Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter December 20, 2019

The isomorphism problem for group algebras: A criterion

  • Taro Sakurai EMAIL logo
From the journal Journal of Group Theory

Abstract

Let R be a finite unital commutative ring. We introduce a new class of finite groups, which we call hereditary groups over R. Our main result states that if G is a hereditary group over R, then a unital algebra isomorphism between group algebras RGRH implies a group isomorphism GH for every finite group H. As application, we study the modular isomorphism problem, which is the isomorphism problem for finite p-groups over R=𝔽p, where 𝔽p is the field of p elements. We prove that a finite p-group G is a hereditary group over 𝔽p provided G is abelian, G is of class two and exponent p, or G is of class two and exponent four. These yield new proofs for the theorems by Deskins and Passi–Sehgal.

Introduction

Let R be a unital commutative ring (throughout this paper, we do not impose a ring (or algebra) to have 1, but we impose 01 if it has 1) and G a finite group. The structure of the group algebra RG of G over R reflects the structure of the group G to some extent. The isomorphism problem asks whether a group algebra RG determines the group G. See a survey by Sandling [20] for a historical account for this problem. In what follows, p stands for a prime number, and 𝔽p denotes the field of p elements. The only classic isomorphism problem that is still open for more than 60 years is the modular isomorphism problem.

Problem.

Let G and H be finite p-groups. Does a unital algebra isomorphism 𝔽pG𝔽pH imply a group isomorphism GH?

Several positive solutions for special classes of p-groups are known; see lists in the introduction of [6] or [8].

In this paper, we introduce a new class of finite groups, which we call hereditary groups over a finite unital commutative ring R (Definition 1.4). Our main result (Criterion 1.6) states that if G is a hereditary group over R, then a unital algebra isomorphism RGRH implies a group isomorphism GH for every finite group H. The proof rests on counting homomorphisms (Lemma 1.2) and adjoint (Lemma 1.3) – this indirect approach is novel in the sense that it does not involve normalized isomorphisms, for example. As application, we study the modular isomorphism problem. We prove that a finite p-group G is a hereditary group over 𝔽p provided G is abelian (Lemma 3.2), G is of class two and exponent p (Lemma 3.5), or G is of class two and exponent four (Lemma 3.10). These yield new proofs for the theorems by Deskins (Theorem 3.1) and Passi–Sehgal (Theorems 3.4 and 3.7) which are early theorems on the modular isomorphism problem.

1 Criterion

This section is devoted to proving our main result (Criterion 1.6). The first lemma is an easy application of the inclusion-exclusion principle.

Lemma 1.1.

Let G and H be finite groups. We denote by Epi(G,H) the set of all epimorphisms from G to H. Let H be the set of all maximal subgroups of H. Then

|Epi(G,H)|=𝒦(-1)|𝒦||Hom(G,K𝒦K)|.

Proof.

First, note that

Epi(G,H)={f:GHimf=H}=K{f:GHimfK}.

Thus, by letting HomK(G,H)={f:GHimfK}, it becomes

Epi(G,H)=Hom(G,H)-KHomK(G,H).

By the inclusion-exclusion principle, we have

|Epi(G,H)|=|Hom(G,H)|-|KHomK(G,H)|=|Hom(G,H)|+𝒦(-1)|𝒦||K𝒦HomK(G,H)|=|Hom(G,H)|+𝒦(-1)|𝒦||Hom(G,K𝒦K)|=𝒦(-1)|𝒦||Hom(G,K𝒦K)|.

(Note that if 𝒦=, then K𝒦K={hHhK(K𝒦)}=H.)∎

The next lemma is inspired by the work of Lovász [11, 12].

Lemma 1.2.

Let G and H be finite groups. Then GH if and only if |G|=|H| and

|Hom(G,K)|=|Hom(H,K)|

for every subgroup K of G.

Proof.

From |Hom(G,K)|=|Hom(H,K)| for every subgroup K of G, it follows that |Epi(H,G)|=|Epi(G,G)|1 by Lemma 1.1. Hence, we have an epimorphism from H to G. It must be an isomorphism because |G|=|H|. ∎

For a unital R-algebra A over a unital commutative ring R, the unit group of A is denoted by A. The following adjoint, which rephrases the universal property of group algebras [15, Proposition 3.2.7], is well-known.

Lemma 1.3.

Let R be a unital commutative ring, G a group and A a unital R-algebra. Then there is a bijection

Hom(RG,A)Hom(G,A)

which is natural in G and A. (Namely, the group algebra functor is left adjoint to the unit group functor.)

Proof.

The restriction (f:RGA)(f|G:GA) gives rise to the desired bijection; see [17, pp. 204–205, 490] for details. ∎

Now we propose a definition of hereditary groups which is crucial in this study.

Definition 1.4.

Set M={[G]Gis a finite group}, where the symbol [G] denotes the isomorphism class of a group G. It becomes a commutative monoid with an operation [G]+[H]=[G×H]. Let K(M) denote the Grothendieck group[1] of M. As it is a -module (abelian group), we can extend scalars and obtain a -vector space L(M)=K(M). For a finite unital commutative ring R, define the -subspace S(R) of L(M) by

S(R)=A is a finiteunital R-algebra[A].

Namely, S(R) is the -subspace of L(M) spanned by the isomorphism classes of unit groups of finite unital R-algebras. We call a finite group G a hereditary group over R if [K]S(R) for every subgroup K of G.

From the definition, being hereditary group is a subgroup-closed property. Note that the group completion MK(M) is injective because M is cancellative by the Krull–Schmidt theorem; the localization K(M)L(M) is also injective because K(M) is torsion-free. Thus, M can be identified with a submonoid of L(M).

Example 1.5.

Let Cq denote the cyclic group of order q. Then, from 𝔽5C4 and (𝔽5C5)C4×(C5)4, we have

[C5]=14[(𝔽5C5)]-14[𝔽5]S(𝔽5).

In particular, C5 is a hereditary group over 𝔽5.

The next criterion – our main result – shows that hereditary groups are determined by their group algebras.

Criterion 1.6.

Let G and H be finite groups, and let R be a finite unital commutative ring. Suppose G is a hereditary group over R. If RGRH, then GH.

The proof is done by describing the number of group homomorphisms in terms of the number of unital algebra homomorphisms.

Proof of Criterion 1.6.

Since a unital commutative ring R has invariant basis number (IBN) property, we have |G|=|H| from RGRH. Hence, by Lemma 1.2, it suffices to prove that |Hom(G,K)|=|Hom(H,K)| for every subgroup K of G.

Since G is a hereditary group over R, we have [K]S(R). Therefore, there is a positive integer n and finite unital R-algebras A,B such that

[K]=1n[A]-1n[B].

Namely, AB×Kn. Hence,

|Hom(G,A)|=|Hom(G,B×Kn)|=|Hom(G,B)|×|Hom(G,K)|n.

Thus, by Lemma 1.3, we can obtain

|Hom(G,K)|=(|Hom(G,A)||Hom(G,B)|)1/n=(|Hom(RG,A)||Hom(RG,B)|)1/n.

We can calculate |Hom(H,K)| similarly and conclude that

|Hom(G,K)|=|Hom(H,K)|

from RGRH. ∎

Remark 1.7.

Studying a finite group that is a “linear combination” of unit groups, precisely an element of S(R), is essential because even the cyclic group of order five cannot be realized as a unit group of any unital ring. (See a theorem by Davis and Occhipinti [4, Corollary 3], for example.) This is quite different from the fact that every finite abelian p-group is a hereditary group over 𝔽p (Lemma 3.2).

It also should be noted that no examples of non-hereditary groups are hitherto found.

Using this criterion, we provide new proofs for some early theorems on the modular isomorphism problem in the last section.

2 Quasi-regular groups

We show that, with Criterion 1.6, study of quasi-regular groups can be used to study the isomorphism problem. Throughout this section, R denotes a unital commutative ring.

Definition 2.1.

Let A be an R-algebra. Define the quasi-multiplication on A by

xy=x+y+xy.

An element xA is called quasi-regular if there is an element yA such that xy=0=yx. We denote the set of all quasi-regular elements by Q(A). It forms a group under the quasi-multiplication, and we call it the quasi-regular group of A. If A=Q(A), then A is called quasi-regular (or radical).

Quasi-multiplication is also called circle operation or adjoint operation. Accordingly, quasi-regular groups are also called circle groups or adjoint groups. As these terms have completely different meaning in other contexts, we avoid using them.

If an R-algebra A has a multiplicative identity, then there is an isomorphism Q(A)A that is defined by x1+x. We study how quasi-regular groups are related to unit groups, especially when algebras do not have multiplicative identities, in the rest of this section.

Definition 2.2.

Let A be an R-algebra. We denote the unitization of A by Aun: it is a direct product Aun=A×R as R-modules, and its multiplication is defined by

(x,r)×(y,s)=(sx+ry+xy,rs).

Note that (0,1)Aun is the multiplicative identity. The unitization is also called the Dorroh extension, especially the case R=.

Lemma 2.3.

Let A be a quasi-regular R-algebra. Then an element (x,r)Aun is a unit if and only if rR is a unit.

Proof.

The “only if” part is trivial. Let us assume rR to show (x,r)Aun. As r-1R exists and r-1xA, there is an element yA such that

(r-1x)y=0=y(r-1x)

because A is quasi-regular. Then it can be shown that (x,r)-1=(r-1y,r-1) by direct calculation. ∎

Lemma 2.4.

Let A be a quasi-regular R-algebra. Then AunQ(A)×R. In particular, [Q(A)]S(R) if R and A are finite.

Proof.

Note that there are homomorphisms

which are well-defined by Lemma 2.3. It is straightforward to check that these satisfy the universal property of a direct product. ∎

Remark 2.5.

For determining whether a finite group is a quasi-regular group of an R-algebra, a theorem by Sandling [18, Theorem 1.7] would be helpful. It should be noted that quasi-regular groups also have severely restricted structure as unit groups. See [19, p. 343].

3 Modular isomorphism problem

As application of Criterion 1.6, we provide new proofs for theorems by Deskins [5] and Passi–Sehgal [13] which are early theorems on the modular isomorphism problem.

3.1 Abelian (class at most one)

Let us state a well-known theorem by Deskins [5, Theorem 2].

Theorem 3.1 (Deskins).

Let G and H be finite p-groups. Suppose G is abelian. If FpGFpH, then GH.

To use our criterion, we need to prove the following, which is also useful to prove Theorems 3.4 and 3.7.

Lemma 3.2.

Every finite abelian p-group is a hereditary group over Fp.

Proof.

Let Cpn be the cyclic p-group of order pn. Since a finite abelian p-group is a direct product of finite cyclic p-groups and being finite cyclic p-group is a subgroup-closed property, it suffices to prove that [Cpn]S(𝔽p). We prove it by induction on n.

Base case (n=0) Clear by Definition 1.4.

Inductive case (n>0) Let Δ(Cpn) denote the augmentation ideal of 𝔽pCpn. Then

(𝔽pCpn)=V×𝔽p,

where V=1+Δ(Cpn). It is clear that V is a finite abelian group. Furthermore, it is easy to see the exponent of V equals pn. Therefore, Vi=1n(Cpi)ai for some non-negative integers a1,,an-1 and a positive integer an. Hence,

[Cpn]=1an[V]-i=1n-1aian[Cpi]=1an[(𝔽pCpn)]-1an[𝔽p]-i=1n-1aian[Cpi],

and we have [Cpn]S(𝔽p) by induction. (This lemma can be also proved by appealing to the structure theorem of (𝔽pCpn) by Janusz [9, Theorem 3.1].) ∎

With this lemma, we provide a new proof of the Deskins theorem.

Proof of Theorem 3.1.

Since the finite abelian p-group G is a hereditary group over 𝔽p by Lemma 3.2, 𝔽pG𝔽pH implies GH by Criterion 1.6. ∎

Remark 3.3.

Besides the original proof by Deskins, an alternative simple proof is given by Coleman [3, Theorem 4]. Proofs can be found in monographs such as [10, Theorem 2.4.3], [14, Lemma 14.2.7], [22, (III.6.2)], [15, Theorem 9.6.1], or [23, Theorem 4.10] as well.

3.2 Class two and exponent p

The aim of this subsection is to provide a new proof of the following theorem by Passi and Sehgal [13, Corollary 13].

Theorem 3.4 (Passi–Sehgal).

Let G and H be finite p-groups. Suppose G is of class two and exponent p. If FpGFpH, then GH.

See also Remark 3.8. To use our criterion, we need to prove the following.

Lemma 3.5.

Every finite p-group of class two and exponent p is a hereditary group over Fp.

A key ingredient for the proof is a slight modification of the theorem by Ault and Watters [1, 7].

Theorem 3.6 (Ault–Watters).

Let G be a finite p-group. Suppose G is of class two and exponent p. Then there is a finite quasi-regular Fp-algebra A with Q(A)G.

Proof.

It is proved in [1] that there is a finite quasi-regular ring A=G with operations[2] defined by

g+h=ghm(g,h)-1,
g×h=m(g,h)

and Q(A)G; here m:G×Gζ(G) is a certain map, where ζ(G) is the center of G. In particular, 1G is the additive identity of A. By induction, it can be shown that

g++gn=gnm(g,g)-n(n-1)/2

for a positive integer n. Since the prime p is odd because a group of exponent two cannot be of class two, we can prove

g++gp=1.

Therefore, there is a canonical 𝔽p-algebra structure on A. ∎

Proof of Lemma 3.5.

Since finite abelian p-groups are hereditary groups over 𝔽p by Lemma 3.2, it suffices to prove that [G]S(𝔽p) for every finite p-group G of class two and exponent p. Because such p-group G is a quasi-regular group of some finite quasi-regular 𝔽p-algebra by Theorem 3.6, [G]S(𝔽p) follows from Lemma 2.4. ∎

Now we are in position to prove the theorem by Passi and Sehgal.

Proof of Theorem 3.4.

Since the finite p-group G of class two and exponent p is a hereditary group over 𝔽p by Lemma 3.5, 𝔽pG𝔽pH implies GH by Criterion 1.6. ∎

3.3 Class two and exponent four

The aim of this subsection is to prove the even prime counterpart of Theorem 3.4.

Theorem 3.7 (Passi–Sehgal).

Let G and H be finite 2-groups. Suppose G is of class two and exponent four. If F2GF2H, then GH.

Remark 3.8.

Note that the third dimension subgroup of G modulo p is Gpγ3(G) if p2 and G4(G)2γ3(G) if p=2, where γ3(G) denotes the third term of the lower central series of G. Thus, the assumption for a group in Theorem 3.4 or Theorem 3.7 holds if G has the trivial third modular dimension subgroup. Actually, this is how assumption is stated by Passi and Sehgal [13, Corollary 7].

Nowadays, more is known. A theorem by Sandling [21, Theorem 1.2] provides a positive solution for a finite p-group of class two with elementary abelian commutator subgroup.

A strategy for the proof is the same as Theorem 3.4. The even prime counterpart of the Ault–Watters theorem is the following theorem by Bovdi [2].

Theorem 3.9 (Bovdi).

Let G be a finite 2-group. Suppose G is of class two and exponent four. Then there is a finite quasi-regular F2-algebra A with Q(A)G.

Lemma 3.10.

Every 2-group of class two and exponent four is a hereditary group over F2.

Proof.

As all finite abelian 2-groups are hereditary groups over 𝔽2 by Lemma 3.2, it suffices to prove that [G]S(𝔽2) for every finite 2-group G of class two and exponent four. Because such 2-group G is a quasi-regular group of some finite quasi-regular 𝔽2-algebra by Theorem 3.9, [G]S(𝔽2) follows from Lemma 2.4. ∎

Proof of Theorem 3.7.

Since the finite 2-group G of class two and exponent four is a hereditary group over 𝔽2 by Lemma 3.10, 𝔽2G𝔽2H implies GH by Criterion 1.6. ∎


Communicated by Britta Spaeth


References

[1] J. C. Ault and J.  F. Watters, Circle groups of nilpotent rings, Amer. Math. Monthly 80 (1973), 48–52. 10.1080/00029890.1973.11993229Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. A. Bovdi, On circle groups of nilpotent rings of characteristic 2, Period. Math. Hungar. 32 (1996), 31–34. 10.1007/BF01879729Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. B. Coleman, On the modular group ring of a p-group, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964), 511–514. 10.2307/2034735Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. Davis and T. Occhipinti, Which finite simple groups are unit groups?, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218 (2014), 743–744. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2013.08.013Search in Google Scholar

[5] W. E. Deskins, Finite abelian groups with isomorphic group algebras, Duke Math. J. 23 (1956), 35–40. 10.1215/S0012-7094-56-02304-3Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Eick and A. Konovalov, The modular isomorphism problem for the groups of order 512, Groups St. Andrews 2009. Vol. 2, Cambridge University, Cambridge (2011), 375–383. 10.1017/CBO9780511842474.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Gilmer and D. Roselle, Complements and comments, Amer. Math. Monthly 80 (1973), 1116–1118. 10.1080/00029890.1973.11993466Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Hertweck and M. Soriano, On the modular isomorphism problem: groups of order 26, Groups, Rings and Algebras, Contemp. Math. 420, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2006), 177–213. 10.1090/conm/420/07976Search in Google Scholar

[9] G. J. Janusz, Faithful representations of p groups at characteristic p. I, J. Algebra 15 (1970), 335–351. 10.1016/0021-8693(70)90063-3Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. L. Kruse and D. T. Price, Nilpotent Rings, Gordon and Breach Science, New York, 1969. Search in Google Scholar

[11] L. Lovász, Operations with structures, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 18 (1967), 321–328. 10.1007/BF02280291Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. Lovász, Direct product in locally finite categories, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 33 (1972), 319–322. Search in Google Scholar

[13] I. B. S. Passi and S. K. Sehgal, Isomorphism of modular group algebras, Math. Z. 129 (1972), 65–73. 10.1007/BF01229543Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. S. Passman, The Algebraic Structure of Group Rings, Pure Appl. Math., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977. Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. Polcino Milies and S. K. Sehgal, An Introduction to Group Rings, Algebra and Applications. 1, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002. 10.1007/978-94-010-0405-3_1Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Rosenberg, Algebraic K-theory and its Applications, Grad. Texts in Math. 147, Springer, New York, 1994. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4314-4Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. H. Rowen, Graduate Algebra: Noncommutative View, Grad. Stud. Math. 91, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2008. 10.1090/gsm/091Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Sandling, Group rings of circle and unit groups, Math. Z. 140 (1974), 195–202. 10.1007/BF01214162Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. Sandling, Units in the modular group algebra of a finite Abelian p-group, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 33 (1984), 337–346. 10.1016/0022-4049(84)90066-5Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. Sandling, The isomorphism problem for group rings: a survey, Orders and Their Applications, Lecture Notes in Math. 1142, Springer, Berlin (1985), 256–288. 10.1007/BFb0074806Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Sandling, The modular group algebra of a central-elementary-by-abelian p-group, Arch. Math. (Basel) 52 (1989), 22–27. 10.1007/BF01197966Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. K. Sehgal, Topics in Group Rings, Monogr. Textb. Pure Appl. Math. 50, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978. Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. K. Sehgal, Group rings, Handbook of Algebra. Vol. 3, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam (2003), 457–541. 10.1016/S1570-7954(03)80069-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-16
Revised: 2019-11-19
Published Online: 2019-12-20
Published in Print: 2020-05-01

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2019-0071/html
Scroll to top button