Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter April 4, 2020

Experimental validation of the reaction mechanism models of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process

  • Hongyang Wang , Kai Dong EMAIL logo and Rong Zhu

Abstract

The reaction mechanism models of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zincrich dust process are studied. The dust collected from a steelwork contains 63.8% zinc and 3.18% chlorine (mass percent), of which, almost all zinc elements exist in ZnO and ZnCl2 forms, and all the chlorine elements are stored in ZnCl2. When the dust is roasted at above 732C in an air atmosphere, the ZnCl2 in the steelmaking zinc-rich dust is volatilized into steam and then oxidized into ZnO. Finding the position where the chemical reaction occurs is the key to determining the reaction mechanisms of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming. In this study, two groups of thermal experiments are designed and executed for roasting in different atmosphere environments and at different roasting temperatures. Based on the experiment results, the mechanism model is discussed and built, and the reaction of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming is shown to be a multi-step process. Because O2 from the air cannot transmit into the dust particle interior or dust bed effectively, the chemical reaction of [Zn] reclaiming occurs in the external gas environment outside of the dust, where the [Zn] recalcining reaction should be limited by the dynamics of new nucleation of ZnO solids.

1 Introduction

The shortage of raw materials is becoming an increasingly prominent issue for the zinc smelting industry in China [1]. Secondary resources, such as steelmaking dust, galvanizing dross, and blast furnace dust, are important raw material supplies [2]. Because of circulation and accumulation effects, EAF steelmaking by galvanized steel and scrap parts produces a large amount of zinc-rich dust. If the steel-making dust can be fully utilized, it will effectively alleviate the domestic shortage of raw materials.

Steelmaking zinc-rich dust cannot be directly used for zinc smelting. The contained [Cl] element enters the electrolyte in ion form (Cl) and corrodes the system’s equipment, such as the positive plate. Eventually, the zinc hydrometallurgy process and the working environment are affected and they deteriorate [3]. Dechlorination from the steelmaking zinc-rich dust is necessary. Some scholars have done a lot of work on dechlorination of steel-making dust [4], including sulfation roasting, water washing process [5], microwave roasting [6], etc. The roasting method is commonly used for defluorination and dechlorination, which gives obvious advantages of being a simple process and having good effects.

In the process of roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust, the synchronous loss of zinc is large. It is necessary to extensively study the internal reaction mechanism to reduce the actual [Zn] loss and achieve complete dechlorination. The reactions of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process occur through a typical multi-step process, which results in morphology changes and the mass transport of reactants and products.

In this paper, the physical and chemical properties of steelmaking zinc-rich dust are confirmed firstly. Then, thermal experiments are designed to validate the key reaction characteristics. Finally, the reaction mechanism model of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steel-making zinc-rich dust process is discussed and built.

2 Discussion about the reaction mechanism

2.1 The physical and chemical properties of the steelmaking zinc-rich dust

In steelmaking using scraps in an electric arc furnace or induction furnace, zinc and other elements are evaporated into the furnace gas at a high temperature, and then they condense with the oxygen in the furnace gas gradually. Finally, the combination product aggregates into fine particles, which is steelmaking dust. The steelmaking dust is commonly processed into auxiliary materials and reused in steelmaking production to recover [Fe]. [Zn] gradually circulates and accumulates, and the heavy use of galvanized scrap steel and scrap parts aggravates the enrichment. Finally, steelmaking zinc-rich dust forms.

In this study, steelmaking zinc-rich dust was collected from a steelwork. A chemical composition analysis was carried out firstly, and the dust was shown to contain 63.8% zinc and 3.18% chlorine, as shown in Figure 1a. Then, the crystal structure of the dust was determined by XRD, and the results (Figure 1b) show that almost all zinc exists in the form of ZnO or ZnCl2; The content of ZnO is extremely high in the dust, and all chlorine is stored in ZnCl2. Finally, the particle size was measured by a laser particle size distribution analyzer, and the steelmaking zinc-rich dust particles were all found to be very small, mainly in the range of 1–10 μm and mostly 2–5 μm. The statistics of the particles size are shown in Figure 1c.

Figure 1 Physical and chemical properties of the steelmaking zinc-rich dust
Figure 1

Physical and chemical properties of the steelmaking zinc-rich dust

The chemical composition of experimental raw materials is mainly determined by chemical detection. Among them, zinc is determined by coordination titration method (GB/T 6890-2000), Cl by titration method (GB/T 11896_1989), F by ion-selective electrode method (GB/T 6730.28-2006).

The flue dust used in this paper has very low Fe content. Zinc mainly exists in the form of ZnO, and other impurity elements are low. After chlorine is removed, it can be directly used in hydrometallurgy.

2.2

Thermodynamics analysis of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaimingZnCl2 is volatile matter, whose melting point, boiling point and saturated vapor pressure at different high temperatures are shown in Table 1. The saturated vapor pressure of ZnCl2 changes by order of magnitude from temperatures of 550 to 650C, which means a greater gasification rate, and ZnCl2 boils at a temperature of 732C. In the roasting process, the ZnCl2 in the dust volatilizes by following the reaction equation shown below:

Table 1

Physical properties of ZnCl2 material

phase transition temperaturesaturated vapor pressure
meltingboiling550C650C750C850C950C
318C732C4.38×103 Pa3.15×104 Pa1.46×105 Pa4.93×105 Pa1.32×106 Pa
ZnCl2s/l=ZnCl2(g)

When the steelmaking zinc-rich dust is roasted under atmospheric pressure or negative pressure at temperatures above 650C, ZnCl2 will evaporate into the gas phase and be dechlorinated directly. As reported in reference [7], the method of roasting at the temperature of 700C for 3 hours is commonly used for dechlorinating some [Zn] or [Pb] rich raw materials.

In the process of ZnCl2 transformation into the gas phase, synchronous loss of zinc is unavoidable. ZnCl2 may react with O2 following the equation below in an oxygen-containing atmosphere such as air. In view of the phase change of ZnCl2, the relationship between the Gibbs free energy of the chemical reaction and the temperature [8] is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 Gibbs free energy of the [Zn] reclaiming reaction under different standard conditions with a changing temperature
Figure 2

Gibbs free energy of the [Zn] reclaiming reaction under different standard conditions with a changing temperature

2ZnCl2+O2=2ZnO+2Cl2

According to the reaction thermodynamics data,when ZnCl2 is in the solid or liquid phase at temperatures below 732C, the Gibbs free energy is always above 0 kJ/mol, and no reaction occurs. At temperatures above the boiling point, the Gibbs free energy falls to below 0 kJ/mol.

There is opportunity for ZnCl2 in the steelmaking zinc-rich dust to be volatilized into steam and then be oxidized into ZnO when the dust is roasted at above 732C in air atmosphere. If the two-step reaction occurs in an ideal position, efficient dechlorination and no loss of zinc elements will be achieved at the same time.

2.3 Discussion on the reaction mechanism and hypotheses

The dust particles can be approximated as spheres. The unidirectional mass transfer process of ZnCl2 from the inner of the dust particle to the outside conforms to the shrinking unreacted core model with a constant particle size. ZnCl2 diffuses into the gas phase on the surface of the unreacted core, and nonvolatile matter forms the layer of residual porous media, which is almost all ZnO. ZnCl2 steam transmits through the layer of residual porous media first, and then diffuses into the gas phase. As the reaction progresses, the diameter of the unreacted core decreases, the thickness of the residual porous media increases, and the overall size of the dust particles remains the same, as shown in Figure 3a. For the overall dechlorinating process of the accumulation layer with a large number of dust particles, the reaction time for dechlorination of a single dust particle can be ignored, and the dechlorinating process of the accumulation layer conforms to the shrinking unreacted core model too, as shown in Figure 3b.

Figure 3 Shrinking unreacted core model of the dust dechlorination process with a constant particle size
Figure 3

Shrinking unreacted core model of the dust dechlorination process with a constant particle size

Roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust in the air atmosphere at a temperature above 732C causes mass transportation of ZnCl2 steam from the inner and oxygen from the gas environment in opposite directions. Affected by the two mass transportations and the chemical reaction, the reaction process of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming may be complicatedly changed and constrained by four influential factors, which are shown below:

  1. The diffusion rate of O2 transmission through the boundary layer and the layer of residual porous media;

  2. The diffusion rate of ZnCl2 steam transmission through the layer of residual porous media and the boundary layer;

  3. The chemical reaction rate of ZnCl2 and O2 reacting with each other;

  4. The diffusion rate of generated Cl2 transmission into the gas atmosphere.

Sufficient reactants are required for the chemical reaction. In the roasting process, if the internal diffusion rate of O2 is higher and the external diffusion rate of ZnCl2 steam is lower, adequate reactant concentrations will be available in the internal slot of the residual porous media. On the contrary, if the internal diffusion rate of O2 is lower and the external diffusion rate of ZnCl2 steam is higher, the necessary reactant concentration may only be provided in the gas environment outside of the particles. In a general situation, the speed of the chemical reaction between gaseous reactants is especially fast, but the nucleation of the ZnO generated from the gas phase may be a restricted link, which is in the solid-phase at the reaction temperature. If the chemical reaction occurs in the internal slot of the residual porous media, because the ZnO existing in the dust particles is already the best nucleation agent, the chemical reaction will complete quickly, and ZnO will be reclaimed in the dust particles internally. If the chemical reaction occurs in the gas environment, the chemical reaction process may last for a long time, and the generated ZnO will leave away the original dust particles, which makes it difficult to reclaim zinc.

In essence, the position at which the chemical reaction occurs is the key characteristic for the reaction mechanism of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process. There are two possibilities in our assumptions: In Hypothesis A, O2 from atmospheric enters the residual porous media and reacts with ZnCl2, and the generated ZnO is attached to the gaps in the layer of the residual porous media (as shown in Figure 4a); in Hypothesis B, the ZnCl2 steam crosses the layer of residual porous media and diffuses into the gas phase, where it reacts with O2 to generate ZnO in the solid phase. Then, the solid ZnO settles onto the surface of the dust or dissipates into the environment (as shown in Figure 4b). All the generated Cl2 gas discharges into the exhaust gas. To verify which hypothesis is consistent with reality, some thermal experiments are necessary.

Figure 4 Hypotheses about the dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming reactive processes
Figure 4

Hypotheses about the dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming reactive processes

3 Experimental schemes

According to the characteristics of the mechanism models, the atmospheric environment and the roasting temperature have different impacts on the reactive results. In this paper, two groups of thermal experiments were designed to discuss and identify the reaction mechanisms of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process.

3.1 Experiments (a) involving roasting in different atmosphere environments

In experiment (a), dust in crucibles was heated and roasted under different gas atmospheres, and the results of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming were investigated after the roasting treatment.

To prepare the experiment objects, every 100 g of dust was weighed and charged into each crucible, and the dust was flatly paved on the bottom of the crucible. The crucibles were made of alumina material and were cylindrical in shape with a diameter of 60 mm and a height of 75 mm. Under different atmospheres, argon or air was sprayed by a quartz tube or no air was sprayed for 60 minutes. The quartz tube was vertically inserted 2 cm below the upper edge of the crucible along the central axis of the crucible. During blowing, a forced gas flow formed in the free space of the crucible. The forced gas flow should not disturb the tiled dust, and the flow rate was confirmed as 100mL/min.

In terms of the experiment equipment, a fast heating muffle furnace of 1600C was prepared, and its semi-sealing and big free space guaranteed the long-term stability of the atmosphere. The experimental gas was supplied by high pressure vessels, and the flow rate was controlled by a pressure-reducing valve and gas flowmeter. The gas was carried through gas pipes, and a heat exchange pipe was equipped in the furnace hearth to ensure that the temperature of the blowing gas was consistent with the furnace. The equipment system for experiment (a) is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 Experiment system for experiment (a) involving roasting in different atmosphere environments
Figure 5

Experiment system for experiment (a) involving roasting in different atmosphere environments

The experiment operation was determined as described below: The muffle furnace was first heated up while empty, and the blowing gas started up too. When the temperature reached the set point, and the gas blowing flow was stabilized, the prepared dust with the crucible was put into the furnace, and after adjusting the position of the blowing pipe and closing the furnace door, the roasting experiment was timed. When the experiment was finished, the dust with the crucible was removed and covered, and the argon gas was blown for dust cooling during sealing. After the experiment, the mass of the dust was weighed, and the compositions of [Zn] and [Cl] in the remaining powder were measured too. To reduce the error, each experiment scheme was carried out three times on average. The specific experimental schemes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Schemes for experiment (a) involving roasting in different atmosphere environments

a-1a-2a-3
Temperature /C900900900
dust Weight /g100100100
roasting time /min606060
atmosphereflowing

Argon
stationary

air
flowing

air
gas compositionAr-air
gas flow rate

mL/min
1000100
gas consume /mL60006000
repeat times333

3.2 Experiment (b) involving roasting at different roasting temperatures

In experiment (b), the prepared dust was heated and roasted in air atmosphere at different temperatures, and the weight and compositions of the remaining powders were investigated after the roasting treatment too.

The dust with crucibles were prepared in the same way and roasted at stationary air atmosphere for 60 minutes at temperatures of 750, 800, 850, 900, and 950C. The operation process was as follows: After the furnace temperature reached the experimental temperature, the prepared dust in crucibles were put into the furnace, and the timer was started. When the roasting time was over, the dust with the crucible was removed and covered, and the argon gas was blown for cooling while sealing. The dust was weighed and chemically examined. Every scheme was carried out three times on average. The equipment system and the experimental schemes for experiment (b) are shown in Figure 6 and Table 3.

Figure 6 Experiment system for experiment (b) involving at different roasting temperatures
Figure 6

Experiment system for experiment (b) involving at different roasting temperatures

Table 3

Schemes for experiment (b) involving at different roasting temperatures

b-1b-2b-3b-4b-5
Temperature /C750800850900950
Dust mass /g100100100100100
Period/min6060606060
Atmospherestationary air
Repeat times33333

4 Experimental results and discussion

In accordance with the schemes of experiment (a), nine experimental dusts were roasted under three different gas environments, and all the residual powders were weighed and chemically examined. The experimental results are shown in Table 4, and the average calculation is shown for each scheme.

Table 4

Results from experiments (a) involving roasting in different atmosphere environments

atmospheredust weightresidual weightcontent of Znaverage weight of Zncontent of Claverage weight of Claverage dechlorination rate
gg%g%g%
a-1flowing

Argon
10088.169.1960.9580.1070.09597.03
10088.069.270.108
10087.869.420.108
a-2stationary

air
10088.569.0461.0690.0430.03898.8
10088.269.290.043
10087.969.390.043
a-3flowing air10088.069.1860.8800.0110.01099.7
10088.269.020.011
10087.869.340.011

Under the three different gas environments, the roasted dusts all dechlorinated completely, and the average dechlorination rate reached 98.51%. The gas environment had little influence on the dechlorination of the steel-making zinc-rich dust. Based on the changes in weight and composition, the dechlorinated mass, the synchronous dezincification, and the actual [Zn] loss were calculated, and the difference between the synchronous dezincification and the actual [Zn] loss represented the mass of [Zn] reclaiming, and the proportion of the [Zn] reclaiming to the synchronous dezincification represented the reclaiming rate of [Zn]. All data are shown in Table 5.

Table 5

Calculation of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in experiment (a) involving in different atmosphere environments

atmospheredechlorinationsynchronous dezincificationactual [Zn] loss[Zn] reclaimingRate of [Zn] reclaiming
gggg%
a-1flowing Argon3.0862.8422.8420.0000
a-2stationary air3.1422.8942.6990.1956.74
a-3flowing air3.1702.9202.9030.0170.58

In the experiment of scheme (a-1), argon gas was used to isolate oxygen from the air and accelerate the external diffusion of ZnCl2, and the chemical reaction of ZnCl2 steam in the crucible was eliminated. As a result, all [Zn] in the ZnCl2 steam was lost (2.843 g), and the mass of [Zn] reclaiming was null. In the experiment of scheme (a-2), the experimental condition was consistent with general roasting in an air environment. With the volatilization of ZnCl2 steam, the dechlorination mass and synchronous dezincification are 3.142 g and 2.894 g respectively, and the mass of [Zn] reclaiming is 0.195 g, which represented 6.74%. In the experiment of scheme [a-3], flowing air accelerates the external diffusion of ZnCl2, and gives little impact on the internal diffusion. The dechlorination and synchronous dezincification masses were 3.170 and 2.920 g respectively, and the [Zn] reclaiming mass was only 0.017 g, which represented 0.58%.

The experiment (a) results show that in the three different atmosphere environments, the actual measured masses of [Zn] reclaiming were all very low. The ZnO generated in the gas phase was affected by the gas flow in the crucible, which accelerates the external diffusion of ZnCl2 steam and is hard to deposit in the crucible. Comparing the experiment results of scheme [a-2] and scheme [a-3],which represent deposition or none, respectively, the mass of [Zn] reclaiming decreased from 0.195 to 0.017 g. According to the most conservative estimation, for the confirmed [Zn] reclaiming reaction, 91.28% of the chemical reaction occurs in the gas environment, compared with 8.72% in the internal gaps of the residual porous media layer. Considering the total mass of zinc that needs to be reclaimed, only 0.58% occurs in the internal gaps of the residual porous media layer. The reaction location of ZnCl2 reclaiming to generate ZnO mainly occurs in the gas phase, and the reaction characteristics of roasting dechlorination and the [Zn] reclaiming process are consistent with the Hypothesis B.

As verification, the dust was roasted at different temperatures in experiment (b). A total of 15 roasting experiments were conducted under five schemes, and the roasted dust was weighed and assayed. All experimental results are shown in Table 6.

Table 6

Results from experiments (b) involving at different roasting temperatures

Temperaturedust weightresidual weightcontent of Znaverage weight of Zncontent of Claverage weight of Claverage dechlorination rate
Cgg%g%g%
b-175010091.268.5462.510.610.55682.5
10091.068.710.61
10091.468.360.61
b-280010089.069.8962.2040.110.09896.9
10089.168.890.11
10089.069.890.11
b-385010090.068.1261.3120.0740.06797.9
10089.068.890.075
10089.068.890.075
b-490010088.569.0461.0690.0430.03898.8
10088.269.290.043
10087.969.390.043
b-595010087.268.8660.9230.0570.05098.4
10086.670.320.057
10087.169.910.057

With an increase in roasting temperature, the dechlorination rate rose gradually, and dechlorination was almost complete at temperatures over 800C. The results of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming at different roasting temperatures are shown in Table 7.As the results show, the mass of [Zn] reclaiming slightly increased first and then gradually decreased with an increase of the roasting temperature. The [Zn] reclaiming rate was more representative of the [Zn] reclaiming reaction degree, which decreased with an increase in the reaction temperature, and the [Zn] loss significantly increased (see Figure 7).

Figure 7 Results of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming with a changing temperature
Figure 7

Results of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming with a changing temperature

Table 7

Calculation of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in experiment (b) involving at different roasting temperatures

Temperaturedechlorinationsynchronous dezincificationactual [Zn] loss[Zn] reclaimingRate of [Zn] reclaiming
Cgggg%
b-17502.6242.4161.2951.12146.40
b-28003.0812.8381.5691.26944.71
b-38503.1132.8672.4880.37913.22
b-49003.1422.8942.6990.1956.74
b-59503.1292.8822.8770.0050.17

According to thermodynamic data, the Gibbs free energy of the [Zn] reclaiming reaction decreases as the reaction temperature increases, which means that the trend of [Zn] reclaiming and the results of the thermal state experiment are contrary to the thermodynamic results. The chemical reaction process is suppressed by the reaction kinetic conditions. According to the Hypothesis A, the ZnCl2 reclaiming reaction occurs in the layer of residual porous media in which the main constituent is solid ZnO; thus, there is no nucleation problem in the formation of ZnO. The results of experiment (b) contradict with the Hypothesis A.

According to the Hypothesis B that ZnCl2 steam reacts with O2 in the gas phase outside of the dust particles, the difficulty of producing a new nucleation ZnO solid phase from gas phase increases with the environmental temperature, and the chemical reaction speed is suppressed. Finally, the ZnO generated and dropped in the crucible decreases. The results of experiment (b) verify the Hypothesis B.

5 Mechanism model of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming

Based on the results of the thermal experiments, the main reaction processes of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming are clear: ZnCl2 is transformed into the gas phase inside the dust particles and spreads out and then diffuses into the surrounding gas phase, where it reacts with O2 and ZnO is generated. The reaction mechanism mode is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8 Reaction mechanism model of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process
Figure 8

Reaction mechanism model of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming in the roasting steelmaking zinc-rich dust process

The reaction of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming is a multi-step process, and the reaction steps are as follows:

  1. When the dust is heated, ZnCl2 boils and becomes steam on the surface of unreacted nuclear matter, and the nonvolatile components form a residual porous media layer at the same time;

  2. ZnCl2 steam spreads from the inner part of the dust to the outside. It transmits through the residual porous media layer and the gas boundary layer and, in turn, diffuses into the gas phase;

  3. O2 from the air is transmitted to the vicinity of the dust particles;

  4. ZnCl2 and O2 encounter and react with each other, and ZnO and Cl2 are generated;

  5. The generated ZnO nucleates and grows into solid particles. Under the action of gravity, some ZnO solid particles settle on the surface of dust particles, while other ZnO solid particles remain loose when they are far away from the dust and the crucible;

  6. The generated Cl2 diffuses into the gas phase and becomes loose.

According to the reaction mechanism model, the concentration of ZnCl2 steam in the dust particles decreases as the distance from the ZnCl2 boiling interface increases, and it is low in a gas environment, and the reaction may be limited by the dynamics of the new nucleation of ZnO solid. ZnCl2 steam spreads a long distance without reacting, and the generated ZnO from the slow chemical reaction appears in the area, which is far away from the dust and the crucible. It cannot be collected efficiently, resulting in little [Zn] being reclaimed.

If the concentration of O2 is higher in the residual porous media layer, the chemical reaction of [Zn] reclaiming must be unstoppable, and the process of ZnCl2 spreading is blocked, which means more [Zn] is reclaimed. The key reason for the chemical reaction occurring in the external gas environment outside of the dust is that O2 from the air environment cannot be transmitted into the dust particle interior or dust bed efficiently. Accelerated transmission of O2 can change the reaction area and cause more [Zn] reclaiming to occur in the roasting steelmaking zincrich dust process.

6 Conclusions

  1. The reaction mechanism model of dechlorination and [Zn] reclaiming from steelmaking zinc-rich dust is shown in Figure 8, and the reaction is a multi-step process, as follows: ① When the dust is heated, ZnCl2 boils and becomes steam on the surface of unreacted nuclear matter, and the nonvolatile components form a residual porous media layer at the same time; ② ZnCl2 steam spreads from the inner part of the dust to the outside. It transmits through the residual porous media layer and the gas boundary layer and, in turn, diffuses into the gas phase; ③ O2 from the air transmits to the vicinity of the dust particles; ④ ZnCl2 and O2 encounter and react with each other, and ZnO and Cl2 are generated; ⑤ the generated ZnO nucleates and grows into solid particles. Under the action of gravity, some ZnO solid particles settle on the surfaces of dust particles, while other ZnO solid particles remain loose when they are far away from the dust and the crucible; ➅ the generated Cl2 diffuses into the gas phase and becomes loose.

  2. The key reason that the chemical reaction occurs in the external gas environment outside of the dust is that O2 from the air environment cannot be transmitted into the dust particle interior or dust bed effectively. Accelerated transmission ofO2 can lead to the solution undergoing efficient [Zn] reclaiming while dechlorinating from the steelmaking zinc-rich dust.

  3. Restricted by the reaction mechanism, the reaction rate of [Zn] recalcining is limited, and lots of zinc is lost synchronously without being recovered, so the actual measured mass of [Zn] reclaiming is very low. The reaction of [Zn] recalcining should be limited by the dynamics of new nucleation of ZnO solid, which is more difficult at higher temperatures, although the Gibbs free energy of the [Zn] recalcining reaction is lower.

References

[1] You, T., L. Ting, Z. Xiangting, et al. Situation and Suggestion of China’s Zinc Resources Industry. Modern Mining, No. 4, 2015, pp. 5–9.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jiantao, J. U. and Y. Dang. Present State and Development of Zinc-bearing Dust Treatment Process in Iron and Steel Plants. Materials Review, Vol. 28, 2014, pp. 109–113.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wang W L. The Behaviors and Control of Chlorine in Zinc Hydrometallurgical Extraction. Hunan Nonferrous Metals, Vol. 50 2007, pp. 22-24.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ma, A., X. Zheng, S. Wang, J. Peng, L. Zhang, and Z. Li. Study on dechlorination kinetics from zinc oxide dust by clean metallurgy technology. Green Processing and Synthesis, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 49-58.10.1515/gps-2015-0041Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chen, W. S., Y. H. Shen, M. S. Tsai, and F. C. Chang. Removal of chloride from electric arc furnace dust. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 190, No. 1-3, 2011, pp. 639–644.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.096Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Ma, A., T. Xie, G. Li, X. Zheng, L. Zhang, and J. Peng. Dechlorination of Zinc Oxide Dust by Microwave Roasting with RSM Optimization. TMS Meeting & Exhibition, TMS 2018: 9th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 715–723.10.1007/978-3-319-72138-5_68Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wang, Y. J., L. B. Zhang, J. H. Peng, et al. Advances in Dechlorination Technology of Zinc Oxide Dust. Mining and Metallurgy, No. 2, 2013, pp. 78–83.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li, R. D., Y. -L. Li, L. Wang, X. -H.Tian, X. Ke, L. -H. Wei, et al. Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study of ZnCl2 Volatilizing in Air Atmosphere. Ranshao Kexue Yu Jishu, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010, pp. 30–34.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-15
Accepted: 2019-09-10
Published Online: 2020-04-04
Published in Print: 2020-04-04

© 2020 H. Wang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2020-0007/html
Scroll to top button