Abstract
Microfacies analyses of twenty-five samples collected from three outcrops located in the northwestern part of the Transylvanian Basin offered new insights into the structural architecture and diagenetic features of the nummultic accumulations in this region. The data from thin-section observations revealed the fact that diagenetic processes (mainly pressure dissolutions) played a crucial role in the fabric development, porosity evolution and general morphology of these build-ups. A high degree of compaction was observed with respect to the abundance of stylolitic structures, fissure sets, and numerous fragmented nummulitic particles within the matrix. Such features allowed the identification of several phases of stylolitization which affected the nummulitic accumulations during burial diagenesis. Moreover, these compactional traits can provide clues for understanding the ratio variations between N. perforatus A (microspheric) and B (macrospheric) forms in such deposits. Combining our results with previous data we better constrained the autochthonous and/or para-autochthonous provenance of the nummulithoclasts. Our results offer a new perspective into the development and preservation of nummulitic accumulations deposited in the Eocene tropical/sub-tropical shallow-marine settings of the central Neotethyan realm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner T (1985) Biofabric as dynamic indicator in nummulite accumulations. J Sediment Petrol 55:131–134
Beavington-Penney SJ (2004) Analysis of the effects of abrasion on the test of Palaeonummulites venosus: implications for the origin of nummulithoclastic sediments. Palaios 19:143–155
Beavington-Penney SJ, Wright VP, Racey A (2005) Sediment production and dispersal on foraminifera-dominated early Tertiary ramps: the Eocene El Garia Formation, Tunisia. Sedimentology 52:537–569
Ben-Itzhak LL, Aharonov E, Karcz Z, Kaduri M, Toussaint R (2014) Sedimentary stylolite networks and connectivity in limestone: large-scale field observations and implications for structure evolution. J Struct Geol 63:106–123
Blondeau A (1972) Les Nummulites. Vuibert, Paris
Briguglio A, Seddighi M, Papazzoni AC, Hohenegger J (2017) Shear versus settling velocity of recent and fossil larger foraminifera: new insights on nummulite banks. Palaios 32(5):321–329
Choquette PW, Pray L (1970) Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. Amer Ass Petrol Geol Bul 54:207–250
de Montfort D (1808) Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles, 1. F. Schoell, Paris
Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham WE (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoirs, vol 1, pp 108–121
Dunnington HV (1967) Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. Proc World Pet Congr 7th Mexico 2:339–352
Ebner M, Piazolo S, Renard F, Koehn D (2010) Stylolite interfaces and surrounding matrix material: nature and role of heterogeneities in roughness and microstructural development. J Struct Geol 32:1070–1084
Embry AF, Klovan JE (1971) Late Devonian reef tract on northwestern Banks Island. Bull Can Petrol Geol 19:730–781
Filipescu S (2001) Cenozoic lithostratigraphic units in Transylvania. In: Bucur II, Filipescu S, Săsăran E (eds) Algae and carbonate platforms in western part of Romania, 4th Regional Meeting of IFAA Cluj-Napoca 2001—Field Trip Guidebook. Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, pp 75–92
Filipescu S (2008) Cenozoic lithostratigraphic units in Transylvania. In: Bucur II, Balica C, Bedelean M, Benea M, Chira C, Codrea V, Filipescu S, Forray FL, Gal A, Popa MV, Săsăran E, Tanţău I (eds) Geological landmarks in the Apusen Mountains and southwestern Southern Carpathians. Presa Universitară Clujeană, Romania, pp 51–64 (in Romanian)
Flügel E (2010) Microfacies of carbonate rocks analysis interpretation and application, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Jorry S, Hasler C-A, Davaud E (2006) Hydrodynamic behaviour of Nummulites: implications for depositional models. Facies 52:221–235
Kövecsi SA, Silye L, Less G, Filipescu S (2016) Odd partnerships among middle Eocene (Bartonian) Nummulites: examples from the Transylvanian (Romania) and Dorog (Hungary) basins. Mar Micropaleontol 127:86–98
Krézsek C, Bally AW (2006) The Transylvanian Basin (Romania) and its relation to the Carpathian fold and thrust belt: insights in gravitational salt tectonics. Mar Pet Geol 23:405–442
Papazzoni CA (2008) Preliminary palaeontological observations on some examples of “nummulite banks”: sedimentary or biological origin? Rend Online Soc Geol It 2:135–138
Papazzoni CA, Seddighi M (2018) What, if anything, is a nummulite bank? J Foraminifera Res 48:276–287
Papazzoni CA, Sirotti A (1995) Nummulite biostratigraphy at the Middle-Upper Eocene boundary in the northern Mediterranean area. Riv It Paleont Strat 101:63–80
Park WC, Schot EH (1968) Stylolites: their nature and origin. J Sediment Petrol 38:175–191
Perry CT (1998) Grain susceptibility to the effects of microboring: implications for the preservation of skeletal carbonates. Sedimentology 45:39–51
Popescu B (1978) On the lithostratigraphic nomenclature of the NW Transylvania Eocene. Rev Roum Géol Géoph Géogr, Géol 22:99–107
Proust J-N, Hosu A (1996) Sequence stratigraphy and Paleogene tectonic evolution of the Transylvanian Basin (Romania, Eastern Europe). Sediment Geol 105:117–140
Racey A (2001) A review of Eocene nummulite accumulations: structure, formation and reservoir potential. J Pet Geol 24:79–100
Răileanu G, Saulea E (1968) Harta geologică a Republicii Socialiste România, scara 1:200.000. Foaia 10. Cluj (L-34-XII). Comitetul de Stat al Geologiei, Institutul Geologic, Bucharest
Raynaud S, Carrio-Schaffhauser E (1992) Rock matrix structures in a zone influenced by a stylolite. J Struct Geol 14:973–980
Rustichelli A, Tondi E, Korneva I, Baud P, Vinciguerra S, Agosta F, Reuschlé T, Janiseck JM (2015) Bedding-parallel stylolites in shallow-water limestone successions of the Apulian Carbonate Platform (central-southern Italy). Ital J Geosci 134:513–534
Rusu A (1995) Eocene formations in the Călata region (NW Transylvania): a critical review. Rom J Tectonics Reg Geol 76:59–72
Rusu A, Brotea D, Melinte MC (2004) Biostratigraphy of the Bartonian deposits from Gilău area (NW Transylvania, Romania). Acta Palaeont Rom 4:441–454
Sadd J, Alsharhan A (2000) Stylolites in Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoir, U.A.E. SEPM Special publication 69:185–207
Schaub H (1981) Nummulites et Assilines de la Téthys Paléogene. Taxinomie, phylogenése et biostratigraphie. Schweiz Pal Abh 104:1–236
Serra-Kiel J, Hottinger L, Cause E, Drobne K, Ferrandez C, Jauhri AK, Less G, Pavlovec R, Pignatti J, Samso JM, Schaub H, Sirel E, Strougo A, Tambareau Y, Tosquella J, Zakarevskaya E (1998) Larger foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Thethyan Paleocene and Eocene. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 169:281–299
Toussaint R, Aharonov E, Koehn D, Gratier P, Ebner M, Baud P, Rolland A, Renard F (2018) Stylolites: a review. J Struct Geol 114:163–195
Vandeginste V, John CM (2013) Diagenetic implications of stylolitization in pelagic carbonates, Canterbury Basin, Offshore New Zealand. J Sediment Res 83:226–240
Acknowledgements
This study is a contribution to the PALNATB project supported by CNCS-UEFISCDI Romania grant PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016–0793, within PNCDI III. The authors thank to the anonymous reviewers and to the editor-in-chief Axel Munnecke for their useful suggestions that have considerably enhanced the manuscript. We are grateful to Lukas Jonkers (MARUM, Bremen) for the comments and corrections made on the earlier version of the manuscript. Alin Oprișa is thanked for the preparation of the thin sections used for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pleș, G., Kövecsi, SA., Bindiu-Haitonic, R. et al. Microfacies analysis and diagenetic features of the Eocene nummulitic accumulations from northwestern Transylvanian Basin (Romania). Facies 66, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-020-00604-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-020-00604-x