Health exposure of users of indoor sports centers related to the physico-chemical properties of particulate matter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106935Get rights and content

Highlights

  • First study on ambient metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a sports hall.

  • Comprehensive analysis of the health risks to sports facility users.

  • Outdoor air quality has a significant impact on the air quality in a sports hall.

  • Children are the most vulnerable group to the carcinogenic components of particles.

  • Suitable solutions are needed to improve indoor air quality of a sports centers.

Abstract

The aim of this study was the identification of the factors that determine the concentrations of particulate matter (PM) in the indoor air of a selected sports facility, as well as the assessment of the health exposure of the sports facility users (pupils aged 8–18 years, trainers and athletes aged 21–40 years) to PM and its components. The mass concentration of size-resolved (PM1, PM1-2.5, PM2.5-4, PM4-10, PM10-100) total suspended particles (TSP) was measured using DustTrak DRX devices. Measurements were conducted for 8 h a day, simultaneously inside and outside a typical sports hall in Warsaw, for 20 days each in the heating (16/10/–20/11/2017) and non-heating (18/05/–21/06/2017) seasons. At the same time, samples of PM4 and TSP were taken (GilAir 3 aspirators) to determine ambient concentrations of PM-bound metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). The main factor affecting TSP concentration in the sports facility was dust resuspension; it was especially visible in variations of coarse PM concentrations. The concentrations of fine PM as well as PM-bound metals and PAHs inside the hall were determined mainly by outdoor sources – combustion of fossil fuels and non-traffic emissions. The incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) related to the exposure of the sports hall users to PM-bound metals and PAHs was in the range of 6.9E-05–1.1E-04; it was higher than that calculated for PM-bound metals and PAHs in atmospheric air (5.4E-05–9.8E-05). The highest ILCR concerns pupils, which inside the sports facility is above the acceptable risk level value of 1E-04.

Introduction

Sports enthusiasts, especially residents of large cities, trying to avoid contaminated urban air usually choose fitness centers, gyms, sports halls, etc., for exercising. Often, they are not aware of the worse air quality inside sports facilities than outside [1,2]. Indoor air quality (IAQ) in sports facilities depends on many factors. The most important are the following:

  • indoor and outdoor (atmospheric) air temperature and humidity;

  • concentration of selected pollution in indoor and outdoor air (e.g., particulate matter (PM), bioaerozols, carbon dioxide (CO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and gaseous precursors of PM);

  • room volume and ventilation parameters [3].

Ambient air temperature is the most perceptible parameter and provides thermal comfort for facility users. An indoor sports center should be kept at a temperature that ensures heat dissipation without creating negative impressions, e.g., cold or hot. The appropriate temperature can be ensured by technical means: air conditioning, ventilators, roofs, or wall insulating or shielding heat sources; reducing heat gains through windows or skylights using reflective films or blinds; and venting hot exhaust gases outside the sports space [4]. According to the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), relative air humidity should be within 25%–60%, and ambient air temperature in the range of 24.5–28 °C; the dynamics of its changes should not be higher than 20% per hour [1]. Low air temperature and increased humidity may cause the ambient air to feel stale and stuffy, while high temperature reduces the amount of heat given away by the body. Moreover, low humidity of ambient air can cause drying of the mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract and resuspension of dust settled on the floor or surfaces of various objects. High humidity can lead to mold and building damage [5].

The most important air pollutant with regard to its adverse impact on human health is particulate matter (PM). The impact of PM on human health is determined by its physical (size and shape, surface, electric charge of dust particles, hygroscopicity, and properties related to light scattering and absorption) and chemical properties (elemental composition, the presence of inorganic ions, organic compounds, and elemental carbon) [6,7]. The size of dust particles in indoor spaces like sports halls, similar to atmospheric air, ranges from nanometers to millimeters [8]. Due to the different ability of PM particles to move and the deposition in the respiratory tract, the assessment of health exposure to PM is divided into three fractions [6,7]:

  • inhalation fraction—particles with an aerodynamic diameter (da) ≤100 μm (total suspended particles, TSP) that do not get into the alveoli, usually stopped in the upper respiratory tract;

  • tracheal fraction—particles with da < 30 μm, which pass through the trachea during breathing;

  • respirable fraction—particles with da < 4 μm, which during breathing can be deposited in alveoli and dissolved in physiological fluids.

Due to the characteristics of the most commonly used measuring devices for PM in atmospheric air, it is customary for PM to be divided into fine (PM2.5) and coarse (2.5-10) particles. The most frequently studied sub-fraction of PM2.5 is the submicron fraction (PM1). PM is an important health exposure factor for people practicing sports due to three reasons. First of all, PM particles settling on the walls of alveoli may cause difficulty in gas exchange. For athletes, this means that in conditions of high concentrations of PM, they will tire faster and the efficiency of their body will be reduced by up to 3%–5% [9]. It may also affect the results, and particularly in the case of high-ranking sports competitions, it may also impact the final outcome [10,11]. Secondly, during intense training, most of the air enters the body directly through the mouth, thus bypassing the natural filtration mechanisms in the upper parts of the respiratory system—the nose, where most of the particles larger than 2 μm are retained [12,13]. Thirdly, during physical effort, the body's need for oxygen increases by almost 3 times, which is associated with increased lung ventilation. After starting training, there is a 2–3-fold increase in minute lung ventilation (VE) and deepening of the breath [14]. If the demand for oxygen is even greater, the respiration frequency also increases. As a result, not only smaller than 2 μm, but also larger particles are transferred to the deeper areas of the respiratory system, i.e., to the tracheobronchial part or to the lungs [[14], [15], [16]]. Increased breathing intensity occurs in people who train regularly, and not only during training. The minute tidal volume for people practicing sports is greater than for people who do not practice; therefore, the need for oxygen in physically active people is higher than for an average person. This means that in all conditions, those people who train regularly are exposed to the deposition of more PM and its components into the body than people who do not engage in sports regularly [11,17].

Despite the high importance of air quality in sports facilities, a query of the literature on the subject indicates that there is a lack of research devoted to the comprehensive assessment of PM properties in the indoor air of sports facilities [18]. Research into this category of facilities has been the subject of only a small number of publications, which specifically focus on measurements of mass and number concentrations of PM in hockey arenas [19], ice rinks [20], gyms [11,21,22], climbing rooms [23], and sports halls [24]. Some of them also concern the concentrations of the selected gaseous pollutants (e.g., SO2, CO, CO2, NO, NO2, and VOC) [1,[25], [26], [27]]. There are only a select few publications on the chemical composition of PM in sports facilities (Fig. 1) [[28], [29], [30], [31], [32]] or on the health exposure of athletes [[33], [34], [35]].

This is the first study that focuses on the short- (daily) and long-term (seasonal) variability of the mass concentrations and chemical composition of size-resolved PM in a closed sports center. More specifically, the work presents the differences in:

  • i)

    the mass concentrations of five PM fractions (PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10, TSP),

  • ii)

    the mass concentrations of PM4-and TSP-bound metals and PAHs,

  • iii)

    PM mass size distribution,

  • iv)

    PM origin,

  • v)

    health exposure to PM-bound metals and PAHs for three groups of users (pupils aged 8–18 years, trainers and athletes aged 21–40 years),

  • inside and outside the selected sports center in various measurement periods.

Section snippets

Sampling site

A sports center, OSiR Targówek,1 located inside a typically urban area in the Targówek district in Warsaw, Poland (52◦16′19 N, 21◦02′42 E) was selected for the study (Fig. 2). OSiR Targówek is a two-story, multifunctional building that allows training in many sports, such as handball, basketball, football, volleyball, table tennis, and so on. On the ground floor is a sports hall with a parquet floor

PM concentration and mass size distribution

During the non-heating season, ranges of 8 h concentrations of PM1 and PM2.5 inside and outside the hall were similar (I: 8–174 μg/m3; O: 3–174 μg/m3) (Fig. 4). The same applies to PM4 (I:9–179 μg/m3; O: 3–174 μg/m3). The range of indoor and outdoor concentrations were different for PM10 and TSP; inside the hall, the maximum concentrations reached 215 μg/m3 for PM10 and 380 μg/m3 for TSP, and outside reached 180 μg/m3 for PM10 and 190 μg/m3 for TSP. In the heating

Conclusions

The research into concentrations of PM inside and outside of the selected sports center in Warsaw provides the following conclusions:

  • Concentrations of PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10 and TSP in the non-heating season are higher inside (on average from 29 for PM1 to 62 μg/m3 for TSP) the sports hall than in its surroundings (on average from 22 for PM1 to 32 μg/m3 for TSP), while in the heating season the opposite (indoor – on average from 38 for PM1 to 56 μg/m3 for TSP; outdoor – on average from 52 for PM1

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (81)

  • E. Liu et al.

    Pollution and health risk of potentially toxic metals in urban road dust in Nanjing, a mega-city of China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • M. Guo et al.

    Particle size distribution and respiratory deposition estimates of airborne perfluoroalkyl acids during the haze period in the megacity of Shanghai

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • L. Da Silva et al.

    Traffic and catalytic conver – related atmospheric contamination in the metropolitan region of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Chemosphere

    (2008)
  • A. Dvorska et al.

    Use of diagnostic ratios for studying source apportionment and reactivity of ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons over Central Europe, Atmos

    Environ. Times

    (2011)
  • A.B. Zwozdziak et al.

    Implications of the aerosol size distribution modal structure of trace and major elements on human exposure, inhaled dose and relevance to the PM2.5 and PM10 metrics in a European pollution hotspot urban area

    J. Aerosol Sci.

    (2017)
  • X. Li et al.

    Modeled deposition of fine particles in human airway in Beijing, China, Atmos

    Environ. Times

    (2016)
  • Z.W. Tang et al.

    Contamination and health risks of heavy metals in street dust from a coalmining city in eastern China, Ecotox

    Environ. Safe.

    (2017)
  • O. Raaschou-Nielsen et al.

    Particulate matter air pollution components and risk for lung cancer

    Environ. Int.

    (2016)
  • C. Alves et al.

    Air quality in sports venues with distinct characteristics

    Int. J. Environ. Ecol. Eng.

    (2013)
  • K. Kuskowska et al.

    A preliminary study of the concentrations and mass size distributions of particulate matter in indoor sports facilities before and during athlete training

    Environ. Protect. Eng.

    (2019)
  • P.O. Fanger et al.

    Indoor Air Quality. Impact on Health, Comfort and Productivity at Work

    (2003)
  • M. Hajian et al.

    Indoor air pollution in exercise centers

    Int. J. Med. Toxicol. Forensic Med.

    (2015)
  • S.T. Kaplan et al.

    Thermal comfort performance of sports garments with objective and subjective measurements

    Indian. J. Fibre Text.

    (2012)
  • B. Połednik

    Variations in Practicals Concentrations and indoor air parameters in classrooms in the heating and summer seasons

    Arch. Environ. Protect.

    (2013)
  • W. Rogula-Kozłowska

    Size-segregated urban particulate matter: mass closure, chemical composition, and primary and secondary matter content

    Air Qual. Atmos. Health.

    (2016)
  • L. Morawska et al.

    Indoor Environment: Airborne Particles and Settled Dust

    (2006)
  • S. Menteşe et al.

    Bacteria and fungi levels in various indoor and outdoor environments in ankara

    Turkey, Clean

    (2009)
  • K.W. Rundell et al.

    Ultrafine and fine Particulate Matter inhalation decreases exercise performance in healthy subjects

    J. Strength Condit Res.

    (2008)
  • P.T. Cutrufello et al.

    Small things make a big difference: particulate matter and exercise

    Sports Med.

    (2012)
  • C.C. Daigle et al.

    Ultrafine particle deposition in humans during rest and exercise

    Inhal. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • Us EPA

    Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual

    (2009)
  • G. Lippi et al.

    Air pollution and sports performance in beijing

    Int. J. Sports Med.

    (2008)
  • A. Abelsohn et al.

    Health effects of outdoor air pollution. Approach to counseling patients using the Air Quality Health Index

    Can. Fam. Physician

    (2011)
  • R.F. Phalen

    Inhalation Studies: Foundations and Techniques

    (2009)
  • K. Kuskowska et al.

    Knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research of indoor particulate matter in Poland

    Pol. J. Environ. Stud.

    (2019)
  • P.E. Georghiou et al.

    Air levels and mutagenicity of PM-10 in an indoor ice arena

    J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc.

    (1989)
  • G. Buonanno et al.

    Particle resuspension in school gyms during physical activities

    Aerosol Air Qual. Res.

    (2012)
  • S. Weinbruch et al.

    Reducing dust exposure in indoor climbing gyms

    J. Environ. Monit.

    (2012)
  • P. Kic

    Dust pollution in the sport facilities

    Agron. Res.

    (2016)
  • S.J. Goung et al.

    A pilot study of indoor air quality in screen golf courses

    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Indoor air quality in sports center: Assessment of gaseous pollutants

      2022, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some studies on air pollutants have been conducted in sports facilities. The vast majority of these studies focused on the impact of air quality in sports facilities and on the health of exercisers [6,9,10,34,35], physiological changes induced by exercise, and the associated increase in inhalation of pollutants and the impact of polluted air on sports performance [8,36]. Although all prior studies agree on the essence of indoor air quality in sports facilities, there is relatively limited research on air pollution concentrations in these types of buildings.

    • User-centric analytic approach to evaluate the performance of sports facilities: A study of swimming pools

      2021, Journal of Building Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consequently, a user-centric research approach has emerged, which incorporates the principles from human factors and ergonomics to create and adapt a human-made environment to suit individual users within sports facilities [1,9]. In built environment studies, the same approach to incorporating human perception is used to evaluate the performance of facilities [10–12]. In the higher education sector, understanding users’ perception of university facilities is quintessentially important because it affects campus asset management strategies, physical and mental health/well-being of facilities users, and long-term environmental sustainability of the institution [13].

    • Effects of liquid-desiccant air conditioning processes on the presence of inhalable particles in the air

      2021, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because in this research the mass concentrations of micro-particles at the air inlet and outlet of the dehumidifier had to be measured quickly and in a timely manner, light scattering was deemed the most suitable method. Currently the instrument used commonly to measure aerosol concentrations by light scattering is DustTrak [24,25]. Therefore, this investigation mainly used DustTrak to study quantitatively how the concentrations of particles of different sizes changed during dehumidification and regeneration.

    • Respirable particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at two Polish fire stations

      2020, Building and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      We examined the PM4 concentrations because when considering workplace exposure, this fraction is considered respirable, which means that when breathing, it can be deposited in the alveoli and dissolved in physiological fluids, thereby worsening asthma symptoms, bronchitis, and lung cancer [30,31]. Previous studies have shown that the mass share of PM2.5-4 in the PM4 mass was negligible in relation to the mass share of fine particles, i.e., particles with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm [32–35]. Therefore, in this study, the concentrations of PM4 are compared with the concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5) in other studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text