Abstract
Laser diffraction (LD) is a modern method for determining particle size distribution of soils and sediments. When deciphering particle size distribution, the area under the differential LD-spectrum is determined, limited by the vertical boundaries at the group edges according to the FAO-classification. In fact, there are no real vertical boundaries between the fractions of the particles, and the fractions themselves are distributed on a scale of size according to normal distribution. To eliminate the errors in the fractions content, deconvolution procedure for separating the original particle size distribution LD-spectrum is proposed. It resulted in a different share of the fractions compared to the common calculation method of the fractions content by FAO-classes. It is possible to detect new invisible fractions and, conversely, to exclude fractions defined within FAO vertical boundaries. In addition, the new indicator dispersion of LD-fractions (D) is proposed, which provides information on the property of individual fractions by particle size. Vertisols’ texture was heavier after deconvolution, especially in the Stavropol Vertisols. Vertisols had relatively low dispersion D < 0.7, which means relative homogeneity of LD-fractions. Northern Italy Andosols, however, had lighter texture after deconvolution. The number of LD-fractions was less than the number of FAO-fractions, while clay and fine sand (63–200 μm) LD-fractions were absent. It is likely due to the increase in LD-fractions dispersion, as evidenced by the high value of D (1.5).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alary K, Babre D, Caner L, Feder F, Szwarc M, Naudan M, Bourgeon G (2013) Pretreatment of soil samples rich in short-range-order minerals before particle-size analysis by the pipette method. Pedosphere 23(1):20–28
Asano M, Wagai R (2014) Evidence of aggregate hierarchy at micro- to submicron scale in an allophonic Andosol. Geoderma 216:62–74
Asano M, Wagai R, Yamaguchi N, Takeidii Ya, Maeda M, Suga H, Takahashi Yo (2018) In search of a binding agent: nano-scale evidence of preferential carbon associations with poorly-crystalline mineral phases in physically-stable, clay-sized aggregates. Soil Syst 2(2):32
Beuselinck L, Govers G, Poesen J, Degraer G, Froyen L (1998) Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method. CATENA 32:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(98)00051-4
Blott SJ, Pye K (2006) Particle size distribution analysis of sand-sized particles by laser diffraction: an experimental investigation of instrument sensitivity and the effects of particle shape: particle size distribution analysis of sands by laser diffraction. Sedimentology 53:671–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00786.x
Buurman P, Pape T, Muggler CC (1997) Laser grain-size determination in soil genetic studies. 1. practical problems. Soil Sci 162(3):211–218
Buurman P, Pape T, Reijneveld JA, de Jong F, van Gelder E (2001) Laser-diffraction and pipette-method grain sizing of Dutch sediments: correlations for fine fractions of marine, fluvial, and loess samples. Neth J Geosci 80:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600022319
Buurman P, Garcı́a Rodeja E, Martı́nez Cortizas A, van Doesburg JD (2004) Stratification of parent material in European volcanic and related soils studied by laser-diffraction grain-sizing and chemical analysis. CATENA 56:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2003.10.007
Cade-Menun BJ, Benitez-Nelson CR, Paytan A (2005) Refining 31P nuclear magnetic rersonance specttoscopy for marine particulate samples: storage conditions and extraction recovery. Mar Chem 97:293–306
Colombo C, Palumbo G, Di Iorio E, Russo F, Terribile F, Jiang Z, Liu Q (2016) Soil development in a quaternary fluvio-lacustrine paleosol sequence in Southern Italy. Quat Int 418:195–207
de Boer GB, de Weerd C, Thoenes D, Goossens HW (1987) Laser diffraction spectrometry: Fraunhofer diffraction versus Mie scattering. Part Part Syst Charact 4:14–19
FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description, 4th edn. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Flogeac K, Guillon ER, Aplincourt M, Marceau E, Stievano I, Beaunier P, Frapart Y-M (2005) Characterization of soil particles by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPY), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Agron Sustan Dev 25:345–353
Greenwood NN, Earnshaw A (1997) Chemistry of the elements. Elsevier Sc, Kidlington
Konert M, Vandenberghe J (1997) Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology 44:523–535
Kun A, Katona O, Sipos G, Barta K (2013) Comparison of pipette and laser diffraction methods in determining the granulometric content of fluvial sediment samples. J Environ Geogr 6(3–4):49–54
Lehmkuhl F, Schulte Ph, Zhao H, Hüllec D, Protze J, Stauch G (2014) Timing and spatial distribution of loess and loess-like sediments in the mountain areas of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. CATENA 117:23–33
Loizeau J-L, Arbouille D, Santiago S, Vernet J-P (1994) Evaluation of a wide range laser diffraction grain size analyser for use with sediments. Sedimentology 41:353–361
Mikutta C (2011) X-ray absorption spectroscopy study on the effect of hydrozybenzoic acids on the formation and structure of ferrihydrite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:5122–5139
Miller BV, Lines RW (1988) Recent advances in particle size measurements: a critical review. CRC Crit Rev Anal Chem 20:75–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00078988808048808
Miller BA, Schaetzl RJ (2012) Precision of soil particle size analysis using laser diffractometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:1719. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0303
Pye K, Blott SJ (2004) Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry. Forensic Sci Int 144:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.028
Referentiel Pedologique (1995) In: Baize D, Girard M-C (eds) Inst Nat Rech Agr, Paris
Sadovsky MA, Bolkhovitinov LG, Pisarenko VF (1982) On the properties of the discreteness of rocks. Izv USSR Acad Sci Ser Earth Phys 12:3–18 (in Russian)
Savichev AT, Stepanov SS (2007) Allowance for superimposition of lines and approximation of background radiation in X-ray fluorescent and microprobe energy-dispersive analyzes. Surface 2:85–89
Schulte Ph, Lehmkuhl F (2017) The difference of two laser diffraction patterns as an indicator for postdepositional grain size reduction in loess-paleosol sequences. Paleogeogr Paleoclimatol Paleoecol 509:126–136
Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy, a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA Agric Handb
Vodyanitskii YuN (2002) The effect of dithionite-containing reagents on soil minerals. Eurasian Soil Sci 35(5):489–499
Vodyanitskii YuN, Milanovskii EYu, Morgun EG, Savichev AT (2019) Deconvolution of the differential particle-size distribution curves of Vertisols. Eurasian Soil Sci 52(9):1112–1121
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Yu. A. Zhukova and A. V. Yudina for their research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vodyanitskii, Y.N., Savichev, A.T. & Morgun, E.G. Towards a new and general method for decoding the soil texture from laser diffraction spectra. Environ Earth Sci 79, 266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09015-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09015-1