Elsevier

Scientia Horticulturae

Volume 271, 20 September 2020, 109479
Scientia Horticulturae

Regulation of floral bud development and emergence by ambient temperature under a long-day photoperiod in white-fleshed pitaya (Hylocereus undatus)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109479Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Reproductive buds emerge under long-day photoperiod at a minimum temperature of 29/19 °C.

  • Low temperature (<27/17 °C) represses bud development and inhibits floral bud emergence under long-day photoperiod.

  • Warm temperature at 32/22 °C accelerates bud development and reproductive bud emergence under long-day photoperiod.

  • Minimum temperature requirement for reproductive bud emergence is higher than that for vegetative bud emergence.

  • Low temperature did not suppress vegetative bud emergence.

Abstract

Night-breaking is used for the off-season production of pitaya (Hylocereus spp.) fruit in subtropical regions but is less successful at higher latitudes with colder winters. Consequently, ambient temperature has been proposed as a crucial factor controlling flowering in pitaya. However, the effects of temperature on reproductive bud development and emergence remain unclear. Therefore, here, we performed two phytotron experiments to clarify these effects in 2–3-year-old field-grown, potted white-fleshed pitaya (Hylocereus undatus “VN White”) under an inductive long-day photoperiod (14/10 h) in Taiwan. Experiment I was conducted in late March 2016 and used day/night temperatures of 32/22 °C (control) and 23/13 °C (low temperature), while experiment II was conducted in late March 2017 and used temperatures of 32/22 °C (optimal temperature), 29/19 °C (required temperature), and 25/15 °C (low temperature). In experiment I, the temperature of the low temperature treatment was increased by 2 °C every 4 weeks from the emergence of reproductive buds in the 32/22 °C treatment until reproductive bud formation, whereas in experiment II, the temperature of the low temperature treatment was increased to 27/17°C 2 weeks after the first reproductive buds emerged in the 29/19°C treatment. The development (stages 0–3) and the emergence of reproductive and vegetative buds were recorded weekly in all treatment groups. Experiment I showed that temperature had no effect on vegetative bud emergence. However, warm temperatures (32/22 °C) enhanced bud development (to stage 3) and induced reproductive bud emergence 3–4 weeks after treatment, whereas most buds remained in a pre-reproductive stage (stage 2) under the low temperature treatment (23/13 °C). More buds reached stages 2 and 3 after raising the temperature to 25/15 °C, but reproductive buds did not emerge until the temperature reached 29/19 °C. Experiment II further showed that plants needed to be kept at 29/19 °C for 9 weeks for reproductive bud emergence. Thus, 29/19 °C may be the minimum required temperature for reproductive bud emergence, while 32/22 °C is the optimal temperature for reproductive bud development and emergence in white-fleshed pitaya. These findings suggest that the induction of reproductive buds in pitaya is first initiated under a long-day photoperiod but warmer temperatures are required for their subsequent emergence.

Graphical abstract

The schematic flow of bud development and emergence regulated by ambient temperature in white-fleshed pitaya. Warm temperatures (32/22 °C day/night temperature) enhanced dormant bud development, and stimulated reproductive bud emergence within 3–4 weeks. The experimental modification of ambient temperature, 29/19 °C forced reproductive bud emergence in nine weeks and may be the minimum required temperature for flowering. Lower temperatures repressed bud development, resulting in most buds remaining in a vegetative state. These results demonstrate an important role for temperature in flowering in white-fleshed pitaya, which may have implications for off-season production processes.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (168KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Pitaya (Hylocereus spp.) is a climbing cactus crop that is grown globally, but especially in Southeast Asian countries (Hoa et al., 2015; Mizrahi et al., 1997; Zee et al., 2004), with the red-fleshed (Hylocereus sp.) and white-fleshed (H. undatus) varieties having become the most widely grown in recent decades. Improvements in the commercial production of pitaya (Jiang and Yang, 2015a) have led to increased production in Taiwan, where this crop is now grown on up to 3,000 ha (Agricultural statistics yearbook, 2019). Night-breaking between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. using 23W compact fluorescent lamps is commonly used to produce off-season fruit in Taiwan (Chiu et al., 2015; Zee et al., 2004). However, climate variations, particularly in low temperature, result in unstable flowering rates and times, leading to an irregular harvest period and limited yield (Jiang et al., 2012, 2016).

In pitaya, the dormant bud under the areole may emerge as a reproductive bud (RB) or a new shoot. Before bud emergence, bud development can be classified into four stages (0–3) according to bud size, with stage 3 buds with more bracteoles indicating the formation of RBs (Jiang et al., 2016). Because the peak production season for pitaya is summer in most regions, they are considered as a long-day plants. However, photoperiod does not affect bud development in pitaya (Jiang et al., 2016) but rather regulates the type of bud that emerges. During the spring, four types of buds emerge sequentially with the gradual increase in day length: normal shoot (S), partial evocation shoot, partial evocation flower, and normal flower (F) buds (Jiang and Yang, 2015b). These buds are categorized by their phenotype and the arrangement of the areole and bracts (Jiang and Yang, 2015b), and observation of their emergence times has indicated that a long-day inductive photoperiod induces flower bud emergence, with a critical photoperiod of 12 h for red-fleshed pitaya (Jiang et al., 2012; Jiang and Yang, 2015c). Consequently, pitaya grown in countries where there is a 12 h photoperiod year-round, such as Malaysia, produce fruit throughout the year (Muas and Jumjunidang, 2015; Zainudin and Ahmad Hafiz, 2015).

In tropical regions, such as southern Taiwan and Vietnam, pitaya blooms between late spring and early autumn, so night-breaking is generally used for off-season production to extend the harvest season (Hoa et al., 2015; Hung and Huong, 2015; Jiang et al., 2012; Zee et al., 2004). However, lower temperatures reduce the success of off-season flowering, with longer night-breaking periods being needed to force flowering during the colder seasons in tropical regions (Jiang et al., 2012, 2016) and no flower bud formation occurring in spring in higher latitude subtropical regions of Israel even with extension of the day length (Khaimov and Mizrahi, 2006), indicating that an interaction between photoperiod and temperature may influence flowering during the non-inductive period.

Khaimov et al. (2012) reported that a long-day photoperiod and moderate temperature conditions have positive effects on flowering. However, the effects of ambient temperature on vegetative bud (VB) and RB development and emergence remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the effects of ambient temperature on the dormant bud stage of the areole as well as RB development and emergence under an inductive photoperiod in white-fleshed pitaya to inform off-season agricultural production processes.

Section snippets

Plant materials

This study was performed in the Kaohsiung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Pingtung, southern Taiwan (22°41′N, 120°31′E), from March to July 2016 and March to June 2017. The commercial white-fleshed pitaya variety “VN White” was used as the plant material, which has been widely cultivated in China, Taiwan, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asian countries since the end of the last century owing to its complete self-compatibility, high yield, and absence of plant variety rights (

Experiment I – Effects of ambient temperature on bud development and emergence

All emerging pitaya buds could be classified as VB, RB, B, or BD (Fig. 2), with no partial evocation of buds being observed. However, a few buds were aborted several days after they reached stage 3. At the start of the experiment, most buds were at stage 0, 1, or 2, with only 2.3% and 1.1% of buds in the CK and LT groups, respectively, being at stage 3 (Fig. 3). Significantly more buds developed to stage 3 in the third week after treatment in the CK group than in the LT group (Fig. 3).

Discussion

The effects of temperature on RB development have been reported in many species, such as lychee (Litchi chinensis), strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum spp.), and prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) (Gutterman, 1995; Ledesma et al., 2008; Menzel and Simpson, 1995; Nozaki and Fukai, 2008), and have been shown to vary among species. A LT is required for flowering in lychee, so too high a temperature (>20/15 °C) may lead to vegetative shoot or leafy panicle formation (

Conclusions

Here, we demonstrated that RB formation in white-fleshed pitaya under an inductive photoperiod can be separated into bud development and bud emergence, both of which are accelerated by a warm ambient temperature. Under a long-day (14 h) photoperiod, a low temperature (<27/17 °C) repressed bud development, inhibited RB emergence, and increased the time required for RB induction. However, RB emergence occurred when a temperature of approximately 29/19 °C was reached. Furthermore, a higher

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yu-Chun Chu: Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Jer-Chia Chang: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study is granted by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China. Grant code. MOST-106-2313-B-005-034-MY3 (to J. C. Chang). We appreciate Miss Yi-Hsuan Hsu for her technical assistant in this experiment.

References (23)

  • N.Q. Hung et al.

    Off-season flowering treatment by lighting red pulp dragon fruit in Gia Lam District, Hanoi, Vietnam

  • Cited by (17)

    • Re-identification of non-facultative crassulacean acid metabolism behavior for red-fleshed pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) micropropagules in vitro using an Arduino-based open system

      2023, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a novel crop in Taiwan, pitaya occupied 2,900 ha of cultivation in 2020 (COA, 2020); the dominant red-fleshed cultivar ‘Da Hong’ H. polyrhizus represents 42% of pitaya cultivation (Jiang and Yang, 2015). In terms of pitaya development, the leading research is focused on reproductive physiology, such as floral development according to day length and temperature (Chu and Chang, 2020; Jiang et al., 2016) and pollination biology (Lichtenzveig et al., 2000; Weiss et al., 1994). However, its vegetative characteristics, i.e., photosynthesis and cladode development, are less documented.

    • The determination of pitaya shoot maturity relevant to the competence of receiving long day length induction by CPPU

      2022, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      Red pitaya (Hylocereus sp.) is a typical long-day plant, and its flowering is highly influenced by day length and temperature (Nerd et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2012, 2016; Chu and Chang, 2020).

    • Codification and description of the phenological growth stages of red-fleshed pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) using the extended BBCH scale- with special reference to spines, areole, and flesh color development under field conditions

      2022, Scientia Horticulturae
      Citation Excerpt :

      The number of mature areoles with hard spines indicates the production potential of the shoot. The vegetative bud or reproductive bud emerges from the secondary meristem under the areole depending on the photoperiod and temperature (Britton and Rose, 1963; Chu and Chang, 2020a; Jiang et al., 2012; Powell and Weedin, 2004). Pitaya is a crassulacean acid metabolism plant and has high water use efficiency (Mizrahi and Nerd, 1999; Nobel and de la Barrera, 2002).

    • Pitaya Nutrition, Biology, and Biotechnology: A Review

      2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text