Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation about composite bearing strength

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bearing investigation on mechanical joints of composite materials is extensive. The main reason for bearing investigation, in a certain aspect, is related to the variability of parameters associated with bearing behavior. In this sense, theoretical and/or experimental studies have been exhaustively conducted. Depending on the solution obtained, there is a cost/benefit relationship for the problem in question. However, in the case of aeronautical applications, an important factor to be considered is the safety, which reflects into safety margin. In this sense, an excess of tests is needed for design that reflects in high cost and time-consuming. Therefore, simpler approaches are necessary in the pre-design phase, where quick answers are required for the initial product definition. In this way, the present work presents composite bearing tests with two distinct environmental conditions, i.e., low-temperature dry (LTD) and room-temperature dry (RTD) in order to show that there is one procedure to simplify the process and gain cost and time. For this, five different configurations specimens with 12 coupons each one were tested in two different environmental conditions. The fastened joint manufactured used protruding fastener, two different diameters (3/16″ and 5/32″) and three laminates (10, 12 and 14 plies). Based on the ASTM D5961 standard, the experimental results showed a linear response not showed in the literature for composite materials. The proposal presented here showed an excellent way to avoid others tests with different conditions, i.e., with different layups and fastener diameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart-Smith LJ (1976) Bolted joints in graphite–epoxy composites. NASA-CR-144899, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, p 156

  2. Camanho PP, Matthews FL (1997) Stress analysis and strength prediction of mechanically fastened joints in FRP: a review. Compos A 28A:529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang HS, Huang CL, Chang FK (1996) Bearing failure of bolted composite joints. Part I: experimental characterization. J Compos Mater 30(12):1284–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang CL, Chang FK (1996) Bearing failure of bolted composite joints. Part II: model and verification. J Compos Mater 30(12):1359–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iriarte FR, Fellows NA, Durodola JF (2011) Experimental evaluation of the effect of clamping force and hole clearance on carbon composites subjected to bearing versus bypass loading. Compos Struct 93:1096–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J et al (2015) Influence of end distances on the failure of composite bolted joints. J Reinf Plast Compos 34(5):388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang B et al (2017) Experimental and numerical study on bearing failure of countersunk composite–composite and composite–steel joints. J Compos Mater 51(22):3211–3224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zou P et al (2018) Bearing strength and failure analysis on the interference-fit double shear-lap pin-loaded composite. Int J Damage Mech 27(2):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Camanho PP, Matthews FL (1999) A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater 33(24):2248–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumitru C, Constantinescu DM (2019) Temperature effects on joint strength and failure modes of hybrid aluminum–composite countersunk bolted joints. J Mater Design Appl 233(11):2204–2218

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hart-Smith LJ (1976) Bolted joints in graphite-epoxy composites. NASA CR-144899, pp 1–159

  12. Hart-Smith LJ (1995) An Engineer’s viewpoint on design and analysis of aircraft structural joints. J Aerosp Eng Part G 209(27):105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chamis CC (1990) Simplified procedures for designing composite bolted joints. J Reinforced Plastics Compos 9:614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ASTM Test Method D 5961/D 5961M (5961M) Bearing response of polymer matrix composite laminates. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  15. MIL-HDBK-17-1D (1994) Polymer matrix composites, volume 1: guidelines for characterization of structural materials. United States Department of Defense

  16. CMH-17-1G (2012) Composite materials handbook: polymer matrix composites guidelines for characterization of structural materials, vol 1. SAE International Publisher, pp 1–721

  17. Arakaki FK (2008) Influence factors in composite bearing allowable. Embraer Technical Report DT1CSY005, Rev, pp 1–24

  18. MIL-HDBK-5E (1987) Military standardization handbook, metallic materials and elements for aerospace structures. United States Department of Defense

  19. Advisory Circular No. 20-107B (2010) Composite aircraft structure, change 1, Federal Aviation Administration. United States Department of Transportation, pp 1–38

  20. Tsai SW et al (2017) Composite laminates theory and practice of analysis, design and automated layup. Composites Design Group, Stanford University, pp 1–370

  21. Daniel IM, Ishai O (1994) Engineering mechanics of composite materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco K. Arakaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D..

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arakaki, F.K., de Faria, A.R. Experimental investigation about composite bearing strength. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02339-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02339-w

Keywords

Navigation