Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 21, 2019

Investigation on Rotor-Labyrinth Seal System with Variable Rotating speed

  • Xingyun Jia , Hai Zhang EMAIL logo , Qun Zheng , Shuangming Fan and Zhitao Tian

Abstract

The following paper presents dynamic leakage rate and coupled interaction for variable speed rotor-labyrinth (LABY) seal, with rotating speed from 18 to 30 krpm. Variable speed rotor vibration characteristics are incorporated into transient computational fluid dynamic (CFD) calculations as boundary conditions of seal flow field to show the real-time effect of rotordynamic in seal flow field. Leakage rate across a variable speed rotor-seal increases with rotor vibration, but this effect is prominent at lower speed than at higher speed. Leakage characteristic is determined by differences in rotor vibration amplitude rather than rotating speed. The results also reveal that aerodynamic forces of labyrinth seal flow field can improve rotor stability, and this interaction between rotor and seal decreases with the increase of rotating speed.

Funding statement: Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant/Award Number: 2015M571393).

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the financial support of Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2015M571393).

Nomenclature

A

Vibration amplitude of rotor (mm)

Ω

Vibration frequency of rotor (Hz)

F

Aerodynamic force on the rotor (N)

t

Time in vibration (s)

m˙

Mass flow (kg/s)

ω

Rotating speed of rotor (r/min)

Δp

Pressure difference (Mpa)

b

Thickness of throttled tooth (mm)

h

Initial height of radial clearance (mm)

x

Dynamic height of radial clearance(mm)

α

Flow coefficient

Pn

Outlet static pressure (Mpa)

α

Averaged flow coefficient

P0

Inlet total pressure (Mpa)

T0

Inlet total temperature (°C)

Z

Number of sealing teeth

Ai

Leakage area of seal (m2)

Qideal

Leakage with no vibration (kg/s)

Qdyn

Dynamic leakage (kg/s)

H

Height of the first layer mesh (m)

Vmax

Velocity of motion of the first layer mesh (m/s)

Subscripts
r

Radial direction

t

Tangential direction

References

[1] Childs DW, Nelson CE. Nicks C, Hale K. Theory versus experiment for the rotordynamic coefficients of annular gas seals. Part 1: test facility and apparatus. ASME J Tribol 1983;108(3):426–31.10.1115/1.3261226Search in Google Scholar

[2] Childs DW, Scharrer JK. Theory versus experiment for the rotordynamic coefficient of labyrinth gas seals: Part II – a comparison to experiment. J Vib Acoust 1988;110(3):281–7.10.1115/1.3269514Search in Google Scholar

[3] Childs DW. Final report for NASA grant NAG 3–181 (RF 4502–0). NASA CR-197679, Texas A & M University, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Weatherwax M, Childs DW. Theory versus experiment for the rotordynamic characteristics of a high pressure honeycomb annular gas seal at eccentric positions. J Tribol 2003;125(2):422–9.10.1115/1.1504093Search in Google Scholar

[5] Childs DW, Scharrer JK. An Iwatsubo-based solution for labyrinth seals: comparison to experimental results. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1986;108(2):325–31.10.1115/1.3239907Search in Google Scholar

[6] Arthur SP, Childs DW. Measured rotordynamic and leakage characteristics of a tooth-on-rotor labyrinth seal with comparisons to a tooth-on-stator labyrinth seal and predictions. ASME Turbo Expo 2015, Montreal, 2015 (in Canada).10.1115/GT2015-43242Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ertas BH, Delgado A, Vannini G. Rotordynamic force coefficients for three types of annular gas seals with inlet preswirl and high differential pressure ratio. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2011;134(4):302–20.10.1115/GT2011-45556Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kanemitsu Y, Ohsawa M, Kawai R. Experimental study on flow induced forces of labyrinth seals. In: Proceedings, post IFToMM conference on flow induced force in rotating machinery, Kobe, 1986 (in Japan).Search in Google Scholar

[9] Benckert H, Wachter J. Flow induced spring coefficients of labyrinth seals. IMechE proceedings of the second international conference, vibrations in rotating machinery, Cambridge, 1980 (in England).Search in Google Scholar

[10] Tam L, Przekwas A, Muszynska A, Hendricks RC, Braun MJ, Mullen R. Numerical and analytical study of fluid dynamic forces in seals and bearings. J Vib Acoust 1988;110(3):315–25.10.1115/1.3269519Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wilbur S, Raymond C, Glenn H, Antonio A, Bharat A, Mahesh M. Numerical, analytical, experimental study of fluid dynamic force in seals, 2004, NASA/CR213199, Vol.5, New York.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Moore J. Three-dimensional CFD rotordynamic analysis of gas labyrinth seals. J Vib Acoust 2003;125(4):427–33.10.1115/1.1615248Search in Google Scholar

[13] Vakili AD, Meganathan AJ, Michaud M, Radhakrishnan S. An experimental and numerical study of labyrinth seal flow. ASME Turbo Expo, Reno-Tahoe, 2005, Paper no. GT 2005–68224, (in American).10.1115/GT2005-68224Search in Google Scholar

[14] Untaroiu A, Untaroiu CD, Wood HG, Allaire PE. Numerical modeling of fluid-induced rotordynamic forces in seals with large aspect ratios. ASME J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2013;135(1):012501.10.1115/GT2012-69830Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hai Z, Qun Z, Yue GQ, Gao J. Numerical analysis of flows and aerodynamic forces in honeycomb and labyrinth seals. Pro IMechE Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2013;227(9):1965–79.10.1177/0954406212470894Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lalanne M, Ferraris G. Rotordynamics prediction in engineering. New York: Wiley, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yahya D, Mustafa CS, Ahmet SB, Altuğ P, Ercan A, Mustafa K. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of labyrinth seal leakage performance depending on mushroom-shaped tooth wear. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2016, 138(3):032503.10.1115/1.4031369Search in Google Scholar

[18] Eldin AMG Mohamed A. Leakage and rotordynamic effects of pocket damper seals and see-through labyrinth seal. Ph.D. thesis, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, 2007 (in American).Search in Google Scholar

[19] Egli A. Leakage of steam through labyrinth seals. ASME J Trans 1935;57(3):115–22.10.1115/1.4019911Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wittig S, Dorr L, Kim S. Scaling effects on leakage losses in labyrinth seals. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1983;105(2):305–9.10.1115/1.3227416Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kearton WJ, Keh TH. Leakage of air through labyrinth glands of staggered type. Proc I Mech E 1952;166(1):180–95.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1952_166_022_02Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-30
Accepted: 2016-11-10
Published Online: 2019-02-21
Published in Print: 2019-03-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2016-0066/html
Scroll to top button