Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter May 22, 2020

Single peaked traveling wave solutions to a generalized μ-Novikov Equation

  • Byungsoo Moon EMAIL logo

Abstract

In this paper, we study the existence of peaked traveling wave solution of the generalized μ-Novikov equation with nonlocal cubic and quadratic nonlinearities. The equation is a μ-version of a linear combination of the Novikov equation and Camassa-Hom equation. It is found that the equation admits single peaked traveling wave solutions.

MSC 2010: 35Q35; 37K45

1 Introduction

We consider the following partial differential equation

mt+k1(u2mx+3uuxm)+k2(2mux+umx)=0, (1.1)

where u(t, x) is a function of time t and a single spatial variable x, and

m:=μ(u)uxx,μ(u):=Su(t,x)dx,

with 𝕊 = ℝ/ℤ which denotes the unit circle on ℝ2. Equation (1.1) can be reduced as μ-Novikov equation [39]

mt+u2mx+3uuxm=0,m=μ(u)uxx, (1.2)

for k1 = 1 and k2 = 0, and the μ-Camassa-Holm equation [28]

mt+2mux+umx=0,m=μ(u)uxx, (1.3)

for k1 = 0 and k2 = 1, respectively.

It is known that the Camassa-Holm equation of the following form [2, 20]

mt+2mux+umx=0,m=uuxx, (1.4)

was proposed as a model for the unidirectional propagation of the shallow water waves over a flat bottom (see also [14, 25]), with u(x, t) representing the height of the water’s free surface in terms of non-dimensional variables. The Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) is completely integrable with a bi-Hamiltonian structure and an infinite number of conservation laws [2, 20], and can be solved by the inverse scattering method [5, 6, 30]. It is of interest to note that the Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) can also be derived by tri-Hamitonian duality from the Korteweg-de Vries equation (a number of additional examples of dual integrable systems derived applying the method of tri-Hamitonian duality can be found in [21, 42]). The Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) has two remarkable features: existence of peakon and multi-peakons [1, 2, 3] and breaking waves, i.e., the wave profile remains bounded while its slope becomes unbounded in finite time [7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 33]. Those peaked solitons were proved to be orbitally stable in the energy space [15, 16] and to be asymptotically stable under the Camassa-Holm flow [38] (see also [26, 27] for other equations). It is worth noting that solutions of this type are not mere abstractizations: the peakons replicate a feature that is characteristic for the waves of great height-waves of largest amplitude that are exact solutions of the governing equations for irrotational water waves [9, 13, 48]. Geometrically, the Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) describes the geodesic flows on the Bott-Virasoro group [37, 47] and on the diffeomorphism group of the unit circle under H1 metric [29], respectively. The Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) also arises from a non-stretching invariant planar curve flow in the centro-equiaffine geometry [4, 41]. Well-posedness and wave breaking of the Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) were studied extensively, and many interesting results have been obtained, see [7, 10, 11, 12, 33], for example. The μ-Camassa-Holm equation (1.3) was originally proposed as the model for the evolution of rotators in liquid crystals with an external magnetic field and self interatction [28]. It is interesting to note that this equation is integrable in the sense that it admits the Lax-pair and bi-Hamiltonian structure, and also describes a geodesic flow on the diffeomorphism group of 𝕊 with Hμ(𝕊) metric (which is equivalent to H1(𝕊) metric). Its integrability, well-posedness, blow-up and peakons were discussed in [19, 28].

It is observed that all nonlinear terms in the Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) are quadratic. In contrast to the integrable modified Korteweg-de Vries equation with a cubic nonlinearity, it is of great interest to find integrable Camassa-Holm type equations with cubic or higher-order nonlinearity admitting peakon solitons. Recently, two integrable Camassa-Holm type equtions with cubic nonlinearities have been appeared in literature. One was introduced by Olver and Rosenau [42](called the modified Camassa-Holm equation, see also [18, 21]) by using the tri-Hamiltonian duality approach, which takes the form

mt+[(u2ux2)m]x=0,m=uuxx. (1.5)

It was shown that the modified Camassa-Holm equation is integrable with the Lax-pair and the bi-Hamiltonian structure. It has single and multi-peaked traveling waves with a different character than of the Camassa-Holm equation (1.4) [22], and it also has new features of blow-up criterion and wave breaking mechanism. The issue of the stability of peakons for the modified Camassa-Holm equation were investigated in [46]. Like μ-Camassa-Holm equation (1.3), μ-version of the modified Camassa-Holm equation

mt+[(2uμ(u)ux2)m]x=0,m=μ(u)uxx (1.6)

was introduced in [44]. Its integrability, wave breaking, existence of peaked traveling waves and their stability were discussed in [34, 44]. The second one is the Novikov equation

mt+u2mx+3uuxm=0,m=uuxx, (1.7)

which is integrable with the Lax pair [40]. A matrix Lax pair reprsentation to the Novikov equation was founded in [23]. It is also noticed that the Novikov equation admits a bi-Hamiltonian structure [23]. Existence of peaked solitons and multi-peakons for Novikov equation were obtained in [24, 40]. Orbital stability of the peaked solitons to the Novikov equation were discussed in [35]. The μ-Novikov equation (1.2), regarded as a μ-version of the Novikov equation, was introduced first in [39]. The existence of its single peakons was established in [39].

More recently, the following generalized μ-Camassa-Holm equation

mt+k1((2μ(u)uux2)m)x+k2(2mux+umx)=0,m=μ(u)uxx (1.8)

was proposed in [45] as a μ-version of the generalized Camassa-Holm equation with quadradic and cubic nonlinearities

mt+k1((u2ux2)m)x+k2(2mux+umx)=0,m=uuxx (1.9)

which was derived by Fokas [18] from the hydrodynamical wave, and can also obtained using the approach of tri-Hamiltonian duality [21, 42] to the bi-Hamiltonian Gardner equation

ut+uxxx+k1u2ux+k2uux=0. (1.10)

Note that the Lax pair of equation (1.9) was obtained in [43]. It was shown in [45] that a scale limit of equation (1.8) yields the following integrable equation

vxtk1vx2vxx+k2vvxx+12vx2=0, (1.11)

which describes asymptotic dynamics of a short capillarty-gravity wave [17], where v(t, x) denotes the fluid velocity on the surface. Notably, the generalized μ-Camassa-Holm equation (1.8) can be regarded as the integrable model that, in a sense, lies midway between equation (1.9) and its limiting version equation (1.11). It has been known that the generalized μ-Camassa-Holm equation (1.8) is formally integrable in the sense that it admits Lax formulation and bi-Hamiltonian form [45].

The existence of periodic peakons is of interest for nonlinear integrable equations because they are relatively new solitary waves (for most models the solitary waves are quite smooth). Applying the method of tri-Hamiltonian duality[21, 42] to the bi-Hamiltonian representation of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), modified Korteweg-de Vries (mKdV), and Gardner equation, the resulting dual systems, such as Camassa-Holm equation (1.4), the modified Camassa-Holm equation (1.5), and the generalized Camassa-Holm equation (1.9), exhibit nonlinear dispersion, and, in most cases, admit a remarkable variety of non-smooth soliton-like solutions, including peakons, compactons, tipons, rampons, mesaons, and so on [32]. It is known that Camassa-Holm equation (1.4), the modified Camassa-Holm equation (1.5), Novikov equation (1.7), and the generalized Camassa-Holm equation (1.9) [2, 22, 36, 40, 43] admit single peakons of the form

u(t,x)=φc(xct)=ae|xct|, (1.12)

where the amplitude a is given by c,3c/2,c, and

3k2±3k22+83ck14k1withk22+83ck10(k10),

for the Camassa-Holm equation, the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Novikov equation, and the generalized Camassa-Holm equation, respectively. Their corresponding periodic peakons take the form

u(t,x)=φc(xct)=acosh(xct[xct]12)cosh(12), (1.13)

where the amplitude a is also given by c,3ccosh(12)/(1+2cosh2(12),c, and

3k2cosh(12)±3k22cosh2(12)+43k1c(1+2cosh2(12))2k1(1+2cosh2(12))

with

k22cosh2(12)+43k1c(1+2cosh2(12))0,

for the Camassa-Holm equation, the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Novikov equation, and the generalized Camassa-Holm equation, respectively.

It is worth noting that the periodic peakons of the μ-integrable equation are of a manifestly different character. For example, in [28, 31, 39, 44], the authors showed that the μ-Camassa-Holm equatioin (1.3), μ-Novikov equation (1.2), modified μ-Camassa-Holm equation (1.6), and generalized μ-Camassa Holm equation (1.8) admit periodic peakons of the following form

u(t,x)=φc(xct)=aφ(xct), (1.14)

where

φ(x)=12x2+2324,x12,12, (1.15)

and φ is extended periodically to the real line, the constant a takes value 12c13,12c13,23c5 and

13k2±169k22+1200ck150k1with169kx2+1200ck10,

respectively, for the μ-Camassa-Holm equation, μ-Novikov equation, modified μ-Camassa-Holm equation, and generalized μ-Camassa-Holm equation.

Motivated by the recent work [28, 44, 45], the aim of this paper is to investigate the existence of periodic peaked solution of the generalized μ-Novikov equation (1.1). Indeed, in Section 2, we give a short review on the notion of a strong and weak solution of the generalized μ-Novikov equation (1.1) and then show that equation (1.1) admits the periodic peakon, which is given by (1.15) with a replaced by

6k2±6k22+4ck113k1 (1.16)

where the wave speed c satisfies k22+4ck10.

2 Peaked Traveling Waves

We first introduce the initial value problem of Equation (1.1) on the unit circle 𝕊, that is

mt+k1(u2mx+3uuxm)+k2(2mux+umx)=0,t>0,xR,u(0,x)=u0(x),m:=μ(u)uxx,xR,u(t,x+1)=u(t,x),t0,xR. (2.1)

We then formalize the notion of a strong (or classical) and weak solutions of the Equation (1.1) used throughout this paper.

Definition 2.1

If uC([0, T), Hs(𝕊)) ∩ C1([0, T), Hs–1(𝕊)) with s > 52 and some T > 0 satisfies (2.1), then u is called a strong solution on [0, T). If u is a strong solution on [0, T) for every T > 0, then it is called a global strong solution.

Note that the inverse operator (μx2)1 can be obtained by convolution with the corresponding Green’s function, so that

u=(μx2)1m=gm, (2.2)

where g is given by [28]

g(x):=12x[x]122+2324. (2.3)

Here [x] denote the greatest integer for x[12,12]. Its derivative at x = 0 can be assigned to zero, so one has [31]

gx(x):=0,x=0x12,0<x<1. (2.4)

Plugging the formula for m := μ(u) – uxx in terms of u into Equation (1.1) results in the following fully nonlinear partial differential equation:

ut+k1u2ux+32(μx2)1xμ(u)u2+uux2+12(μx2)1ux3+k2uux+(μx2)1x(2uμ(u)+12ux2)=0. (2.5)

The formulation (2.5) allows us to define the notion of a weak solutions as follows.

Definition 2.2

Given the initial data u0W1,3(𝕊), the function uL([0, T); W1,3(𝕊)) is said to be a weak solution to (2.1) if it satisfies the following identity:

0TSuψt+k113u3ψx32gxμ(u)u2+uux2ψ12(gux3)ψ+k212u2ψxgx(2uμ(u)+12ux2)ψdxdt+Su0(x)ψ(0,x)dx=0,

for any smooth test function ψ(t,x)Cc([0,T)×S). If u is a weak solution on [0, T) for every T > 0, then it is called a global weak solution.

Our main theorem is in the following.

Theorem 2.1

For any ck224k1, Equation (1.1) admits the peaked periodic-one traveling wave solution uc = ϕc(ξ), ξ = xct, where ϕc(ξ) is given by

ϕc(ξ)=a12ξ122+2324,ξ12,12, (2.6)

where the amplitude

a=6k2±6k22+4ck113k1,k1012c13k2,k1=0,k20 (2.7)

and ϕc(ξ) is extended periodically to the real line with period one.

Proof

Inspired by the forms of periodic peakons for the μ-CH equation [28](See also [44, 45]), we assume that the peaked periodic traveling wave of Equation (1.1) is given by

uc(t,x)=a12ξ[ξ]122+2324.

According to Definition 2.2 it is found that uc(t, x) satisfies the following equation

j=16Ij:=0TSuc,tψdxdt+k10TSuc2uc,xψdxdt+32k10TSgx(μ(uc)uc2+ucuc,x2)ψdxdt+12k10TSg(uc,x3)ψdxdt+k20TSucuc,xψdxdt+k20TSgx(2μ(uc)uc+12uc,x2)ψdxdt=0, (2.8)

for some T > 0 and every test function ψ(t,x)Cc([0,T)×S). For any x ∈ 𝕊, one finds that

μ(uc)=a0ct12xct+122+2324dx+act112xct122+2324dx=a.

To evaluate Ij, j = 1, ⋯, 6, we need to consider two cases: (i) x > ct, and (ii) xct.

For x > ct, we have

μ(uc)uc2+ucuc,x2=a334ξ124+2312ξ122+529576,uc2uc,x=a314ξ125+2324ξ123+529576ξ12,2μ(uc)uc+12uc,x2=a232ξ122+2312anducuc,x=a212ξ123+2324ξ12.

On the other hand,

32k1gxμ(uc)uc2+ucuc,x2=32k1a3Sxy[xy]1234yct[yct]124+2312yct[yct]122+529576dy=32k1a30ctxy1234yct+124+2312yct+122+529576dy+32k1a3ctxxy1234yct124+2312yct122+529576dy+32k1a3x1xy+1234yct124+2312yct122+529576dy=k1a3940ξ1252324ξ123+4871920ξ12,
12k1g(uc,x3)=12a3S12xy[xy]122+2324yct[yct]123dy=12k1a30ct12xy122+2324yct+123dy+12k1a3ctx12xy122+2324yct123dy+12k1a3x112xy+122+2324yct123dy=k1a3140ξ125+1640ξ12,

and

k2gx2μ(uc)uc+12uc,x2=k2a2Sxy[xy]1232yct[yct]122+2312dy=k2a20ctxy1232yct+122+2312dy+k2a2ctxxy1232yct122+2312dy+k2a2x1xy+1232yct122+2312dy=k2a212ξ123+18ξ12.

It follows that

I1=0TSuc,tψdxdt=ca0TSξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I2=k1a30TS14ξ125+2324ξ123+529576ξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I3=k1a30TS940ξ1252324ξ123+4871920ξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I4=k1a30TS140ξ125+1640ξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I5=k2a20TS12ξ123+2324ξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I6=k2a20TS12ξ123+18ξ12ψ(x,t)dxdt.

Plugging above expressions into (2.8), we deduce that for any ψ(t,x)Cc([0,T)×S)

j=16Ij=0TSaξ12169144k1a2+1312k2acψ(t,x)dxdt.

A similar computation yields for xct that

μ(uc)uc2+ucuc,x2=a334ξ+124+2312ξ+122+529576,uc2uc,x=a314ξ+125+2324ξ+123+529576ξ+12,2μ(uc)uc+12uc,x2=a232ξ+122+2312,ucuc,x=a212ξ+123+2324ξ+12,

and

32k1gxμ(uc)uc2+ucuc,x2=k1a3940ξ+1252324ξ+123+4871920ξ+12,12k1g(uc,x3)=k1a3140ξ+125+1640ξ+12,k2gx2μ(uc)uc+12uc,x2=k2a212ξ+123+18ξ+12.

This allows us to evaluate

j=14Ij=0TSξ+12ac+169144k1a3ψ(t,x)dxdt,I5=k2a20TS12ξ+123+2324ξ+12ψ(x,t)dxdt,I6=k2a20TS12ξ+123+18ξ+12ψ(x,t)dxdt.

Hence we arrive at

j=16Ij=0TSaξ+12169144k1a2+1312k2acψ(t,x)dxdt.

Since ψ(t, x) is an arbitrary, both cases imply that the parameter a fulfills the equation

169144k1a2+1312k2ac=0.

Clearly, its solutions are given by which gives (2.7). Thus the theorem is proved.□

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2017R1C1B1002336).

References

[1] M. S. Alber, R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, and J. E. Marsden, The geometry of peaked solitons and billiard solutions of a class of integrable PDE’s, Lett. Math. Phys. 32 (1994), 137–151.10.1007/BF00739423Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Camassa and D. D. Holm, An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (11) (1993), 1661–1664.10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. Cao, D. Holm, and E. Titi, Traveling wave solutions for a class of one-dimensional nonlinear shallow water wave models, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 16 (2004), 167–178.10.1023/B:JODY.0000041284.26400.d0Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. S. Chou and C. Z. Qu, Integrable equations arising from motions of plane curves I, Physica D 162 (2002), 9–33.10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00364-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Constantin, V. S. Gerdjikov, and I. Ivanov, Inverse scattering transform for the Camassa-Holm equation, Inverse Problems 22 (2006), 2197–2207.10.1088/0266-5611/22/6/017Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Constantin, V. S. Gerdjikov, and I. Ivanov, Generalised Fourier transform for the Camassa-Holm hierarchy, Inverse Problems 23 (2007), 1565–1597.10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/012Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Constantin, Existence of permanent and breaking waves for a shallow water equation: a geometric approach, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 50 (2000), 321–362.10.5802/aif.1757Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Constantin, On the blow-up of solutions of a periodic shallow water equation, J. Nonlinear Sci. 10 (2000), 391–399.10.1007/s003329910017Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Constantin, The trajectories of particles in Stokes waves, Invent. Math. 166 (2006), 523–535.10.1007/s00222-006-0002-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Constantin and J. Escher, Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlocal shallow water equations, Acta Math. 181 (1998), 229–243.10.1007/BF02392586Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Constantin and J. Escher, On the blow-up rate and the blow-up set of breaking waves for a shallow water equation, Math. Z 233 (2000), 75–91.10.1007/PL00004793Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Constantin and J. Escher, Global existence and blow-up for a shallow water equation, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 26 (1998), 303–328.Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Constantin and J. Escher, Analyticity of periodic traveling free surface water waves with vorticity, Ann. Math. 173 (2011), 559–568.10.4007/annals.2011.173.1.12Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Constantin and D. Lannes, The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 192 (2009), 165–186.10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Constantin and W. Strauss, Stability of peakons, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 53 (2000), 603–610.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(200005)53:5<603::AID-CPA3>3.0.CO;2-LSearch in Google Scholar

[16] K. El Dika and L. Molinet, Stability of multipeakons, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Lin’Eaire 18 (2009), 1517–1532.10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Faquir, M.A. Manna, and A. Neveu, An integrable equation governing short waves in a long-wave model, Proc. R. Soc. A 463 (2007), 1939–1954.10.1098/rspa.2007.1861Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Fokas, On a class of physically important integrable equations, Physica D 87 (1995), 145–150.10.1016/0167-2789(95)00133-OSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Fu, Y. Liu, and C.Z. Qu, On the blow-up structure for the generalized periodic Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), 3125–3158.10.1016/j.jfa.2012.01.009Search in Google Scholar

[20] B. Fuchssteiner and A. S. Fokas, Symplectic structures, their Bäcklund transformations and hereditary symmetries, Physica D 4 (1981/1982), 47–66.10.1016/0167-2789(81)90004-XSearch in Google Scholar

[21] B. Fuchssteiner, Some tricks from the symmetry-toolbox for nonlinear equations: generalizations of the Camassa-Holm equation, Physica D 95 (1996), 229–243.10.1016/0167-2789(96)00048-6Search in Google Scholar

[22] G. Gui, Y. Liu, P. J. Olver, and C.Z. Qu, Wave-breaking and peakons for a modified Camassa-Holm equation, Comm. Math. Phys., 319 (2013), 731–759.10.1007/s00220-012-1566-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. N. Hone and J. P. Wang, Integrable peakon equations with cubic nonlinearity, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008), 372002.10.1088/1751-8113/41/37/372002Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. N. Hone, H. Lundmark, and J. Szmigielski, Explicit multipeakon solutions of Novikov’s cubically nonlinear integrable Camassa-Holm type equation, Dyn. Partial Diff. Eqns. 6 (2009), 253–289.10.4310/DPDE.2009.v6.n3.a3Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. S. Johnson, Camassa-Holm, Korteweg-de Vries and related models for water waves, J. Fluid Mech. 455 (2002), 63–82.10.1017/S0022112001007224Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. Kabakouala and L. Molinet, On the stability of the solitary waves to the (generalized) Kawahara equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 457 (2018), no. 1, 478–497.10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Kabakouala, A remark on the stability of peakons for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Nonlinear Anal. 132 (2016), 318-326.10.1016/j.na.2015.11.018Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Khesin, J. Lenells, and G. Misiolek, Generalized Hunter-Saxton equation and the geometry of the group of circle diffeomorphisms, Math. Ann. 342 (2008), 617–656.10.1007/s00208-008-0250-3Search in Google Scholar

[29] S. Kouranbaeva, The Camassa-Holm equation as a geodesic flow on the diffeomorphism group, J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999), 857–868.10.1063/1.532690Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. Lenells, The scattering approach for the Camassa-Holm equation, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 9 (2002), 389–39310.2991/jnmp.2002.9.4.2Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. Lenells, G. Misiolek, and F. Tiglay, Integrable evolution equations on spaces of tensor densities and their peakon solutions, Comm. Math. Phys. 299 (2010), 129–16110.1007/s00220-010-1069-9Search in Google Scholar

[32] Y. A. Li, P. J. Olver, and P. Rosenau, Non-analytic solutions of nonlinear wave models, in: M. Grosser, G. Höormann, M. Kunzinger, M. Oberguggenberger (Eds.), Nonlinear Theory of Generalized Functions, in: Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 401, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 1999, pp. 129–145Search in Google Scholar

[33] Y. A. Li and P. J. Olver, Well-posedness and blow-up solutions for an integrable nonlinearly dispersive model wave equation, J. Differential Equations 162 (2000), 27–6310.1006/jdeq.1999.3683Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y. Liu, C.Z. Qu, and Y. Zhang, Stability of peakons for the modified μ-Camassa-Holm equation, Physica D (2013), 66–7410.1016/j.physd.2013.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[35] X. Liu, Y. Liu, and C.Z. Qu, Stability of peakons for the Novikov equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. 101 (2014), 172–18710.1016/j.matpur.2013.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[36] X. Liu, Y. Liu, P. J. Olver, and C.Z. Qu, Orbital stability of peakons for a generalization of the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Nonlinearity 27 (2014), 2297–231910.1088/0951-7715/27/9/2297Search in Google Scholar

[37] G. Misiolek, A shallow water equation as a geodesic flow on the Bott-Virasoro group and the KdV equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1998), 203–208.Search in Google Scholar

[38] L. Molinet, A Liouville property with application to asymptotic stability for the Camassa-Holm equation, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 230 (2018), no. 1, 185–230.10.1007/s00205-018-1243-3Search in Google Scholar

[39] B. Moon, The existence of the single peaked traveling waves to the μ-Novikov equation, Appl. Anal. 97 (2018), 1540–1548.10.1080/00036811.2017.1321112Search in Google Scholar

[40] V. Novikov, Generalizations of the Camassa-Holm equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009), 342002.10.1088/1751-8113/42/34/342002Search in Google Scholar

[41] P. J. Olver, Invariant submanifold flows, J. Phys. A 4 (2008), 344017.10.1088/1751-8113/41/34/344017Search in Google Scholar

[42] P. J. Olver and P. Rosenau, Tri-Hamiltonian duality between solitons and solitary-wave solutions having compact support, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996), 1900–1906.10.1103/PhysRevE.53.1900Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Z. Qiao, B. Xia, and J. B. Li, Integrable system with peakon, weak kink, and kink-peakon interactional solutions, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1205.2028Search in Google Scholar

[44] C. Z. Qu, Y. Fu, and Y. Liu, Well-posedness, wave breaking and peakons for a modified μ-Camassa-Holm equation, J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 422–477.10.1016/j.jfa.2013.09.021Search in Google Scholar

[45] C. Z. Qu, Y. Fu, and Y. Liu, Blow-Up Solutions and Peakons to a Generalized μ-Camassa-Holm Integrable Equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 331 (2014), 375–416.10.1007/s00220-014-2007-zSearch in Google Scholar

[46] C. Z. Qu, X. Liu, and Y. Liu, Stability of Peakons for an Integrable Modified Camassa-Holm Equation with Cubic Nonlinearity, Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), 967–997.10.1007/s00220-013-1749-3Search in Google Scholar

[47] J. Schiff, The Camassa-Holm equation: a loop group approach, Phys. D 121 (1998), 4633–4648.10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00099-2Search in Google Scholar

[48] J.F. Toland, Stokes waves, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 7 (1996), 1–48.10.12775/TMNA.1996.001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-07-17
Accepted: 2020-03-28
Published Online: 2020-05-22

© 2021 Byungsoo Moon, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2020-0106/html
Scroll to top button