Skip to main content
Log in

Microfacies analysis and diagenetic features of the Eocene nummulitic accumulations from northwestern Transylvanian Basin (Romania)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Facies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microfacies analyses of twenty-five samples collected from three outcrops located in the northwestern part of the Transylvanian Basin offered new insights into the structural architecture and diagenetic features of the nummultic accumulations in this region. The data from thin-section observations revealed the fact that diagenetic processes (mainly pressure dissolutions) played a crucial role in the fabric development, porosity evolution and general morphology of these build-ups. A high degree of compaction was observed with respect to the abundance of stylolitic structures, fissure sets, and numerous fragmented nummulitic particles within the matrix. Such features allowed the identification of several phases of stylolitization which affected the nummulitic accumulations during burial diagenesis. Moreover, these compactional traits can provide clues for understanding the ratio variations between N. perforatus A (microspheric) and B (macrospheric) forms in such deposits. Combining our results with previous data we better constrained the autochthonous and/or para-autochthonous provenance of the nummulithoclasts. Our results offer a new perspective into the development and preservation of nummulitic accumulations deposited in the Eocene tropical/sub-tropical shallow-marine settings of the central Neotethyan realm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner T (1985) Biofabric as dynamic indicator in nummulite accumulations. J Sediment Petrol 55:131–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavington-Penney SJ (2004) Analysis of the effects of abrasion on the test of Palaeonummulites venosus: implications for the origin of nummulithoclastic sediments. Palaios 19:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beavington-Penney SJ, Wright VP, Racey A (2005) Sediment production and dispersal on foraminifera-dominated early Tertiary ramps: the Eocene El Garia Formation, Tunisia. Sedimentology 52:537–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Itzhak LL, Aharonov E, Karcz Z, Kaduri M, Toussaint R (2014) Sedimentary stylolite networks and connectivity in limestone: large-scale field observations and implications for structure evolution. J Struct Geol 63:106–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondeau A (1972) Les Nummulites. Vuibert, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Briguglio A, Seddighi M, Papazzoni AC, Hohenegger J (2017) Shear versus settling velocity of recent and fossil larger foraminifera: new insights on nummulite banks. Palaios 32(5):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquette PW, Pray L (1970) Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. Amer Ass Petrol Geol Bul 54:207–250

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montfort D (1808) Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles, 1. F. Schoell, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham WE (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoirs, vol 1, pp 108–121

  • Dunnington HV (1967) Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. Proc World Pet Congr 7th Mexico 2:339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner M, Piazolo S, Renard F, Koehn D (2010) Stylolite interfaces and surrounding matrix material: nature and role of heterogeneities in roughness and microstructural development. J Struct Geol 32:1070–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embry AF, Klovan JE (1971) Late Devonian reef tract on northwestern Banks Island. Bull Can Petrol Geol 19:730–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipescu S (2001) Cenozoic lithostratigraphic units in Transylvania. In: Bucur II, Filipescu S, Săsăran E (eds) Algae and carbonate platforms in western part of Romania, 4th Regional Meeting of IFAA Cluj-Napoca 2001—Field Trip Guidebook. Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipescu S (2008) Cenozoic lithostratigraphic units in Transylvania. In: Bucur II, Balica C, Bedelean M, Benea M, Chira C, Codrea V, Filipescu S, Forray FL, Gal A, Popa MV, Săsăran E, Tanţău I (eds) Geological landmarks in the Apusen Mountains and southwestern Southern Carpathians. Presa Universitară Clujeană, Romania, pp 51–64 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flügel E (2010) Microfacies of carbonate rocks analysis interpretation and application, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorry S, Hasler C-A, Davaud E (2006) Hydrodynamic behaviour of Nummulites: implications for depositional models. Facies 52:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecsi SA, Silye L, Less G, Filipescu S (2016) Odd partnerships among middle Eocene (Bartonian) Nummulites: examples from the Transylvanian (Romania) and Dorog (Hungary) basins. Mar Micropaleontol 127:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krézsek C, Bally AW (2006) The Transylvanian Basin (Romania) and its relation to the Carpathian fold and thrust belt: insights in gravitational salt tectonics. Mar Pet Geol 23:405–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazzoni CA (2008) Preliminary palaeontological observations on some examples of “nummulite banks”: sedimentary or biological origin? Rend Online Soc Geol It 2:135–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazzoni CA, Seddighi M (2018) What, if anything, is a nummulite bank? J Foraminifera Res 48:276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazzoni CA, Sirotti A (1995) Nummulite biostratigraphy at the Middle-Upper Eocene boundary in the northern Mediterranean area. Riv It Paleont Strat 101:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Park WC, Schot EH (1968) Stylolites: their nature and origin. J Sediment Petrol 38:175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry CT (1998) Grain susceptibility to the effects of microboring: implications for the preservation of skeletal carbonates. Sedimentology 45:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu B (1978) On the lithostratigraphic nomenclature of the NW Transylvania Eocene. Rev Roum Géol Géoph Géogr, Géol 22:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust J-N, Hosu A (1996) Sequence stratigraphy and Paleogene tectonic evolution of the Transylvanian Basin (Romania, Eastern Europe). Sediment Geol 105:117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racey A (2001) A review of Eocene nummulite accumulations: structure, formation and reservoir potential. J Pet Geol 24:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Răileanu G, Saulea E (1968) Harta geologică a Republicii Socialiste România, scara 1:200.000. Foaia 10. Cluj (L-34-XII). Comitetul de Stat al Geologiei, Institutul Geologic, Bucharest

  • Raynaud S, Carrio-Schaffhauser E (1992) Rock matrix structures in a zone influenced by a stylolite. J Struct Geol 14:973–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rustichelli A, Tondi E, Korneva I, Baud P, Vinciguerra S, Agosta F, Reuschlé T, Janiseck JM (2015) Bedding-parallel stylolites in shallow-water limestone successions of the Apulian Carbonate Platform (central-southern Italy). Ital J Geosci 134:513–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusu A (1995) Eocene formations in the Călata region (NW Transylvania): a critical review. Rom J Tectonics Reg Geol 76:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusu A, Brotea D, Melinte MC (2004) Biostratigraphy of the Bartonian deposits from Gilău area (NW Transylvania, Romania). Acta Palaeont Rom 4:441–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadd J, Alsharhan A (2000) Stylolites in Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoir, U.A.E. SEPM Special publication 69:185–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub H (1981) Nummulites et Assilines de la Téthys Paléogene. Taxinomie, phylogenése et biostratigraphie. Schweiz Pal Abh 104:1–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra-Kiel J, Hottinger L, Cause E, Drobne K, Ferrandez C, Jauhri AK, Less G, Pavlovec R, Pignatti J, Samso JM, Schaub H, Sirel E, Strougo A, Tambareau Y, Tosquella J, Zakarevskaya E (1998) Larger foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Thethyan Paleocene and Eocene. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 169:281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint R, Aharonov E, Koehn D, Gratier P, Ebner M, Baud P, Rolland A, Renard F (2018) Stylolites: a review. J Struct Geol 114:163–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandeginste V, John CM (2013) Diagenetic implications of stylolitization in pelagic carbonates, Canterbury Basin, Offshore New Zealand. J Sediment Res 83:226–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a contribution to the PALNATB project supported by CNCS-UEFISCDI Romania grant PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016–0793, within PNCDI III. The authors thank to the anonymous reviewers and to the editor-in-chief Axel Munnecke for their useful suggestions that have considerably enhanced the manuscript. We are grateful to Lukas Jonkers (MARUM, Bremen) for the comments and corrections made on the earlier version of the manuscript. Alin Oprișa is thanked for the preparation of the thin sections used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lóránd Silye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pleș, G., Kövecsi, SA., Bindiu-Haitonic, R. et al. Microfacies analysis and diagenetic features of the Eocene nummulitic accumulations from northwestern Transylvanian Basin (Romania). Facies 66, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-020-00604-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-020-00604-x

Keywords

Navigation