Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Restoration of Obliterated Markings on Aluminium Engine Block by Chemical Etching Techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of aluminium alloys as the material of manufacturing has increased tremendously such as manufacturing of Nissan, Audi, Honda and BMW cars. However, there is lack of complete data on the best technique for restoration of obliterated serial numbers on such alloy used in the engine block. This research study was carried out to identify the most efficient and sensitive reagent among the five different etchants for restoration of obliterated markings on aluminium alloy surfaces. The aluminium alloy engine block of Nissan car was cut into small plates, and each plate was engraved with some alphanumerical characters using a computer-controlled “Gravograph” machine. Then, the marks were erased using abrasive papers to different levels (0.03 mm, 0.05 mm, 0.08 mm and 0.1 mm), below the bottom part of the engraving marks. The erased plates were etched by swabbing or immersion in each tested reagent. Etching with etchant that contained 10 g NaOH and 90 mL of water was useful to reveal the obliterated marks. Marks that were removed from 0.03 to 0.1 mm below the bottom of engraving were successfully restored with good contrast and in less time (minimum time of 23 min). Another reagent 10% aq. H3PO4 was also effective to restore the obliterated marks when the erased areas were immersed in it for long hours (minimum time of 21 h). On the other hand, reagent of 10% NaOH and 10% NHO3 had also achieved fair contrast and reproducible restoration of marks from 0.03 to 0.1 mm below the depth of engraving. All the restored alphanumerical characters on the plates were visualised using fluorescent powder irradiated with UV light. In contrast, other two tested reagents, i.e. 60% HCl and 40% NaOH, 1 N NaOH and 0.1 M HgCl2 in 0.1 N HCI, showed poor contrast restoration and hence were not recommended for practical application. The findings from this research would help the investigator particularly in stolen car cases to choose the best etching reagent for restoration of obliterated serial numbers as well as to improve etching procedures on the aluminium alloy surfaces used in the car engines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heard B J, Handbook of Firearms and Ballistics: Examining and Interpreting Forensic Evidence, Wiley, New Jersey (1997) p 213.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katterwe H, Restoration of Serial Number, Academic Press, Amsterdam (2006) p 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petterd C, Encyclopedia of Forensic Science, Academic Press, San Diego (2000) p 1205.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuppuswamy R, Metallographic Etching of Aluminium and Its Alloys for Restoration of Obliterated Marks in Forensic Science Practice and Investigations, InTech, Croatia (2011) p 332.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Voort G F V, Metallography: Principle and Practice, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. King F, Aluminium and its Alloys, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turley D M, J Forensic Sci32 (1987) 640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wightman G, and Matthew J, Forensic Sci Int180 (2008) 54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nickolls L C, The Scientific Investigation of Crime, Butterworth, Oxford (1956) p 150.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chisum W J, J Forensic Sci Soc6 (1966) 89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Massiah E, AFTE J8 (1976) 26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petzow G, Metallographic Etching, American Society for Metals, Ohio (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peeler G, Gutowski S, Wrobel H, and Dower G, J Forensic Ident58 (2008) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baharum M I, Kuppuswamy R, and Rahman A A, Forensic Sci Int177 (2008) 221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bong Y U, and Kuppuswamy R, Forensic Sci Int195 (2010) 86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nalini N, and Hemalatha M, J Forensic Ident53 (2003) 421.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Okayasu M, Sato K, and Mizuno M, J Mater Sci43 (2008) 2792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uli N, Kuppuswamy R, and Amran M F, Forensic Sci Int208 (2011) 66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Azlan M Z M, Kuppuswamy R, and Harun H, Forensic Sci Int171(2007) 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all staff at Forensic and Analytical Laboratories, School of Health Sciences of USM Health Campus, for guidance and support towards this study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the study. FNMA performed the experiments. All authors analysed the data, discussed and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nik Fakhuruddin Nik Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohd Aris, F.N., Zakaria, Y. & Nik Hassan, N.F. A Comparison of Restoration of Obliterated Markings on Aluminium Engine Block by Chemical Etching Techniques. Trans Indian Inst Met 73, 1867–1878 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-01997-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-01997-7

Keywords

Navigation