Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping snow cover using landsat data: toward a fine-resolution water-resistant snow index

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Snow cover is of significant importance to freshwater supplies and influences the hydrology of different altitudes in mountainous regions. The monitoring of snow cover over the Mediterranean region of Turkey is of high priority due to its rapid irregularities experienced during the past decades. These irregularities in snow cover might especially lead to severe risks for the local ecosystems, such as rivers, and irrigated agriculture. Water-Resistant Snow Index (WSI) is a new and powerful spectral index for mapping snow cover using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. There still exists a large knowledge gap about how to improve the finer resolution applications of WSI. This study aimed to explore the applicability of WSI using Landsat TM and OLI images with a better spatial resolution to a complex catchment in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. The WSI maps derived from both MODIS/Terra-MOD09A1 and Landsat images from 2005 to 2018 were compared with the high-resolution Sentinel-2A data. The comparative analysis of the MODIS and Landsat WSI maps for the snowy areas was also presented with error distribution patterns. The baseline snow cover led to the coefficient of determination values of 0.77 with the MODIS data and 0.78 with the Landsat data. The results indicated that Landsat images offered a suitable spatial resolution for the snow cover mapping using the WSI approach in regional studies. A finer resolution mapping of snow cover with the Landsat data can provide essential insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics at the local and regional scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyürek Z, Şorman A (2002) Monitoring snow-covered areas using NOAA-AVHRR data in the eastern part of Turkey. Hydrol Sci J 47:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane RG, Anderson MR (1984) Satellite discrimination of snow/cloud surfaces. Int J Remote Sens 5:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz AJ, Kuenzer C, Gessner U, Dech S (2012) Remote sensing of snow—a review of available methods. Int J Remote Sens 33:4094–4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donmez C, Berberoglu S (2016) A comparative assessment of catchment runoff generation and forest productivity in a semi-arid environment. Int J Digit Earth 9:942–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1158875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donmez C, Berberoglu S, Erdogan MA et al (2015) Response of the regression tree model to high-resolution remote sensing data for predicting percent tree cover in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Environ Monit Assess 187:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donmez C, Berberoglu S, Cilek A, Evrendilek F (2016) Spatiotemporal modeling of net primary productivity of Eastern Mediterranean biomes under different regional climate change scenarios. Int J Environ Res 10(2):341–356 (ISSN: 1735-6865)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier J (1989) Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the Landsat thematic mapper. Remote Sens Environ 28:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESA (2019) European Space Agency Data Hub. https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home

  • George MW (2018) United States Geological Survey. In: Miner. Commod. Summ. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/mercury/myb1-2016-mercu.pdf

  • Grossi G, Lendvai A, Peretti G, Ranzi R (2017) Snow precipitation measured by gauges: systematic error estimation and data series correction in the central Italian Alps. Water 9:461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner H, Seidel K, Ehrler H (1997) Applications of snow cover mapping in high mountain regions. Phys Chem Earth 22:275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh J, Cox DR, Snell EJ (1990) Analysis of binary data, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DK, Riggs GA (2007) Accuracy assessment of the MODIS snow products. Hydrol Process 21:1534–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DK, Riggs GA, Salomonson VV (1995) Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sens Environ 54:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DK, Riggs GA, Salomonson VV et al (2002) MODIS snow-cover products. Remote Sens Environ 83:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DK, Crawford CJ, DiGirolamo NE et al (2015) Detection of earlier snowmelt in the Wind River Range, Wyoming, using Landsat imagery, 1972–2013. Remote Sens Environ 162:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Goswami A, Saraf AK (2008) Accuracy assessment of MODIS, NOAA, and IRS data in snow cover mapping under Himalayan conditions. Int J Remote Sens 29:5863–5878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice C, Townshend J (2002) Special issue on the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS): a new generation of land surface monitoring. Remote Sens Environ 83:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AG, Barnett AC (2003) Validation of daily MODIS snow cover maps of the Upper Rio Grande River Basin for the 2000–2001 snow year. Remote Sens Environ 86:162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Rhoads JD, Dubayah RO, Lettenmaier DP (2003) Evaluation of the snow-covered area data product from MODIS. Hydrol Process 17:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsämäki S, Böttcher K, Pulliainen J et al (2018) The accuracy of snow melt-off day derived from optical and microwave radiometer data—a study for Europe. Remote Sens Environ 211:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolin AW (2011) Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow. J Glaciol 56:1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter TH, Rittger K, McKenzie C et al (2009) Retrieval of subpixel snow-covered area, grain size, and albedo from MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 113:868–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parajka J, Blöschl G (2008) The value of MODIS snow cover data in validating and calibrating conceptual hydrologic models. J Hydrol 358:240–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe A, Sansosti E, Berardino P, Lanari R (2005) On the generation of ERS/ENVISAT DInSAR time-series via the SBAS technique. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 2:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazzi G, Tanis C, Kuter S et al (2019) Cross-country assessment of H-SAF snow products by Sentinel-2 imagery validated against in-situ observations and webcam photography. Geosciences 9:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirazzini R, Leppänen L, Picard G, Lopez-Moreno JI, Marty C, Macelloni G, Kontu A, Von Lerber A, Tanis CM, Schneebeli M, De Rosnay P, Arslan AN (2016) European in-situ snow measurements: practices and purposes. Sensors 2018:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal W, Dozier J (1996) Automated mapping of montane snow cover at subpixel resolution from the landsat thematic mapper. Water Resour Res 32:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomonson V, Appel I (2004) Estimating fractional snow cover from MODIS using the normalized difference snow index. Remote Sens Environ 89:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma RC, Tateishi R, Hara K (2016) A new water-resistant snow index for the detection and mapping of snow cover on a global scale. Int J Remote Sens 37:2706–2723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreve CM, Okin GS, Painter TH (2009) Indices for estimating fractional snow cover in the Western Tibetan plateau. J Glaciol 55:737–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR (2011) Transnational dimensions of cold war anticommunism: actions, networks, transfers. Color Gamut Transform Pairs 136:23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart IT (2009) Changes in snowpack and snowmelt runoff for key mountain regions. Hydrol Process 23:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vikhamar D, Solberg R (2003) Subpixel mapping of snow cover in forests by optical remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 84:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren SG (1982) Optical properties of snow. Rev Geophys 20:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [Project IDs: 115Y063 and 118Y509].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cenk Donmez.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: J.-F. Miao.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donmez, C., Berberoglu, S., Cicekli, S.Y. et al. Mapping snow cover using landsat data: toward a fine-resolution water-resistant snow index. Meteorol Atmos Phys 133, 281–294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00749-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00749-y

Navigation