong C., Soohyun K., Riyul K., Yunsuk C., Soowhan K., Ho-Young J., Jung Hoon Y., Hee-Tak K. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.188.Search in Google Scholar
26. Seel F., Güttler H. J., Simon G., Więckowski A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 49, 45−54. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac197749010045.Search in Google Scholar
27. Kim D. J., Hermann, K. R., Prokofjevs A., Otley M. T., Pezzato C., Owczarek M., Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6635–6643. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b01209.Search in Google Scholar
28. Liang Y., Tao Z., Chen J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 742–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100795.Search in Google Scholar
29. Byon H. R., Lee S. W., Chen S., Hammond P. T., Shao Horn Y. Carbon 2011, 49, 457−467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.042.Search in Google Scholar
30. Choi B. G., Yang M., Hong W. H., Choi J. W., Huh Y. S. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 4020−4028. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3003345.Search in Google Scholar
31. Wang G., Shen X., Yao J., Park J. Carbon 2009, 47, 2049−2053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.053.Search in Google Scholar
32. Lian P., Zhu X., Liang S., Li Z., Yang W. Wang H. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 3909−3914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.025.Search in Google Scholar
33. Sun Y., Wu Q., Shi G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1113−1132. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00683A.Search in Google Scholar
34. Byon H. R., Gallant B. M., Lee S. W., Shao-Horn Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200697.Search in Google Scholar
35. Lee S. W., Gallant B. M., Byon H. R., Hammond P. T., Shao-Horn Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1972–1985. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00642D.Search in Google Scholar
36. Xu Y., Sheng K., Li C., Shi G. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324−4330. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101187z.Search in Google Scholar
37. Zhou Y., Bao Q., Tang L. A. L., Zhong Y., Loh K. P. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2950−2956. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9006603.Search in Google Scholar
38. Chen W., Yan L. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3132−3137. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1nr10355e.Search in Google Scholar
39. Zhao J., Ren W., Cheng H. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20197–20202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM34128J.Search in Google Scholar
40. Gan T., Sun J., Huang K., Song L., Li Y. Sensors Actuators B Chem 2013, 177, 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.11.033.Search in Google Scholar
41. Kim S. K., Kim Y. K., Lee H., Lee S. B., Park H. S. Chem. Sus. Chem. 2014, 7, 1094–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201301061.Search in Google Scholar
42. Milczarek G., Inganas O. Science 2012, 335, 1468–1471. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.Search in Google Scholar
43. Kim Y. J., Wu W., Chun S. E., Whitacre J. F., Bettinger C. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20912–20917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314345110.Search in Google Scholar
44. Kim J., Lee J., You J., Park M. S., Hossain M. S. A., Yamauchi Y., Kim J. H. Mater. Horiz. 2016, 3, 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MH00165C.Search in Google Scholar
45. Kolb H. C., Finn M. G., Sharpless K. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::aid-anie2004>3.3.co;2-x.10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar
46. Hu P., Wang H., Yang Y., Yang J., Lin J., Guo L. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3486–3492. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505917.Search in Google Scholar
47. Hu P., Chen T., Yang Y., Wang H., Luo Z., Yang J., Fu H., Guo L. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 1423–1427. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09190C.Search in Google Scholar
48. Pande N., Jambhale A., Jaspal D., Ambekar J., Kulkarni M. Inorg. Nano-Metal Chem. 2020, 50, 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701556.2019.1705340.Search in Google Scholar
49. Jung K. N., Kim J., Yamauchi Y., Park M. S., Lee J. W., Kim J. H. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 14050–14068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA04510C.Search in Google Scholar
50. Kim J., Kim J., Ariga K. Joule 2017, 1, 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.018.Search in Google Scholar
51. Mozafari M., Chauhan N. P. S. Fundamental and emerging applications of polyaniline, 1st ed.; Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands, 2020. pp. 1–308.Search in Google Scholar
52. Kim J., You J., Kim E. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 2322–2327. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9025306.Search in Google Scholar
53. Chauhan N. P. S., Mozafari M., Chundawat N. S., Meghwal K., Ameta R., Ameta S. C. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 36, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.003.Search in Google Scholar
54. Wild S., Friebe C., Haupler B., Janoschka T., Schubert U. S. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9438–9484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00070.Search in Google Scholar
55. Song Z., Zhou H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2280–2301. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE40709H.Search in Google Scholar
56. Kolb H. C., Sharpless K. B. Drug Discov. Today 2003, 8, 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02933-7.Search in Google Scholar
57. Yigit S., Sanyal R., Sanyal A. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2648–2659. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201100440.Search in Google Scholar
58. McKay C. S., Finn M. G. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 1075–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.09.002.Search in Google Scholar
59. Boujioui F., Bertrand O., Ernould B., Brassinne J., Janoschka T., Schubert U. S., Vlad A., Gohy J. F. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6PY01807F.Search in Google Scholar
60. Ernould B., Bertrand O., Minoia A., Lazzaroni R., Vlad A., Gohy J. F. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 17301–17310. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA02119D.Search in Google Scholar
61. Ryu W. H., Gittleson F. S., Thomsen J. M., Li J., Schwab M. J., Brudvig G. W., Taylor A. D. Nat. Commun.7, 12925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00884.Search in Google Scholar
62. Li F. J., Zhang T., Zhou H. S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE00053B.Search in Google Scholar
63. Battistuzzi G., Borsari M., Ranieri A., Sola M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017188m.Search in Google Scholar
64. Nam W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar700027f.Search in Google Scholar
65. Johnson C. S., Kang S. H., Vaughey J. T., Pol S. V., Balasubramanian M., Thackeray M. M. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902713m.Search in Google Scholar
66. Laoire C. O., Mukerjee S., Abraham K. M., Plichta E. J., Hendrickson M. A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20127–20134. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp908090s.Search in Google Scholar
67. Laoire C. O., Mukerjee, S., Abraham K. M., Plichta E. J., Hendrickson M. A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9178–9186. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp102019.Search in Google Scholar
68. Ryu W. H., Gittleson F. S., Schwab M., Goh T., Taylor A. D. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503760n.Search in Google Scholar
69. Landa-Medrano I., Ruiz de Larramendi I., Ortiz-Vitoriano N., Pinedo R., Ignacio Ruiz de Larramendi J., Rojo T. J. Power Sources 2014, 249, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.077.Search in Google Scholar
70. Chang Z., Xu J., Zhang X. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700875. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700875.Search in Google Scholar
71. Suguro M., Iwasa S., Kusachi Y., Morioka Y., Nakahara K. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1929–1933. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200700300.Search in Google Scholar
72. Jahnert T., Haupler B., Janoschka T., Hager M. D., Schubert U. S. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 2616–2623. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201300408.Search in Google Scholar
73. Suga T., Sugita S., Ohshiro H., Oyaizu K., Nishide H. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003525.Search in Google Scholar
74. Oyaizu K., Nishide H. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2339–2344. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200803554.Search in Google Scholar
75. Oyaizu K., Suga T., Yoshimura K., Nishide H. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 6646–6652. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma702576z.Search in Google Scholar
76. Nakahara K., Iwasa S., Satoh M., Morioka Y., Iriyama J., Suguro M., Hasegawa E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 359, 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00705-4.Search in Google Scholar
77. Kim JK, Cheruvally G, Choi JW, Ahn JH, Choi DS, Song CE. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154, A839–A843. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2752022.Search in Google Scholar
78. Weber A. Z., Mench M. M., Meyers J. P., Ross P. N., Gostick J. T., Liu Q. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2011, 41, 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-011-0348-2.Search in Google Scholar
79. Wei X., Xu W., Vijayakumar M., Cosimbescu L., Liu T., Sprenkle V., Wang W. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7649–7653. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201403746.Search in Google Scholar
80. Winsberg J., Muench S., Hagemann T., Morgenstern S., Janoschka T., Billing M., Schacher F. H., Hauffman G., Gohy J. F., Hoeppener S., et al. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY02036K.Search in Google Scholar
81. Milczarek G., Inganäs O. Science 2012, 335, 1468–1471. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215159.Search in Google Scholar
82. Son E. J., Kim J. H., Kim K., Park C. B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 11179–11202. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03123D.Search in Google Scholar
83. Chauhan N. P. S., Gholipourmalekabadi M, Mozafari M. J. Macromole. Sci. Part A 2017, 54, 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2017.1317211.Search in Google Scholar
84. Kim Y. J., Wu W., Chun S. E., Whitacre J. F., Bettinger C. J. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6572–6579. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201402295.Search in Google Scholar
85. Liu Y., Ai K., Lu L. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5057–5115. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400407a.Search in Google Scholar
86. Meyer T. J., Huynh, V. M. H., Thorp H. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 6, 5284–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600917.Search in Google Scholar
87. Kord Forooshani P., Lee B. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 9–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.28368.Patil N., Jérôme C., Detrembleur C. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 82, 34–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
88. Schnurrer J., Lehr C. M. Int. J. Pharm. 1996, 141, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(96)04625-X.Search in Google Scholar
89. Coombs T. L., Keller P. J. Aquat. Toxicol. 1981, 1, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(81)90023-0.Search in Google Scholar
90. Mozafari M., Chauhan N. P. S. Advanced functional polymers for biomedical applications, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
91. Baty A. M., Leavitt P. K., Siedlecki C. A., Tyler B. J., Suci P. A., Marchant R. E., Geesey G. G. Langmuir 1997, 13, 5702–5710. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9610720.Search in Google Scholar
92. Lu Q., Oh D. X., Lee Y., Jho Y., Hwang D. S., Zeng H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3944–3948. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201210365.Search in Google Scholar
93. Pillai K. V., Renneckar S. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 798–804. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801284y.Search in Google Scholar
94. Dalsin J. L., Hu B. H., Lee B. P., Messersmith P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4253–4258. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0284963.Search in Google Scholar
95. Dalsin J. L., Lin L., Tosatti S., Vörös J., Textor M., Messersmith P. B. Langmuir 2005, 21, 640–646. https://doi.org/10.1021/la048626g.Search in Google Scholar
96. Tyson C. A., Martell A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3379–3386. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01015a015.Search in Google Scholar
97. Chauhan N. P. S., Chundawat N. S. Inorg. Organomet. Polym., De Gruyter, Berlin 2019, 21; https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501514609.Search in Google Scholar
98. Borgias B. A., Cooper S. R., Koh Y. B., Raymond K. N. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00176a005.Search in Google Scholar
99. Sever M. J., Wilker J. J. Dalt. Trans. 2006, 6, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1039/B509586G.Search in Google Scholar
100. Chauhan N. P. S., Hosmane N. S., Mozafar M. Mater. Todays Chem. 2019, 14, 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2019.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
101. Yoshino K., Kotaka M., Okamoto M., Kakihana H. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 3005–3009. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.52.300.Search in Google Scholar
102. Guin P. S., Das S., Mandal P. C. Int. J. Electrochem. 2011, 816202, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/816202.Search in Google Scholar
103. McDowell L. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 20293–20295. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.29.20293.Search in Google Scholar
104. Yang J., Cohen Stuart M. A., Kamperman M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8271–8298. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00185K.Search in Google Scholar
105. Forooshani, P. K., Lee B. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2016, 55, 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.28368.Search in Google Scholar
106. Yamamoto H., Ohkawa K. Amino Acids 1993, 5, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806193.Search in Google Scholar
107. Sever M. J., Wilker J. J. Tetrahedron 2009, 57, 6139–6146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00601-9.Search in Google Scholar
108. Statz A. R., Meagher R. J., Barron A. E., Messersmith P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7972–7973. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0522534.Search in Google Scholar
109. Yu M., Deming T. Macromolecules. 1998, 31, 4739–4745. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma980268z.Search in Google Scholar
110. Yin M., Yuan Y., Liu C., Wang J. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2764–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.039.Search in Google Scholar
111. Yadav N., Yadav N., Singh M. K., Hashmi, S. A. Energy Technol 2019, 1900132. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201900132.Search in Google Scholar
112. Yu H., Wu J., Fan L., Xu K., Zhong X., Lin Y., Lin J. Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, 6881–6886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.06.039.Search in Google Scholar
113. Yin Y., Zhou J., Mansour A. N., Zhou X. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 5997–6002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.079.Search in Google Scholar
114. Salunkhe R. R., Kaneti Y. V., Kim J., Ho Kim J., Yamauchi Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 29308–29315. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP05555A.Search in Google Scholar
115. Gomez I., Leonet O., Alberto Blazquez J., Grande H. J., Mecerreyes D. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00154.Search in Google Scholar
116. Venkatachalam S., Nayak S. G., Labde J. V., Gharal P. R., Rao K., Kelkar A. K. Degradation and recyclability of Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate). Polyester 2012, https://doi.org/10.5772/48612.Search in Google Scholar
117. Cai X., Lai L., Shen Z., Lin J. J. Mater.Chem. A 2017, 5, 15423–15446. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04354F.Search in Google Scholar
118. Ahmadiparidari A., Warburton R. E., Majidi L., Asadi M., Chamaani A., Jokisaari J. R., Rastegar S., Hemmat Z., Sayahpour B., Assary R. S., et al. Adv. Mater. 2019, 1902518. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902518.Search in Google Scholar
119. Ryu W. H., Gittleson F. S., Thomsen J. M., Li J., Schwab M. J., Brudvig G. W., Taylor A. D. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12925. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12925.Search in Google Scholar
120. Friebe C., Schubert U. S. Top. Curr. Chem. 2017, 375.10.1007/s41061-017-0103-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
121. Patil N., Aqil A., Ouhib F., Admassie S., Inganäs O., Jérôme C., Detrembleur C. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703373, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703373.Search in Google Scholar
122. Lukatskaya M. R., Dunn B., Gogotsi Y. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12647, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12647.Search in Google Scholar
123. Miroshnikov M., Divya K. P., Babu G., Meiyazhagan A., Arava L. M. R., Ajayan P. M., John G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12370, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03166H.Search in Google Scholar
124. Wang S., Wang Q., Shao P., Han Y., Gao X., Ma L., Yuan S., Ma X., Zhou J., Feng X., Wang B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4258–4261. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b02648.Search in Google Scholar
125. Liu T., Kim K. C., Lee B., Chen Z., Noda S., Jang S. S., Lee S. W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE02641A.Search in Google Scholar
126. Vlad A., Singh N., Melinte S., Gohy J. F., Ajayan P. M. Sci. Rep.6, 22194, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04315.Search in Google Scholar
127. Vlad A., Singh N., Galande C., Ajayan P. M. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1402115, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201402115.Search in Google Scholar
128. Béguin F., Presser V., Balducci A., Frackowiak E. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2219–2251. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304137.Search in Google Scholar
129. Simon P., Gogotsi Y., Dunn B. Science 2014, 343, 1210–1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249625.Search in Google Scholar
130. Holze R., Wu Y. P. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 122, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.100.Search in Google Scholar
131. Ernould B., Devos M., Bourgeois J. P., Rolland J., Vlad A., Gohy J. F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8832–8839. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00570A.Search in Google Scholar
132. Zhang L., Lyons L., Newhouse J., Zhang Z., Straughan M., Chen Z., Amine K., Hamers R. J., West R. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 8224–8226. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm01596b.Search in Google Scholar
133. Zhang S. S. J. Power Sources 2006, 162, 1379–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.07.074.Search in Google Scholar
134. Gallaway J. W., Barton S. A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 130, 8527-8536. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0781543.Search in Google Scholar
135. Scodeller P., Carballo R., Szamocki R., Levin L., Forchiassin F., Calvo E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11132–11140. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1020487.Search in Google Scholar
136. Pöller S., Beyl Y., Vivekananthan J., Guschin D. A., Schuhmann W. Bioelectrochemistry 2012, 87, 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.11.015.Search in Google Scholar
137. Guo W., Xue X., Wang S., Lin C., Wang Z. L. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2520–2523. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3007159.Search in Google Scholar
138. Xue H., Zhao J., Tang J., Gong H., He P., Zhou H., Yamauchi Y., He J. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 4915–4923. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201504420.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
