3-D printed customizable vitrification devices for preservation of genetic resources of aquatic species
Introduction
Development of germplasm repositories to protect the genetic resources of aquatic species has been hindered by several factors over the past 70 years including an almost complete focus on cryopreservation research and protocol development. Other problems include a lack of approaches for standardization, and the requirement to adapt equipment and supplies developed for livestock and human medicine for use with fish and shellfish. New fabrication technologies such as 3-dimensional (3-D) printing can provide expanded access to CAD-CAM capabilities, and open new opportunities for custom design and production of standardizable devices directly based on the needs of aquatic user communities. Inexpensive devices such as these can be distributed as open-source files to facilitate application, and to support and focus protocol development, ensuring that high-quality material can be made available to centralized germplasm repositories.
Because of the current lack of repository development, the utility of cryopreservation remains largely unrealized for aquatic species in multiple areas including genetic improvement for aquaculture (Blackburn, 2011; Hu et al., 2011), stock enhancement for wild fisheries (Riley et al., 2004; Tiersch, 2004), protection of genetic diversity in imperiled species (Liu et al., 2018; Wayman et al., 2008), and storage and distribution of tens of thousands of research lines of biomedical research models (Torres et al., 2017; Yang and Tiersch, 2009). Cryopreserved sperm has been incorporated into germplasm repositories for protection and management of genetic resources in other species such as livestock (Purdy et al., 2016), but that is because they have moved past protocol research into application, often by utilization of engineering approaches.
Efforts in application of engineering technologies for sperm cryopreservation have primarily focused on conventional cryopreservation (‘equilibrium freezing’) methods. A critical factor determining the success of equilibrium freezing is to identify and achieve ideal cooling rates (e.g., 5−40 °C/min) during freezing. Control of cooling rate requires specialized equipment, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars for computer-programmed types or several thousand dollars for other types.
An alternative and relatively new method for sperm cryopreservation is vitrification, by which liquid is cooled at > 1000 °C/min (‘rapid cooling’) to transform into an amorphous solid (glass) phase without the formation of crystalline ice (Cuevas-Uribe et al., 2017; Rall and Fahy, 1985). The rapid cooling can be obtained simply by plunging a thin film (e.g., several μl loaded on loops) or droplets (e.g., on plates or strips) of sample into liquid nitrogen. As such, vitrification allows low-cost sample preservation (Magnotti et al., 2018) and is suitable for: (1) small-bodied species with miniscule sample volumes, (2) fieldwork at remote locations where equipment or electricity are not accessible, and (3) small-scale freezing for research purposes. For example, swordtails and guppies (family Poeciliidae) are popular ornamental and aquaculture species in the U.S. and typically provide < 5 μL of sperm from each male (Huang et al., 2009; Yang, 2009), and thus vitrification could be an ideal method for preserving sperm of these species for genetic management purposes (Cuevas-Uribe et al., 2011b).
There are several major limitations of existing devices (i.e., with specialized vitrification functions) and tools (i.e., designed for applications other than vitrification) used in sperm vitrification. Firstly, most commercial vitrification devices previously reported were designed for freezing of mammalian oocytes and embryos, and thus only accommodate small sample volumes (e.g. < 2 μL) for sperm loading. For example, the Cryotop® devices (KITAZATO, Valencia, Spain), designed for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos, were used in sperm vitrification of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and European eel (Anguilla anguilla) (Kása et al., 2017). However, only 2 μL of sperm suspension could be loaded onto each device (Marco-Jiménez et al., 2016). Secondly, devices specifically designed for sperm vitrification are often medical devices intended for human clinical application, and thus these devices are costly. For example, the Cryotop® costs more than $20/device. The Sperm VD device (Berkovitz et al., 2018) designed for sperm vitrification with storing and labeling mechanisms costs $60 and can only load about 1 μL of sample per device. Thirdly, non-specialized tools have been adopted for sperm vitrification. For example, a study of sperm vitrification of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) evaluated various options (Cuevas-Uribe et al., 2011a), such as pipette tips (originally for liquid transfer), sperm cryopreservation straws (for equilibrium freezing of semen) cut at various angles, and inoculation loops (for microbiology). Although these tools can help reduce costs and some of them can provide limited functionality for operation and sample recovery, they lack the capability to be customized, standardized, securely labeled, and efficiently stored.
Recently, the increasing availability of consumer-level 3-D printing makes it possible to rapidly prototype and fabricate devices at a low cost. This technology has been introduced to the field of cryobiology (Hu et al., 2017; Tiersch and Monroe, 2016) and repository development for aquatic species (Tiersch and Tiersch, 2017). Previous work has demonstrated the feasibility of using 3-D printed loops with a material cost of $0.01/unit to perform sample vitrification (Tiersch et al., 2019). Given the feasibility of vitrification within 3-D printed loops (a single component) the next step is design and test operational devices (multiple integrated components), with additional features to achieve practical capabilities and functionalities, such as handling, sorting, labeling, and storage. The goal of the present study was to develop and test operational prototypes of low-cost 3-D printed sperm vitrification devices with innovative elements that can provide comprehensive functionalities for practical repository development for aquatic species. The specific objectives were to: (1) design component prototypes and operational prototypes; (2) evaluate fabrication feasibility with consumer-grade 3-D printers; (3) evaluate the relationship of sample volume capacity with various configurations, and (4) evaluate the feasibility of operational prototypes to achieve vitrification. The innovation of these operational prototypes can provide a foundation for further performance testing, and divergent modifications, and ultimately standardization (as a long-term goal) based on the needs of user communities.
Section snippets
Design of prototypes
Computer-aided design (CAD) software (Inventor® Autodesk, San Rafael, CA) was used to create 3-D designs of prototypes. Based on concepts of previous studies (Tiersch et al., 2019; Tiersch and Tiersch, 2017), the present study (Fig. 1A) integrated several innovative components and functions, including: (1) a loop to suspend a thin film of fluid (i.e. sperm suspension); (2) a retractable sleeve to protect vitrified samples and allow permanent labeling by ink-jet printing; (3) a handle to
Design of prototypes
Based on 32 versions of initial component prototypes (not shown), a design for operational prototypes was selected (Fig. 2) and evaluated. The loop featured a lanceolate shape with configurations of three different lengths (10, 15, and 20 mm) and 13 different thicknesses. Thirteen layers was the maximum that could fit within the protective retractable sleeve (0.2–2.6 mm based on 1–13 layers of thermoplastic deposition with a nominal 0.2-mm thickness of each layer). The handle length was
Discussion
Basic methods for cryopreserving gametes of aquatic and livestock species were each first developed about 70 years ago (Blaxter, 1953; Polge and Rowson, 1952), and since then cryopreserved sperm of livestock has grown into a multi-billion-dollar global industry (Hu et al., 2011), but aquatic species remain at initial stages with tremendous growth potential. Some progress has been made, for example, the National Animal Germplasm Program (NAGP) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a national
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the feasibility of custom fabricating 3-D printed, inexpensive (< $0.1 material cost), and customizable devices with practical functions including vitrification, volume control, labeling, protection, and storage. Overall, it should be recognized that research itself cannot directly lead to standardization. An innovative device (or approach) will not immediately (or naturally) become a standardized device (or approach) without interaction with user communities. After a
Author contributions
Connor Tiersch: Design of the work, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the article, and final approval of the version to be published.
Yue Liu: Design of the work, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the article, and final approval of the version to be published.
Terrence R. Tiersch: Design of the work, data analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the article, and final approval of the version to be published.
Todd Monroe: Design of the
Declaration of Competing Interest
Authors have no conflict of interest to be disclosed.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by funding from the National Institutes of Health, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (R24-OD010441 and R24-OD011120), with additional support provided by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (Hatch project LAB94420), the USDA NAGP-AGGRC Cooperative Agreement (Award 58-3012-8-006), the Louisiana State University Research & Technology Foundation (AG-2018-LIFT-003), and the LSU-ACRES (Audubon Center for
References (37)
Production of channel catfish with sperm cryopreserved by rapid non-equilibrium cooling
Cryobiology
(2011)Workshop report: cryopreservation of aquatic biomedical models
Cryobiology
(2019)High-throughput cryopreservation of spermatozoa of blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus): establishment of an approach for commercial-scale processing
Cryobiology
(2011)3-D printing provides a novel approach for standardization and reproducibility of freezing devices
Cryobiology
(2017)Sperm cryopreservation in guppies and black mollies — a generalized freezing protocol for livebearers in Poeciliidae
Cryobiology
(2009)Development of sperm vitrification protocols for freshwater fish (Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis) and marine fish (European eel, Anguilla anguilla)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
(2017)Production of live young with cryopreserved sperm from the endangered livebearing fish Redtail Splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni, Rutter, 1896)
Anim. Reprod. Sci.
(2018)Development of germplasm repositories to assist conservation of endangered fishes: examples from small-bodied livebearing fishes
Theriogenology
(2019)- et al.
From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: how 3D printing is changing business model innovation
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2016) Cryopreservation of sperm of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus)
Aquaculture
(2004)
Three-dimensional printing with polylactic acid (PLA) thermoplastic offers new opportunities for cryobiology
Cryobiology
Sperm cryopreservation of a live-bearing fish, Xiphophorus couchianus: male-to-male variation in post-thaw motility and production of F1 hybrid offspring
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C: Toxicol. Pharmacol.
Current status of sperm cryopreservation in biomedical research fish models: zebrafish, medaka, and Xiphophorus
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol.
Explore the Inventory of National Animal Germplasm Program
A novel solution for freezing small numbers of spermatozoa using a sperm vitrification device
Hum. Reprod.
The USDA National Animal Germplasm Program and the aquatic species collection
Sperm storage and cross-fertilization of spring and autumn spawning herring
Nature
Production of F1 offspring with vitrified sperm from a live-bearing fish, the Green Swordtail Xiphophorus hellerii
Zebrafish
Cited by (16)
The emerging role of open technologies for community-based improvement of cryopreservation and quality management for repository development in aquatic species
2022, Animal Reproduction ScienceCitation Excerpt :An early development of 3-D printed vitrification technologies for tool production (Tiersch et al., 2019) featured a single-piece loop fabricated with PLA or ABS that could support sperm samples in thin films (Fig. 6A) (Tiersch and Tiersch, 2017). More complicated vitrification devices were developed that featured elongated loops, labeling mechanisms, handles to facilitate processing, and storage by integration with existing cryopreservation vials (Fig. 5B) (Liu et al., 2021b) and straws (Fig. 5C) (Tiersch et al., 2020). This demonstrated the feasibility of standardized low-cost (<US$0.05 material cost) 3-D printed devices with practical functions including vitrification, volume control, labeling, protection, and storage within conventional systems.
A 3-D printed vitrification device integrated with French straws
2022, HardwareXCitation Excerpt :Long-term sample storage and identification are critical for practical development and management of germplasm repositories [27]. As such, a vitrification device [20] was created to fit within identification jackets from commercially available High Security sperm straws (CBS straws, IMV Technologies, L'Aigle, France), which enabled secure storage, identification printing, and sample management within existing goblets containers. The cost of CBS identification jackets is about $0.15/each, which is relatively expensive and much-less used compared to industry-standard cryopreservation straws (‘French straws’, $0.05/each).
An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture
2022, Aquaculture and FisheriesIs catalase an effective additive to alleviate oxidative stress during cryopreservation of zebrafish sperm at the repository level?
2022, CryobiologyCitation Excerpt :This is essential for decision-making on the repository management level when dealing with large numbers of samples, especially for samples contributed by the research community. Other mechanisms are being addressed to standardize cryopreservation procedures and outcomes across user communities by custom development of open scientific hardware [27,57]. Incorporation of new avenues, such as these to repository development, emphasizes the need to develop mechanisms to integrate research findings at the repository level through community-level approaches.
- 1
Present address: Aquaculture Systems Technologies, LLC, 2120 N. 3rd Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70802, USA.