Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T04:11:22.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Through others we become ourselves”: The dialectics of predictive coding and active inference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Dimitris Bolis Open the ORCID record for Dimitris Bolis [Opens in a new window]  and
Leonhard Schilbach Open the ORCID record for Leonhard Schilbach [Opens in a new window]
Dimitris Bolis
Affiliation:
Independent Max Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804Munich-Schwabing, Germany. dimitris_bolis@psych.mpg.de leonhard_schilbach@psych.mpg.de https://sites.google.com/site/dimitrisbolis/ https://www.leonhardschilbach.de/english.html International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry (IMPRS-TP), Munich, Germany Munich Medical Research School (MMRS), Dekanat der Medizinischen Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336Munich, Germany
Leonhard Schilbach
Affiliation:
Independent Max Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804Munich-Schwabing, Germany. dimitris_bolis@psych.mpg.de leonhard_schilbach@psych.mpg.de https://sites.google.com/site/dimitrisbolis/ https://www.leonhardschilbach.de/english.html International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry (IMPRS-TP), Munich, Germany LVR Klinikum Düsseldorf/Kliniken der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, 40629Düsseldorf, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thinking through other minds creatively situates the free-energy principle within real-life cultural processes, thereby enriching both sociocultural theories and Bayesian accounts of cognition. Here, shifting the attention from thinking-through to becoming-with, we suggest complementing such an account by focusing on the empirical, computational, and conceptual investigation of the multiscale dynamics of social interaction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e93
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolis, D., Balsters, J., Wenderoth, N., Becchio, C. & Schilbach, L. (2017) Beyond autism: Introducing the dialectical misattunement hypothesis and a Bayesian account of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 50(6):355–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolis, D. & Schilbach, L. (2017) Beyond one Bayesian brain: Modeling intra- and inter-personal processes during social interaction: Commentary on “Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference” by Fotopoulou & Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis 19(1):35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolis, D. & Schilbach, L. (2018a) Observing and participating in social interactions: Action perception and action control across the autistic spectrum. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 29:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolis, D. & Schilbach, L. (2018b) “I Interact Therefore I Am”: The self as a historical product of dialectical attunement. Topoi 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9574-0.Google Scholar
Brandi, M. L., Kaifel, D., Bolis, D. & Schilbach, L. (2019) The interactive self – A review on simulating social interactions to understand the mechanisms of social agency. i-com 18(1):17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J. D., Veissière, S. P. L. & Friston, K. J. (2019b) Regimes of expectations: An active inference model of social conformity and decision making. Frontiers in Psychology 10:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. (2007) Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4):485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C. & De Jaegher, H. (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, G., Kelso, J. A. & Nadel, J. (2014) Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches. Frontiers in Psychology 5:882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. J. (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(2):127–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. J. & Frith, C. D. (2015b) Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex 68:129–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, T., Iizuka, H. & Ikegami, T. (2013) From synthetic modeling of social interaction to dynamic theories of brain-body-environment-body-brain systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4):420–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. & Allen, M. (2018) Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese 195(6):2627–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1269-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirmayer, L. J. & Crafa, D. (2014) What kind of science for psychiatry? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R., Lewontin, R. C. (1985) The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, D. E. (2012) On the ontological status of autism: The “double empathy problem”. Disability & Society 27(6):883–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramstead, M. J. D., Badcock, P. B. & Friston, K. J. (2018) Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation. Physics of Life Reviews 24:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.09.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redcay, E. & Schilbach, L. (2019) Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 20(8):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilbach, L. (2016) Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1686):20150081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T. & Vogeley, K. (2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(04):393–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönherr, J. & Westra, E. (2017) Beyond “interaction”: How to understand social effects on social cognition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70(1):27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, R. & Brown, R. A. (2009) Theory and method at the intersection of anthropology and cultural neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5(2–3):130–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2019) Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1930–1935/1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Original work 1930–1935. Translated in Greek, (1997) by Bibou, A. and Vosniadou, S., Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1987) The genesis of higher mental functions. In: The history of the development of higher mental functions, vol. 4, ed. Reiber, R., pp. 97–120. Plenum. Original work 1931.Google Scholar