Next Article in Journal
Anthelmintic Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Ivermectin Paste after Oral Administration in Mules Infected by Cyathostomins
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of MSTN Mutation on Growth and Carcass Performance in Duroc × Meishan Hybrid Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Additivity of Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility in Diets Containing Corn, Soybean Meal, and Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles for Male Broilers

1
Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea
2
Monogastric Animal Feed Research Institute, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
3
Institute of Poultry Science, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Pyeongchang 25340, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(6), 933; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060933
Submission received: 28 April 2020 / Revised: 23 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

There is limited information on the additivity on ileal digestibility of amino acids (AAs) in poultry diets containing corn distillers dried grains with solubles. The aim of this study was to test additivity of two types of ileal digestibility of AAs in mixed diets containing corn, soybean meal, and corn distillers dried grains with solubles in male Ross 308 broiler chickens. The apparent ileal digestibility of some amino acids in feed ingredients used in the study was not additive in mixed diets, whereas the standardized ileal digestibility of most amino acids was additive. Based on the results, standardized ileal digestibility values are more additive in poultry diets containing various feed ingredients compared with apparent ileal digestibility values.

Abstract

The aim was to test additivity of apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AAs) in mixed diets for Ross 308 broiler chickens. Two hundred and eighty-eight, 20-d-old male broiler chickens were assigned to one of six diets, with six birds per cage using a randomized complete block design. The diets consisted of a nitrogen-free diet, three diets containing corn, soybean meal (SBM), and corn distillers dried grains with solubles (CDDGS) as the sole source of nitrogen, respectively, and two mixed diets containing corn, SBM or CDDGS. Chromic oxide was added to the diets as an indigestible index. On day 24, birds were euthanized for ileal digesta collection. Relative proportion of the basal endogenous loss of AAs to total ileal outflow of AAs in corn was greater (p < 0.05) than that of SBM and CDDGS. For the corn-SBM and corn-SBM-CDDGS mixed diets, the AID of AAs differed (p < 0.05) from the predicted values. No difference was observed between the measured and predicted SID of AA. In conclusion, the SID of AAs is more additive in mixed diets containing corn, SBM, or CDDGS compared to AID values.

1. Introduction

Additivity of nutrients is fundamental for accurate diet formulation and it has been accepted that digestible amino acid (AA) values are more additive than total AA values for diet formulation because animals cannot use all the AAs in feed ingredients [1].
The AA digestibility may vary depending on various factors such as the digestive ability, age of animal, type of feed ingredient, and digestible AA contents in feed ingredients [2]. Some suggest that ileal digestibility rather than total tract digestibility of AAs is a more acceptable value for poultry diet formulation because of modification of AAs by microbes present in the hindgut [3]. Depending on the correction of basal endogenous losses (BELs) of AAs, ileal digestibility can be categorized into apparent (AID) and standardized ileal digestibility (SID). However, there have been several studies showing that AID values are less additive than SID because AID might be underestimated for ingredients containing low protein because of a greater portion of BEL of AAs in ileal digesta [1].
Using alternative feed ingredients other than corn or soybean meal (SBM) has increased because of price fluctuation of these two conventional ingredients. Demand for biofuel production with corn increased the production of corn distillers dried grains with solubles (CDDGS), which is one of common alternative ingredients used for energy and protein supply in poultry diets. Many studies have determined the ileal digestibility of AAs in various feed ingredients, including CDDGS for broilers [2,4,5,6]. However, there is a dearth of information on the additivity of digestible AAs from CDDGS in a mixed diet for broiler chickens. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to test the additivity of the AA digestibility in a mixed diet containing corn, SBM, or CDDGS for 24-day-old male broiler chickens.

2. Materials and Methods

Experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea (approval number: KNU2019-125).

2.1. Test Ingredients

Corn, SBM, and CDDGS used in this study were analyzed for AA content as shown in Table 1.

2.2. Dietary Treatments

The feed ingredient composition for the experimental diets is shown in Table 2. A nitrogen-free diet (NFD) was formulated to estimate the BEL of AAs. Three diets were formulated to contain either corn, SBM, or CDDGS as the sole source of AAs. Two diets containing corn and SBM, or corn, SBM, and CDDGS were formulated to test the additivity of the AID and SID of AAs in mixed diets. Energy and nutrients, except for crude protein (CP) and AAs, met or exceeded the recommended requirements for broilers [7]. All diets contained 0.5% chromic oxide (Cr2O3) as an index for the calculation of digestibility. The analyzed CP and AA concentrations in the experimental diets are shown in Table 3.

2.3. Animal, Management and Experimental Design

Two-hundred and eighty-eight male broiler chicks (Ross 308) were fed a standard starter diet from day 0 to 20. On day 20, birds were individually weighed and assigned to one of six treatments with eight replicates (6 birds/cage) based on body weight, in a randomized complete block design. All birds were offered ad libitum access to water and feed from day 0 to 24. The birds were housed in wire-floored cages in an environmentally controlled room at 32 °C on day 0; the temperature was gradually reduced to 24 °C by day 20 and further reduced to 23 °C by day 24.

2.4. Sample Collection

At the end of the experiment (day 24), all birds were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation. Ileal digesta samples from the distal two-thirds of the ileum, which is equivalent to the portion of the small intestine from Meckel’s diverticulum to approximately 1 cm anterior of the ileocecal junction, were collected by rinsing the ileum with distilled water and collecting the contents into clean plastic containers. The digesta samples from six birds in the same cage was pooled and stored at −20 °C for further analyses.

2.5. Chemical Analysis

The ingredients and experimental diet samples were dried at 105 °C for 2 h (method 930.15) [8] and ground using a mill grinder (CT 293 Cyclotec, Foss Innovation Centre, Hillerød, Denmark). Freeze-dried ileal digesta samples were ground using a coffee grinder. The dried samples of the ingredients, diets, and ileal digesta were analyzed for AA content (method 982.30) [8]. Dried diets and ileal digesta samples were analyzed for chromium content [9] which was used in calculating ileal digestibility.

2.6. Calculation

AID, BEL, and SID of the AAs were calculated using the following equations from Kong and Adeola [10]:
AID (%) = 100 − [(Crdiet × AAdigesta)/(Crdigesta × AAdiet)] × 100
BEL (mg/kg of DMI) = (Crdiet/Crdigesta) × AAdigesta
SID (%) = AID + [(BEL/AAdiet) × 100]
where Crdiet (g/kg) and Crdigesta (g/kg) are the chromium concentrations of the diet and digesta on a DM basis, respectively; AAdiet (mg/kg) and AAdigesta (mg/kg) are the AA concentrations of the diet and digesta on a DM basis, respectively. The measured and predicted AID or SID values were calculated as reported by Kong and Adeola [10] and the values were compared to test additivity of the digestibility of AA in the mixed diet.
Predicted AID or SID (%) = [(AAcorn × AID or SIDcorn) + (AASBM × AID or SIDSBM) + (AACDDGS × AID or SIDCDDGS)]/(AAcorn + AASBM + AACDDGS)
where AAcorn, AASBM, and AACDDGS are the concentrations (%) of the contributed AA in the mixed diet, respectively. The relative proportion of BEL to total ileal outflow of AAs (RBEL %) were calculated to investigate the influence of the BEL of AAs on the values of AID of the AAs using the following equations:
Total ileal outflow of AA for feed ingredient (g/kg DM) = dietary AA content (g/kg DM) × (1 − coefficient of AID of AA)
RBEL (%) = BEL (g/kg DMI)/Total ileal outflow of AA (g/kg DM) × 100

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the mixed procedure in SAS [11]. The experimental unit was a cage. The values of AID and SID for corn, SBM, and CDDGS were presented as least squares means and compared using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. Differences in measured and predicted values for AID or SID of the AA in mixed diets were tested using a 2-sided, one-sample t-test [1]. The significance was set at an alpha-level of 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

The estimated BEL of AAs in the ileal digesta are shown in Table 4. The BEL was lower in this study compared with values from previous studies [1,12,13]. The differences in BEL of AAs between the present and previous studies may be attributed, in part, to the difference in age of the birds, methods used to determine BEL including the nutrient composition of NFD, duration of feeding NFD, and types of indigestible index used for the BEL calculation [14].
Ileal digestibility rather than the total tract digestibility of AAs is commonly used because most of digestion and absorption of AAs are completed before the end of the small intestine and microbial modifications of the AAs occurs in the hindgut [3,10]. The SID of CP and AAs are considered as the more reliable value for the formulation of poultry diets in comparison with the AID because the SID values are calculated by correcting AID for BEL of CP and AAs [10]. The determined AID and SID of AAs in feed ingredients were affected differently depending on the AA compositions in this study. The AID and SID of AAs in corn, SBM, and CDDGS are shown in Table 5 and Table 6. The AID of indispensable AAs in corn, SBM, and CDDGS ranged from 74.6% (Thr) to 92.1% (Leu), from 88.5% (Thr) to 95.9% (Arg), and from 70.1% (Thr) to 89.5% (Leu), respectively. The lowest AID of Thr in corn, SBM, and CDDGS found here are in agreement with previous findings [1,12,13]. This may be attributed to a greater concentration of Thr in BEL. One of major components in BEL is the mucin protein, which is composed of a large amount of Thr [1]. The AID of AAs in corn and SBM were within the range reported in previous studies [1,15]. However, the estimated AID of AAs in CDDGS in this study was higher than those previously reported [16]. The SID of AAs for corn, SBM, and CDDGS were within the range reported in previous studies [1,15,17,18]. The SID of the indispensable AAs in corn, SBM, and CDDGS ranged from 91.4% (Thr) to 98.0% (Met), from 93.5% (Thr) to 97.4% (Met), and from 73.5% (Lys) to 89.5% (Leu), respectively. The poor SID of Lys in CDDGS is in agreement with previously reported results in broilers [12,19] and pigs [20]. The lower ileal digestibility of Lys in CDDGS is attributed to heat damage of Lys, through the Maillard reaction, during the drying process [21,22]. The Maillard reaction is a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and AAs. Lys is more susceptible to heat damage and the free amino group of Lys easily reacts with reducing sugar. The altered chemical structure of Lys can interfere with the absorption of AAs and reduce the efficiency of proteolytic enzyme activity [22].
The values for RBEL in the feed ingredients were calculated to investigate the relative influence of BEL on AID of the AAs in feed ingredients (Table 7). The value for the total ileal AA outflow for feed ingredient is calculated by multiplying dietary AA content and indigestibility of dietary AAs. The calculated value represents the sum of the indigested AAs derived from ingredients and excreted AAs from the body during the digestion process. Calculated RBEL and contents or indigestibility of the AAs are in reciprocal proportion; whereby the RBEL values increased as the contents and indigestibility of AAs decreased. In this study, corn had the greatest RBEL for all AAs, followed by SBM and CDDGS (p < 0.05). This can be explained by the low AA content in the corn. Whereas, the lowest RBEL for CDDGS may be because of the combined effect of the greater AA content and less digestibility of AAs in CDDGS compared with corn. In addition, SBM had a greater AID of AAs than corn, and the RBEL values for SBM were less than those for corn. This may be attributed to the relatively greater impact of AA content in SBM compared to digestibility.
Additivity of digestibility of AAs in a mixed diet is important for accurate feed formulation. In this study, the difference between the measured and the predicted digestibility of AAs in the mixed diet were used for the additivity test. If there is no difference between the measured and the predicted digestibility, digestibility of AAs in the mixed diet could be predicted by using AA digestibility of individual ingredients and their proportion in the mixed diet. For the corn-SBM mixed diet, measured values for AID in 5 of 17 AAs differed from predicted values (p < 0.05), however, there were no differences in the SID of AAs (Table 8). These results are in agreement with previous studies [1,15]. Kong and Adeola [10] reported that there were differences between the measured and the predicted AID of eight AAs for broilers fed a corn-SBM based diet, whereas the SID of AAs did not differ between the measured and the predicted values, except Cys. The lack of additivity for AID of AAs in the corn-SBM mixed diet may be attributed to the underestimated AID of AAs in corn. The corn had high RBEL for most of the AAs, indicating an overestimation of AAs in the total ileal outflow, which underestimates the AID of the AAs. In the corn-SBM-CDDGS mixed diet, the measured AID of two of 17 AAs differed from the predicted values, whereas the measured SID of all AAs in the mixed diet were not different from the predicted values, except Arg (p < 0.05, Table 9). These results are in agreement with a previous study [12]. The corn-SBM-CDDGS mixed diet had fewer differences between the measured and the predicted AID of AAs than the corn-SBM mixed diet. This may be attributed to a reduction of corn in the mixed diet and an increase in DDGS which has relatively less RBEL compared with the corn.

4. Conclusions

The present study shows that the AID of AAs could be underestimated when the digestibility is determined for low-CP ingredients such as corn, which has a relatively greater RBEL compared with other ingredients, which have lower RBEL and high CP. In addition, the use of the AID of AAs in corn for predicting digestibility of AAs in the mixed diet containing corn cause an underestimation of AA digestibility; whereas the additivity was improved with ingredients having relatively greater CP and lower RBEL compared to the corn. The present study also suggests that the SID of AAs in individual ingredient is more accurate in predicting the digestibility of AAs in a mixed diet compared to the AID. In conclusion, the SID of AAs is more additive in mixed diets containing corn, SBM, or CDDGS compared to AID values.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H.A., H.-K.K. and C.K.; methodology, S.H.A. and C.K.; investigation, S.H.A.; data curation, S.H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.A. and J.Y.S.; writing—review and editing, S.H.A., J.Y.S. and C.K.; supervision, C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ014162022020)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kong, C.; Adeola, O. Additivity of amino acid digestibility in corn and soybean meal for broiler chickens and White Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2381–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lemme, A.; Ravindran, V.; Bryden, W.L. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2004, 60, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ravindran, V.; Hew, L.I.; Ravindran, G.; Bryden, W.L. A comparison of ileal digesta and excreta analysis for the determination of amino acid digestibility in food ingredients for poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 1999, 40, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adedokun, S.A.; Adeola, O.; Parsons, C.M.; Lilburn, M.S.; Applegate, T. Standardized Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Plant Feedstuffs in Broiler Chickens and Turkey Poults Using a Nitrogen-Free or Casein Diet. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 2535–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Szczurek, W. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids from several cereal grains and protein-rich feedstuffs in broiler chickens at the age of 30 days. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2009, 18, 662–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ullah, Z.; Ahmed, G.; Nisa, M.U.; Sarwar, M. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of commonly used feed ingredients in growing broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 1322–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th ed.; The National Academic Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  8. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th ed.; Horwitz, W., Latimer, G.W.J., Eds.; Association of Official Analytical Chemistry: Arlington, VA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fenton, T.W.; Fenton, M. An improved procedure for the determination of dietary chromic oxide in feed and feces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1979, 59, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kong, C.; Adeola, O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT® 9.4 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Osho, S.O.; Babatunde, O.O.; Adeola, O. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in wheat, canola meal, and sorghum distillers dried grains with solubles in mixed diets fed to broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1333–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ravindran, V.; Morel, P.C.H.; Rutherfurd, S.M.; Thomas, D.V. Endogenous flow of amino acids in the avian ileum as influenced by increasing dietary peptide concentrations. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 101, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adeola, O.; Xue, P.C.; Cowieson, A.J.; Ajuwon, K.M. Basal endogenous losses of amino acids in protein nutrition research for swine and poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 221, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cowieson, A.; Sorbara, J.O.; Pappenberger, G.; Abdollahi, M.R.; Roos, F.F.; Ravindran, V. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of corn and soybean meal in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3722–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dozier, W.; Perryman, K.R.; Hess, J.B. Apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of reduced-oil distillers dried grains with solubles fed to broilers from 23 to 31 days of age. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Adedokun, S.A.; Jaynes, P.; Payne, R.L.; Applegate, T. Standardized Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Corn, Corn Distillers’ Dried Grains with Solubles, Wheat Middlings, and Bakery By-Products in Broilers and Laying Hens. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2480–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fries-Craft, K.; Bobeck, E.A. Evaluation of a high-protein DDGS product in broiler chickens: Performance, nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolisable energy, and standardised ileal amino acid digestibility. Br. Poult. Sci. 2019, 60, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Batal, A.B.; Dale, N.M. True Metabolizable Energy and Amino Acid Digestibility of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2006, 15, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Almeida, F.N.; Htoo, J.K.; Thomson, J.; Stein, H. Amino acid digestibility of heat damaged distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Stein, H.H. Distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) in diets fed to swine. Swine Focus 2007, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Martinez-Amezcua, C.; Parsons, C.M.; Singh, V.; Srinivasan, R.; Murthy, G.S. Nutritional Characteristics of Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles as Affected by the Amounts of Grains Versus Solubles and Different Processing Techniques. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 2624–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Analyzed amino acid composition of feed ingredients (%, as-fed basis).
Table 1. Analyzed amino acid composition of feed ingredients (%, as-fed basis).
ItemFeed Ingredient
CornSBMCDDGS
Indispensable amino acid
 Arg0.353.151.12
 His0.211.090.65
 Ile0.262.030.95
 Leu0.903.483.02
 Lys0.242.750.84
 Met0.160.520.55
 Phe0.402.301.25
 Thr0.291.831.02
 Val0.382.051.26
Dispensable amino acid
 Ala0.552.041.94
 Asp0.515.031.72
 Cys0.160.630.54
 Glu1.448.004.13
 Gly0.281.881.04
 Pro0.712.412.20
 Ser0.372.181.24
 Tyr0.171.340.76
SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles.
Table 2. Ingredient composition (%) of the experimental diets (as-fed basis).
Table 2. Ingredient composition (%) of the experimental diets (as-fed basis).
ItemDietary Treatments
NFDCornSBMCDDGSCorn-SBMCorn-SBM-CDDGS
Ingredient %
Corn-92.72--56.9046.91
SBM--41.84-32.7622.90
CDDGS---73.00-20.00
Cornstarch29.382.0049.2918.732.002.00
Sucrose55.00-----
Soybean oil4.00-4.004.003.503.50
Dicalcium phosphate2.141.781.700.791.591.38
Limestone1.882.001.762.141.851.93
Vitamin premix 10.200.200.200.200.200.20
Mineral premix 20.200.200.200.200.200.20
Salt-0.400.400.400.400.40
Chromic oxide0.500.500.500.500.500.50
Choline chloride0.260.200.110.040.100.08
Cellulose5.00-----
Sodium bicarbonate0.75-----
Potassium chloride0.30-----
Magnesium oxide0.09-----
Potassium carbonate0.30-----
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
Calculated nutrient and energy
AME, kcal/kg338431883362290830173001
Crude protein, %0.07.120.020.020.020.0
Calcium, %1.001.001.001.001.001.00
Non-phytate, P %0.450.450.450.450.450.45
NFD: nitrogen-free diet; SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles; AME: apparent metabolizable energy; P: phosphorus. 1 Supplies the following per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 24,000 IU; vitamin D3, 8000 IU; vitamin E, 160 mg/kg; vitamin K3, 8 mg/kg; vitamin B1, 8 mg/kg; vitamin B2, 20 mg/kg; vitamin B6, 12 mg/kg; pantothenic acid, 40 mg/kg; folic acid, 4 mg/kg; niacin, 12 mg/kg; 2 Supplies the following per kilogram of diet: Fe, 120 mg/kg; Cu, 320 mg/kg; Zn, 200 mg/kg; Mn, 240 mg/kg; Co, 2 mg/kg; Se, 0.6 mg/kg; I, 2.5 mg/kg.
Table 3. Analyzed amino acids composition of the experimental diets (%, as-fed basis).
Table 3. Analyzed amino acids composition of the experimental diets (%, as-fed basis).
ItemDietary Treatment
NFDCornSBMCDDGSCorn-SBMCorn-SBM-CDDGS
Indispensable amino acid
Arg-0.351.580.811.381.12
His-0.210.550.470.530.50
Ile-0.251.040.680.910.80
Leu-0.851.752.171.801.93
Lys-0.231.390.621.190.94
Met-0.130.260.330.290.30
Phe-0.351.170.921.071.01
Thr-0.280.930.740.870.81
Val0.020.361.070.910.990.95
Dispensable amino acid
Ala-0.531.021.401.081.17
Asp0.010.492.541.262.231.83
Cys-0.180.290.400.320.37
Glu0.021.354.113.093.863.57
Gly0.010.290.940.760.870.80
Pro-0.671.181.561.281.33
Ser-0.341.110.901.050.98
Tyr-0.150.560.550.510.51
NFD: Nitrogen-free diet; SBM: Soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles.
Table 4. Ileal basal endogenous losses of amino acids for broiler chickens fed the nitrogen-free diet (mg/kg DMI) 1.
Table 4. Ileal basal endogenous losses of amino acids for broiler chickens fed the nitrogen-free diet (mg/kg DMI) 1.
ItemBasal Endogenous Losses of Amino Acid
Indispensable amino acid
Arg156
His69
Ile208
Leu312
Lys156
Met87
Phe278
Thr469
Val260
Dispensable amino acid
Ala139
Asp469
Cys191
Glu677
Gly226
Pro278
Ser434
Tyr122
DMI: dry matter intake. 1 Values were determined using the pooled samples from eight replicate cages of six birds per cage.
Table 5. Apparent ileal amino acid digestibility (%) of broilers fed corn-, SBM-, and CDDGS-based diets.
Table 5. Apparent ileal amino acid digestibility (%) of broilers fed corn-, SBM-, and CDDGS-based diets.
ItemApparent Ileal DigestibilitySEMp-Value
CornSBMCDDGS
Indispensable amino acid
Arg90.2 b95.9 a85.8 c0.55<0.001
His88.4 b93.4 a80.5 c0.75<0.001
Ile86.4 b92.7 a80.3 c0.78<0.001
Leu92.1 a92.5 a88.1 b0.47<0.001
Lys82.1 b93.4 a70.9 c1.14<0.001
Met91.3 a94.1 a86.0 b0.88<0.001
Phe88.7 b92.2 a82.0 c0.89<0.001
Thr74.6 b88.5 a70.1 b1.47<0.001
Val86.0 b91.8 a79.5 c0.87<0.001
Dispensable amino acid
Ala91.1 b93.1 a86.6 c0.47<0.001
Asp83.2 b90.5 a70.8 c1.21<0.001
Cys85.0 a86.8 a77.6 b1.26<0.001
Glu91.6 a94.2 a86.4 b0.69<0.001
Gly79.7 b89.2 a71.3 c1.09<0.001
Pro88.5 b91.9 a85.0 c0.46<0.001
Ser82.3 b90.3 a77.2 c1.24<0.001
Tyr85.6 c93.7 a87.8 b0.52<0.001
a–c Least squares means within a row without a common superscript differ (p < 0.05). SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 6. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility (%) of broilers fed corn-, SBM-, and CDDGS-based diets.
Table 6. Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility (%) of broilers fed corn-, SBM-, and CDDGS-based diets.
ItemStandardized Ileal DigestibilitySEMp-Value
CornSBMCDDGS
Indispensable amino acid
Arg94.7 a96.9 a87.7 b0.55<0.001
His91.7 a94.7 a82.0 b0.75<0.001
Ile94.7 a94.7 a83.4 b0.78<0.001
Leu95.7 a94.3 a89.5 b0.47<0.001
Lys88.9 b94.5 a73.5 c1.14<0.001
Met98.0 a97.4 a88.6 b0.88<0.001
Phe96.6 a94.6 a85.1 b0.89<0.001
Thr91.4 a93.5 a76.5 b1.47<0.001
Val93.2 a94.2 a82.4 b0.87<0.001
Dispensable amino acid
Ala93.8 a94.4 a87.5 b0.47<0.001
Asp92.7 a92.3 a74.5 b1.21<0.001
Cys95.6 a93.4 a82.3 b1.26<0.001
Glu96.7 a95.8 a88.6 b0.69<0.001
Gly87.5 a91.6 a74.3 b1.09<0.001
Pro92.6 a94.2 a86.8 b0.46<0.001
Ser95.1 a94.2 a82.0 b1.24<0.001
Tyr93.7 b95.9 a90.0 c0.52<0.001
a–c Least squares means within a row without a common superscript differ (p < 0.05). SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 7. Relative proportion of BEL of AAs to total ileal outflow of AAs (%) in broilers fed corn-, SBM-, or CDDGS -based diets.
Table 7. Relative proportion of BEL of AAs to total ileal outflow of AAs (%) in broilers fed corn-, SBM-, or CDDGS -based diets.
ItemRelative Proportion of BEL of AAs to Total Ileal Outflow of AAsSEMp-Value
CornSBMCDDGS
Indispensable amino acid
Arg42.9 a23.2 b12.5 c1.43<0.001
His26.7 a18.5 b7.0 c0.80<0.001
Ile57.2 a26.4 b14.3 c1.52<0.001
Leu43.4 a22.9 b11.1 c1.02<0.001
Lys35.5 a16.4 b8.0 c0.95<0.001
Met72.0 a55.1 b17.6 c3.11<0.001
Phe65.7 a29.7 b15.6 c2.05<0.001
Thr61.9 a42.4 b19.6 c2.32<0.001
Val48.2 a28.8 b12.9 c1.66<0.001
Dispensable amino acid
Ala27.7 a18.9 b6.8 c0.82<0.001
Asp53.4 a18.8 b11.7 c1.60<0.001
Cys66.1 a49.2 b19.7 c3.31<0.001
Glu56.1 a27.5 b14.9 c1.63<0.001
Gly35.9 a21.5 b9.5 c0.98<0.001
Pro33.6 a27.9 b10.9 c1.01<0.001
Ser67.9 a39.0 b19.7 c2.62<0.001
Tyr52.8 a33.3 b16.7 c1.79<0.001
a–c Least squares means within a row without a common superscript differ (p < 0.05). BEL: basal endogenous loss; AAs: Amino Acids; SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table 8. Measured and predicted values for AID and SID (%) of AAs and the difference between the measured and the predicted AID and SID of AAs in male broilers fed a corn and SBM mixed diet.
Table 8. Measured and predicted values for AID and SID (%) of AAs and the difference between the measured and the predicted AID and SID of AAs in male broilers fed a corn and SBM mixed diet.
ItemAIDSID
MeasuredPredictedDifference 1SEp-ValueMeasuredPredictedDifferenceSEp-Value
Indispensable amino acid
Arg95.395.00.30.290.49596.496.5−0.10.290.797
His93.192.11.00.390.13294.493.90.50.390.381
Ile92.691.51.10.450.13494.894.70.30.450.724
Leu93.092.30.60.450.39994.794.70.00.450.983
Lys93.391.91.40.340.05794.693.80.90.340.125
Met94.693.11.50.300.01397.697.60.00.300.970
Phe92.791.41.30.480.13495.395.10.30.480.734
Thr89.185.53.70.650.02794.593.11.50.650.159
Val92.190.31.80.510.04894.893.90.90.510.300
Dispensable amino acid
Ala92.992.40.50.410.44194.294.20.00.411.000
Asp90.989.41.50.530.08693.092.40.70.530.426
Cys88.586.22.20.810.10194.494.10.40.810.765
Glu94.293.60.60.350.26495.996.0−0.10.350.869
Gly89.287.31.90.550.04891.890.81.10.550.237
Pro91.990.71.20.820.35294.193.70.40.820.755
Ser91.188.42.70.600.02095.294.40.90.600.348
Tyr93.392.21.00.400.11795.695.50.20.400.761
AID: apparent ileal digestibility; SID: standardized ileal digestibility; AAs: Amino Acids; SBM: soybean meal; SE: standard error. 1 Calculated as measured–predicted. Data represents mean from four replicates per treatment.
Table 9. Measured and predicted values for the AID and SID (%) of AAs and difference between measured and predicted AID and SID of AAs in male broilers fed a corn, SBM, and CCDGS mixed diet.
Table 9. Measured and predicted values for the AID and SID (%) of AAs and difference between measured and predicted AID and SID of AAs in male broilers fed a corn, SBM, and CCDGS mixed diet.
ItemAIDSID
MeasuredPredictedDifference 1SEp-ValueMeasuredPredictedDifferenceSEp-Value
Indispensable amino acid
Arg92.193.0−0.90.310.08693.394.5−1.20.310.037
His89.588.90.70.370.28890.289.90.30.370.497
Ile88.988.60.20.410.72391.191.5−0.40.410.462
Leu91.390.90.40.310.42092.592.6−0.10.310.790
Lys87.987.80.10.450.86189.389.6−0.30.450.635
Met91.990.51.50.450.07194.294.20.50.450.453
Phe89.888.90.90.500.23991.991.90.10.500.952
Thr83.881.12.70.710.03788.587.51.00.710.311
Val88.487.21.20.560.16790.690.10.50.560.546
Dispensable amino acid
Ala90.290.3−0.10.330.75591.491.9−0.50.330.344
Asp85.585.6−0.10.610.89187.588.4−0.80.610.350
Cys86.583.33.20.770.02690.690.61.50.770.190
Glu91.591.7−0.30.360.59292.892.8−0.80.360.103
Gly83.482.80.60.610.50386.286.20.00.610.966
Pro89.488.70.70.260.11391.591.50.20.260.683
Ser87.185.21.90.630.08190.590.50.50.630.568
Tyr91.490.80.60.320.25593.693.8−0.10.320.800
AID: apparent ileal digestibility; SID: standardized ileal digestibility; AAs: Amino Acids; SBM: soybean meal; CDDGS: corn distillers dried grains with solubles; SE: standard error. 1 Calculated as measured–predicted. Data represents mean from four replicates per treatment.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, S.H.; Sung, J.Y.; Kang, H.-K.; Kong, C. Additivity of Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility in Diets Containing Corn, Soybean Meal, and Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles for Male Broilers. Animals 2020, 10, 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060933

AMA Style

An SH, Sung JY, Kang H-K, Kong C. Additivity of Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility in Diets Containing Corn, Soybean Meal, and Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles for Male Broilers. Animals. 2020; 10(6):933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060933

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Su Hyun, Jung Yeol Sung, Hwan-Ku Kang, and Changsu Kong. 2020. "Additivity of Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility in Diets Containing Corn, Soybean Meal, and Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles for Male Broilers" Animals 10, no. 6: 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop