Elsevier

Earth-Science Reviews

Volume 207, August 2020, 103212
Earth-Science Reviews

Hydrology of debris-covered glaciers in High Mountain Asia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103212Get rights and content

Abstract

The hydrological characteristics of debris-covered glaciers are known to be fundamentally different from those of clean-ice glaciers, even within the same climatological, geological, and geomorphological setting. Understanding how these characteristics influence the timing and magnitude of meltwater discharge is particularly important for regions where downstream communities rely on this resource for sanitation, irrigation, and hydropower, such as High Mountain Asia. The hydrology of debris-covered glaciers is complex: rugged surface topographies typically route meltwater through compound supraglacial-englacial systems involving both channels and ponds, as well as pathways that remain unknown. Low-gradient tongues that extend several kilometres retard water conveyance and promote englacial storage. Englacial conduits are frequently abandoned and reactivated as water supply changes, new lines of permeability are exploited, and drainage is captured due to high rates of surface and subsurface change. Seasonal influences, such as the monsoon, are superimposed on these distinctive characteristics, reorganising surface and subsurface drainage rapidly from one season to the next. Recent advances in understanding have mostly come from studies aimed at quantifying and describing supraglacial processes; little is known about the subsurface hydrology, particularly the nature (or even existence) of subglacial drainage. In this review, we consider in turn the supraglacial, englacial, subglacial, and proglacial hydrological domains of debris-covered glaciers in High Mountain Asia. We summarise different lines of evidence to establish the current state of knowledge and, in doing so, identify major knowledge gaps. Finally, we use this information to suggest six themes for future hydrological research at High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers in order to make timely long-term predictions of changes in the water they supply.

Introduction

Debris-covered glaciers have gained increased research attention over recent years, partly in recognition of their role as water sources for large parts of the world’s population (Immerzeel et al., 2020; Scherler et al., 2011) and partly because they host a range of distinctive features, driven by processes that are largely absent from their clean-ice counterparts. Definitions of what constitutes a ‘debris-covered glacier’ vary widely (e.g. Anderson, 2000; Kirkbride, 2011), but here we define them to be glaciers with a largely continuous layer of supraglacial debris over most of the ablation area, typically increasing in thickness towards the terminus (Fig. 1). Debris can be supplied to such glaciers by snow avalanches, rockfalls, and landslides from mountainsides onto the glacier surface (Fig. 2, Fig. 3A), melt-out of englacial debris, thrusting from the glacier bed, dust blown from exposed moraines, or solifluction from (ice-cored) moraines (Dunning et al., 2015; Gibson et al., 2017b; Hambrey et al., 2008; Kirkbride and Deline, 2013; Rowan et al., 2015; van Woerkom et al., 2019). The surface debris layer can range in thickness from scattered particles to several metres, including large rocks and substantial boulders (Fig. 3C and D) (Inoue and Yoshida, 1980; McCarthy et al., 2017; Nicholson et al., 2018).

Debris-covered glaciers are present in nearly all of Earth’s glacierised regions, with a particularly large concentration in High Mountain Asia (Bolch et al., 2012; Kraaijenbrink et al., 2017; Scherler et al., 2018); sub-regional variability in the debris cover of which is presented by Brun et al. (2019) (their Fig. 1). Debris-covered glaciers therefore contribute an important proportion of streamflow used for drinking water, irrigation, and hydroelectric power; this streamflow is particularly effective in reducing seasonal water shortages (Bolch et al., 2019; Immerzeel et al., 2020; Immerzeel et al., 2010; Pritchard, 2019; Scott et al., 2019). Glacier mass loss in response to climate warming is currently increasing river discharge and contributions to sea level (Hock et al., 2019; Lutz et al., 2014; Radić et al., 2014; Shea and Immerzeel, 2016), but studies simulating future scenarios universally project long-term reductions in flow, perhaps as soon as 2050 in central Asia (Barnett et al., 2005; Bolch et al., 2012; Huss and Hock, 2018; Lutz et al., 2014; Ragettli et al., 2016b; Rounce et al., 2020; Sorg et al., 2012). Passing of ‘peak water’ threatens future water security in many regions, particularly across High Mountain Asia (Bolch et al., 2019; Eriksson et al., 2009; Hannah et al., 2005; Huss and Hock, 2018; Immerzeel et al., 2010; Winiger et al., 2005). A decrease in discharge from the Indus and Brahmaputra rivers alone is estimated to affect 260 million people (Immerzeel et al., 2010).

The long-term response of debris-covered glaciers to changing climatic conditions is non-linear and results from complexities relating to spatial variability in debris concentration and climatic controls integrated over at least several decades (Benn et al., 2012; Vaughan et al., 2013). A multidecadal trend of surface lowering, stagnation, and glacier mass loss has already been observed on many debris-covered glaciers across High Mountain Asia (Bolch et al., 2012; Bolch et al., 2011; Brun et al., 2017; Dehecq et al., 2019; Hock et al., 2019; Kääb et al., 2012; Pellicciotti et al., 2015; Scherler et al., 2011) as a result of warmer air temperatures and weaker monsoons (Pieczonka et al., 2013; Thakuri et al., 2014). However, predictions of mass loss from individual glacierised regions vary considerably. For example, in the Everest region of the Himalaya, estimates of ice mass loss by 2100 vary from ~10% (Rowan et al., 2015), through 50% (Soncini et al., 2016), to 99% in extreme scenarios (warming of ~3°C) (Shea et al., 2015). Model outputs also vary spatially at a regional scale (e.g. Chaturvedi et al., 2014; Kraaijenbrink et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2014). Such projections depend on the future climate scenario used, but a number of key knowledge gaps also exist concerning the character of debris-covered glaciers and the processes influencing their varied geometrical response to climate change (Benn et al., 2012; Bolch et al., 2012; Huss, 2011; Scherler et al., 2011).

Understanding how meltwater is produced, transported, and stored within High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers is therefore imperative. There is growing recognition that the configuration and efficiency (i.e. bulk system transit velocity) of water routing across and through debris-covered ice is distinctively different from that of clean-ice glaciers, even within the same glacial system. This was first shown by a recent study on Miage Glacier, a debris-covered glacier in the Italian Alps (Fyffe et al., 2019b). Debris-covered glacier surfaces are complex, particularly those in High Mountain Asia, the ablation areas of which are often characterised by hummocky, rugged topography atop a shallow (or even reversed) longitudinal surface gradient (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). This commonly results from an inverted mass-balance regime, where the greatest ablation rates are experienced in the middle, rather than lower, ablation area (King et al., 2017). Debris-covered ablation areas also exhibit bare ice cliffs and supraglacial ponds – depressions capable of storing meltwater for both short and long periods within nested catchments of varying spatial scales (Section 2) – and these glaciers frequently terminate in proglacial lakes (Section 5). Other unique characteristics of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers include the accumulation areas often being at extremely high elevations, with a steep surface gradient (often an icefall) transporting ice into the ablation area (Fig. 1). These features provide a setting that strongly influences the nature of hydrological systems in this region (Benn et al., 2017; Miles et al., 2019), but has restricted hydrological research due to the remoteness and inaccessibility of such glaciers.

In this review, we consider the current state of knowledge of debris-covered glacier hydrological systems in High Mountain Asia. Four hydrological domains are considered in turn: supraglacial (Section 2), englacial (Section 3), subglacial (Section 4), and proglacial (Section 5). Within each section, we summarise existing research and understanding of debris-covered glacier hydrological systems and then address key remaining knowledge gaps. Fig. 2 provides a reference conceptual diagram of a (High Mountain Asian) debris-covered glacier, with each hydrological feature encompassing both known and unknown elements of each domain. Finally, in light of the review, we propose six future research themes concerning the hydrology of debris-covered glaciers (Section 6). This review is intended to complement existing reviews of clean-ice valley glacier hydrology (e.g. Fountain and Walder, 1998; Hubbard and Nienow, 1997; Irvine-Fynn et al., 2011; Jansson et al., 2003). We note that there are a number of differing climatic regimes across High Mountain Asia, with precipitation in particular varying closely with topography (Bookhagen and Burbank, 2006); these climatic regimes will influence the thermal regime, geometry, mass balance, and thus hydrology of the glaciers in each of these sub-regions. While our review draws on research carried out across High Mountain Asia, much of that research has been carried out in the monsoon-influenced Himalaya, particularly Nepal, from where the review and our illustrations of many of the key elements draw strongly.

Section snippets

Meltwater generation

Supraglacial meltwater is produced on debris-covered glaciers through ablation of surface ice and snow, with the spatial pattern of melt complicated by the surface debris extent, thickness, and lithological characteristics (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). A debris layer shallower than the critical thickness, typically ~0.05 m, decreases albedo and thus increases the ablation rate compared to debris-free ice (Fig. 4). The ablation rate peaks at a debris thickness of ~0.02–0.05 m, known as the effective

Englacial zone

Exceptionally, englacial conduits at High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers have been at least as well explored by glaciospeleologists as at clean-ice glaciers. Such exploration has been carried out primarily in the Nepal Himalaya, including at Khumbu Glacier (Gulley et al., 2009a), Ngozumpa Glacier (Benn et al., 2017; Benn et al., 2009; Gulley and Benn, 2007), Ama Dablam and Lhotse Glaciers (Gulley and Benn, 2007), as well as several debris-covered glaciers in the Tien Shan (Narama et

Subglacial zone

Knowledge of subglacial drainage at High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers is limited, although some evidence at least points to the existence of such systems. For example, glaciospeleological investigations indicated that the proglacial stream of a retreating tributary of Khumbu Glacier reached Khumbu’s bed (Benn, pers. comm., 2018). This conduit was assumed to follow the bed for some distance downglacier, similar to the perennial sub-marginal conduits present at the edge of the

Proglacial lakes

One of the most distinctive characteristics of the proglacial zone of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers is the frequent presence of a proglacial lake (Fig. 9), which are far more common than at equivalent clean-ice glaciers. These lakes form by a continuation of the processes of glacier thinning and supraglacial pond growth (Section 2.1.2), facilitated by the deposition of sufficient debris by debris-covered glaciers to create high, arcuate terminal moraines. Here, perched

Future research themes

Based on the review above, we identify six hydrological research themes, including examples of appropriate techniques, that would contribute substantially to advancing our understanding of the hydrology of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers.

Summary

In this review, we have summarised our understanding of the hydrology of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers, identified numerous knowledge gaps, and suggested six themes for future research. While research has advanced substantially in recent years, there remain many questions about how the hydrological systems of debris-covered glaciers behave, and how this varies through both space and time. This limitation is largely due to the location of debris-covered glaciers in areas that may

Author contributions

KM and BH planned the manuscript. KM led the manuscript writing and illustration. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the ‘EverDrill’ Natural Environment Research Council Grant awarded to Aberystwyth University (NE/P002021) and the Universities of Leeds and Sheffield (NE/P00265X). KM is funded by an AberDoc PhD Studentship, with fieldwork costs supported by the Mount Everest Foundation and Postgraduate Research Awards from the British Society for Geomorphology, the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG), and Aberystwyth University Department of Geography and Earth Sciences. TIF

References (223)

  • D.M. Hannah et al.

    Flow regimes of Himalayan rivers of Nepal: Nature and spatial patterns

    J. Hydrol.

    (2005)
  • U.K. Haritashya et al.

    Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment transported in meltwater from the Gangotri Glacier, central Himalaya - An indicator of subglacial sediment evacuation

    Geomorphology

    (2010)
  • S.I. Hasnain

    Factors controlling suspended sediment transport in Himalayan glacier meltwaters

    J. Hydrol.

    (1996)
  • S.I. Hasnain et al.

    Character of the subglacial drainage system in the ablation area of Dokriani glacier, India, as revealed by dye-tracer studies

    J. Hydrol.

    (2001)
  • B. Hubbard et al.

    Alpine subglacial hydrology

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (1997)
  • W.W. Immerzeel et al.

    High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2014)
  • P. Jansson et al.

    The concept of glacier storage: a review

    J. Hydrol.

    (2003)
  • A. Kääb

    Combination of SRTM3 and repeat ASTER data for deriving alpine glacier flow velocities in the Bhutan Himalaya

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (2005)
  • A.A. Khan et al.

    The Himalayan cryosphere: A critical assessment and evaluation of glacial melt fraction in the Bhagirathi basin

    Geosci. Front.

    (2017)
  • M.P. Kirkbride et al.

    Tasman Glacier, New Zealand: 20th-century thinning and predicted calving retreat

    Glob. Planet. Change

    (1999)
  • S. Adhikary et al.

    Dust influence on the melting process of glacier ice: experimental results from Lirung Glacier, Nepal Himalayas

  • Y. Ageta et al.

    Expansion of glacier lakes in recent decades in the Bhutan Himalayas

  • C. Andermann et al.

    Impact of transient groundwater storage on the discharge of Himalayan rivers

    Nat. Geosci.

    (2012)
  • R.S. Anderson

    A model of ablation-dominated medial moraines and the generation of debris-mantled glacier snouts

    J. Glaciol.

    (2000)
  • T.P. Barnett et al.

    Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions

    Nature

    (2005)
  • S. Basnett et al.

    The influence of debris cover and glacial lakes on the recession of glaciers in Sikkim Himalaya, India

    J. Glaciol.

    (2013)
  • D.I. Benn et al.

    Rapid growth of a supraglacial lake, Ngozumpa Glacier, Khumbu Himal, Nepal

    IAHS Publ.

    (2000)
  • D.I. Benn et al.

    Growth and drainage of supraglacial lakes on debris-mantled Ngozumpa Glacier, Khumbu Himal, Nepal

    J. Glaciol.

    (2001)
  • D.I. Benn et al.

    Englacial drainage systems formed by hydrologically driven crevasse propagation

    J. Glaciol.

    (2009)
  • D.I. Benn et al.

    Structure and evolution of the drainage system of a Himalayan debris-covered glacier, and its relationship with patterns of mass loss

    Cryosph.

    (2017)
  • M.P. Bhatt et al.

    Chemical characteristics of pond waters within the debris area of Lirung Glacier in Nepal Himalaya

    J. Limnol.

    (2007)
  • D. Bocchiola et al.

    An ablation model for debris-covered ice: The case study of Venerocolo glacier (Italian Alps)

    Geogr. Fis. e Din. Quat.

    (2015)
  • T. Bolch

    Hydrology: Asian glaciers are a reliable water source

    Nature

    (2017)
  • T. Bolch et al.

    Multi-decadal mass loss of glaciers in the Everest area (Nepal Himalaya) derived from stereo imagery

    Cryosph.

    (2011)
  • T. Bolch et al.

    The State and Fate of Himalayan Glaciers

    Science.

    (2012)
  • T. Bolch et al.

    Status and Change of the Cryosphere in the Extended Hindu Kush Himalaya Region

  • B. Bookhagen et al.

    Topography, relief, and TRMM-derived rainfall variations along the Himalaya

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2006)
  • L.N. Braun et al.

    Application of a Conceptual Precipitation- Runoff Model in the Langtang Khola Basin, Nepal Himalaya. Snow Glacier Hydrol

  • B.W. Brock et al.

    Meteorology and surface energy fluxes in the 2005-2007 ablation seasons at the Miage debris-covered glacier, Mont Blanc Massif, Italian Alps

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2010)
  • F. Brun et al.

    Quantifying volume loss from ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using high-resolution terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry

    J. Glaciol.

    (2016)
  • F. Brun et al.

    A spatially resolved estimate of High Mountain Asia glacier mass balances from 2000 to 2016

    Nat. Geosci.

    (2017)
  • F. Brun et al.

    Ice cliff contribution to the tongue-wide ablation of Changri Nup Glacier, Nepal, central Himalaya

    Cryosph.

    (2018)
  • F. Brun et al.

    Heterogeneous Influence of Glacier Morphology on the Mass Balance Variability in High Mountain Asia

    J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.

    (2019)
  • P. Buri et al.

    A physically-based 3-D model of ice cliff evolution on a debris-covered glacier

    J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.

    (2016)
  • P. Buri et al.

    A grid-based model of backwasting of supraglacial ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers

    Ann. Glaciol.

    (2016)
  • A.C. Byers et al.

    A field-based study of impacts of the 2015 earthquake on potentially dangerous glacial lakes in Nepal

    Himalaya

    (2017)
  • K.A. Casey et al.

    Geochemical characterization of supraglacial debris via in situ and optical remote sensing methods: a case study in Khumbu Himalaya

    Nepal. Cryosph.

    (2012)
  • R.K. Chaturvedi et al.

    Glacial mass balance changes in the Karakoram and Himalaya based on CMIP5 multi-model climate projections

    Clim. Change

    (2014)
  • C. Chen et al.

    The application of artificial neural networks to simulate meltwater runoff of Keqikaer Glacier, south slope of Mt. Tuomuer, western China

    Environ. Geol.

    (2009)
  • K. Chikita et al.

    The basin expansion mechanism of a supraglacial lake in the Nepal Himalaya

    J. Hokkaido Univ. Fac. Sci. Ser. VII Geophys.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Deep learning-based framework for monitoring of debris-covered glacier from remotely sensed images

      2023, Advances in Space Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      GLOFs, DFs and DCGFs can have the potential to damage huge investments that include infrastructures and livelihood dependencies like agricultural land of communities living in downstream areas (Rounce, 2016). However, recent developments in remote sensed data and GIS to assess potential risks of DFs, GLOFs, and DCG flows have assisted in predicting and managing hazards on time (Miles et al., 2020). Nevertheless, there are accuracy issues when mapping debris-covered glacier flows, which may limit the prediction accuracy about a specific DCGF hazard, resulting in more human and financial loss.

    • Debris-cover impact on glacier melting in the Upper Indus Basin

      2022, Polar Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Analysis of the glacier shrinkage and snout retreat from the selected set of 98 clean and debris-covered glaciers during 2000–2017 in the entire study area spread over the three sub-basins and within each sub-basin in the UIB showed a significant variability. The higher glacier area loss and higher retreat rate of the clean glaciers across the study area, as compared to the debris-covered glaciers is mainly due to the presence of thick debris-cover on the ablation zone, which slows down the melting process (Mattson et al., 1993; Scherler et al., 2011; Dobhal et al., 2013; Miles et al., 2020). The glacier area loss showed a decreasing trend with the increase in debris-cover (r = -0.53; p value < 0.05) (Fig. 7a).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text