Abstract
Let R be a finite unital commutative ring.
We introduce a new class of finite groups, which we call hereditary groups over R.
Our main result states that if G is a hereditary group over R, then a unital algebra isomorphism between group algebras
Introduction
Let R be a unital commutative ring (throughout this paper, we do not impose a ring (or algebra) to have 1, but we impose
Problem.
Let G and H be finite p-groups.
Does a unital algebra isomorphism
Several positive solutions for special classes of p-groups are known; see lists in the introduction of [6] or [8].
In this paper, we introduce a new class of finite groups, which we call hereditary groups over a finite unital commutative ring R (Definition 1.4).
Our main result (Criterion 1.6) states that if G is a hereditary group over R, then a unital algebra isomorphism
1 Criterion
This section is devoted to proving our main result (Criterion 1.6). The first lemma is an easy application of the inclusion-exclusion principle.
Lemma 1.1.
Let G and H be finite groups.
We denote by
Proof.
First, note that
Thus, by letting
By the inclusion-exclusion principle, we have
(Note that if
The next lemma is inspired by the work of Lovász [11, 12].
Lemma 1.2.
Let G and H be finite groups.
Then
for every subgroup K of G.
Proof.
From
For a unital R-algebra A over a unital commutative ring R, the unit group of A is denoted by
Lemma 1.3.
Let R be a unital commutative ring, G a group and A a unital R-algebra. Then there is a bijection
which is natural in G and A. (Namely, the group algebra functor is left adjoint to the unit group functor.)
Proof.
The restriction
Now we propose a definition of hereditary groups which is crucial in this study.
Definition 1.4.
Set
Namely,
From the definition, being hereditary group is a subgroup-closed property.
Note that the group completion
Example 1.5.
Let
In particular,
The next criterion – our main result – shows that hereditary groups are determined by their group algebras.
Criterion 1.6.
Let G and H be finite groups, and let R be a finite unital commutative ring.
Suppose G is a hereditary group over R.
If
The proof is done by describing the number of group homomorphisms in terms of the number of unital algebra homomorphisms.
Proof of Criterion 1.6.
Since a unital commutative ring R has invariant basis number (IBN) property, we have
Since G is a hereditary group over R, we have
Namely,
Thus, by Lemma 1.3, we can obtain
We can calculate
from
Remark 1.7.
Studying a finite group that is a “linear combination” of unit groups, precisely an element of
It also should be noted that no examples of non-hereditary groups are hitherto found.
Using this criterion, we provide new proofs for some early theorems on the modular isomorphism problem in the last section.
2 Quasi-regular groups
We show that, with Criterion 1.6, study of quasi-regular groups can be used to study the isomorphism problem. Throughout this section, R denotes a unital commutative ring.
Definition 2.1.
Let A be an R-algebra. Define the quasi-multiplication on A by
An element
Quasi-multiplication is also called circle operation or adjoint operation. Accordingly, quasi-regular groups are also called circle groups or adjoint groups. As these terms have completely different meaning in other contexts, we avoid using them.
If an R-algebra A has a multiplicative identity, then there is an isomorphism
Definition 2.2.
Let A be an R-algebra.
We denote the unitization of A by
Note that
Lemma 2.3.
Let A be a quasi-regular R-algebra.
Then an element
Proof.
The “only if” part is trivial.
Let us assume
because A is quasi-regular.
Then it can be shown that
Lemma 2.4.
Let A be a quasi-regular R-algebra.
Then
Proof.
Note that there are homomorphisms
which are well-defined by Lemma 2.3. It is straightforward to check that these satisfy the universal property of a direct product. ∎
3 Modular isomorphism problem
As application of Criterion 1.6, we provide new proofs for theorems by Deskins [5] and Passi–Sehgal [13] which are early theorems on the modular isomorphism problem.
3.1 Abelian (class at most one)
Let us state a well-known theorem by Deskins [5, Theorem 2].
Theorem 3.1 (Deskins).
Let G and H be finite p-groups.
Suppose G is abelian.
If
To use our criterion, we need to prove the following, which is also useful to prove Theorems 3.4 and 3.7.
Lemma 3.2.
Every finite abelian p-group is a hereditary group over
Proof.
Let
Base case (
Inductive case (
where
and we have
With this lemma, we provide a new proof of the Deskins theorem.
3.2 Class two and exponent p
The aim of this subsection is to provide a new proof of the following theorem by Passi and Sehgal [13, Corollary 13].
Theorem 3.4 (Passi–Sehgal).
Let G and H be finite p-groups.
Suppose G is of class two and exponent p.
If
See also Remark 3.8. To use our criterion, we need to prove the following.
Lemma 3.5.
Every finite p-group of class two and exponent p is a hereditary group over
A key ingredient for the proof is a slight modification of the theorem by Ault and Watters [1, 7].
Theorem 3.6 (Ault–Watters).
Let G be a finite p-group.
Suppose G is of class two and exponent p.
Then there is a finite quasi-regular
Proof.
It is proved in [1] that there is a finite quasi-regular ring
and
for a positive integer n. Since the prime p is odd because a group of exponent two cannot be of class two, we can prove
Therefore, there is a canonical
Proof of Lemma 3.5.
Since finite abelian p-groups are hereditary groups over
Now we are in position to prove the theorem by Passi and Sehgal.
3.3 Class two and exponent four
The aim of this subsection is to prove the even prime counterpart of Theorem 3.4.
Theorem 3.7 (Passi–Sehgal).
Let G and H be finite 2-groups.
Suppose G is of class two and exponent four.
If
Remark 3.8.
Note that the third dimension subgroup of G modulo p is
Nowadays, more is known. A theorem by Sandling [21, Theorem 1.2] provides a positive solution for a finite p-group of class two with elementary abelian commutator subgroup.
A strategy for the proof is the same as Theorem 3.4. The even prime counterpart of the Ault–Watters theorem is the following theorem by Bovdi [2].
Theorem 3.9 (Bovdi).
Let G be a finite 2-group.
Suppose G is of class two and exponent four.
Then there is a finite quasi-regular
Lemma 3.10.
Every 2-group of class two and exponent four is a hereditary group over
Proof.
As all finite abelian 2-groups are hereditary groups over
References
[1] J. C. Ault and J. F. Watters, Circle groups of nilpotent rings, Amer. Math. Monthly 80 (1973), 48–52. 10.1080/00029890.1973.11993229Search in Google Scholar
[2] A. A. Bovdi, On circle groups of nilpotent rings of characteristic 2, Period. Math. Hungar. 32 (1996), 31–34. 10.1007/BF01879729Search in Google Scholar
[3] D. B. Coleman, On the modular group ring of a p-group, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964), 511–514. 10.2307/2034735Search in Google Scholar
[4] C. Davis and T. Occhipinti, Which finite simple groups are unit groups?, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218 (2014), 743–744. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2013.08.013Search in Google Scholar
[5] W. E. Deskins, Finite abelian groups with isomorphic group algebras, Duke Math. J. 23 (1956), 35–40. 10.1215/S0012-7094-56-02304-3Search in Google Scholar
[6] B. Eick and A. Konovalov, The modular isomorphism problem for the groups of order 512, Groups St. Andrews 2009. Vol. 2, Cambridge University, Cambridge (2011), 375–383. 10.1017/CBO9780511842474.005Search in Google Scholar
[7] R. Gilmer and D. Roselle, Complements and comments, Amer. Math. Monthly 80 (1973), 1116–1118. 10.1080/00029890.1973.11993466Search in Google Scholar
[8]
M. Hertweck and M. Soriano,
On the modular isomorphism problem: groups of order
[9] G. J. Janusz, Faithful representations of p groups at characteristic p. I, J. Algebra 15 (1970), 335–351. 10.1016/0021-8693(70)90063-3Search in Google Scholar
[10] R. L. Kruse and D. T. Price, Nilpotent Rings, Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1969. Search in Google Scholar
[11] L. Lovász, Operations with structures, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 18 (1967), 321–328. 10.1007/BF02280291Search in Google Scholar
[12] L. Lovász, Direct product in locally finite categories, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 33 (1972), 319–322. Search in Google Scholar
[13] I. B. S. Passi and S. K. Sehgal, Isomorphism of modular group algebras, Math. Z. 129 (1972), 65–73. 10.1007/BF01229543Search in Google Scholar
[14] D. S. Passman, The Algebraic Structure of Group Rings, Pure Appl. Math., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977. Search in Google Scholar
[15] C. Polcino Milies and S. K. Sehgal, An Introduction to Group Rings, Algebra and Applications. 1, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002. 10.1007/978-94-010-0405-3_1Search in Google Scholar
[16] J. Rosenberg, Algebraic K-theory and its Applications, Grad. Texts in Math. 147, Springer, New York, 1994. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4314-4Search in Google Scholar
[17] L. H. Rowen, Graduate Algebra: Noncommutative View, Grad. Stud. Math. 91, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2008. 10.1090/gsm/091Search in Google Scholar
[18] R. Sandling, Group rings of circle and unit groups, Math. Z. 140 (1974), 195–202. 10.1007/BF01214162Search in Google Scholar
[19] R. Sandling, Units in the modular group algebra of a finite Abelian p-group, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 33 (1984), 337–346. 10.1016/0022-4049(84)90066-5Search in Google Scholar
[20] R. Sandling, The isomorphism problem for group rings: a survey, Orders and Their Applications, Lecture Notes in Math. 1142, Springer, Berlin (1985), 256–288. 10.1007/BFb0074806Search in Google Scholar
[21] R. Sandling, The modular group algebra of a central-elementary-by-abelian p-group, Arch. Math. (Basel) 52 (1989), 22–27. 10.1007/BF01197966Search in Google Scholar
[22] S. K. Sehgal, Topics in Group Rings, Monogr. Textb. Pure Appl. Math. 50, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978. Search in Google Scholar
[23] S. K. Sehgal, Group rings, Handbook of Algebra. Vol. 3, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam (2003), 457–541. 10.1016/S1570-7954(03)80069-4Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston